اثر بخشی سطح سوم پاسخ به مداخله (TIRE3) بربهبود عملکرد ریاضی دانش آموزان با اختلال ریاضی
محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافی
رقیه زراعتی ایده لو
1
(گروه روانشناسی تربیتی واحد قم ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،قم، ایران)
مجید ضرغام
2
(گروه روانشناسی تربیتی، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم ، ایران.)
کامبیز کامکاری
3
(گروه روانشناسی، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلامشهر، ایران.)
کلید واژه: دانش‌آموزان با اختلال ریاضی, سطح سوم پاسخ به مداخله (TIRE3), عملکرد ریاضی,
چکیده مقاله :
: هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثر بخشی سطح سوم پاسخ به مداخله (TIRE3)بربهبود عملکرد ریاضی دانش آموزان با اختلال ریاضی بوده است این پژوهش از نوع نیمه آزمایشی ، با طرح پیش آزمون- پس آزمون و گروه کنترل است .جامعه ی آماری شامل تمام دانش آموزان ابتدایی دختر با اختلال یادگیری ریاضی شهر تهران در سال تحصیلی 1398-1397 بوده است که بین آن ها از طریق نمونه گیری در دسترس دانش آموزان با اختلال ریاضی مدارس ابتدایی دخترانه منطقه یک تهران انتخاب گردیدند و به صورت تصادفی به دو گروه آزمایش (5 نفر ) و کنترل(5 نفر ) گماشته شدند .گروه آزمایش طی 25 جلسه 45 دقیقه ای تحت سطح سوم پاسخ به مداخله (TIRE3)) قرار گرفتند در حالی که گروه کنترل مداخله ای دریافت نکردند . ابزار های مورد استفاده در این پژوهش شامل مقیاس هوش وکسلر کودکان و آزمون ریاضی ایرانی کی مث بوده است.برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از تحلیل کواریانس (آنکوا)استفاده گردید نتایج نشان دهنده تاثیرمثبت سطح سوم پاسخ به مداخله (TIRE3) بر بهبود عملکرد ریاضی کودکان با اختلال ریاضی بوده است.(p <0.05). بنا بر این به نظر می رسد سطح سوم پاسخ به مداخله (TIRE3)می تواند بهبود عملکرد ریاضی دانش آموزان با اختلال ریاضی را در پی داشته باشد .
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the third level of response to intervention (TIRE3) to improve the math performance of students with Dyscalculia.
Materials and Methods: The research method was semi-experimental with pretest-posttest design with control group. The statistical population included all elementary school students with Dyscalculia in Tehran, which among them through available sampling students with math disorder in elementary schools in Tehran district 1 were selected. And randomly assigned to two experimental groups (5 people) and control (5 people). The experimental group underwent 25 sessions- Each 45 minutes-of the third level of response to intervention (TIRE3). The tools used in this study included the Wechsler Intelligence Scale of Children and the Iranian Key Math Test.
Results: The results of covariance analysis reflects the impact of the third level of response to intervention (TIRE3) to improve mathematics achievement of children with Dyscalculia (p < 0.05( . In other words, the mean scores of the students in the experimental group in the post test were significantly higher than the mean scores of the control group.
Conclusion: It seems that the third level of response to intervention (TIRE3) can improve the mathematical performance of students with Dyscalculia.
Keyword :
Students with Dyscalculia , the third level of response to intervention (TIRE3), mathematical functions.
Adewoye, O. M. (2018). The Effects of Professional Development and Formative Assessment Quality on Students' Self-Regulation in Primary School Mathematics. .ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Walden University.
Bandura, A. (1991). "Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation" (PDF). . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.
Baumeister, Roy; Vohs, Kathleen; Tice, Dianne. (2007). The Strength Model of Self-Control". Current Directions in Psychological Science. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534. .
Berch, D. B., & Mozacco, M. M. (2007). Why Is Math So Hard for Some Children? The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Learning Difficulties and Disabilities. Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co . Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.
Bryant, Diane Pedrotty; Bryant, Brian R.; Gersten, Russell; Scammacca, Nancy; Chavez, Melissa. (2008). .(2008). Mathematics Intervention for First- and Second-Grade Students with Mathematics Difficulties: The Effects of Tier 2 Intervention Delivered as Booster Lessons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932507309712.
Bryant, Diane Pedrotty; et al . (2014). (Tier 2 Intervention for At-Risk First-Grade Students within a Response-to-Intervention Model of Support. School Psychology Review .http://www.nasponline.org/publications/periodicals/spr/volume-43/volume-43-issue-2.
Bryant,Brian R; Bryant,Diane Pedrotty ; Porterfield ,Jennifer. (2014). The Effects of a Tier 3 Intervention onthe Mathematics Performance of SecondGrade Students With Severe Mathematics Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. DOI: 10.1177/0022219414538516.
Charles, A., & Douglas, D. (2011). Response To Intervention: A Research-Based Summary. Theory Into Practice. 4–11. 50 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.534909.
Chatzistamatiou, Mariza; Dermitzaki, Irini; Bagiatis, Vasilios. (2014). Self-Regulatory Teaching in Mathematics: Relations to Teachers' Motivation, Affect and Professional Commitment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, v29 n2 p295-310 Jun 2014.
Connolly, A. (1988). Keymath revised; A Diagnostic inventory of essential mathematics. New York: American Guidance Service Pub.
Connolly, A. (1988). Keymath revised; A Diagnostic inventory of essential mathematics. . American Guidance Service Pub. New York.
Delbridge, N. H. (2018). A Phenomenological Study of Parents' Involvement in Mathematics Instruction. .ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Capella University.
DSM-5. (2016). DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS FIFTH EDITION. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
Duchaine, Ellen L.; Jolivette, Kristine; Fredrick, Laura D.; Alberto, Paul. (2018). Increase Engagement and Achievement with Response Cards: Science and Mathematics Inclusion Classes. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, v16 n2 p157-176 2018.
Engelman,s;Phyllis; Elaine,B. (1966). Teach Your Child to Read 100easy leassonse. Published by Simon and Schuter: Newyork. Engelman,s;Phyllis; Elaine,B.
Flovell.J.T. (1979). Meta cognition and Cognitive monitoring Anew area of cognitive development. American psycologist,340,pp906-912.
Fuchs, LS; et al. (2013). "Effects of first-grade number knowledge tutoring with contrasting forms of practice.
Fuchs, Lynn S.; Fuchs, Douglas; Prentice, Karin. (2004). Responsiveness to Mathematical Problem-Solving Instruction: Comparing Students at Risk of Mathematics Disability With and Without Risk of Reading Disability. journal of Learning Disabilities, ttps://.
Geary, D. (2004). .Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. . Journal of Learning Disabilities 37(1):4-15. DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370010201.
Hale, J. (2010). "Critical Issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus" (PDF). Learning Disability Quarterly. 33 (3): 223–236.
Hott, Brittany L.; Evmenova, Anya; Brigham, Frederick J. (2014). Effects of Peer Tutoring and Academic Self-Monitoring on the Mathematics Vocabulary Performance of Secondary Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders. .Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, p113-132 .
IDEA. (2014). IDEA Parent Guide -. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
Kavkler, Marija; Babuder, Milena Košak; Magajna, Lidija. (2015). .Inclusive Education for Children with Specific Learning Difficulties: Analysis of Opportunities and Barriers in Inclusive Education in Slovenia . Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2015.1,S.31-52.
Kerschen, Keith; Cooper, Sandi; Shelton, Ryann; Scott, Lakia. (2018).
Kerschen, Keith; Cooper, Sandi; Shelton, Ryann; Scott, Lakia. (2018). The Impact of a Summer Mathematics Academy on Rising Kindergartners' Understanding of Early Number Concepts. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, v32 n4 p419-434 2018.
Kroesbergen and Van Luit. (2003).
Lovett, M. W.; De Palma, M.; Frijters, J.; Steinbach, K.; Temple, M.; Benson, N.; Lacerenza, L. (2008). .Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. .". Journal of Learning Disabilities. 41 (4): 333–352. doi:10.1177/0022219408317859.
Murphy, M. M., Mazzocco, M. M., Hanich, L., & Early, M. (2007). . Cognitive characteristics of children with Mathematics Learning Disability (MLD) varies as a function of criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 467–487.
NJCLD. (2005). responsiveness to intervention and learning disability . avalable from :http://www.Idonline.org.
Paris ,S.G; Paris ,A.H. (2001). .Classroom Applications of research on selferegulated learning. . Educational Phycologist,36(2),89-101.
Ruiz, M. (2012). . "Training school personnel on implementation of check-in–check-out behavioral interventions". Communique. 41 (1): 7–10. ISSN 0164-775X.
Salaschek, Martin; Souvignier, Elmar. (2014). Web-Based Mathematics Progress Monitoring in Second Grade. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, v32 n8 p710-724 Dec 2014.
Skwarchuk, S. (2009). How do parents support preschoolers’ numeracy learning experiences at home? . Early Childhood Education Journal, 37, 189-197.DOI: 10.1007/s10643-009-0340-1.
Stewart, Rachel M. ; Martella, Ronald C. ; Marchand-Martella , Nancy E. ; and Benner , Gregory J. (2005). "Three-Tier Models of Reading and Behavior . JEIBI. 2 (3): 115–124.
Suggate, S. P. (2010). "Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size.". Developmental Psychology. 46 (6): 1556–1579. PMID 20873927. doi:10.1037/a0020612. .
_||_