بررسی انواع همسر آزاری در مناطق شهری و روستایی استان اردبیل و عوامل مؤثر بر آن
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه
1 - استادیار جامعه شناسی دانشگاه آیت الله العظمی بروجردی.
کلید واژه: استان اردبیل, همسرآزاری, پرسش‌نامه حاج یحیی, تحلیل رگرسیون چند متغیره,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش به بررسی انواع همسرآزاری در مناطق شهری و روستایی استان اردبیل و عوامل مؤثر بر آن در تابستان و پاییز 1394 شمسی با استفاده از روش پیمایش پرداخته‌است. نمونه‌های مورد مطالعه 1100 نفر از زنان مناطق شهری و روستایی استان اردبیل بودند که با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای انتخاب شده‌بودند. بمنظور سنجش همسرآزاری از پرسش‌نامه استاندارد حاج یحیی که برای نخستین‌بار در سال 2000 میلادی در فلسطین اجرا شده‌بود، به عنوان ابزار سنجش استفاده گردید.گردآوری داده‌های پاسخگویان از راه مراجعه مستقیم پرسشگران زبده به صورت مصاحبه انجام شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان دادند؛ همسر آزاری در استان اردبیل به مقدار 6/29 درصد بوده‌است که در این بین، همسرآزاری مالی با 2/33 درصد بیش‌ترین نوع همسرآزاری و همسرآزاری فیزیکی با 2/27 درصد کم‌ترین نوع همسرآزاری بوده‌است، مقدار همسرآزاری روانی حدود 29 درصد و همسرآزاری جنسی حدود 2/29درصد در سطح استان محاسبه شد. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر همسر آزاری، نشان دادند متغیرهای مستقل؛ دخالت خویشاوندان در زندگی زوجین، تحریک شوهر از سوی همسر، اعتماد بین زوجین و یادگیری خشونت در خانواده مبدأ به ترتیب بیش‌ترین نقش را در همسر آزاری داشته‌اند.
The present study investigates wife abuse and its affecting factors in urban and rural areas of Ardebil province in 2016 via survey study. The sample size included 1100 women selected from urban and rural areas of Ardabil province by using stratified sampling. In order to measure wife abuse the Haj Yahy wife abuse standard questionnaire implemented in 2000 in Palestine as a measurement tool for the first time was used. Answers were collected through direct interviewees and questionnaires. The results showed that the amount of wife abuse in all areas of Ardabil province was 29.6 percent. Investigating the aspects of wife abuse, identified that financial abuse with 33.2 percent was the most of wife abuse and physical abuse with 27.2 percent, was the lowest ones. Psychological wife abuse in this study, approximately 29 percent and sexual abuse is estimated around 29.2 percent. Regression analysis of affecting factors of wife abuse showed, the independent variables such as; involvement of families, Irritation to the husband, trust between couples and learning violence in the origin family leads to a change the amount of wife abuse respectively. The independent variables explained 50 percent of variance of dependent variable.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory, New York: General Learning Press.
- Bhaswati, D. Deepshikha, T. (2011). Women’s decision-making play an important role in determining her reproductive health and fertility behavior,Journal of Social Change, University of New Dehli, Vol 41, PP 233-249.
- Bradshaw, S. (2013). Women’s decision-making in rural and urban households in Nicaragua, Environment and Urbanization, London.
- Cooney Rosemary, S. (1987). Decision Making in intergenerational puetrican families, journal of marriage & the family, Vol 44, pp: 621-631.
- Dobash, R.E, Dobash, R. P. (1978). Violence against wives. New York: Free Press.
- Fisher,C. & et al. (2007). Health a difficult beast: The interrelation ships between domestic violence, women health and health sector an Australian case study. Social Science & Medicine.65.1742-1750.
- Ezazi, Sh. (2004). Investigation Iran social problems,Tehran, Payamenoor Press.(Persian)
- Ezazi, Sh. (2004). Sociology of family with emphasizing on role structure & function of family in contemporary era. Tehran, Roshangaran Press.(Persian)
- Enayat, H. & Dastranj, M. (2010). The study of power structure in Lar city families, Journal of women research, Vol8, NO1, P107-124.(Persian)
- Field, J. (2009). Social Capital, Translated by gholamabbastavasolli, Tehran, Kavir Press.(Persian)
- Garousi, S. (2009). The study of power structure in Lar city families, Journal of women research,Vol6, No2, P7-25.(Persian)
- Gelles, R.J. (1985). Family Violence" Annual review of sociology,(11)347-367.
- Good ,W.,J (1971). Force & Violence in the Family. Journal of Marriage and the family,vol.3.No, 4.
- Hassan, M. (2010). women abuse, M.A Dissertation, Tehran university.(Persian)
- Kane, T. Staiger, Pk. Ricciardelli, La. (2000). Male Domestic Violence Attitudes, Aggression, and Interpersonal Dependency. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 15(1) 16-29.
- Kim,J.et al (2009). The Incidence and Impact of Family Violence on Mental Health among South Korean Women. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 24.193-202.
- Mansourfar, K. (2006). Statistical Methods, Tehran university Press.(Persian)
- Margolin ,G. Richard, S. Foo, J. Foo, L. (1998). Interactive and unique risk factor for husbands emotional and physical abuse of their wives. Journal of Family Violence. 13(4)315-344.
- Mirrless, C. (1999). Domestic violence : findings from a New British crime survey self-completion questionnaire. London: Home Office research studies.
- Mohammahkhani, P. Mohammadi, M.R. Rezaiidogaheh, E. & Azadmehr, H. (2006). Physiological Pathology & personal and relationship problems of men who did family Violence, Iranian Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases,Vol7,No4.(Persian)
- Mohebi, F. (2001). Violence against women. Journal of women sociocultural association, Vol14,p6-19.(Persian)
- Nazparvar, B. (2002). Wife abuse, Journal of women research, women studies & research center,Vol3, p45-66.(Persian)
- Pamela, A. Wallace, C. (2004). An introduction to sociology: feminist perspectives, Translated by manizhehnajmeeraghi, Tehran, Ney Press.(Persian)
- Putnam, R. (2005). Social Capital, trust ,democracy & Development, Translated by kiantajbakhsh,Tehran,Shirazeh Press.(Persian)
- Reid, S. Titus. (2000). " Crime and Criminology", U.S.A.: McGraw- Hill.-Saroukhani B. (1999) "Violence in Iranian Family", InternationalConference Violence in Family (2000) World Health Organization2002,World Report On Violence and Health.
- Reyahi, M.E. (2007). Sociological Analyses of attitudes toward divorce, Journal of women research, Vol5, No3, P109-140.(Persian)
- Ritzer, G. (2008). Sociology Theory in contemporary era, Translated by mohsensolasi, Tehran, Elmi Press.(Persian)
- Romito, P. Molzanturan, J. & Marchi, M. (2005). The impact of current and past interpersonal violence on womans mental health. Social Science & Medicine.60.1717-1727.
- Segal, U. (1999). Family violence: A focus on India. Aggression and Violent Behavior.2.213-231.
- Rubington, E. & Weinberg, M. (2007). Seventh theoretical approaches to social issues, Translated by rahmatollahsedighesarvestani, Tehran university Press. (Persian)
- Saroukhani, B. (2007). Research Methods in Human sciences , Tehran university Press.(Persian)
- Sparks, L. (2009). Family Decision – Making, University of Chapman press.
- Srinivasan, K. (2009). Social Networks and Decision – Making:Women’s Participation in Household Decisions, NewwDehli, India: Radiant.
- Straus, M. Gelles, R. & Steinmetz, S. (2006). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in The American Family,Anchor Press.
- Straus, M. .(1980). Stress and child abuse. In C. H .kempe and R.E Helfer ( E d ). The battered child. Chicago,I l : university of Chicago press.
- Werner, E. et al. (1985). Dominance in Marital Decision making in women’s librration& Non liberayion families, Jornal of Marriage & the family, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 223 – 233.
_||_