Exergoeconomic and Environmental Analysis of a Combined Cycle Power Plant Using the Particle Swarm Optimizer: A case study
محورهای موضوعی : انرژیهای تجدید پذیر و شبکه های هوشمند
Mostafa Khalatbari
1
,
Ashkan Abdalisousan
2
1 - Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch,Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Thermal Combined-Cycle (TCC) power plant, exergy, exergoeconomic analysis, particle swarm optimization.,
چکیده مقاله :
In addition, to optimally find the optimum design parameters, an exergoeconomic approach with multi-objective function is employed. The demanded power on the fixed design parameter is 360 MW of net power output. The results show that exergy efficiency and cost product for plant are 8% and 3% better than base case, respectively. Since, environmental pollution and energy shortage are the two factors limiting the development of the society; nevertheless, this analysis tends to optimally find the design parameters which result in a decrease in the fuel mass flow rate. Also, this reduction (about 6.4%) in the mass flow rate and increasing exergetic efficiency can decrease the environmental impacts. Finally, the analysis and comparison between the results of the current research and two other researches was done and the results are reported.
[1] Dincer, I. Rosen, M. A. Chapter 2 - EXERGY AND ENERGY ANALYSES. EXERGY, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development
2007, Pp. 23-35. (2007).
[2] Kallio, S. Siroux, M. Exergy and Exergy-Economic Approach to Evaluate Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Buildings. (2023). Energies 2023, 16, 1029. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031029
[3] B. Rismanchi. District energy network (DEN), current global status and future development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Vol. 75, August 2017, Pp. 571-579. (2017).
[4] Naquash. A. Lee, M. Design and performance analysis of energy efficient hydrogen liquefaction process. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering
Vol. 52, Pp. 875-880. (2023).
[5] Kazemi, A. and others. Economic optimization and comparative environmental assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plants with CO2 capture. Energy, Vol. 277. (2023)
[6] Yang, K. and others. Exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses of novel solar- and biomass-driven trigeneration system integrated with organic Rankine cycle. Energy, Vol. 301, 15 August 2024, 131605. (2024).
[7] Panbechi, B. and others. Environmental, economic and energy evaluation of alternative fuels for a steam power plant: Focus on biodiesel-nanoparticles utilization. Results in Engineering, Vol. 23. (2024).
[8] Ren, J. and others. Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analysis of a combined cooling and power system for natural gas-biomass dual fuel gas turbine waste heat recovery. Energy, Vol. 269, 15 April 2023, 126676. (2023).
[9] Stanford University, Introduction to Mathematical Optimization. (2024). Related link:
https://web.stanford.edu/group/sisl/k12/optimization/MO-unit1-pdfs/1.1optimization.pdf
[10] Genetic Algorithms - Quick Guide. Tutorialspoint academy. (2024).
[11] Lorencin, I. and others. Genetic Algorithm Approach to Design of Multi-Layer Perceptron for Combined Cycle Power Plant Electrical Power Output Estimation. Energies 2019, 12, 4352; doi:10.3390/en12224352. (2019).
[12] Hilali, A. and others. Towards sustainable water pumping systems: Integration of particle swarm optimization and direct torque control PSO-DTC. e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy
Vol. 7, March 2024, 100480. (2024).
[13] Divasón, J. and others. PSO-PARSIMONY: A method for finding parsimonious and accurate machine learning models with particle swarm optimization. Application for predicting force–displacement curves in T-stub steel connections. Neurocomputing, Vol. 548, 1 September 2023, 126414. (2023).
[14] Barrios, D. M. Gerardo, B. D. Global Optimization using Random Adaptive Backtracking Particle Swarm Optimization (RAB-PSO). Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 230, 2023, Pp. 223-232. (2023).
[15] Khademi, M. and others. Techno-economic operation optimization of a HRSG in combined cycle power plants based on evolutionary algorithms: A case study of Yazd, Iran. Energy Equip Systems, Vol. 7, No. 1, Pp. 67-79. (2019).
[16] Wang, L., Singh, Ch.,.Stochastic combined heat and power dispatch based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 30, 226–234. (2007).
[17] Evers, G. The No Free Lunch Theorem Does Not Apply to Continuous Optimization. International conference on swarm intelligence, ICSI. (2011). http://icsi11.eisti.fr/papers/paper_25.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2011.
[18] Khorasani Nejad, E., Hajabdollahi, F., Hajabdollahi, Z., Hajabdollahi, H. Thermo-economic Optimization of Gas Turbine Power Plant with Details in Intercooler. Heat Transfer—Asian Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. doi: 10.1002/htj.21051. (2013).
[19] Erzen, S. Açıkkalp, E. Hepbasli, A. 7 - Off-grid hybrid systems based on combined conventional and unconventional technologies: Design, analyses, and illustrative examples. Hybrid Technologies for Power Generation, Hybrid Energy Systems 2022, Pp. 189-218. (2022).
[20] Cengel, Y., Boles, M..Thermodynamics, An Engineering Approach. 5th edition, McGraw-Hill.
[21] Spiegel, C. (2008).PEM Fuel Cell Modeling and Simulation Using MATLAB. Academic Press publications, Elsevier, Chapter 2. (2006)
[22] Schorr, M. Chalfin, J. Gas Turbine NOx Emissions Approaching Zero – Is it Worth the Price?. General Electric Power Systems. (2023).
[23] Balat, M. Security of energy supply in Turkey: Challenges and solutions. Energy Conversion and Management, 51, 1998–2011. (2010).
[24] Abdalisousan, A., Fani, M., Farhanieh, B. and Abbaspour, M. ‘EFFECT OF DECISION VARIABLES IN THE STEAM SECTIONNFOR THE EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TCCGT POWER PLANT: A CASE STUDY’, Energy & Environment · Vol. 25, No. 8, 1381-1404. (2014)
