تبیین علّی معنای زندگی براساس ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، باورهای ضمنی هوش و انطباق‌پذیری

محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافی

نجمه نصیری ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی تربیتی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.)
مریم کورش نیا ² (استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.)
مجید برزگر ³ (استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.)
نادره سهرابی ⁴ (استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/07/08 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/09/08 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/08/01

کلید واژه: معنای زندگی, ویژگی‏های شخصیتی, باورهای ضمنی هوش, انطباق‏پذیری,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه: این پژوهش با هدف بررسی نقش واسطه‏ گری انطباق ‏پذیری در رابطه ‏ی بین ویژگی‏های شخصیتی و باورهای ضمنی هوش با معنای زندگی صورت گرفت.
روش: این پژوهش از نوع همبستگی در قالب مدل معادلات ساختاری ارائه شده است. جامعه‌ی پژوهش دربرگیرنده‏ی دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی شهر شیراز بود. از جامعه‎ آماری مذکور 315 دانش‌آموز دختر (170) و پسر (145) پایه دهم و یازدهم دبیرستان در سال تحصیلی 99-1398 به روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. آنان به پرسش‌نامه‏ معنای زندگی (استگر و همکاران، 2006)، مقیاس انطباق‌پذیری (مارتین و همکاران، 2012)، مقیاس باورهای ضمنی هوش (عبدالفتاح و ییتس، 2006)، سیاهه شخصیتی نئو (کاستا و مک‌کری، 1985) پاسخ دادند.
یافته‎ها: در بخش‏ یافته‏ها نیز مشخص شد که ویژگی‏های شخصیتی از راه انطباق ‏پذیری بر معنای زندگی اثر دارد. افزون بر این، نشان داده شد که باور به افزایشی و ذاتی بودن هوش بر معنای زندگی از راه انطباق ‏پذیری اثر معنادار دارد.
نتیجه‎گیری: زمانی که در نهادهای آموزشی و تربیتی به ویژگی‏های شخصیتی، باورهای ضمنی هوش توجه ویژه شود سازگاری افراد افزایش پیدا می‏کند و آنان را برای موفقیت جنبه‏ های گوناگون زندگی بالاخص معنای زندگی آماده می‏سازد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction:
The aim of this study was to investigate the mediating role of adaptability in the relationship between personality traits and implicit beliefs of intelligence with the meaning of life.
Method:
This correlational research is presented in the form of structural equation model. The research population included high school students in Shiraz. From the mentioned statistical population, 315 female (170) and male (145) students of 10th and 11th grade of high school in the academic year of 2019-2020 were examined by accidental sampling method. They are responded the Estger et al Meaning of Life Questionnaire, the Martin et al Adaptability Scale,  the Abdel Fattah and Yates Implicit Beliefs Intelligence Scale, and the Costa and McCurry Neo Personality Inventory.
Results:
In the findings section, it was found that personality traits affect the meaning of life through adaptability. In addition, it was shown that the belief in the incremental nature of intelligence has a significant effect on the meaning of life through adaptability.
Conclusion:
When special attention is paid to personality traits, implicit beliefs of intelligence in educational institutions, people's adaptation increases and prepares them for success in various aspects of life, especially the meaning of life.

منابع و مأخذ:

1- Heintzelman SJ, Mohideen F, Oishi S, King LA. Lay beliefs about meaning in life: Examinations across targets, time, and countries. Journal of Research in Personality. 2020 Oct 1;88:104003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104003

2- Fischer IC, Shanahan ML, Hirsh AT, Stewart JC, Rand KL. The relationship between meaning in life and post-traumatic stress symptoms in US military personnel: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020 Dec 1;277:658-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.063

3- Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of counseling psychology. 2006 Jan;53(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80

4- Garcini LM, Short M, Norwood WD. Affective and motivational predictors of perceived meaning in life among college students. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being. 2013;1(2):47-60. https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:A7rlXmbxje8J:scholar.google.com/+Affective+and+motivational+predictors+of+perceived+meaning+in+life+among&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5

5- Liem GA, Martin AJ. Young people’s responses to environmental issues: Exploring the roles of adaptability and personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015 Jun 1;79:91-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.003

6- Martin AJ, Nejad HG, Colmar S, Liem GA. Adaptability: How students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their academic and non-academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013 Aug;105(3):728. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032794

7- Gray DL. Is psychological membership in the classroom a function of standing out while fitting in? Implications for achievement motivation and emotions. Journal of school psychology. 2017 Apr 1;61:103-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.02.001

8- Schultz DP, Schultz SE. Theories of Personality Hardcover. National Library of Australia, 2008.

9- Hengartner MP, van der Linden D, Bohleber L, von Wyl A. Big five personality traits and the general factor of personality as moderators of stress and coping reactions following an emergency alarm on a Swiss University Campus. Stress and Health. 2017 Feb;33(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2671

10- Poladi Bagh Bardani MA. Presenting a structural model of the relationship between implicit intelligence beliefs and motivational beliefs with students' academic adjustment: the mediating role of academic self-handicapping and future orientation. Ph.D. Thesis. kharazmi University. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2019. [in Persian].

11- Molden DC, Dweck CS. Finding" meaning" in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American psychologist. 2006 Apr;61(3):192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192

12- Beck AT, editor. Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford press; 1979.

13- Ghaderi F, Namdari K, Ghobadi S, Shokroolahi M. The structural relationship of meaning in life, personal growth initiative, life orientation and wisdom with authentic personality in students. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry 2019; 6 (5) :55-71. [in Persian]. 10.29252/shenakht.6.5.55

14- Izadi N, Poorkiani M, Beyg zadeh Abbasi F, Sheikhi A. Intercultural Adaptation Functions on Personality Characteristics and Job Performance (Case Study: Employees of Tehran Oil Refining Company). Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 2018; 9(35): 163-185. [in Persian].  20.1001.1.22286853.1397.9.35.7.0

15- Jovanović V. Adolescent life satisfaction: The role of negative life events and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019 Dec 1;151:109548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109548

16- Hamzehnejhad F, Hassaniraad M. Studying the relationship between intelligence beliefs and academic performance of students with learning difficulties. Empowering Exceptional Children, 2019; 10(1): 116-124. [in Persian]. 10.22034/ceciranj.2019.91937

17- Ghanbaritalab M, Shekholeslami R, Foladghang M, Hoseinchari M. Relationship Between Intelligence Beliefs and School well- being: The Meditating Role of Hope Emotion. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 2018; 6(11): 95-115. [in Persian]. 20.1001.1.24237906.1397.6.11.5.6

18- Nikdel, F., Kohestani, Z. The Mediating Role of Intellectual Beliefs on the Effect of Family Communication Patterns on Academic Self- handicapping. New Educational Approaches, 2017; 12(1): 130-151. [in Persian]. 10.22108/nea.2017.21755

19- Reihani MB, Sharifi M, Derakhshan M, Shafee M, Alizadeh M, Zarei R. Intelligence Beliefs and Academic Engagement: Mediating Role of Social Cognition. Educational Psychology, 2017; 13(46): 31-48. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22054/jep.2018.8475

20- Bergold S, Steinmayr R. The relation over time between achievement motivation and intelligence in young elementary school children: A latent cross-lagged analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2016 Jul 1;46:228-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.06.005

21- Snyder KE, Malin JL, Dent AL, Linnenbrink-Garcia L. The message matters: The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2014 Feb;106(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034553

22- Rickert NP, Meras IL, Witkow MR. Theories of intelligence and students' daily self-handicapping behaviors. Learning and Individual Differences. 2014 Dec 1;36:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.002

23- Magno C. Implicit theories of intelligence, achievement goal orientation, and academic achievement of engineering students. The International Journal of Research and Review. 2012 Sep 1;9: 32-43. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2287210

24- Perera HN, McIlveen P, Oliver ME. The mediating roles of coping and adjustment in the relationship between personality and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2015 Sep;85(3):440-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12084

25- Huff KC, Song P, Gresch EB. Cultural intelligence, personality, and cross-cultural adjustment: A study of expatriates in Japan. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2014 Jan 1;38:151-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.005

26- Lin YC, Chen AS, Song YC. Does your intelligence help to survive in a foreign jungle? The effects of cultural intelligence and emotional intelligence on cross-cultural adjustment. International Journal of intercultural relations. 2012 Jul 1;36(4):541-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.03.001

27- Hung-Wen L. Factors that influence expatriate failure: An interview study. International Journal of Management. 2007 Sep 1;24(3):403-413. https://www.proquest.com/openview/bcbc994454d2e6205a0f862c31810838/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=5703

28- Zakari H, Yousefi F. The effectiveness of positive education on academic and non-academic achievements. Educational psychology doctoral thesis. Shiraz university. 2018. [in Persian].

29- Abd-El-Fattah SM, Yates GC. Implicit Theory of Intelligence Scale: Testing for factorial invariance and mean structure. InAustralian Association for Research in Education Conference, Adelaide, South Australia 2006 Nov (pp. 1-14).

30- Barzegar M, Delavar A, Ahadi H. The Mediating Role of 2*2 Model of Developmental Goals and Cognitive Strategies relating to Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Educational Development: A Causal Model. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 2012; 3(10): 71-86. [in Persian]. 20.1001.1.20086369.1391.3.10.5.6

31- Grossi Farshi M, Mehryar A, Ghazi Tabatabai M. The application of the new Neo personality test and the analysis of its characteristics and factor structure among Iranian university students. Al-Zahra University Humanities Research Quarterly, 2001; 11(3), 173-199. [in Persian].

32- McCrae RR, Costa Jr PT. Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and individual Differences. 1985 Jan 1;6(5):587-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90008-X