فراتحلیل اثربخشی برنامه‌های آموزش محیط زیست بر سواد زیست محیطی در ایران

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

سیروس محمودی ¹

1 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/04/12 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/09/14 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/10/01

کلید واژه: فراتحلیل, نگرش زیست محیطی, سواد زیست محیطی, آموزش محیط زیست,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه و هدف:  هدف پژوهش حاضر، جمع­آوری و یکپارچه­سازی اثربخشی برنامه­های آموزش محیط زیست  بر سواد زیست محیطی و محاسبه میزان اثر آن ها با استفاده از رویکرد پژوهشی فراتحلیل بود. روش شناسی پژوهش: در این تحقیق، 35 پژوهش(یازه زمانی1399- 1388) که از لحاظ روش­شناسی مورد قبول بود انتخاب و فراتحلیل بر روی آن ها انجام شد. ابزار پژوهش چک لیست فراتحلیل بود که 3948 شرکت کننده را در خود جای داده بود. روایی ابزار پژوهش با روش محتوایی و صوری و نظر متخصصان تأیید شد و پایایی آن با روش ویلیام اسکات 97/0 به دست آمد. پس از خلاصه کردن نتایج پژوهش­ها، اندازه اثر محاسبه و بر اساس رویکرد فراتحلیل هانتر و اشمیت ترکیب شده و طبق جدول کوهن تفسیر شدند. یافته­ ها: یافته­ های پژوهش نشان داد که میزان اثر ترکیبی اجرای برنامه­های آموزش محیط زیست بر سواد زیست محیطی 37/0 بود (p</001)، که این میزان اثر مطابق با جدول کوهن بالاتر از متوسط است اندازه اثر ترکیبی برای مقطع سنی پیش­دبستان و دبستان 25/0(پایین­تر از متوسط)، برای دوره متوسطه(اول و دوم)، 36/0 (بالاتر از متوسط)و برای مقطع سنی بزرگسال 59/0(زیاد) ارزیابی شده است. هم چنین اندازه اثر ترکیبی برای دانش محیط زیست 31/0(متوسط)، نگرش محیط زیست41/0 (بالاتر از متوسط) و برای رفتار محیط زیست47/0 (بالاتر از متوسط) است. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل تعدیلی، بیانگر اثرگذاری متغیرهای تعدیل کننده در این مداخلات بود. بحث و نتیجه­ گیری: یافته­ های این پژوهش از اثربخشی برنامه­های آموزش محیط زیست بر سواد زیست محیطی حکایت دارد و با بالا رفتن سن دانش­آموز این اثربخشی بیشتر می­شود.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analysis the Effectiveness of Environmental Education Programs on Environmental Literacy by using meta-analysis method based on the Hunter and  Schmidt approach. research methodology: For this purpose, thirty five studies which were accepted methodologically were included in the meta-analysis. The checklist of meta-analysis with 3948 participants were used. After summarizing the research results, the effect size was calculated and combined based on Hunter and Schmidt meta-analysis approach and interpreted according to Cohen's table Findings: The results indicated that the Effectiveness of Environmental Education Programs on Environmental Literacy was 0/37 (p</0001), According to Cohen's table, this effect size is higher than average. Combined effect size for preschool and primary school age 0.25 (below average), for secondary school (first and second), 0.36 (above average) and for adult age 0.59 (high) Has been evaluated. Also, the size of the combined effect was 0.31 (average) for environmental knowledge, 0.41 (above average) for environmental attitude and 0.47 (above average) for environmental behavior. The results of modulatory analysis showed the effectiveness of modulatory variables in these interventions. Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate the effectiveness of environmental education programs on environmental literacy.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Aric,S&Yilmaz,M(2020). The Effect of Constructivist Learning Approach and Active Learning on Environmental Education: A Meta-Analysis Study, International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education,10(2),44-84.


2. Asrai,A&Rahbari,M(1392).The study of environmental education effects on improving hospital waste separation (A case study: Ahmadnejad Hospital, Katalom city), Journal of Environmental Education&Sustaineble Dvelopment, 1(4),1-9. (in Persian(

3.CEPA-Canada, (2012), Education for Sustainable Development in Canadian Faculties of Education, Canada Education for sustainable Development Working Group.

4.Chapman, D. & Sharma. K. (2001).environmental attitudes and behavior of primery and secondary students in Asian cities: An overview strategy for implementing an eco-schools program. The Environmentalist. 21, 265-272.

5. Cohen, J.(1998) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


6. Duvall,J& Zint,M(2007). A Review of Research on the Effectiveness of Environmental Education in Promoting Intergenerational Learning, the journal of environmental education,38(4),14-24.

7.Elham,S&Larigani,M&Frajolahi,M(2016). Influence of Urban Environmental Education on Valuation & Environmental Behavior of Secondary School Students in Isfahan Province, Journal of Environmental Education&Sustaineble Dvelopment,4(2),30-37. (in Persian(.

8.Erdogan,M (2015). The Effect of Summer Environmental Education Program (SEEP) on Elementary School Students’ Environmental Literac, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education,10(2),165-181.

9.Erdogan,M& Uşak,M (2013). A Review of Research on Environmental Education in Non-traditional Settings in Turkey, 2000 and 2001, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education,8(1),37-57.

10.Farahani,H. A&Oraizi,H. R (2009). Advanced research methods in the humanities,Esfahan:Jahad. (in Persian)

11.Fortier, J. D., Grady, Susan M., Lee, & Shelley, A. (1998). Wisconsin’s Model Academic Standards for Environmental Education. Wisconsin Department of public Instruction. Inter-national Journal of Education Development, 22, 35-46.

12.Ganian,M. et al(2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of the training course of the Environment Organization among elementary school students in Ahvaz,5th International Conference on New Research in Management, Economics, Accounting .

13.Ghazi Tabatabaii,M&Vedadhir,A (2010). Meta-analysis in social and behavioral research, Tehran: sociologists pub. (in Persian).

14. Harris, K. M. (2019). Mapping inequality: Childhood asthma and environmental injustice: A case study of St. Louis, issouri. Social Science & Medicine, 230,

91-110.

15.Hojati,M&Khodibakhshi,A(2016). The effectiveness of environmental group education on attitude and environmental awareness raising of female primary school students in Tehran, Journal of Pediatric Nursing,2(3),1-8. (in Persian)

16.Homan,H. A (2013). Practical guide to meta-analysis in scientific research,Tehran:Samt pub. (in Persian)

17. Hosaini,M(2014). Investigating the Role of Public Environmental Education in Improving Students' Awareness: A Case Study of Middle School Students in District 4 of Tehran, Master Thesis, Payame Noor University of Tehran, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. (in Persian(

18.Howitt, D& Cramer, D (2014). Introduction to Statistics in Psychology 6th Edition, translated by Pasha Sharifi et al, Tehran: Sokhan pub. (in Persian(

19.Huffcutt A. I. (2004). Research perspectives on meta analysis. In S. G.

20.Huston,A (2016). "The Impact of Environmental Education on Environmental Literacy and Motivation in Urban Communities".School of Education Student Capstone Theses and Dissertations. 4189. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/4189

21.Igbokwe,B(2016). Environmental Literacy Assessment: Assessing the Strength of an Environmental Education Program (EcoSchools) in Ontario Secondary Schools for Environmental Literacy Acquisition, PhD Thesis, University of Windsor. 

22.Jadidi,M&Naohegar,A(2019).Investigating the effectiveness of environmental education on female junior high school students for the protection of wetlands,Ecohydrology,6(3),623-630. (in Persian(

23.Kalantari,A&Saidi Pour(2018).The effect of environmental education based on communication theory on the level of learning and relationship with nature of sixth grade elementary students, Journal of Environmental Education&Sustaineble Dvelopment,4(3),5-10. (in Persian(

24.Karimipour,A&Babaie,F(2013). Investigation the Role of Environmental Instructions in Reduction the Use of polyethylene Material (Case study: District 9 of Tehran), Journal of Environmental Education&Sustaineble dvelopment,1(4),58-68. (in Persian(

25.Khoshtinat,V(2015). The effect of environmental education on promoting environmental literacy of women living in Darkeh neighborhood of Tehran, Master Thesis, Payame Noor University of Tehran, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. (in Persian(

26.Lahasaiizade, A. (2006). Developing ways of maintaining Environment (Volume I). Tehran: Kianmehr. (in Persian)

27.Larijani,M&Rashidi,s(2016). Evaluation of the effectiveness of computer games on knowledge, attitude and behavior of waste management in preschool children, Quarterly of Preschool and Elementary School Studies,1(4),55-68. (in Persian(

28.Larijani,M&Rashidi,S(2014).The effectiveness of blogging as an educational aid activity in environmental education, Information and communication technology in educational sciences,5(2),79-95. (in Persian(.

29. Maantay, J. A., & Maroko, A. R. (2018). Brownfields to greenfields: Environmental justice versus environmental gentrification. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1-17.

30.Momeni,M(2012). The importance of environmental education planning in the sustainable development of ecotourism, Tourism Space Quarterly,11(3),49. (in Persian(

31.Mosavi,N. et al(2018). The effectiveness of environmental education courses on the level of knowledge, attitude and skills of the environment, Environmental Sciences,17(2),154-139. (in Persian(

32.Palmer,J(2015). Environmental education in the 21st century,translated by khorshid dost, Tehran:Samt. (in Persian(.

33. Palmos,D,& et al(2021). Enhancing the environmental programmes of secondary education by using web-tools concerning precaution measures in civil protection: The case of Western Attica (Greece), safety science,139(2),1-5.

34.Rezvani,M, et al(2011). Study of Effectiveness of The Environmental Educations of  Teachers In The Field of Optimization of Energy Utilization, Two Quarterly Journal of Urban Ecology,2(4),9-20. (in Persian(

35.Rosenthal, R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews.  Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 47-61.

36.Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Edited by Cooper, H. and Hedges, LV, eds. New York:Russell Sage Foundation,. 231-44.

37.Sarbaz,s&Setoodeh,A&Rahimi,M(2017).Investigating the Impact of Environmental Education on Improving Elementary Students' Attitudes Toward Animal Rights,5(2),25-33. (in Persian(

38.Schlesinger, W. H. (2004). Environmental education for a sustainable future. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 3(2): 1–3.

39. SeongjiJeong & Sun Jin Yun (2018). A Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Environmental Education Programs on Environmental Literacy of Elementary Students, Korean Journal of Environmental Education,31(3), 241-258.

40.Shobeir,S.M&et al(2013). The relationship of using mass media (with emphasis on television) with Upgrade the teacher's environmental education level,Journal of  Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences 4(1),23-40. (in Persian(

41.Shobairi,S.M, et al(2016). The effect of educational games on learning the concepts of recycling and reuse in preschool boys, quarterly journal of education, 32(2),69-86. (in Persian(

42.Shobairi,S.M&Aslani,M(2015). Investigating the effect of environmental education on the level of knowledge of male and female students with professors from visual mass media, Journal of Education Technology,10(2),145-154. (in Persian(.

43.Thompson, B., & Snyder, P. A. (1997). Statistical significance testing practices .Journal of Experimental Education,66, 75-83.

44.UNESCO, (2019) Belem Framework for Action: Sixth International Conference on Adult Education in Brazil, Use The Power and Capacity of Adult Education and Learning for Dynamic Future, Interprete Department of Education of UNESCO National Commission of Iran.

45.UNESCO.(1999).Adult environmental education: awarness and environmental action. Available at: http://www.education.unesco org/uie

46.Vali Por,F&Fozan,F(2018). The effect of environmental education on awareness, attitude and pro-environmental behavior in 2nd grade high school female students (Case study: District 4 of Ahvaz city),20(4),213-225. (in Persian(