رابطه سبک های هویت با بهزیستی فضیلت طلبانه و لذت گرایانه با نقش واسطه ای تعهد

محورهای موضوعی : روش ها و مدل های روانشناختی

عباس رحیمی نژاد ¹ (دانشیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.)
محبوبه رحیمی جعفری ² (آموزگار دبستان، آموزش و پرورش تهران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/03/10 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/11/19 تاریخ انتشار : 1395/08/20

کلید واژه: تعهد, سبک های هویت, بهزیستی لذت گرایانه, بهزیستی فضیلت طلبانه,

چکیده مقاله :

    رابطه هویت یافتگی و سردرگمی با شاخص های سلامت روان از موضوعات قابل توجه است. در این پژوهش با هدف بررسی نقش واسطه ای تعهد در رابطه بین سبک های هویت و بهزیستی فضیلت‌طلبانه و لذت‌گرایانه انجام شد. تعداد 320 نفر از دانشجویان دختر و پسر(با میانگین سنی76/20 و انحراف معیار 16/2) دانشکده های گوناگون دانشگاه تهران بصورت تصادفی مرحله‌ای خوشه ای انتخاب شدند. جهت گردآوری داده‌ها از ترجمه فارسی پرسش‌نامه های سبک هویت (ISI-4) و مقیاس بهزیستی کیز استفاده شد. با روش آماری تحلیل مسیر مدل پژوهش آزمون شد. نتایج نشان دادند که الگوی فرضی اولیه با داده های مشاهده شده برازش مطلوب دارد؛ سبک هویت داده‌ها با بهزیستی فضیلت‌طلبانه رابطه مستقیم و به واسطه تعهد با بهزیستی لذت گرایانه و فضیلت‌طلبانه رابطه غیرمستقیم و معنادار دارد؛ سبک هویت هنجاری با بهزیستی لذت‌گرایانه رابطه مستقیم و به واسطه تعهد با بهزیستی لذت گرایانه و فضیلت‌طلبانه رابطه غیر مستقیم معناداردارد؛ سبک هویت سردرگم/ اجتنابی با تعهد و بهزیستی فضیلت طلبانه رابطه منفی دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The aim of current research was to investigate mediating role of commitment in relationship between identity styles and eudemonic and hedonistic well-being. A number of 320 male and female students (age mean= 20.76 and S.D=2.16) were selected from different faculties of University of Tehran via multistage cluster sampling method. The Identity Style Inventory version 4(ISI-4) of Philips and Pitman and Keyes Well-being were used. Using path analysis as finding showed, the acceptable fitness with the theoretical model. Result showed; the informative style had direct and significant relation with eudemonic well-being and indirect relation with both well-beings from commitment way; the normative style had direct and significant relation with hedonic well-being and indirect relation with both well-beings from commitment way; the avoidant/diffusion style had negative relation with eudemonic well-being via commitment.

منابع و مأخذ:

- Arbuckle, J.L. (2009). Amos 18. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.

- Beaumont, S. I. (2009). Identity processing and personal wisdom: an information - oriented identity style predicts self -actualization and self transcendence. An international Journal of theory and research, 9(2), 95-115.

- Berzonsky, M. D. (2003). Identity Style and Well-Being: Does Commitment Matter? Identity: An international journal of theory and research, 3(2), 131–142.

- Berzonsky, M. D., Cieciuch, J., Duriez, B., & Soenens, B. (2011). The how and what of identity formation: Associations between identity styles and value orientations.Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 295-299.

- Bosch, L. A., & Card, N. A. (2012). A meta_analytic review of berzonskys identity style inventory (ISI).journal adolescence, 35, 333-343.   

- Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1998). Recent studies on subjective well-being. indian journal of clinical psychology, 24, 25-41.

- Diener, E., Lucas, R., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 63-73). New York: Oxford University Press.

- Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R., & Nosratabadi, M. (1385). Study of the comprehensive well-being scale factor. Journal of Developmental psychology (Iranian Psychological), 9, 35-52.

- Joshanloo, M., & Rasteghar, p. (1386). Five-lane main character and self-esteem as predictors of virtue-oriented. Journal of Iranian Psychologists, 4, (82), 13-24.

- Hofer, J., Kartner,J., Chasiotis, A., & Busch, H. (2007). Socio-cultural aspects of identity formation between commitment and well-being in student sample from camroon and germany. Identity: An internasional journal of theory and research, 7,265-288.   

- Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing Pleasure or Virtue: The Differential and Overlapping Well-Being Benefits of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives. J Happiness Stud, 11, 735-762.         

- Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425-1456.

- Hooman, H. (1388). Structural equation modeling using LISREL software. Tehran, Samt.

- Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social psychology quarterly, 121-140.

- Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life. Journal of Health and Social Research, 43, 207-222.

- Keyes,C. L. M. (2006). Subjective well-being in mental health and development research worldwide: An introduction. Social Indicators Research, 77, 1–10.

- Keyes, C. L. M., Fredrickson, B. L., & Park, N. (2012). Positive Psychology and the Quality of Life. Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research.

- Kimiecik, J. (2011). Exploring the Promise of Eudaimonic Well-Being Within the Practice of Health Promotion:The ‘‘How’’ is as Important as the ‘‘What’’. J happiness Stud, 12:769–792.

- McMahan, E. A., & Estes, D. (2011). Hedonic Versus Eudaimonic Conceptions of Well- being: Evidence of Differential Associations with Self-reported Well-being. Soc Indic Res, 103:93–108.

- Philips, T.M. & Pittman, J.F. (2007). Adolescent Psychological Well-being by Identity Style. Journal of adolescence. 30. 1021-1034

- Rahiminezhad, A., yazdanivarzaneh, M., Amani, H., & Farahani, H. (1389). Investigating the psychometrics characteristics the fourth version of identity styles inventory (ISI-4). Journal Psychological Science, 9, (36), 405-416.

- Rahiminezhad, A., Rostami, R., Seyahposh, s., & Akbarizaradkhaneh, s. (1392). The relationship between identity and psychological well-being. Quarterly psychological research applications, 4(1), 103-116.

- Rayan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentialis:a review research on hedonic and eudaimanic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52, 141-160.

- Rezaeian, M. Sarandii, P. (2011). Determine the relationship between identity styles and role of identity commitment and the psychological well-being in secondary school students in Tabriz , Journal of Education , 3 ( 11 ) : 79-92 .

- Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9,139–170. 

- Schwartz, S. J., Beyers, W., Luyckx. K., Soenens. B., Zamboanga, B. L., Forthun. L. F., Hardy,S. A., Vazsonyi. A. T., Ham. L. S., Kim, S. Y., Whitbourne,  S. Krauss., & Waterman, A.  S. (2011). Examining the Light and Dark Sides of Emerging Adults’ Identity: A Study of Identity Status Differences in Positive and Negative Psychosocial Functioning. J Youth Adolescence, 40(7), 839-859.

- Tahari, M., Yaryari, F., Sarami, G., & Adibmanesh, M. (1392). The relationship between identity styles, happiness and psychological well-being university students. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology, 14(1), 72-82.

- Vleioras, G., & Bosma, H. A. (2005). Are identity styles important for psychological well-being? Journal of Adolescence Research, 28, 397-409.

- Vittersø, J., Oelmann, H. I., & Wang, A. L. (2009). Life satisfaction is not a balanced estimator of the good life. Evidence from reaction time measures and self-reported emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 1–17.

- Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(4), 678.

- Waterman, A. S. (2007). Doing Well: The Relationship of Identity Status to Three Conceptions of Well-Being. Identity: an international journal of theory and research, 7(4), 289-307.