اثر متغیرهای اقتصاد کلان بر درآمد بخش کشاورزی ایران

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

هادی ربیعی ¹ (دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه زابل)
ماشاا... سالارپور ² (استادیار اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه زابل)
محمود صبوحی صابونی ³ (دانشیار اقتصاد کشاورزی دانشگاه زابل)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/09/26 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/09/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/01/01

کلید واژه: قیمت محصول, نرخ ارز, نرخ بهره, درآمد بخش کشاورزی, همگرایی یوهانسون,

چکیده مقاله :

امروزه تصور اقتصادی بدون استفاده از ابزارهای سیاست گذاری و مداخله سیاست گذاران تقریباً غیرممکن به نظر می رسد، لذا آنچه اهمیت دارد کاهش هزینه های ناشی از سیاست ها و افزایش کارایی آنهاست. بخش کشاورزی با دیگر بخش ها در اقتصاد داخلی وابسته است و به کارگیری و اجرای سیاست های کلان اقتصادی از سوی دولتمردان به طرق مختلف بر فعالیت بخش های گوناگون اقتصادی اثر می گذارد. در این تحقیق اثرات کوتاه و بلندمدت تغییر در متغیرهای اقتصاد کلان شامل قیمت محصولات کشاورزی، نرخ بهره، نرخ ارز، حجم پول، تولید ناخالص داخلی و یارانه بر درآمد بخش کشاورزی ایران در یک چارچوب همگرایی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. بدین منظور، مدل همگرایی یوهانسون با داده های سالانه 1387-1355 به کار گرفته شد. نتایج برآورد الگو نشان داد که رابطه تعادلی بلندمدت بین متغیرهای اقتصاد کلان منتخب و درآمد بخش کشاورزی وجود دارد. نرخ بهره و نرخ ارز در کوتاه و بلندمدت، به ترتیب رابطه منفی و مثبت با درآمد بخش کشاورزی دارد که از لحاظ تئوری قابل انتظار است. همچنین قیمت محصولات کشاورزی و حجم نقدینگی در بلندمدت اثر منفی، اما در کوتاه مدت اثر مثبت بر درآمد بخش کشاورزی دارند. علاوه بر این یافته های مطالعه بیان کرد که یارانه اعطایی به این بخش اثر معنی داری بر درآمد کشاورزان نداشته است.  

چکیده انگلیسی:

Now seems almost impossible, imagine an economy without the use of policy tools and intervention policy makers. So, what is important is cost reduction resulting from the policies and increasing their efficiency. Agricultural sector with other sectors in the domestic economy is dependent, and application and performance macro-economic policies by the government affects on different parts of economic activity in different ways. This study examines the short and long-run effects of changes in macroeconomic variables, including agricultural commodity prices, interest rate, exchange rate, money supply, GDP and subsidies on the Iran's agricultural sector income in a cointegration framework. For this purpose, is used from Johansen Model with annual data for 1976– 2008. Results show that there exist the long-run equilibrium relationships among selected macroeconomic variables and income agricultural sector. Interest rate and exchange rate, that could be expected Theoretically, have in the short and long-run respectively, negative and positive relationship with income agricultural sector. Also, the prices of agricultural commodities and money supply have in the long term negative effect, but in the short term positive effect on income agricultural sector. The results showed that the payment subsidy to the agricultural sector has not significant effect on income farmers  

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Akbari, N.M And Hadian, V. 2003. The effect of government

spending on agricultural value added. Journal of Agricultural and

Development Economics. 42: 137-166.

2. Appleyard D.R. And Field A.J. 1998. International Economics.

New York: McGraw-Hill. 3rd Edition.

3. Baek J. And Koo WW. 2007. Dynamic interrelationships between

the U.S. agricultural trade balance and the macroeconomy.

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 39: 457- 470.

4. Baek J And Koo W.W. 2008. Identifying macroeconomic

linkages to U.S. agricultural trade balance. Canadian Journal of

Agricultural Economics. 56: 63- 77.

5. Baek J And Koo W.W. 2010. The U.S. Agricultural Sector and

the Macroeconomy. Journal of Agricultural and Applied

Economics. 42: 457– 465.

6. Baek J. Koo, W.W And Mulik K. 2009. Exchange Rate Dynamics

and the Bilateral Trade Balance: The Case of U.S. Agriculture.

Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 38: 213– 228.

7. Baek, J And Koo, W.W. 2009. On the dynamic relationship

between U.S. farm income and macroeconomic variables. Journal

of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 41: 521- 528.

8. Baskara, R. 1998. Cointegration and its economic applications.

Translated by Ali Hossein Samadi. Sasan publication. Shiraz, 320

p.

9. Bessler, D.A And Babula, R.A. 1987. Forecasting wheat exports:

Do exchange rates matter?. Journal of Business and Economic

Statistics. 5: 397– 406.

10. Bhide, S. Vani, B.P And Rajeev, M. 2008. Do Macroeconomic

Conditions Matter for Agriculture?. The Indian Experience. The

Singapore Economic Review.

11. Bradshaw, R And Orden, D. 1990. Granger causality from the

exchange rate to agricultural prices and export sales. Western

Journal of Agricultural Economics. 15: 100–110.

12. Central Bank of Iran (1959-2008). Economic report and balance

sheet. Office of Economic.

Beik Zadeh, S And Mehdi Pour, A. 2005. The effect of the 

monopoly price (guaranteed) by the government to buy wheat on

the open market price of barley. 5th Conference of Iranian

agricultural economy. Zahedan. University of Sistan and

Baluchestan.

13. Parizan, V And Torkamani, J. 2005. Effects of monetary policy

and exchange rates on changes in relative prices of agriculture.

Proceedings of the 5th Conference of Iran's agricultural economy.

Zahedan. University of Sistan and Baluchestan.

14. Tavakoli, A. 1997. Time series analysis: Cointegration and

uniform cointegration. Tehran: Business Research Institute.

188p.

15. Sasuli, M.r And Saleh, A. 2007. The effect of monetary and

financial policies on the value added of agriculture sector in Iran.

6th Conference of Iran's agricultural economy. Mashhad.

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

16. Shaghaghi Shahri, V. 2005. Evaluation of macro-economic

variables affecting on the Iranian trade account deficit. Journal of

Economic Literature. 2 (3): 143-174.

17. Chambers, R.G. 1981. Interrelationships between monetary

instruments and agricultural commodity trade. American Journal

of Agricultural Economics. 63: 934–941.

18. Chambers, R.G. 1984. Agricultural and Financial Market

Interdepence in the short run. American Journal of U. S.

Agricultural Economics. 66: 12- 24.

19. Chaudhuri, K And Rao, R.K. 2004. Output fluctuations in Indian

agriculture and industry: a reexamination. Journal of Policy

Modeling. 26: 223– 237.

20. Cheung, Y And Lai, K. 1993. A fractional conitegration analysis

of purchasing power parity. Journal of Business and Economic

Statistics. 21: 102-112.

21. Johansen, J. 1995. Likelihood-based inference in cointegrate

vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

267p.

22. Kaabia, M.B And Gil, J.M. 2000. Short and long-run effects of

macroeconomic variables on the Spain agricultural sector.

European Review of Agricultural Economics. 27: 449- 471.

23. Lachaal, L And womak, A.W. 1998. The Impacts trade of

macroeconomic linkages on Canadian agriculture, American

Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80: 45- 60.

24. Letsoalo, A And Kirsten, J. 2003. Modeling the impacts of

macroeconomic and trade policies on the South African

agricultural sector. Annual Conference of the Agricultural

Economic Association of South African (AEASA). October. 2- 3.

25. Mojtahed, A And Sharifi, M. 2004. Effects of monetary and

financial policies on agricultural growth in Iran. Journal of

Agricultural and Development Economics. 47: 1-28.

26. Mehrabian, K. 2001. Effects of monetary and financial policy on

growth Iranian agriculture. The Thesis MSC of Agricultural

Economics. Department of Agricultural Economics University of

Tehran.

27. Mohammadi, H. 2010. Effect of government monetary and

financial policies on exports, capital investment and added value

to agricultural. Proceedings of Conference on Agriculture in Iran

in 1404. 8 Oct. Rasht. Islamic Azad University.

28. Moghaddasi, R And Farhadi, A. 2005. Effectiveness of monetary

and financial policies on the agricultural sector (1971-2001).

Agriculture and National Development. Planning and Agricultural

Economics Research Institution. Volume II: 68-75.

29. Noferesti, M. 1999. Unit root and Cointegration in econometrics.

Tehran. Resa cultural institution. 480p.

30. Ordon, D. 2002. Exchange rate effects on Agricultural trade.

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 34(2): 301- 312.

31. Ramachandran, M. 2004 . Do Broad Money, Output and Prices

Stand for Stable Relationship in India?. Journal of Policy

Modeling. 26: 983-1001.

32. Rosson, C.P. 2009. Discussion: Exchange Rates, Energy Policy

and Outcomes in Agricultural Markets. Journal of Agricultural

and Applied Economics. 41(2): 529–530.

33. Schuh, G.E. 1974. The Exchange rate and U. S agriculture.

American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 56: 1- 13.

34. Schuh, G.E. 1976. The New Macroeconomics of Agricultural.

American Journal of Agricultural Econ. 58: 802-811.

35. Shane, M. Liefert, W. Morehart, M. Peters, M. Dillard, J.

Torgersen, D And Edmondson W. 2009. The 2008/2009 World 

Economic Crisis: What It Means for U.S. Agriculture. Economic

Research Service Report WRS-09-02. USDA.

36. Snell, W.M. Marchant, M.A And Infanger, C.L. 1997.

Macroeconomic Policy Linkages to Agriculture. University of

Kentucky. College of Agriculture.