نشانگان ارزیابی عملکرد معلمان متوسطه دوم مدارس دولتی استان خراسان جنوبی : سنتزپژوهی براساس مدل روبرتس(یک مطالعه کیفی)

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

رضا مرادی ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه خوارزمی.)
حسین عباسیان ² (استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران.)
حسن رضا زین آبادی ³ (دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران.)
بیژن عبدللهی ⁴ (دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/01/27 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/06/19 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/01/01

کلید واژه: ارزیابی عملکرد, متوسطه دوم, آموزش‌وپرورش, نشانگان, معلمین,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی نشانگان ارزیابی عملکرد معلمان است. رویکرد پژوهش حاضر تحلیل محتوای اسنادی و روش آن سنتز پژوهی است. جامعه پژوهش کلیه مقالاتی هستند (137 سند و مطالعه)که در مورد نشانگان ارزیابی عملکرد معلمان در پایگاه­های تخصصی و علمی ارائه‌شده‌اند. نمونه پژوهش 23 سند و مطالعه است که این تعداد بر اساس پایش موضوعی، اشباع نظری داده­ها و به‌صورت هدفمند انتخاب‌شده‌اند. داده­های پژوهش از تحلیل کیفی اسناد موردمطالعه، گردآوری‌شده‌اند. با تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده­ها، نشانگان ارزیابی عملکرد معلمان در 4 بُعد، 15 محور طبقه­بندی شدند. این ابعاد شامل بعد فردی (مشتمل بر محورهای؛ شخصیتی، مهارت­های ادراکی و آراستگی ظاهری)، بُعد سازمانی (مشتمل بر عوامل؛ تعهد، توسعه حرفه‌ای، مشارکت سازمانی، انگیزش حرفه­ای، ارتباطات و رضایت)، بُعد اجتماعی (مشتمل بر عوامل؛ ارزش­های اجتماعی و مناسبات اجتماعی) و بعد فرآیند یاددهی و یادگیری (مشتمل بر عوامل؛ رعایت قوانین آموزشی، تدریس، ارزشیابی و پژوهش و تألیف) هست.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance appraisal syndrome of teachers. The approach of the present study is the analysis of documentary content and its method is synthesis research. The research population is all articles (137 documents and studies) about teacher performance appraisal syndrome in specialized and scientific databases. The research sample is 23 documents and studies, which have been purposefully selected based on thematic monitoring, theoretical data saturation. Research data were collected from qualitative analysis of the studied documents. By analyzing the data, teachers' performance appraisal symptoms were classified into 4 dimensions, 15 axes. These dimensions include the individual dimension (including axes; personality, perceptual skills, and appearance), Organizational dimension (including factors; commitment, professional development, organizational participation, professional motivation, communication and satisfaction), It is the social dimension (including factors; social values and social relations) and the dimension of the teaching and learning process (including factors; observance of educational rules, teaching, Evaluation and research and writing).

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Seyed Mohammad and Torkzadeh, Ali (2000) Educational Needs Assessment in Organizations, Tehran. ]in persian[


2. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012). Using performance management to win the talent war. Business Horizons, 55, 609-616.


3. Almeida, J C(2017). Teacher Performance Evaluation: The Importance of Performance Standards. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 8(1), 2973-2981.


4. Arnăutu, E., & Panc, I. (2015). Evaluation criteria for performance appraisal of faculty members.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,203, 386-392.


5. Asgari Bajgarani, Mahboubeh, Shaemi, Ali and Allameh, Mohsen (2011). Assessing the level of governance of talent management strategy in Isfahan Municipality. Urban Management, 29, 276-286 . ]in persian[


6. Barman, P, Bhattacharyya D, Barman P(2010). Teaching Effectiveness of Teacher Educators in Different Types of B.Ed Colleges in West Bengal, India. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(11):1364-1377.


7. Bichi, A.A(2017). Evaluation of Teacher Performance in Schools: Implication for Sustainable Development Goals. Northwest Journal of Educational Studies,1(2), 102-113.


8. Buyruk, H. (2014). Öğretmen performansının göstergesi olarak merkezi sınavlar ve eğitimde performans değerlendirme. Trakya, Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (2), 28-42.


9. Çetin, M., Sarıdaş, G., Araç, İ. (2015). Eğitim Denetimi Uygulamaları Kapsamında Öğretmenlere Göre Öğretmenlerin Performans Değerlendirmesine İlişkin Bir İnceleme. 7. İzmir, Uluslararası Eğitim Denetimi Kongresi.


10. Chiu, W.U, Lee, U.D, Lin, T.U.(2010). Performance evaluation criteria for personal trainers: An analytical hierarchy process approach. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2010, 38(7), 895-906.


11. Christenson, R. S., & Barney, D. C. (2008). A teacher self-appraisal checklist for physical educators to assess instructional performance.OAHPERD, XLIV, (3), 23-27.


12. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Research Synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, and J. C. Valentine (eds.), The Handbook of Research synthesis and meta-Analysis (pp. 3-16). US: Russell Sage.


13. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000).Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice [Electronic version]. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.


14. Dela Rosa, P. (2001). Research as an essential element of effective instruction.Ad Veritatem, 1(1), 54-80.


15. Gachpezian, Hassan and Khandel, Mehdi (2016). Evaluating the performance of male physical education teachers in Greater Tehran based on their performance indicators, the first national conference on sustainable tourism with the approach of sports tourism, health and environment, Ardabil. ]in persian[


16. Gorkashani, Mahdieh Sadat, Haji Hosseininejad, Gholamreza, Musaipour, Nematullah and Ebrahimzadeh, Issa (2020). Design and validation of a conceptual model for evaluating the professional competence of teachers in Iran. Journal of Educational Sciences, 26 (2), 27-50 . ]in persian[


17. Groenewald T.(2004). A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods; 3(1):42-55.


18. Grossi, L. E. (2012). Performance Appraisal as a Tool for Efficiency in the Public Sector.


19. Gunaratne A K, J duPlessis A.(2007). performing management system: A powerful tool to achieve organizationalgoals. Journal of global business and technology. 2007; 3(1):17-28.


20. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. (2011). Teacher Training, Teacher Quality and Student Achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (1), 798–812.
    
    
    
    • Hemmatinejad, Mehr Ali, Ramezani Nejad, Rahim, Rezaei Kamani, Amir, Afsharnejad, Taher, Shafiei, Shahram (2008) Evaluation of the evaluation system of physical education teachers. Movement, 38 (1), 128-111. ]in persian[
    
    
    
    


21. Hollan, D. (2012). On the varieties and particularities of cultural experience. Ethos, 40(1), 37-53.


22. Hyun Yu, J., Luo, Y., Sun, Y., & Strobel, J., (2012). "A Conceptual k-6 Teacher Competency Model for Teaching Engineering", SciVerse ScienceDirect, Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences (56), 243-252.


23. Javadipour, Mohammad and Mohammadi, Ramazan Ali (2009). Evaluating the performance of guidance teachers from the perspective of principals and primary school teachers in Tehran based on the model of John Wales and Joseph Bondi. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 2 (3), 103-127 . ]in persian[


24. Ke, C. L., & Yang, C. C. (2002). Study in constructing a fitness instructors’ professional knowledge chart. Journal of Physical Education Fu Jen Catholic University, 1, 85-96.


25. Liu, C. C. (1991). The human resources management of professional fitness instructors. National Sports Quarterly, 20(4), 46-57.


26. Mirkazemi, Ozra, Hossein Aliani, Mahdieh and the wrestler, Mohammad (2014). Identifying and prioritizing the criteria for evaluating the performance of physical education teachers by hierarchical method, Sports Management Studies, 25, 65-78. . ]in persian[


27. Moffet, J. (2015). Twelve tips for “flipping” the classroom. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 331-336.


28. Mohammad Davoodi, Amir Hossein and Bahadori, Saeed (1396). Determining the effective factors on the effectiveness of professional ethics from the perspective of teachers in Qom province. A New Approach in Educational Management, 8 (3), 165-186. ]in persian[


29. Moradi Pardanjani, Hojjatullah and Sadeghi, Majid (2014). Phenomenology; Philosophical, interpretive and methodological approach to entrepreneurship studies. Journal of Religious Methodology Studies, 1 (2): 62-72. ]in persian[


30. Mousavi Rad, Seyedeh Tahereh, Roozbehani, Mahboubeh and Roheh, Mahvash (2014). Evaluating the performance of physical education teachers with 360-degree feedback (case study of Parsian teachers). Studies of Fundamentals of Management in Sport 1 (3), 61-70. ]in persian[


31. Nazari Shahram, Diokan Behzad, Kowsaripour Mohsen (2021). Explaining the performance evaluation indicators of physical education teachers in Tehran. Journal of Education, 36 (1), 107-124. ]in persian[


32. National Union of Teachers. (2011). Teachers' Working Time and Duties. National Union of Tecaher's Guide Book, 23‐24.


33. Nolan, J. F., & Hoover, L. E. (2008). Teacher supervision evaluation: theory into practice, Translated by Abdollahi, B., Tehran, Contemporary Works Publishing.


34. Prashar, A. (2015). Assessing the flipped classroom in operations management: A pilot study. Journal of Education for Business, 90(3), 126-38.


35. Ranaei Kurdsholi, Habibollah and Sakapour, Asia (2012). Designing an employee performance appraisal model based on organizational performance management models. Public Management Perspectives, 6, 95-114. . ]in persian[


36. Robinson W, Campbell J.(2010). Evaluation of teacher quality and practice. International Encyclopedia of Education.8(3); 674-80.


37. Sadeghinia, Zohreh, Salehi, Keyvan and Moghaddamzadeh, Ali (2009). Phenomenological approach in identifying the factors affecting the performance evaluation of primary school principals, School Management, 6 (2), 1-21. ]in persian[


38. Sarmadi and Seif (2012). Training process management. Tehran: Payam-e-Noor University Press, Tehran. ]in persian[


39. Santiago P, Benavides F.(2009) Teacher evaluation a conceptual framework and examples of country practices. OECD-Mexico workshop towards a teacher evaluation framework in Mexico: international practices, criteria and mechanisms.


40. Sayin S.D & Arslan H(2017). Determining the Criteria Identifying Teacher Performance Through Multiple Indicators. European Scientific Journal ,13(16), 19-31.


41. Shayek, Reza (2011). Designing a performance evaluation system for the headquarters, units and research institutes of Jihad Keshavarzi. Tehran: Central Organization of the University of Tehran, research project. ]in persian[


42. Stiff, M. C. (1993). The personal trainer. Fitness and Sport Review International, 28(3), 83-88.


43. Taheri, Ahmad, Taghipour Zahir, Ali and Jafari, Parivash (1398). Investigating the main components and indicators of school performance evaluation. Social Science Quarterly, 13 (3), 69-95. ]in persian[


44. Tasar,Hoseyin &Mücahit Çelik ,( 2011). Examination of Implementation Level of the Total Quality Management Principles by the Principals and Teachers Functioning at Elementary Schools: The Case of Adiyaman Province. Asian Social Science , 7( 9), 33-42


45. The Center for Development and Enterprise (2015). "Teacher Evaluation, lessons from other countries, building on what works in education, concise summaries of ongoing policy research aimed at helping to improve the national education system", The Center for Development and Enterprise, 3-8.


46. Tigelaar, D., Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., &Vleuten, C. (2004).The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education.Higher Education, 48(2), 253-268.


47. Yıldız, Ö. (2013). Physical Education Teachers’ Performance Evaluation.Life Science Journal,10(1), 796-803.