Relationship between parenting styles, identity styles and students’ internet addiction in Kerman University of Medical Sciences
محورهای موضوعی : Report of Health CareMohammad Ghaderi Rammazi 1 , Ali Mehdizadeh Zare Anari 2 , Hamidreza Dehghan 3 , Vahid Najafi 4
1 - MA in General Psychology, Department of Educational Science, Farhangian University, Kerman, Iran
2 - Psychiatrist, Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences,
Kerman, Iran
3 - MA in General Psychology, Department of psychology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran
4 - MA in Family Counseling, Department of Counseling, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch, Marvdasht, Iran
کلید واژه: parenting styles, Identity Styles, internet addiction,
چکیده مقاله :
Introduction: Improper use of the internet and its subsequent effects has recently started to be considered as an important issue. Students are among the most vulnerable groups regarding this phenomenon. Although internet addiction can be related to different parenting styles, but the use of internet provides an opportunity to seek individual’s identity. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between parenting styles, identity styles and students’ internet addiction in Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: In this descriptive correlational type of research, the study population included all students who were addicted to the internet at Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2014. The research sample consisted of 375 subjects selected through multi-stage cluster sampling method. All participants completed the questionnaires on internet addiction, parenting and identity styles.
Results: Findings showed that among different identity styles, there was a negative correlation between informational identity style and internet addiction. Moreover, there was a positive significant correlation between diffuse/avoidant identity style and internet addiction. Concerning different parenting styles, we could observe a positive significant correlation between permissive parenting style and internet addiction, while there was a negative significant correlation between authoritative parenting style and internet addiction. Additionally, regression analysis results illustrated that students’ internet addiction level could be predicted regarding their identity styles and their parents’ parenting styles.
Conclusion: It seems that applying proper parenting styles and providing the requirements of successful identity achievement can lower the incidence of internet addiction.
1. Demetrovics Z, Szeredi B, Rózsa S. The three-factor model of Internet addiction: the development of the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40(2): 563-74.
2. Khosrojerdi M, Mirzayie SA. The study of determining indices and criteria of citizen’s satisfaction with urban public spaces. Strategy 2009; 53(18): 213-25. [In Persian].
3. Xu J, Shen LX, Yan CH, Hu H, Yang F, Wang L, et al. Personal characteristics related to the risk of adolescent internet addiction: a survey in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 1106.
4. Christakis DA, Moreno MM, Jelenchick L, Myaing MT, Zhou C. Problematic internet usage in US college students: a pilot study. BMC Med 2011; 9: 77.
5. Cao H, Sun Y, Wan Y, Hao J, Tao F. Problematic Internet use in Chinese adolescents and its relation to psychosomatic symptoms and life satisfaction. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 802.
6. Kalaitzaki AE, Birtchnell J. The impact of early parenting bonding on young adults’ Internet addiction, through the mediation effects of negative relating to others and sadness. Addict Behav 2014; 39(3): 733-6.
7. Shek DT, Tang VM, Lo C. Internet addiction in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: assessment, profiles, and psychosocial correlates. Sci World J 2008; 8: 776-87.
8. Moiedfar S, Habib Poor K, Ganji A. Internet addiction, causes and consequences. Media Journal 2005; 63: 39-68. [In Persian].
9. Weinstein AM. Computer and video game addiction-a comparison between game users and non-game users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2010; 36(5): 268-76.
10. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Atwi K, Zullino D, Khan R, Billieux J. Arabic validation of the compulsive Internet use scale (CIUS). Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2011; 6: 32.
11. Mazalin D, Moore S. Internet use, identity development and social anxiety among young adults. Behav Change 2004; 21(2): 90-102.
12. Kormas G, Critselis E, Janikian M, Kafetzis D, Tsitsika A. Risk factors and psychosocial characteristics of potential problematic and problematic internet use among adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 595.
13. Berzonsky MD. Identity processing style, self-construction, and personal epistemic assumptions: a social-cognitive perspective. Eur J Dev Psychol 2004; 1(4): 303-15.
14. Berzonsky MD. Identity formation: The role of identity processing style and cognitive processes. Pers Individ Dif 2008; 44(3): 645-55.
15. Adams GR, Berzonsky M. Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
16. Khajehpour M, Attar H. A comparison of child rearing practices with identity styles and their relationship among students of both sexes of pre-university level in Shiraz. Journal of Education and Training 2009; 8(1): 1-27. [In Persian].
17. Abdolmaleki F. Investigating of Structural Equations Between Users’ Personality and Their Identity Style [dissertation]. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University; 2007. [In Persian].
18. Ramazani A. Comparison of Identity Style Between Students Are Using Satellite and Internet with Non-user Students. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Rode branch; 2002. [In Persian].
19. Soltanifar M. Investigating the Relationship Between Students’ Identity Status and Religious Believes in Quem City. Tehran: Tarbyate Moallem University; 2004. [In Persian].
20. Rahimirad A. Generating and Validating the Identity Base Questionnaire in Students of Quem University and Comparison of Identity Base between Students. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaie University; 2004. [In Persian].
21. Fathi M, Sohrabi F, Saidian M. Comparison of the characteristics and identity style of internet addicts and non-addicts students. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences 2013; 11(2): 90-9. [In Persian].
22. Bagheri H. Internet addiction and identity status in students. Journal of School Counselor 2011; 7(25): 16-24. [In Persian].
23. Pourebrahim T, Heydari J, Khoshkonesh A. Relationships among parenting styles, identity and job tendency in adolescents. Quarterly Journal of Career & Organizational Counseling 2011; 3(8): 11-24. [In Persian].
24. Babapourkh J, Esmaeili A B, Gholamzadeh M, Mohammadpour V. The relationship between parenting styles and identity styles among adolescents.The First International & 4th National Congress on health Education & Promotion; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran; 2001. [In Persian].
25. Sandi F, Salehi E, Kafi M, Rezaie S. relationship of perceived parenting style and identity style with self-esteem in female high school students. Quarterly Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling (Studies in Education & Psychology) 2011; 2(2): 41-56. [In Persian].
26. Zeinali A, Vahdat R. The relationship between parenting style and addiction susceptibility in children. Family Research 2010; 6(3): 335-52. [In Persian].
27. Rabiyifar A, Zare E, Tardast N, Jaefaepoor A, Chelbeyanloo G. Parenting styles and dependence to the Internet. Contemporary Psychology 2013; 7(Suppl): 1365-9. [In Persian].
28. Lau WW, Yuen AH. Adolescents’ risky online behaviours: the influence of gender, religion, and parenting style. Comput Human Behav 2013; 29(6): 2690-6.
29. Farahmand M. Girls and the use of internet. Quarterly Women’s Strategic Studies 2008; 11(41): 135-70. [In Persian].
30. Buri JR. Parental authority questionnaire. J Pers Assess 1991; 57(1): 110-9.
31. Mehrafrooz H. Investigating the relationship between attitudes toward mothers’ parenting styles with locus of control and male students’ academic achievement. Tehran: Tarbyate Moallem University; 2008. [In Persian].
32. Alavi S. Investigating the psychometric characteristics of IAT questionnaire in student users of Isfahan city. Iran: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; 2009. [In Persian].
33. Kirmayer LJ, Raikhel E, Rahimi S. Cultures of the Internet: Identity, community and mental health. Transcultural Psychiatry 2013; 50(2): 165-91.
34. Kadivar P. Educational Psychology. 2nd ed. Tehran: Samt Publication; 2013. [In Persian].
35. Leung L, Lee PS. The influences of information literacy, internet addiction and parenting styles on internet risks. New Media & Society 2012; 14(1): 117-36.
36. Zarei E. Relationship between parent child– rearing practices and high risk behavior on basis of cloninger’s scale. Journal of Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 2010; 18(3): 220-4. [In Persian].
37. Berk LE. Development through the lifespan. 4th ed. Boston, Ma: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
38. Laboviti B. Relations between the Parenting Styles and Identity Status of Teenagers in Albanian Context. Journal of Educational and Social Research 2015; 5(1): 65.
39. Vaala SE, Bleakley A. Monitoring, Mediating, and Modeling: Parental Influence on Adolescent Computer and Internet Use in the United States. J Child Media 2015; 9(1): 40-57.
