بررسی اثربخشی درمان بافت نگر انصاف محور مبتنی بر نظریه بوزورمنی-نایج بر افزایش کیفیت و کاهش تعارضات زناشویی در زوجین

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه

آیدین صنم نژاد ¹ , حسین قمری کیوی ² , علی شیخ الاسلامی ³ , علی رضایی شریف ⁴

1 - دانشجوی مقطع دکترا رشته مشاوره، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
2 - استاد تمام، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل ، ایران
3 - دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
4 - دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/06/15 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/05/09 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/05/01

کلید واژه: زوجین, تعارضات زناشویی, درمان بافت نگر انصاف محور, نظریه بوزورمنی-نایج, کیفیت زناشویی,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی اثربخشی رویکرد درمانی بافت نگر انصاف محور (مبتنی بر نظریه بوزورمنی-نایج) بر افزایش کیفیت زناشویی و کاهش دلزدگی زناشویی در زوجین دارای تعارضات زناشویی بود. روش­: روش این پژوهش از نوع شبه آزمایشی با طرح پیشآزمون ـ پسآزمون، با گروه کنترل و پیگیری سه‌ماهه بود. جامعه آماری شامل همه زوج‌هایی بود که در سال 1398- 1397 به دفتر مشاوره و خدمات روان‌شناختی خصوصی زیر نظر سازمان نظام روانشناسی و مشاوره در شهر ارومیه مراجعه داشتند پرسشنامه‌های مورد استفاده شامل مقیاس کیفیت زناشویی فرم تجدیدنظر شده باسبی و همکاران (RDAS) و پرسشنامه تعارضات زناشویی تجدیدنظر شده ثنایی و همکاران (MCQ-R) بود. پس از همتاسازی، آزمودنی ها در  دو گروه (آزمایش و کنترل) هر گروه 8 زوج گماشته شدند. سپس برای گروه آزمایشی 10جلسه روان درمانی با رویکرد بافت نگر انصاف محور  صورت گرفت و پیگیری پس از 3 ماه  انجام گرفت. برای تحلیل داده‌ها و فرضیه‌ها از روش آزمون آماری «تحلیل واریانس اندازه‌گیری مکرر» و نرم‌افزار SPSS استفاده گردید. یافته­ها: نتایج نشان داد، اثربخشی رویکرد درمانی بافت نگر انصاف محور بر افزایش «کیفیت زناشویی» و کاهش «تعارضات زناشویی» با گروه کنترل در سطح (001/0p<)  تفاوت معنادار وجود دارد  و اثربخشی درمان با گذشت زمان پایدار است. بنابراین می توان گفت در درازمدت حس عدالت و انصاف در رابطه منجر به بهبودی پایدار کارکردهای خانواده می گردد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The aim of the present study was to Comparison of the Effectiveness of Contextual Therapy fair- centered (CT) (based on Iván Böszörményi-Nagy) on the Marital Quality and Marital Conflict among couples. The statistical population consisted of all couples with marital conflict who referred to the clinic of Counseling and Psychological Services in Urmia in 2017-2018. The questionnaires included Bassby et al.'s Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS, and Sanai et al.'s revised marital conflict questionnaire(MCQ-R). In this study, applicants after matching divided into an experimental group (8 couples (and a control group (8 couple). Then, for the experimental group, 10 sessions were performed with Contextual Therapy and follow-up was performed 3 after months. To analyze the data and hypotheses, the statistical test method of "repeated measurement variance analysis" and SPSS software were used. The results showed that there is a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the effectiveness of the Contextual Therapy approach on increasing "marital quality " and reducing "marital conflict " with the control group and the effectiveness of therapeutic is steady over time. Therefore, it can be said that in the long run, a sense of justice and fairness in a relationship leads to a steady improvement in family functioning.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Long, L., & Yang, M. (2007). Counseling and treatment issues in couple. Translated by Ali Mohamad nazari, (2018). Tehran: Avaye Noor Publisher. [link]


2. Harper, C., & Snowden, M. (2017). Environment and society: Human perspectives on environmental issues: Taylor & Francis. [link]


3. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650-666. [link]


4. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (2013). Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy: Routledge. [link]


5. Doherty, W. J. (2020). Public policy and systemic family therapy for couples. The Handbook of Systemic Family Therapy, 3, 533-549. [link]


6. Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and family Therapy, 21(3), 289-308. [link]


7. Yousefi, N. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scales (RDAS). Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling, 1(2), 183. [persian]. [link]


8. sanai zaker, B., Barati, T., & Bustani, A. (2008). Famili and marriage scales. Besat Publications. [persian]. [link]


9. Hargrave, T. D., & Pfitzer, F. (2004). The new contextual therapy: Guiding the power of give and take: Routledge. [link]


10. Khojasteh Mehr, R., Ahmadi Ghozlojeh, A., Sodani, M., & Shirali Nia, K. (2015). The effectiveness of Fairness-based Contextual and brief integrative couples counseling on emotional intimacy and marital quality of couples. university of ahvaz.Department of Counseling, degree of Doctor of in Counseling. [persian]. [link]


11. Johnson, S. M., & Whiffen, V. E. (Eds.). (2003). Attachment processes in couple and family therapy. Guilford Press. [link]


12. Donovan, J. M. (1999). Short-term couples group psychotherapy: A tale of four fights. Guilford Press. [link]


13. Munsch, C. L. (2018). Correction:“Her Support, His Support: Money, Masculinity, and Marital Infidelity” American Sociological Review 80 (3): 469–95. American Sociological Review, 83(4), 833-838. [link]


14. Crowley, A. K. (2010). The relationship of adult attachment style and interactive conflict styles to marital satisfaction. Texas A & M University. [link]


15. Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work: A practical guide from the country's foremost relationship expert: Harmony. [link]


16. Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. Contemporary theories about the family: research-based theories/edited by Wesley R. Burr... [Et al.]. [link]


17. Bookwala, J. (2005). The role of marital quality in physical health during the mature years. Journal of aging and health, 17(1), 85-104. [link]


18. Perry, B. J. (2004). The relationship between equity and marital quality among Hispanics, African Americans and Caucasians. The Ohio State University. [link]


19. Lively, K. J., Steelman, L. C., & Powell, B. (2010). Equity, emotion, and household division of labor response. Social psychology quarterly, 73(4), 358-379. [link]


20. Feeney, J., Peterson, C., & Noller, P. (1994). Equity and marital satisfaction over the family life cycle. Personal Relationships, 1(1), 83-99. [link]

 

1. Eshaghi, M., Mohebbi, SF., Parvin, S., Mohammadi, F. (2013). Evaluating Social Factors Affecting Women's Divorce Request in Tehran. Women in Development & Politics. 1391(3):97. [link]


2. Grames, H. A., Miller, R. B., Robinson, W. D., Higgins, D. J., & Hinton, W. J. (2008). A test of contextual theory: The relationship among relational ethics, marital satisfaction, health problems, and depression. Contemporary Family Therapy, 30(4), 183-198. [link]


3. Bernstein, F. H., & Bernstein, M. B. (2003). Communication-Therapeutic Behavior from a Behavioral Perspective (Translated by Hamid Reza Sohrabi). [link]


4. Sprecher, S. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 599-613. [link]


5. Hagedoorn, M., Van Yperen, N. W., Coyne, J. C., van Jaarsveld, C. H., Ranchor, A. V., van Sonderen, E., & Sanderman, R. (2006). Does marriage protect older people from distress? The role of equity and recency of bereavement. Psychology and aging, 21(3), 611. [link]


6. Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2012). Family therapy: An overview Cengage learning. Translated by Hamid Reza Hossein Shahi Barvati, Siamak Naqshbandi and Elham Arjmand. (1389), Tenth edition, Tehran: Ravan Publishing. [Persian].[link]


7. Gangamma, R., Bartle‐Haring, S., & Glebova, T. (2012). A study of contextual therapy theory's relational ethics in couples in therapy. Family Relations, 61(5), 825-835. [link]


8. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. M. (1973). Loyalty. Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. [link]


9. Dankoski, M. E., & Deacon, S. A. (2000). Using a feminist lens in contextual therapy. Family process, 39(1), 51-66. . [link]


10. Mauldin, G. R. (2003). “Forgive and forget”: A case example of contextual marital therapy. The Family Journal, 11(2), 180-184. [link]


11. Altamirano, L. (2003). A brief contextual therapy model for treating complicated grief. [link]


12. Khojasteh Mehr, R., Sobhani joo, s., & Rajabi, g. (2014). direct and indirect effect of perspective- taking on marital quality: testing a mediation model.journal of psychology (tabriz university, 8(32). [link]


13. Jafari Nejad, L., Khojasteh Mehr, r., rajabi, G.(2012) The Effect of Gender Equality Ideology on Marital Coordination and Disharmony Mediated by the Perception of Fairness. Journal of Psychological Achievements. 12(2):159-76. [link]


14. Khojasteh Mehr, R., Koraei, A., Rajabi, G.(2010). A Study of a Proposed Model for Some Precedents and Outcomes of Forgiveness in Marriage. Modern psychological research. 2010; 4(16):155. [link]


15. Wilcox, W. B., & Nock, S. L. (2006). What's love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women's marital quality. Social forces, 84(3), 1321-1345. . [link]


16. Ghorbani k. rational treatment of couple’s therapy - emotional and behavioral Inconsistent and irrational thoughts counseling center in Isfahan. MSc Thesis University of Isfahan. 2005. [link]


17. Karantzas, G. C., Feeney, J. A., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Is less more? Confirmatory factor analysis of the Attachment Style Questionnaires. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(6), 749-780. [link]


18. Troxel, W. M. (2006). Marital quality, communal strength, and physical health. University of Pittsburgh. [link]


19. Johnson, M. D., Cohan, C. L., Davila, J., Lawrence, E., Rogge, R. D., Karney, B. R., ... & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 73(1), 15. [link]


20. Khojasteh Mehr, R.(2005) A study of personality traits, social skills, attachment styles and demographic characteristics as predictors of success and failure of marital relationship in divorced and normal couples in Ahvaz. PhD Thesis in Psychology. University of Shahid Chamran (Ahvaz). [link]


21. Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 228-237. [link]


22. Bahmani, M,. Fallahchaie, S,. Zareie, E.(2011) A Comparative Study of Marital Justice among Satisfied and Conflicting Couples in Bandar Abbas. Semi-annual Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 1(3):382-98. [link]


23. Mosavi, F., Eskandari, H., & Bagheri, F. (2018). Therapy and Emotion- focused therapy on Relationship Quality and Marital Satisfaction in betrayed Women in Tehran. 2, 6(6), 141-157. [persian]. [link]


24. 44. Ghanbari Hassanabadi, B,. Balandi, E.(2014). Comparing the effectiveness of group therapy of structural therapy with emotion-oriented therapy on perfectionism and defense styles of married women with fear of intimacy. Master Thesis 2014; Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad). [link]