رابطه بین مدیریت دانش با خودکارآمدی و خلاقیت معلمان مراکز پیش‌دبستانی

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

سارا باعزت ¹ (گروه علوم تربیتی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ارسنجان، ارسنجان، ایران)
حسین افلاکی فرد ² (استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ارسنجان، ارسنجان، ایران)
نیما شهیدی ³ (استادیارگروه علوم تربیتی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نورآباد ممسنی، نورآباد ممسنی، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1393/07/05 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/02/12 تاریخ انتشار : 1395/12/19

کلید واژه: خلاقیت, خودکارآمدی, معلمان, مدیریت دانش, پیش دبستانی,

چکیده مقاله :

    هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی رابطه بین مدیریت دانش با خودکارآمدی و خلاقیت معلمان مراکز پیش دبستانی ناحیه دو شهر شیراز در سال تحصیلی 1393-1392 بود. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی معلمان مراکز پیش دبستانی ناحیه دو آموزش و پرورش شهر شیراز به تعداد 78 نفر بود و با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده و بر اساس جدول تعیین حجم نمونه کرجسی و مورگان تعداد 66 نفر به عنوان اعضای نمونه مورد مطالعه انتخاب شدند. ابزار های گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسش‌نامه مدیریت دانش جاشپارا (2004) که پایایی آن بر اساس محاسبه ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برابر 89/0 بود، پرسش‌نامه خودکارآمدی معلمان شوارتزر و همکاران (1991) که پایایی آن بر اساس محاسبه ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برابر 82/0 بود و پرسش‌نامه خلاقیت رندسیپ با آلفای کرونباخ 76/0 می‌باشد. برای بررسی رابطه بین ابعاد گوناگون مدیریت دانش شامل خلق، سازماندهی، بکارگیری و تبادل دانش با خودکارآمدی و خلاقیت معلمان از محاسبه ضریب همبستگی پیرسون استفاده شد. هم‌چنین، برای تعیین قدرت پیش بینی ابعاد مدیریت دانش برای خودکارآمدی و خلاقیت معلمان از تحلیل رگرسیون هم‌زمان استفاده شد. نتایج نشان دادند که بین تمام ابعاد مدیریت دانش با خودکارآمدی و خلاقیت معلمان رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. هم‌چنین، از بین ابعاد مدیریت دانش بعدسازماندهی دانش از قدرت پیش بینی معناداری برای خودکارآمدی معلمان و ابعاد سازماندهی و بکارگیری دانش از قدرت پیش بینی معناداری برای خلاقیت معلمان برخوردار بودند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

    The main purpose of this research was to study the relationship among knowledge management ,self-efficacy and creativity of  teachers in pre-school centers of Shiraz Educational Organization  region 2. The population of research was all 78 pre –school teachers in region 2 of shiraz educational organization. the sample were 66 teachers and was selected randomly based on Krejcie & Morgan table. Jashapara knowledge management questionnaire (Cronbach alpha= 0.89), Schwarzer et al. (1991) self- efficacy questionnaire (Cronbach alpha=0.82) and Randseep creativity questionnaire (Cronbach alpha=0.76) with appropriate validity based on the specialists’ points of view were used to conduct this research. Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression tests were used to studying the relationship between knowledge management and teachers self-efficacy and creativity. the results showed that all dimensions of knowledge management including knowledge creating, organizing, implementing and sharing had a positive and significant relationship with teachers self-efficacy and creativity. Among the dimensions of knowledge management, knowledge organizing had a significant power for predicting teachers’ self-efficacy, and knowledge implementing and knowledge organizing had a significant power for predicting teachers’ creativity.

منابع و مأخذ:

- Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, No.17, pp: 86-95. 4

- Awang, M. Ismail, R. Flett, P. Curry, A. (2012). Knowledge Management in Malaysian School Education: Do the Smart Schools Do It Better? Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, vol: 19 No: 3 pp: 263 -282

- Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate Self-Efficacy For Personal And Organization Effectiveness Handbook Of Principles Of Organization Behavior. Oxford, Uk: Blackwell.Pp.120-139

- Balcombe, J. (1999). Getting Out Of the Box: The Role of Information Professional in Knowledge Management. The Low Librarian.

- Bhatt, G.D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies techniques, and people. Journal of knowledge management, Vol. 5, No. 1, PP: 68-75.

- Caprara, G.V. (2006). Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs As Determinants Of Job Satisfaction And Students' Academic Achievement: A Study At The School Level, Journal Of School Psychology, No. 44 , Pp:473–490

- Chacon, C. T. (2005). Teachers' perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teacher in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 257-272.

- Chan, D. (2008). Teacher self-efficacy and successful intelligence among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong, Educational Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 7, 735–746,  available at : http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713415498

- Chue, K.W. Wang, M. & Yuen, A. (2011). Implementing Knowledge Management in School Environment: Teachers' Perception, Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol.3, No.2.

- Ciganek, A.P. Mao, E. & Srite, M. (2008). Organizational Culture for Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, No.1, Pp.1-16

- Civi, E. (2000). Knowledge management as a competitive asset: a review marketing intelligence and planning, Vol. 18, No. 4, PP: 166-74.

- Davenport, I.H. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organization Manage What They Know. Harvard Bussiness School Press, Boston, MA

- Drang, D. (2011). Preschool Teachers' Beliefs, Knowledge, and Practices Related to Classroom Management, Dissertation from Digital Repository at the University of Maryland.

- Duffy, J. (2000). Knowledge management: to be or not to be. Information Management Journal. Vol. 34. No. 1. PP:: 64-7.

- Edmonds, E. & Candy, J. (2002). Creativity art practice, and knowledge. paper of the ACM 45 (10).PP: 91-95.

- Ghalai, B. Kadivar, P. Sarami, Gh. & Esfandiari, M. (2012). Assessment Of Teachers Model Of Self-Efficacy Believes As Predictor Of Their Job Satisfaction And Studendts Academic Achievement, Research In Curriculum Planning, Vol 2, No 32, Pp 95-107(Persian)

- Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability. Academy Of Management Review, Vol.17, No.2, Pp: 183-211.

- Guskey, T. R. & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, No.31, pp: 627–643.

- Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education 17, 819–836.

- Hosseini, A. (2009). The Nature of creativity, Behnashr publication, Mashhad

- Jashapara, A. (2004). Knowledge Management: An Integrated Approach Harlow, Essen: Prentice Hall

- Joorabchi, M. (2008). Studying The Influence Of Knowledge Management On Efficieny Of Tehran High School Teachers, M.A Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Roodhen Branch, (Persian)

- Lio, X. (2009). How entrepreneurial orientation moderates the effects of knowledge. System research and behavioral management on innovation, Vol. 26, Iss. 6. P: 645.

- Margolis, H. & Mccabe, P. (2010). Self-Efficacy: A Key To Improving The Motivation Of Struggling Learners, Available At :  Http://Www. Informaworld. Com/Smpp/Title~Content=T914957660

- Muijs, R. D. & Rejnolds, D. (2001). Teachers' Beliefs And Behaviors: What Really Matters. Journal of Classroom Interaction, No 37, 3−15.

- Niazazari, K. Berimani, A. & Hajigholikhani, B. (2011). Studying The Role of Knowledge Management In Creativity of High School Teachers, Journal of Management,Vol 8, No 21, Pp 79-87(Persian)

- Ohlsen, M. (2009). A Study Of School Culture, Leadership, Teacher Quality And Student Outcomes Via A Performance Framework In Elementary Schools Participating In A School Reform Initiative, Phd Dissertation ,University Of Florida

- Pajares, F. (2002). Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Motivation, and Achievement In Writing: A Review of The Literature, Reading And Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, Vol.19, No.2, Pp: 139-158.

- Perez, J.M. (2011). Effects of Self-Efficacy on Objective and Subjective Outcomes In Transactions And Disputes, International Journal Of Conflict Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, Pp. 170-189

- Petrides, L. A. & Nodine, T. R. (2003). Knowledge Management in Education: Defining the Landscape. (Report). Half Moon Bay, CA: Institute for the Study Of Knowledge Management In Education.

- Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 7, pp: 49–73, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

- Ross, J. A., Hogaboom-Gray, A., & Hannay, L. (2001). Effects of teacher efficacy on computer skills and computer cognitions of Canadian students in grades k-3, The Elementary School Journal, Vol.102, pp: 141-156

- Seyf, A. (2008). Educational psychology, Agah Publication, Tehran

- Shanhong, T. (2000). Knowledge management in libraries in the 21st century. Paper presented at the 66th IFLA council and general conference, Availableat: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/057-110e.htm

- Shirzadkebria, B. & Khoshnazar, (2009). The Effect Of Knowledge Management On Research Efficiency Of Teachers  According To Principals’ View In Saghez, Educational Management Researches Journal, Vol 1,No 2, Pp,11-36(Persian)

- Von Villas, B. (2004). Improving the way we observe classrooms. School Administrator, 61 (8), 52-53