طراحی الگوی عملکرد محصول جدید مبتنی بر بازارگرایی و سرعت نوآوری در صنعت چرم
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزیحسین عباسی 1 , حبیب اله دانایی 2 , ام البنین اسدی قربانی 3
1 - استادیار گروه مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: بازارگرایی, عملکرد محصول جدید, سرعت نوآوری, ایجاد هوشمندی, توزیع هوشمندی,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی الگوی عملکرد محصول جدید مبتنی بر بازارگرایی و سرعت نوآوری در صنعت چرم انجام گرفته، که از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نوع توصیفی-پیمایشی است. داده‌های میدانی در سال 1396 از طریق پرسشنامه با مراجعه به 200 نفر از مدیران و دست‌اندرکاران واحدهای تولیدی و فروش چرم در شهر تبریز که به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب گردیده بودند، جمع‌آوری شده است. تحلیل داده‌ها، آزمون فرضیات و نیز برازش مدل مفهومی پژوهش با روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار LESREL انجام گرفته است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد، بازارگرایی با ابعاد ایجاد هوشمندی، توزیع هوشمندی و پاسخگویی هم به‌صورت مستقیم و هم به‌صورت غیرمستقیم از طریق سرعت نوآوری بر عملکرد محصول تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. همچنین، بازارگرایی در قالب سه متغیر فوق تأثیر مثبت بر سرعت نوآوری دارد. نتایج حاصل از بررسی روابط بین متغیرهای مستقل نشان می‌دهد، ایجاد هوشمندی و توزیع هوشمندی تأثیر قابل توجهی بر پاسخگویی به هوشمندی بازار داشته و نیز ایجاد هوشمندی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر توزیع هوشمندی دارد.
This study aimed to design a new product performance model based on market orientation and innovation speed in the leather industry has been done. While this study is essentially an applied research and it is descriptive survey. Field data was collected using questionnaires in 2017 by referring to 200 managers and directors of leather manufacturing and sell units in Tabriz Township, that were selected randomly. Data analysis, testing hypotheses, and also fitting the conceptual model of research was performed using structural equation modeling and LISREL software. Findings indicate, market orientation in form of intelligence generation, intelligence dissemination and responsiveness influences new products performance positively and meaningfully, both directly and indirectly through innovation speed, and also have positive and meaningful effect on innovation speed. The results were obtained by surveying relationship between independent variables show, intelligence generation and intelligence dissemination have a significant effect on responsiveness to market intelligence. Finally, intelligence generation has a positive and meaningful effect on intelligence dissemination.
- Akgun, A., Lynn, G.S. & Yilmaz, C. (2006). Learning process in new product development teams and effects on product success: a socio-cognitive perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2): 210-24.
- Arrigo, E. (2015). Open Innovation and Market Orientation: An Analysis of the Relationship. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 9(2): 150-161.
- Ayers, D., Dahlstrom, R. & Skinner, S.J. (1997). An exploratory investigation of organizational antecedents to new product success. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1): 107-17.
- Brockman, B. & Morgan, R. (2003). The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decision Sciences, 349(2): 385-419.
- Carbonell, P. & Escudero, A.I.R. (2010). The effect of market orientation on innovation speed and new product performance. Journal of Business & Industrial marketing, 25(7): 501–513.
- Carbonell, P. & Rodriguez, A.I. (2006). The impact of market characteristics and innovation speed on perceptions of positional advantage and new product performance. International Journal of Research in marketing, 23(1): 1-12.
- Chahal, H., Dangwal, R.C. & Raina, S. (2016). Marketing orientation, strategic orientation and their synergistic impact on business performance: a case of SMEs in emerging context (India). Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 18(1): 1-24.
- Chang, J.J., Hung, K.P. & Lin, M.J.J . (2014). Knowledge Creation and New Product Performance: The Role of Creativity. R&D Management, 44(2): 107-123.
- Chao, M.C., Feng, S. & Li, F. (2014). The Journey from Market Orientation to New Product Performance in the Host Country: A Knowledge and Learning Perspective. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 8(1): 62-73.
- Cooper, R. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986). An investigation into the new product process: steps, deficiencies and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(2): 71-85.
- Drucker, P.F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
- Farrell, M. (2000). Developing a Market-Oriented Learning Organization. Journal of Management, 25(2): 201-222.
- Ebrahimpur, M. & Shabani, S. (2017).The effect of market orientation on firm performance with the mediation role of innovation ambidexterity. ORMR . 7(3): 19-35. (In Persian)
- Gotteland, D. & Boule´ , J.M.(2006). The market orientation-new product performance relationship: redefining the moderating role of environmental conditions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(2): 171-185.
- Homburg, C., Krohmer, H. & Workman, J.P. (2004). A strategy implementation perspective of market orientation. Journal of Business Research, 57(12): 1331-40.
- Kessler, E.H. & Bierly, P.E. (2002). Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implication of innovation speed. IEEE Transections on Engineering Management, 49(1): 2-12.
- Kirca, A.H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, O.W. (2005). Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance. Journal of Marketing, 69: 24–41.
- Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
- Kohli, A.K. & Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, no. 54(2): 1-18.
- Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, P.R. (2011). Is Market Orientation a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage or Simply the Cost of Competing? Journal of Marketing, 75: 16–30.
- Le, P.B. & Lei, H. (2018). The effects of innovation speed and quality on differentiation and low-cost competitive advantage: The case of Chinese firms, Chinese Management Studies, 12(2): 305-322
- Liao, C.C., Wang, H.Y., Chuang, S.H., Shih, M.L & Liu, C.C. (2010). Enhancing knowledge management for R&D innovation and firm performance: An integrative view. African Journal of Business Management,4(14): 3026-3038.
- Lynn, G.S., Rilly, R.R. & Akgun, A.E.(2000 ). knowledge management in new product teams: practices acd outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2): 221-231.
- Menon, A. & Varadarajan, P.R. (1992). A model of marketing knowledge use within firms. Journal of Marketing, 56(4): 53-71.
- Mokhtarzadeh, G.N. & Zamani, M. (2015). Examining the effects of market orientation and management innovation on firm performance: The mediating role of technological innovation. Business management.7(2): 463-484. (In Persian)
- Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational market information processes: cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3): 318-335.
- Moreno-Moya, M. & Munuera-Aleman, J.L. (2016). The Differential Effect of Development Speed and Launching Speed on New Product Performance: An Analysis in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2): 750-770.
- Narver, J.C. and Slater. S.F. 1990. The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, no. 54(4): 20-35.
- Özturan, P., Özsomer, A. & Pieters, R. (2014). The Role of Market Orientation in Advertising Spending During Economic Collapse: The Case of Turkey in 2001. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2): 139–152.
- Prifti, R. & Alimehmeti, G. (2017). Market Orientation, Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Analysis of Albanian Firms. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1): 1-19.
-Rodriguez-Pinto, J., Carbonell, P., & Rodriguez-Escudero, A.I. (2011). Speed or quality? How the order of market entry influences the relationship between market orientation and new product performance. Journal of Research in marketing, 28(2): 145-154.
- Sarin, S. & McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34)4): 707-39.
- Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3): 63-74.
- Song, X.M., Montoya-Weiss, M.M. & Schmidt, J.B. (1997). The role of marketing in developing successful new products in South Korea and Taiwan. Journal of International Marketing, 5(3): 47-69.
- Stayton, J. & Mangematin, V. (2016). Startup time, innovation and organizational emergence: A study of USA-based international technology ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(3): 373-409.
- Zaltman, G. (1986). Knowledge utilization as planned social change, in Beal, G., Dissanayake, W. and Konoshima, S. (Eds), Knowledge Generation, Exchange and Utilization. Westview Press, Boulder, CO: 433-62.
_||_