اثر بخشی طرح مثلث موفقیت در افزایش عملکرد تحصیلی دانشآموزان
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورشمهدی قلی زارعی 1 , نادره سهرابی 2 , سیامک سامانی 3
1 - کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مرودشت.
2 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت. ایران.
3 - دانشیار گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران.
کلید واژه: مشارکت معلمان, مشارکت دانشآموزان, عملکرد تحصیلی, مشارکت والدین,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف تبیین اثر بخشی مشارکت والدین، معلم و دانشآموزان بر عملکرد تحصیلی دانشآموزان سال سوم متوسطه انجام گرفت. روش پژوهش شبه آزمایشی از نوع پیش آزمون و پس آزمون با گروه کنترل میباشد. متغییر مستقل در این پژوهش برنامه آموزشی برای مشارکت والدین، معلم و دانشآموزان با عنوان مثلث موفقیت میباشد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش دانشآموزان دوره دوم، سال سوم متوسطه استان فارس میباشد که با روش نمونهگیری خوشهای تصادفی از بین شهرستانها انتخاب شدند. حجم نمونه شامل 781 نفر میباشد که در شیراز از ناحیه چهار مدرسه شاهد پسرانه سیزده و از ناحیه دو مدرسه شاهددخترانه پانزده و دبیرستان دخترانه و پسرانه فسا به عنوان گروه آزمایش و دبیرستان دخترانه علامه امینی ناحیه یک و دبیرستان پسرانه سید احمد خمینی ناحیه سه و دبیرستان دخترانه و پسرانه کازرون به عنوان کنترل انتخاب گردید. دادهها از راه گردآوری کارنامه دانشآموزان در سالهای تحصیلی 93-92 و 94-93 مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. برای تجزیه و تحلیل فرضیههای پژوهش از روش آماری تحلیل کووارایانس استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل دادهها نشان دادند که اجرای برنامه مثلث موفقیت، باعث بهبود عملکرد تحصیلی دانشآموزان شده است. همچنین، اجرای این برنامه باعث بهبود عملکرد دانشآموزان پسر گردید، اما در مورد دختران تفاوتی معنادار مشاهده نشد.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the partnership of parents, teacher and students on the academic performance of students in the 3th grade of high school. The method of the study was quasi-experimental with pre and post-tests and the control group. The treatment was "successful triangular" to evaluate the partnership of parents, teacher and students. The statistical population of this study was the students in the second and third grade of high school in Fars province. They were selected by cluster random sampling method among the cities. The sample consisted of 781 students who were selected from Shahed high school in Shiraz, Fasa and Kazeron. The data were collected and used by the workbooks of students in 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 academic years. In order to analyze the hypotheses, the Covariance Method was used as the statistical analytic method. The results of data analysis indicated that the application of "successful triangular" caused the improvement of students' academic performance. In applying the successful triangular among both groups, there was a significant difference in the academic performance of boys. In applying the successful triangular among both groups, there wasn’t a significant difference in the academic performance of girls.
- Acota, Y. (2006). Quality assurance vital. New vision, university guide 2006-2007.
- Koontz, H. & Weihrich, H. (1988). Management. McGraw-Hill, INC. New York.
- Saleemi, N. A. (1997). Systems theory, analysis and design simplified. N. A Saleemi publisher: Nairobi.
- Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and Classroom context effects on students achievement: implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.
- Harris, N. H., & Sass, T. R. (2007). Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Rducation Research. Working Paper 3.
- Tella, A. (2008). Teacher variables as predictors of academic achievement of primary school pupils mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1, 16-33.
- Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: the impact of school, family, and community connection on student achievement. National Center for Family and Community Connection with School. Austin, Texas.
- Flecha, A. (2012). Family education improves student's academic performance: contributions from European research. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational research, 3, 301-321.
- Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect roll of parental expectations and the home environment. Lournal of Family Psychology, 19, 294-304.
- Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mattern, R. A. (2005). Coolege students' goal orientation and achievement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17, 27-32.
- Deary, I. J., Steve, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13-21.
- Rinderman, H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2004). Processing speed, intelligence, creativity, and school performance: testing of causal hypotheses using structural equation models. Intelligence, 32, 573-589.
- Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: a cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 441-451.
- Osei Emmanuel, A., Adom, E. A., Josephine, B., & Solomon, F. K. (2014). Achievement motivation, academic self-concept and academic achievement among high school students. European Journal of Research and Refelection in Educational Sciences, 2, 24-37.
- Mohammad, A. S., Bakar, N. A., Mijinyawa, S. I., & Halabi, K. A. (2014). Impact of motivation on students' academic performance: a case study of University Sultan Zainal Abidin Students. The American Journal of Innovation Research and Applied Sciences, 222-227.
- Wenglinsky, H. (2002). Teacher classroom practices student performance: How schools can make a difference. Research Report, Education Testing Service.
- Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Family functioning and academic achievement in middle school a social emotional perspective. The Journal of Early adolescence, 14, 268-291.
- Avan, R. U., Noureen, G., & Naz, A. (2011). A study of relationship between achievement motivation, self-concept and achievement in english and mathematics at secondary level. International Education Studies, 4, 72-79/
_||_