واکاوی تیم های‌ مجازی پژوهشی در نظام آموزش عالی کشور: مطالعه موردی کیفی

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

قاسم سلیمی ¹ (بخش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی و درسی-دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی-دانشگاه شیراز)
الناز نظری ² (دانشگاه شیراز)
علی اکبر صفوی ³ (دانشکده فنی و مهندسی دانشگاه شیراز)
مهدی محمدی ⁴ (بخش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی و درسی-دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی-دانشگاه شیراز)
مریم شفیعی سروستانی ⁵ (بخش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی و درسی-دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی-دانشگاه شیراز)

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/11/15 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/02/06 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/12/01

کلید واژه: دانش آفرینی, تیم های مجازی, تیم های مجازی پژوهشی,

چکیده مقاله :

با توجه به نقش محوری تیم های مجازی پژوهشی در تولید دانش، پژوهش حاضر در پی کاوش چگونگی دانش آفرینی مبتنی بر توسعه تیم های مجازی پژوهشی و روش پژوهش کیفی و مبتنی بر یک مطالعه موردی انجام گرفته است. ابزار جمع آوری داده ها، مصاحبه های نیمه ساختاریافته بوده و به منظور گردآوری اطلاعات، با به کارگیری روش نمونه گیری هدفمند، با 26 نفر از اعضای هیات علمی فنی و مهندسی با تجربه ی عضویت در تیم های مجازی پژوهشی از سه دانشگاه شیراز، تهران و صنعتی شریف به عنوان سه دانشگاه برتر کشور، مصاحبه انجام گردید. سپس داده های به دست آمده با استفاده از نرم افزار Nvivo از طریق فن تحلیل مضمون مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت و در قالب مضامین پایه، سازماندهنده و فراگیر دسته بندی و شبکه مضامین سازماندهی شد. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده، تیم های مجازی پژوهشی(مضمون فراگیر) دارای اهداف، راهبرد، الزامات، جو منفی مشارکت و کارکرد (مضامین سازماندهنده) هستند که هر یک دارای ابعاد گوناگونی(مضامین پایه) هستند  

چکیده انگلیسی:

In fact, role of research virtual teams in knowledge creation is very important., the present research seeks to explore how knowledge creation is based on the development of virtual research teams. The method of qualitative research is based on a case study. Data collection tools were semi-structured interviews. In order to collect information, using a targeted sampling method, 26 faculty members with technical and engineering experience with membership in virtual research teams from three universities in Shiraz, Tehran and Sharif Industrial Company was interviewed as the three top universities in the country. Then, the data was analyzed using the NVIVO software through thematic analysis fan and was organized in the form of comprehensive themes, organized themes and basic themes. Based on the result, the virtual research teams (comprehensive themes) have goals, strategies, requirement, negative atmosphere of participation and function(organized themes). each of which has different dimensions(basic themes).

منابع و مأخذ:

 

• Abbas Zadeh, M. & Moghtadaei, L. (2009). Sociological study of the impact of social capital on knowledge creation. Sociology of Iran, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 1-23.


• Abbas Zadeh, M. ; Moghtadaei, L. & Hosseinpour, I.(2010). Social interaction and the quality of academic production. Journal of Social Sciences Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 6, pp. 1-28.


• Abbasi, S. & Bagheri, N.(2010) . Virtual Collaboration in Project Management: A Case Study of Successful Teams. Sixth International Project Management Conference, Tehran.


• Agbi, R. O. (2018). Leadership Communications Strategies for Enhancing Virtual Team Performance.‏


• Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3): 2653-2669.


• AliNasab,z., Fazlollah Qamshi, Seyfollah & Karimian, H. (2015). Knowledge creation in universities; Examining weaknesses and strengths. Social Cultural Knowledge, No. 24, pp. 87-108.


• Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017). Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust. Information & Management, 54(4), 479-490


• Amara, N. & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinates of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms. Evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey, Technovation 25,245-259.


• Amin Bidokhty, Ali Akbar and Dukhanian, Razieh (2011). Study and compilation of requirements for promoting the role of the university in the national innovation system. Proceedings of the National Conference on Research and Technology Management.


• Asgari, M.; Adli, F. & Mehran, G. (2016).Identifying the Factors Affecting the Creation of Faculty Members of Higher Education Institutions. Marine Science Education, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp. 27-39.


• Azizollah, N. & Saifuddini Homani, B. (2013).Testing and analyzing the applicability of virtual software teams using cloud technology. Conferences in Iran, The First Regional Conference on Optimization and Soft Computing Methods in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Safashahr.


• Berry, G. R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: Understanding why traditional team skills are insufficient. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 48(2), 186-206.


• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb. In Knowledge creation in education (pp. 35-52). Springer Singapore.


• Braun, V. & V. Clarke (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), P.77-101.


• Clark, W. R., Clark, L. A., & Crossley, K. (2010). Developing multidimensional trust without touch in virtual teams. Marketing Management Journal, 20(1), 177-193.


• Dari, B.& Talebnejad, A.(2008). The study of the status of strategic factors of knowledge creation in universities affiliated to the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 49.


• Dehghanian, H. & Pourmohaddisyan, P.(2015). Analyzing the relationship between trust and effectiveness in virtual teams with an emphasis on the role of knowledge sharing. Information Technology Management Studies, Vol. 4, No. 13, pp. 19-19.


• De Stefano, D., Fuccella, V., Vitale, M. & Zaccarin, S. (2013). The use of different data sources in the analvsis of coauthorship networks and scientific performance. Social networks, 35(3), 370-381.


• Draghici, A., & Draghici, G. (2007). Research virtual teams establishment and development. The case of inpro virtual research network. Annals of the Oradea university, Fascicle of management and technological engineering, 5(1), 10-18.


• Dube, S. & Marnewick, C. (2016). A conceptual model to improve performance in virtual teams. South African Journal of Information Management, 18(1), 1-10.


• Gazor, H. (2012). A literature review on challenges of virtual team's leadership. Journal of Sociological Research, 3(2), 134-145.


• Ghaneh, M. & Rahimi, F.(2011). Documentary Analysis and Pattern of Contributing Contribution by Six Iranian English Language Professors in the Technical and Engineering Fields Indexed on the Islamic Citation Sciences Database (ISC). Journal of Science and Technology Research Center of Iran, Special Scientology, p. 159-175.


• Ghanei Rad, M. & Ghazipour, F. (2002). Normative and organizational factors affecting the efficiency of faculty members. Cultural Research Letter, No. 4, pp. 167-206.


• Gibbs, J. L., Kim, H., & Boyraz, M. (2017). Virtual Teams. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication


• Haeussler, C., & Sauermann, H. (2013). Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Research Policy, 42(3), 688-703.


• Hallinger, P. (2011). Developing a knowledge base for educational leadership and management in East Asia. School Leadership & Management, 31(4), 305-320.


• Hamidizadeh, M. (2005). Approaches and strategies for knowledge creation in universities. Technology Development Quarterly, No. 2.


• Han, G., & Harms, P. D. (2010). Team identification, trust and conflict: A mediation model. International Journal of conflict management, 21(1), 20-43.


• Hu, H. (2015). Building virtual teams: experiential learning using emerging technologies. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(1), 17-33.


• Jang, C. (2013). Facilitating trust in virtual teams: The role of awareness. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 21(1/2), 61-77.


• Jansen, D. (2017). Networks, social capital, and knowledge production. In Networked Governance, 15-42, Springer International Publishing.


• Javdani, H. & Pardakhtchi, M.(2007). A Study on the Status of Organizational Development in Iran's Higher Education System. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 13 (4), pp. 21-44.


• Kramer, S., & Benson, S. (2013). Changing faculty use of technology–one cohort at a time. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 5(2), 202-221.


• Lin, P. Y., Chang, Y. H., Lin, H. T., & Hong, H. Y. (2017). Fostering college students’ creative capacity through computer-supported knowledge building. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(1), 43-56.


• Lockwood, J. (2015). Virtual team management: What is causing communication breakdown? Language and Intercultural Communication, 15, 125-140.


• Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2017). Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 605-622.


• Masa’deh, R. E., Shannak, R., R., Maqableh, M. & Tarhini, A. (2017). The impact of knowledge management on job performance in higher education: The case of the University of Jordan. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(2), 244-262.


• Mirkamali, M., Hamidizadeh, M. & NaranjiSani, Fatemeh (2015). Factors Related to Knowledge Creation in Universities: Qualitative Research. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp. 121-147.


• Mohammad Davoodi, A &  Pajuhesh, Sh. (2015). Evaluation of Common Leadership Model in the Knowledge Creation Team at Faculty Members of Radi University of Kermanshah. A New Approach to Educational Management, Spring 94, No. 21, pp. 123-146.


• 11. Musa Khani, M. ; Hasan-Golipour, T.  & Task, Z.  (2013). Provide a model to explain the relationship between knowledge management processes and HR development in higher education. Public Administration Research, Vol. 6, No. 22, p. 49-71.


• Nowroozi, A.; AbulGhasemi, M. & Ghahremani, M. (2012). The science production strategy based on the analysis of organizational management structures of the university. Strategic Management Studies, Volume 3, Issue 12, pp. 123-143.


• Nowroozzadeh, R. & . Rezai, N.(2009). Scientific Development in the Islamic Republic of Iran Dimensions of Barriers and Solutions. Social Science: Research Journal, No. 39, pp. 49-49.


• Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information & Management, 50(4), 144-153.


• Pangil, F., & Moi Chan, J. (2014). The mediating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between trust and virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 92-106.


• Pirezat, A & . Saadabadi, A.(2012).Hierarchical Analysis of Cartymy Barriers in Universities Using Fuzzy Approach (Case Study of Tehran Universities). Organizational Behavior Studies, Year 1, No. 3, pp. 67-81.


• Rezaeian, A.(2014). Grouping in the 21st Century. Tehran, Publications of the Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books of Universities .


• Schulze, A., & Hoegl, M. (2008). Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach. Research policy, 37(10), 1742-1750.


• Shams, A. (2016). Facilitating faculty members. Development Management Process, No. 2, Volume 29, pp. 71-98.


• Soltani, A. & Tabatabaiyan, H. (2010). Evaluation of research and technology policies and programs in the new decade. National Conference on Research and Technology Management, Tehran, Imam Sadiq University (AS).


• Szewc, J. (2013). Selected success factors of virtual teams: literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management and Economics, 38(1), 67-83.


• Teodoridis, F. (2017). Understanding Team Knowledge Production: The Interrelated Roles of Technology and Expertise. Management Science.


• Tsai, C. C., Chai, C. S., Koon Siak Wong, B., Hong, H. Y., & Tan, S. C. (2013). Positioning Design Epistemology and its Applications in Education Technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2).


• Vashisth, R., & Mehta, A. (2013). Knowledge Management in Indian Higher Educational Institutions: A three-dimensional Approach. In International Conference on Technology and Business Management March,Vol. 18, p. 20.


• Wisey, R. & Keshavaresar, A. (2011). Pathology of Challenges, Challenges and Obstacles to Social Research. Proceedings of the National Conference on Research and Technology Management, Vol. 4.


• White, C. S., James, K., Burke, L. A., & Allen, R. S. (2012). What makes a “research star”? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(6), 584-602.


• Wakefield, R. L., Leidner, D. E., & Garrison, G. (2008). Research Note: A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams. Information systems research, 19(4), 434-455.