تدوین مدل علی ازدواج موفق براساس سبک های دلبستگی و ویژگیهای شخصیتی با نقش واسطه ای تمایزیافتگی

محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافی

مریم حاجیلو ¹ (دانشجوی دکترا،مشاوره خانواده، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران)
محمود گودرزی ² (استادیار،گروه مشاوره، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران)
حمزه احمدیان ³ (استادیار،گروه روانشناسی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/08/12 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/04/27 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/03/01

کلید واژه: سبک‌های دلبستگی, ویژگی‌های شخصیتی, تمایزیافتگی, ازدواج موفق,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف: ازدواج به عنوان یکی از رویدادهای مهم زندگی است که بیشتر ما برای تشکیل خانواده از این رویداد مهم استقبال میکنیم ازدواج چه در سنت وچه در فرهنگ امری پسندیده و نیکوست. هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدل علی ازدواج موفق بر اساس سبک‌های دلبستگی، ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با میانجیگری تمایزیافتگی می‌باشد.
روش­: حجم نمونه‌ای برابر 500 زوج از زوجین شهرستان خوی به شیوه دردسترس و با لحاظ نمودن ملاک های ورود به پژوهش انتخاب شدند. داده های پژوهش با استفاده از پرسشنامه سبک‌های دلبستگی، ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، تمایزیافتگی، عملکرد خانواده و رضایت زناشویی جمع‌آوری و بااستفاده از معادلات ساختاری مورد تجزیه تحلیل قرار گرفت
یافته­ها: یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که بیشترین تأثیر مستقیم بر ازدواج موفق از سوی تمایزیافتگی با تأثیرپذیری 379/0 می‌باشد و کمترین میزان تأثیرپذیری نیز برون‌گرایی با میزان 266/0- می‌باشد. که اگر فرد دارای تمایزیافتگی بالایی باشد یا بیاموزد آن را ارتقاء بخشد، حتی در صورت داشتن ویژگی‌های شخصیتی ناهمخوان نیز با پذیرش و مدیریت برخورد نموده به‌جای گیرکردن در تغییر خود یا طرف مقابل تمام انرژی خود را صرف حل مسئله زندگی زناشویی کرده و دلبستگی ایمن زوجی ایجاد می‌شود. در عین حفظ فردیت، زوج به "ماشدن" مطلوب در ازدواجی موفق می‌رسند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction:Marriage is one of the most important events in life and most of us welcome this important event to start a family. Marriage is a good thing both in tradition and culture. This study aims to present a causal model of a successful marriage based on attachment styles, personality traits mediated by differentiation.
Methods:The sample size of 500 couples from Khoy city couples was selected by available methods and considering the inclusion criteria. Research data were collected using the Questionnaire of Attachment Styles, Personality Traits, Differentiation, Family Function, and Marital Satisfaction and analyzed using structural equations.
Findings:Findings indicate that the most direct effect on successful marriage is differentiation by affectivity with 0.379 and the least effect is extraversion with -0.266. If a person has a high degree of differentiation or learns to improve it, even if he / she has inconsistent personality traits, he / she will accept and manage it. Is created. While maintaining individuality, couples achieve the desired "being" in a successful marriage.
 

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Katon, W. (2012). Associations between adult attachment style and health risk behaviors in an adult female primary care population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 72(5): 364-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.02.002.


2.  Melchionna, M, Marchesan, S, Prato, M, & Fornasiero, P. (2015). Carbon nanotubes and catalysis: the many facets of a successful marriage. Catalysis Science & Technology, 5(8): 3859-3875.


3. Prinsen, J, Deschepper, A, Maes, E, & Alaerts, K. (2019). Attachment styles have a modulatory impact on psychophysiological arousal evoked by reciprocated and unreciprocated gaze. Biological Psychology, 148(6):107-773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107773


4. Usha, B. (2010). Self-differentiation in women with and without mental disorders. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 (2010) 559–562.


5. Fakhri, M. (2017). Social mobility and spouse selection. Cultural and Educational Quarterly of Women and Family 12 (40): 1-26. [In Persian] 


6. Wu, Y. (2016). Correlation between self-differentiation and professional adaptability among undergraduate nursing students in China. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 3(4): 394-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.10.003.


7. Goudarzi, M & Bustanipour, A. (2012). Evaluation of the effectiveness of systemic-behavioral couple therapy on increasing marital adjustment. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 3 (2): 281-297.[In Persian]


8. James V, G. (2011) Successful Marriage, Pastoral Psychol (2011) 60(6):651–658.


9. Asadi, M; Ahmad Doust, M; Bakhshipour, H; Shir Alipour, J and Kiani, H. (2012). The role of attachment styles and sexual satisfaction in marital satisfaction mediated by lovemaking. Socio-Psychological Studies of Women, Fifteenth Year, 98-115. [In Persian]


10.  Tarvardizadeh, A. (2017). Correlation of attachment styles with marital satisfaction in employed female nurses. Rehabilitation Research in Nursing, Fourth Year3: 8-14.


11. Pettay, Jenni E., Chapman, Simon N., Lahdenperä, Mirkka, & Lummaa, Virpi. (2020). Family dynamics and age-related patterns in marriage probability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(1), 35-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.09.001


12.  Meinhart, Melissa, Seff, Ilana, Darmstadt, Gary L., Weber, Ann M., & Stark, Lindsay. (2020). Attitudinal Acceptance of Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Nigeria and Tanzania: An Exploration Into Target Reference Groups. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(1, Supplement), S3-S8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.10.006.


13. Goudarzi, Mahmoud; Salari Zare, Zeinab; Zandi; Farzad & Karimi Thani, Parviz. (2019). Transformation of previous researches in order to achieve the components of successful marriage in Iran Knowledge and research in applied psychology in the twentieth year, No. 4, Winter 1398, (78): Pp. 36-24.[In Persian]


14. Cacciapaglia, G; Cai, H; Flacke, T; Lee, S; Parolini, Alberto & Serôdio, Hugo. (2015). Anarchic Yukawas and top partial compositeness: the flavor of a successful marriage. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015(6): 85-90.


15. Conway, M. (2019). Attachment styles in college students and depression: The mediating role of self-differentiation. Mental Health & Prevention, 1(3): 135-142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2019.01.011.


16. Karim Khani, A. (2016). Determining the relationship between the five major personality factors and the information-seeking behavior of graduate students. Human interaction and information. 4 (3): 1-10. [In Persian] 


17. Fuchs, Nikolas Fabian, & Taubner, Svenja. (2019). Exploring the interplay of attachment style and attachment-related mood on short-term change in mentalization: A pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences, 144: 94-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019/02/037.


18. Buelow, Melissa T., & Cayton, Charles. (2020). Relationships between the big five personality characteristics and performance on behavioral decision making tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 109931. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109931


19.  Khoshe lahja, M. (2017). Investigating the mediating role of differentiation in the relationship between depression and marital satisfaction of women. Psychological Methods and Models, Year 8: 109-126. [In Persian] 


20. Hartmann, J. (2019). Effect of self-monitoring through experience sampling on emotion differentiation in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 244: 71-77. DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.092.


21. Goudarzi, M, Mohsenzadeh, F, & Shahrarai, M. (2009). Investigate the relationship between self-differentiation and identity styles. Consulting Research, 32 (8): 73-90. [In Persian]


22. Candel, Octav-Sorin, & Turliuc, Maria Nicoleta. (2019). Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 190-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.037


23.  Ardenghi, Stefano, Rampoldi, Giulia, Bani, Marco, & Strepparava, Maria Grazia. (2020). Attachment styles as predictors of self-reported empathy in medical students during pre-clinical years. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(5), 965-970. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.11.004


24. French, Michael T., Popovici, Ioana, Robins, Philip K., & Homer, Jenny F. (2014). Personal traits, cohabitation, and marriage. Social Science Research, 45, 184-199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.01.002


25. Mirels, H. L., Stevens, F., Greblo, P., & Yurek, D. L. (2020). Differentiation in personality descriptions of the self and others. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 663-681. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00084-1.


26. Azin, S. A., & Salehpour, S. (2017). 306 Approach to Sexual and Reproductive Health in Iran and Pakistan: A Comparative Study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(1, Supplement 1), S91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.207[In Persian] 


27.  Kawamoto, T. (2020). The moderating role of attachment style on the relationship between self-concept clarity and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 152: 109-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109604


28. Széman, Z. (2015). How Marriage Can be Successful. European Journal of Mental Health, 10(02): 275-277.


29. Nokabadi, M. (2016). Predicting a Successful Marriage Based on Attachment Style and Love Story in Married Students of Isfahan University of Technology, Family Quarterly, 2 (40): 20-30


30. Nadi, M. (2018). The Effectiveness of schema group therapy on attachment styles (secure, insecure anxiety & insecure avoidance) and symptoms in patients with obsessive-compulsive. 2(8): 253-259.


31. Minuchin, S; translator. Sanai, B. (1390). Family and Family Therapy, Fifth Edition, Tehran, Amirkabir Publications. [In Persian]