شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در خشونت علیه زنان شهر اهواز

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه

سارا حیدری نژاد ¹ , عبدالرضا نواح ²

1 - کارشناس ارشد گروه جامعه‌شناسی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران
2 - دانشیار، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده اقتصاد، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1395/11/23 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/11/13 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/11/01

کلید واژه: حمایت اجتماعی, خشونت علیه زنان, دخالت خانواده‌ی مرد,

چکیده مقاله :

پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در خشونت علیه زنان شهر اهواز صورت گرفته است. داده‌های این تحقیق با روش پیمایش و با استفاده از پرسش­نامه­ی خودسنجی از نمونه‌ای با حجم 200 نفر از زنان متأهل مراجعه‌کننده به دستگاه قضایی به علت واقع شدن خشونت علیه آن‌ها توسط همسر خویش به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس جمع‌آوری شد. فرضیات از طریق ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، آزمون تی گروه‌های مستقل و رگرسیون چند متغیره آزمون گردیدند. روایی پرسش­نامه از طریق روایی صوری مورد سنجش قرار گرفت و پایایی آن از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شد. ضرایب به­دست آمده برای متغیرها 65/0 به­دست آمد که براین اساس می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که ابزار پژوهش ابزاری پایا و اعتمادپذیر بود. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که بین پذیرش اقتدار مرد در خانواده، جامعه‌پذیری جنسیتی، داشتن اقتدار و سلطه­ی مرد، اعتیاد شوهر، دخالت خانواده­ی مرد، نبود حمایت اجتماعی در خشونت علیه زنان رابطه­­ی معنی‌داری مشاهده شد. بنابراین هر چه پذیرش اقتدار مرد در خانواده، جامعه‌پذیری جنسیتیزنان، اقتدار و سلطه­ی مرد در خانواده، دخالت اطرافیان زن و مرد و نبود حمایت اجتماعی زنان افزایش یابد، خشونت علیه آن‌ها نیز افزایش می‌یابد. هم‌چنین خشونت علیه زنان در بین زنان دارای شوهر معتاد بیشتر از زنان دارای شوهر غیرمعتاد بوده است. از بین متغیرهای مستقل، به ترتیب بیشترین سهم را در میزان خشونت علیه زنان، پذیرش اقتدار مرد با (387/0= β)، دخالت خانواده مرد با (373/0=β)، اقتدار و سلطه­ی مردانه با (241/0 = β)، نبود حمایت اجتماعی با (224/0 = β) و جامعه‌پذیری جنسیتی با (223/0 = β) دارند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

This study aimed to Identification of effective factors on violence against women in Ahvaz city. The data of this study is to survey using self-report questionnaire of a sample size of 200 married women referred to the judiciary the real cause of violence against them by their spouse were collected by sampling. Assumptions through Pearson correlation coefficient, independent t-test and multivariate regression were tested. Its validity was assessed through validity and reliability through Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated. The coefficients obtained for the variables are 0.65, which can be concluded that the research tool was a reliable and reliable instrument. The results showed that the acceptance of male authority in the family, gender socialization, authority and male domination, addiction husband, male and family involvement, lack of social support in violence against women, a significant relationship was observed. Therefore, the greater the acceptance of male authority in the family, the gendered socialization of women, the authority and domination of the man in the family, the involvement of men and women around the community and the lack of social protection of women, violence against them also increases. Also, violence against women among women with addicted husbands has more than women with unmarried husbands, of the independent variables, the highest share was observed in the rate of violence against women, acceptance of male authority (β = 0.387), husband's interference with (β = 0.373), authority and male domination (β= 0.241), Lack of social protection with (β=0.224) and gender socialization with (β=0.223).

منابع و مأخذ:

-        Ahmedi, H., and Grosi, S. (2004). The effect of social and cultural factors on gender inequality in families and villages surrounding the city of Kerman. Journal of Women's Studies, 2 (6), 5-30. (Persian)

-        Azazi, Sh. (2001). Domestic violence, battered women. Tehran: Sally. (Persian)

-        Azazi, Sh. (2004). Domestic violence and social violence. Proceedings of Social Pathologies in Iran, 79-91. (Persian)

-        Azizian, R., Saroukhani, B., & Mahmodi, M. (2004). Violence against women: A study of underlying factors in Tehran forensic center 2001. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2 (3), 37-48. (Persian)

-        Bandura, A. (1992). Social learning theory. In F. Maher (Ed.). Shiraz: Rahgosha Press. (Persian)

-        Bgrzayy, P. (2003). Domestic violence against women study the effective causes in the family about the city of Ilam. M.A. Thesis Women's Studies, faculty of social sciences of Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran. (Persian)

-        Blood, R. and Wolf, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Westport, Connecticut, USA: Greenwood Press.

-        Darvishpoor, M. (1999). Why are men to encourage violence against women?. Women Magazine, 56. (Persian)

-        Dlazr, R., and Hossein Farahi. (2009). Suicide ideation and practice religious rites in patients with depression. Journal of Medical Sciences Ardabil, 9 (3), 224-234. (Persian)

-        Gelles, R. J. (1985). Familly violence. Annual review of Sociology, 11, 347-367.

-        Goode, W. (1971). Force and Violence in the Family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 624–636.

-        Lhastani, A., & Madani, Y. (2010). Husbands tendency to violence against wives (case study of Shiraz). Journal of Women and Society, 1, 1-24. (Persian)

-        Mohammadi, F., and Mirzaei, R. (2012). Social factors affecting violence against women (the city Rawansar). Journal of Social Studies, 6 (1), 1-29. (Persian)

-        Pournaghash Tehran, S. (2005). Investigate violence in Tehrani. Families Scholar Behavior, 18 (50), 36-23. (Persian)

-        Riahi, M.E., Lyvrdynya, A., and Bahrami kakavand, S. (2006). Sociological analysis the trend of divorce. Women's Research, 5 (3), 109-140. (Persian)

-        Ritzer, G. (2003). Jamh Shnasy theory in modern times. Tehran: Academic Press. (Persian)

-        Salarifar, M. R. (2009). Explaining the reasons and grounds of domestic violence. The Journal of Islamic Studies and Psychology Expert, 3 (4), 41-47. (Persian)

-        Shams Esfand Abad, H., & Emami Pour, S. (2003). Surveying the prevalence of spouse abuse and its effective factors. Woman in Development and Politics, 1(5), 59-82. (Persian)

-        Sothy, E. (2010). Domestic violence against women in Cambodia: Husbands control Frequency of spousal discussion and domestic violence reported by Cambodian women, FAM, 25, 237-246.

-        Wallace, C. and Abbott, P. (2001). Women Sociology. In  M. Najm Iraq (Ed.). Tehran: Ney Press. (Persian)

-        WHO (World Health Organization). (1997). Violence against women information pack: A priority health issue. Available at: URL http:// www.who.int/frh whd/Vaw/info

-        Yazdkhasti, B., and Shiri, H. (2008). Values of patriarchy and violence against women. Women's Studies, 6 (3), 79-55. (Persian)

-        Youngblade, L.M., Theokas, C., Schulenberg, J., Curry, L., Huang, I.C., Novack, M. (2007). Risk and promotive factors in families, schools, and com-munities: A contextual model of positive youth development in adolescence. Pediatrics, 119, 47–53.