نقش ساختار شهری مطلوب در تحقق و توسعه ی شهر دانش (مطالعه ی موردی: شهر بندرعباس)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی پژوهش و برنامه ریزی شهری

مارال زمانی راد ¹ , نوید سعیدی رضوانی ² , ایرج قاسمی ³

1 - گروه شهرسازی، واحد بین المللی کیش، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، جزیره کیش، ایران.
2 - گروه شهرسازی، واحد بین المللی کیش، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، جزیره کیش، ایران.
3 - گروه مدیریت برنامهریزی شهری و منطقهای، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی جهاد دانشگاهی، تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/05/07 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/04/13 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/05/01

کلید واژه: ساختار شهری, شهر دانش, کارکنان دانش, اقتصاد جهانی, بندرعباس,

چکیده مقاله :

رویکرد جدید توسعه شهری مبتنی بر دانش بر چهار جنبه‌ی کلیدی اقتصادی، محیطی، سازمانی و اجتماعی- فرهنگی تمرکز یکپارچه دارد به طوریکه ظهور اقتصاد مبتنی بر دانش به عنوان عامل اصلی توسعه‌ی اقتصاد جهانی و محلی به حساب می‌آید. از این رو هدف این پژوهش نقش ساختار شهری مطلوب در تحقق و توسعه‌ی شهر دانش بندرعباس با روش توصیفی- تحلیلی و سنجش کمی (پرسشنامه) و با بهره‌گیری از آزمون مقایسه زوجی، T و فریدمن می‌باشد. جامعه آماری تحقیق، کارکنان دانش در 55 مرکز رشد و فناوری بندرعباس می‌باشند، که مجموعاً 258 نفر کل جامعه می‌باشد. نتایج حاکی از آن است که با استفاده از مقایسه‌ی وضع موجود شهر بندرعباس و شهر دانش مطلوب توسط نمودار عنکبوتی، مشخص شد شهر بندرعباس از لحاظ شاخص‌های شهر دانش تفاوت‌هایی با ایده‌آل دارد و بیشترین اختلاف مربوط به شاخص ساختار شهری است و نتایج حاصل از آزمون‌ T نشان می‌دهد که از بین اصول شهر دانش، میانگین اهمیت شاخص ساختار شهری با 2.95 دارای بیشترین مقدار، زیرساخت های شهری با مقدار 2.90 و اشتراک گذاری دانش با 2.71 و اهمیت فناوری و اطلاعات با مقدار 1.90 به ترتیب دارای مقدار میانگین بیشتری هستند. همچنین مقایسه میانگین رتبه‌ها نشان می‌دهد که بالاترین میانگین رتبه به ساختار شهری با مقدار 3.88 اختصاص دارد که بدین معناست که مهم ترین شاخص موثر در جذب کارکنان دانش در شهر بندرعباس از نظر طبقه‌ی خلاق، ساختار شهری مطلوب است. بنابراین به منظور حفظ کارکنان دانش در شهر بندرعباس و با توجه به پایین بودن میانگین رتبه ای محیط دانش محور، امنیت دانش محور و دولت دانش محور باید این سه مورد در دستور کار مسئولین شهری، نخبگان و مردم قرار گیرد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The new approach to knowledge-based urban development focuses on four key economic, environmental, organizational and socio-cultural aspects, so that the emergence of knowledge-based economy is considered as the main factor in the development of global and local economies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is the role of the desired urban structure in the realization and development of the city of knowledge in Bandar Abbas by descriptive-analytical method and quantitative measurement (questionnaire) and using the pairwise comparison test, T and Friedman. The statistical population of the study is knowledge staff in 55 growth and technology centers of Bandar Abbas, which is a total of 258 people in the whole community. The results show that by comparing the current situation of Bandar Abbas and the city of knowledge with the spider diagram, it was found that Bandar Abbas has differences with the ideal in terms of indicators of the city of knowledge and the biggest difference is related to the structure index. It is urban and the results of the T test show that among the principles of the city of knowledge, the average importance of the urban structure index with 2.95 has the highest value, urban infrastructure with 2.90 and knowledge sharing with 2.71 and the importance of technology and information with 1.90 have a higher average value, respectively. Also, the comparison of the average rankings shows that the highest average rank is allocated to the urban structure with a value of 3.88, which means that the most important effective indicator in attracting knowledge staff in Bandar Abbas in terms of creative class is the desirable urban structure. Therefore, in order to retain knowledge workers in Bandar Abbas and due to the low average rank of knowledge-based environment, knowledge-based security and knowledge-based government, these three items should be on the agenda of city officials, elites and people.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Poor Ramadan, J., Poor Hossein Roshan, H., Ali Akbari, S. (2016). Knowledge-based city: The strategy of future development of Zanjan city as a sustainable and creative city. Environmental Management Quarterly, No. 35, pp: 171-192.


2. Jomehpoor, M., Isa Lu, S., Goodarzi, V., Dosti Sabzi, B. (2015). Development of urban development strategies with knowledge-based development approach (Case study: Arak Industrial City). Journal of Urban Economics and Management, No. 5, pp: 53-65.


3. Kharazmi, O. A. (2014). Investigating the role of science and technology park and the factors affecting it in the development of knowledge city) with emphasis on Mashhad metropolis (7th National Conference and the first International Conference on Knowledge Management, Shahid Beheshti International Conference Center, Tehran.


4. Kharazmi, O. A., Nedayi, A. (2013). Evaluation of Innovation Infrastructures in Iran: A Case Study of Growth Centers in Mashhad. Journal of Geographical Studies of Dry Areas, pp: 103-127.


5. Saeedi Rezvani, N. (2016). Verification of definitions and criteria of science and technology corridors, scientific policy research center of the country.


6. Abedini, A., Khalili, A., Khorram, F., Ghorbani, Sh. (2020), Feasibility study of implementing a knowledge-based city in Tabriz metropolis with a knowledge-based development approach, studies of urban structure and function, seventh year, number twenty-four , pp: 175-155.


7. Mortazavi, F. (2011). Investigating the characteristics of Daneshbanian city of Tehran based on attracting and retaining knowledge staff. Master Thesis, University of Tehran, Faculty of Management.


8. Meshkini, A., Hatami Nejad, H., Mahdenjad, H. (2014). Creative city (a new model for the development of knowledge-based in the field of urban management), Arad Ketab Publishing, Tehran, pp: 89-96.


9. Momeni, M. (2008). Analysis of statistical data using SPSS, Tehran: New Book.


10. Naseri, A., Ghavamifar, A. (2011). Presenting a coherent methodology and model for creating and developing knowledge-based cities. The first international conference of electronic city.


11. Homafar, M., Pourjafar, M. R., Saeedi Rezvani, N. (2017). Analysis of the spatial distribution pattern of knowledge-based activities in Tehran. Journal of Urban Economics and Management, No. 6, pp: 57-75.


12. Baum, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Horton, S., Velibeyoglu, K., Gleeson, B. (2006) The Role of Community and Lifestyle in the Making of a Knowledge City. Report, Griffith University, Brisbane.


13. Berg, L. van den, Pol, P.M.J., Winden, W. van & Woets, P. 2005. European cities in the knowledge economy. Aldershot, England, Ashgate Publishing limites. pp:80-120.


14. Bulu, M., Onder,M., Aksakalli,V. (2014). Algorithm-embedded IT applications for an emerging knowledge city: Istanbul, Turkey, Expert Systems with Applications, 41, pp: 5625–5635.


15. Carrillo, F. J. (2014). Capital cities: a taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities, Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), pp:28-46.


16. Chatzkel, J. (2004). Greater phoenix as a knowledge capital . Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), pp: 28-46.


17. Chica, J. E. (2016). Spatial clustering of knowledge-based industries in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), pp: 320-328.


18. Cigu Elenaa, C. (2015).The making of knowledge cities in Romania, Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, pp: 534 – 541.


19. Durmaz, B., Yigitcanlar, T., Velibeyoglu, K. (2008). Creative cities and the film industry: Antalya’s transition to a Eurasian film centre, The open Urban Studies Journal, 1(1), pp: 1-10.


20. Edvardsson, I. R., Yigitcanlar, T., Pancholi, S. (2016). Knowledge city research and practice under the microscope: a review of empirical findings, Journal of Knowledge Management Research & Practice, pp: 75-93.


21. Edvinsson, L., Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital, European Management Journal, Volume 14, pp: 356-364.


22. Ergazakis, K, Metaxiotis, K., Psarras, J. (2006) Knowledge cities: the answer to the needs of knowledge-based development. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 36(1), pp: 67–81.


23. Ergazakis, K., Metaxiotis, K., Psarras, J. (2004). Towards knowledge cities: conceptual analysis and success stories, Journal of knowledge management, pp: 5-15.


24. Farhangi, M. (2013). Moving Esfahan forward in kowledge based urban development: the opportunities and constraints, Proceedings of the 6th Knowledge Cities World Summit, Istanbul: Lookus Scientific, pp: 92-100.


25. Florida, R.(2005) The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. Harper Collins, London.


26. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, Basic Books, New York.


27. Gabe, T., Abel, J., Ross, A., Stolarick, K. (2012). Knowledge in cities. Urban Studies, 49(6), pp: 1179–1200.


28. Knight, R. (1995). Knowledge-based development: policy and planning implications for cities, Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp: 225–260.


29. Kozak, M. (2011). Strategic approach to intellectual capital development in regions, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital , pp: 76–93.


30. Lonnqvist, A., Kapyla, J., Salonius, H., Yigitcanlar, T. (2014). Knowledge that matters: identifying regional knowledge assets of Tampere Region. European Planning Studies, 9, pp: 2011-2029.


31. Mellander, ch., Florida, R. (2006). The Crative Class or Human Capital? Explaning Regional Development in Sweden, preprint.


32. Metaxiotis, K,. Ergazakis, K. (2004). Exploring Paths toward Knowledge Cities Developments: A Research Agenda, chapter 8.14.


33. Metaxiotis, K., Ergazakis, K. (2011). Formulating integrated knowledge city development strategies: the KnowCis 2.0 methodology, Journal of Knowledge Management Research & Practice.


34. Metin, S., Korten, F. G. (2015). ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED URBAN DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF TURKISH PROVINCES, The 8th Knowledge Cities World Summit, South Korea.


35. Penco, L. (2013). The Development of the Successful City in the Knowledge Economy: Toward the Dual Role of Consumer Hub and Knowledge Hub, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.


36. Ruiz, V., Navarro, J., Pena, D. (2014). Knowledge-city index construction: An intellectual capital perspective, Expert Systems


37. Sarimin, M., Yigitcanlar, T. (2012). Towards a comprehensive and integrated knowledge-based urban development model: status quo and directions, Journal of Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development.


38. Wang, X., Lihua, R. (2006). Examining knowledge management factors in the creation of new city: Empirical evidence from Zhengdong New District, Zhengzhou, China, Journal of Technology Management In China 1(3), pp: 241-263.


39. Yigitcanlar, T. (2007) The making of urban spaces for the knowledge economy: global practices. In Knowledge Cities: Future of Cities in the Knowledge Economy, I Al-Furaih, A Sahab, A Hayajneh, A Abdullah, M Thalha and M Ibrahim (eds.), pp: 73–97.


40. Yigitcanlar, T. (2009). Planning for knowledge-based urban development: global perspectives, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(5), pp: 228-242.


41. Yigitcanlar, T. (2010). Making space end place for the knowledge economy: Knowledge-based development of Australian cities. European Planning Studies, 18(11), pp: 178-196.


42. Yigitcanlar, T. (2011). Position paper: Redefining knowledge-based urban development. International Journal of Knowledge Based Development, 2(4), pp: 340–356.


43. Yigitcanlar, T., Martinez-Fernandez, C. (2007) Making space and place for knowledge production: knowledge precinct developments in Australia. In State of Australian Cities Conference, November 2007, University of South Australia. Adelaide, Australia, pp: 28-30.


44. Yigitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K., Westerman, C. (2008). The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience. Cities , Vol. 25, No. 2, pp: 63-72.


45. Yigitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K., Westerman, C. (2008). The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience. Cities, 25(2), pp: 63–72.