تغییرپذیری فضایی و زمانی نرخ باروری گروه‌های ویژه سنی در نواحی روستایی ایران (1385-1395)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

مهرانگیز رضائی ¹ (استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستائی، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.)
سیامک طهماسبی ² (پژوهشگر پژوهشکده سیاستگذاری، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/09/19 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/01/15 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/03/31

کلید واژه: نواحی روستایی, نرخ باروری گروه های ویژه سنی, خود‌همبستگی فضایی محلی, هموارسازی فضایی, جمعیت شناسی فضایی,

چکیده مقاله :

باروری یک فرآیند جمعیتی کلیدی است که نقش مهمی در پویایی و روندهای جمعیت دارد. کاهش بارروی، به پدیده‌ای جهانی تبدیل شده است؛ و در اولویت‌های سیاستی بسیاری از کشورهای جهان قرار گرفته است. با این‌حال، مطالعات اندکی هستند که به طور‌مستقیم بر پایة مفاهیم جغرافیایی و بعد فضایی باروری، تمرکز کرده باشند. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی روند تغییرپذیری فضایی و زمانی نرخ باروری گروه‌های ویژه سنی (ASFRs)  زنان روستایی در سال‌های 1385 و 1395 ‌است. داده‌های موالید و گروه‌های سنی زنان(49- 15) روستایی از سرشماری نفوس و مسکن مرکز آمار در دو دوره 1385 و 1395 جمع‌آوری و از آزمون‌های موران I سراسری (GMI) و موران محلی با بیز تجربی (LM-EB)  برای سنجش خود‌همبستگی فضایی و کشف الگوهای فضایی نرخ باروری ویژه گروه‌های سنی در نرم افزار GeoDa استفاده شد. نتایج نشان‌داد که نرخ باروری گروه‌های ویژه سنی طی دوره‌ مورد بررسی افزایش یافته‌است و بیشترین افزایش باروری در گروه سنی 24‌-20 ساله رخ داده است. خوشه‌بندی فضایی نرخ باروری ویژه سنی نشان‌می‌دهد در سال 1395 قوی‌تر و گسترده‌تر از سال 1385 بوده است. در بین گروه‌های سنی و در هر دو دوره، گروه سنی 39- 35 سال و 49- 45 سال به ترتیب بیشترین ‌(447/0=GMI1385671/0=GMI1395)‌ و کمترین(07/0=GMI1385 ،198/0=GMI1395) مقدار خودهمبستگی فضایی را داشته‌اند. همچنین مناطق روستایی جنوب‌شرق کشور خوشه‌بندی باروری ویژه سنی بالا را داشته‌اند. در برخی از گروه‌های سنی در شرق، شمال شرق، شمال‌غرب، جنوب‌غرب و تا حدودی جنوب نیز الگوی بالا- بالا شکل گرفته‌اند. الگوی بالا- بالا در شمال‌غرب تنها در گروه سنی 19- 15 سال شکل گرفته‌است و الگوی پایین- پایین باروری در مناطق روستایی عمدتاً در قسمت‌های داخلی، شمال و غرب متمرکز شده‌اند. شناسایی و کشف خوشه‌های فضایی، زمینه را برای ساخت مفروضات و مدل برای تحقیقات آینده فراهم‌ می کند. بنابراین آنچه در این پژوهش انجام شده است، می‌تواند بستر مناسب علمی و دقیق برای تحقیقات بنیادین بعدی در حوزه جمعیت و باروری روستایی و توسعه را فراهم می‌کند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Fertility is a key demographic process that plays an important role in population dynamics and trends. Fertility decline has become a global phenomenon; also, it has been placed in the policy priorities of many countries in the world. However, there are few studies that have focused directly on the concepts of geography and the spatial dimension of fertility. The purpose of this study is to exploring the spatial and temporal variation in age specific fertility rates (ASFRs) across Iran’s rural areas in 2006 and 2016. Data on births and age groups of rural women (15-49) were collected from the census of the Statistics Center in 2006 and 2016. Global Moran’s I and local Moran with Empirical Bayes (LM-EB) tests were used to measure spatial autocorrelation and discover the ASFRs local patterns. The results show that the fertility rate of age-specific groups has increased and the highest increase in fertility has occurred in the age group of 20-24 years. Spatial patterns of ASFRs shows that autocorrelation in 2016 was stronger and wider than in 2006. Among the age groups and in both periods, the age groups of 35-39 years and 45-49 years had the highest (GMI1385= 0.447; GMI1395= 0.671) and lowest (GMI1385= 0.070; GMI1395= 0.198) spatial autocorrelation, respectively. Rural areas in the southeast of the country have had a strong ASFRs clustering. In some age groups in the east, northeast, southwest and to some extent in the south, a high-high pattern has been formed. The high-high pattern in the northwest is formed only in the age group of 15-19 and the low-low pattern of fertility is mainly concentrated in the interior, north and west areas. Identifying spatial clusters will provide the basis for constructing assumptions and models for future research. Therefore, what has been done in this research can provide a suitable scientific and accurate basis for further basic research in the field of population and rural fertility and development.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Fertility is a key demographic process that plays an important role in population dynamics and trends. In addition to its fluctuations over time, the spatial dimension of fertility can show how it affects population dynamics in a particular region. Identifying and explaining spatial variation of fertility is considered an important component of the subfields of population geography and spatial demography. Reviewing the literature of sources in the field of population geography of Iran also shows that the issue of fertility has been less discussed compared to other population processes including migration. However, a geographic perspective is one of the keys to understanding fertility change.
Place or geographical context plays an important role in fertility behavior, so the study of fertility variability reveals the importance of geographic variability or lack thereof. Also, the analysis of spatial variability in fertility helps to understand and predict the dynamics of the regional population and to test the hypotheses related to the general determinants of fertility. This study attempts to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of fertility of age- specific fertility rates (ASFRs) in rural areas. Identifying and discovering spatial and temporal patterns of fertility is important in two aspect. First, identifying spatial and temporal variability of fertility at the regional level can be useful in designing policies and programs to provide social services, education, health, as well as population and development programs. Second, the discovery of spatial and temporal patterns can be used to construct assumptions, test and model in future research.
 
Methodology
The present study is applied in terms of purpose and exploratory-descriptive in terms of method. In this research, the data related to the results of the census of population and housing were used. The time period is from 2006-2016; the spatial scale in the analysis is the county level. Spatial data exploratory analysis (ESDA) techniques were used to analyze age- specific fertility rates (ASFRs) in rural areas of Iran. There are a variety of techniques for exploratory analysis of spatial data that vary according to the nature of the data. In this study, global Moran’s I (GMI) and local Moran with Empirical Bayes (LM-EB) tests in GeoDa software were used. Due to the importance of age specific fertility rate (ASFR) in this study, this index has been used:
 Where B is the number of live births of one year in each age group and w is the population of women in the same age group in the same year and a is the corresponding age group of 50 years (49 to 15 years).
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the ASFRs increased during the study period and the highest increase in fertility occurred in the age group of 20-24 years. The findings of this study show that 1) Spatial clustering of rural ASFRs in 2016 was stronger than in 2006. Among the age groups and in both periods, the age groups of 35-39 years and 45-49 years had the highest and lowest spatial autocorrelation, respectively. 2) In all age groups in the two years studied, rural areas in the southeast of the country had high ASFRs clustering. However, in some age groups in other regions, a high-high pattern has been formed. These include east, northeast, northwest, southwest and to some extent south. The high-high pattern in the northwest is formed only in the age group of 15-19. 3) In the low-low pattern, ASFR in rural areas are mainly concentrated in the center, north and west, however, in the age groups and in terms of time, these patterns have increased or decreased in the mentioned areas.
 
Conclusion
In this study, the spatial and temporal variability of age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) was investigated using spatial exploratory data analysis (ESDA) techniques for 2006 and 2016.This study is one of the first attempts to analyze the fertility of age groups in rural areas with a spatial approach. Although the identification and discovery of spatial clusters does not provide a causal explanation for the reasons for the formation of fertility patterns, it can provide a basis for constructing assumptions and models for future research. What has been done in this research provides a suitable scientific and accurate basis for further fundamental research in the field of rural fertility and development.
 

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Alexander, M., Zagheni, E., & Barbieri, M, (2017), A flexible Bayesian model for estimating subnational mortality. Demography, 54(6), 2025-2041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0618-7


2. Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J, (2020), Demographic Transition and New Pronatalist Policies in Iran. ББК 66.75 П 26, 16, 30.


3. Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., MacDonald, P & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M, (2009), The fertility transition in Iran: revolution and reproduction, Springer Netherlands.


4. Ahmadian, M & Mehrbani, V, (2013), Women's Education and Fertility in Tehran: An Economic Approach. Economic Research, 48(1). Doi: 10.22059/jte.2013.30357 [In Persian].


5. Alam, M. S., Hossain, S. S., & Sheela, F. F, (2019), Spatial smoothing of low-birth-weight rate in Bangladesh using Bayesian hierarchical model. Journal of Applied Statistics, 46(10), 1870-1885. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1572722


6. Aliei, M, (2015), The role of population and population policies in strengthening the internal structure of power of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Security Horizons, 8 (28), 107-133.


7. Ali-Mohammadi, G, A. (2000). Investigating the economic, social and demographic factors affecting birth and fertility among the Turkmen of Kalaleh city. Master's thesis, Social Science Department, University of Theran. [In Persian].


8. Anselin, L., Lozano, N., & Koschinsky, J. (2006), Rate transformations and smoothing. Urbana, 51, 61801.


9. Assunção, R. M., Schmertmann, C. P., Potter, J. E., & Cavenaghi, S. M, (2005), Empirical Bayes estimation of demographic schedules for small areas. Demography, 42(3), 537-558. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0022


10. Beroll, H., Berke, O., Wilson, J., & Barker, I. K, (2007), Investigating the spatial risk distribution of West Nile virus disease in birds and humans in southern Ontario from 2002 to 2005. Population Health Metrics, 5(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-5-3


11. Boyle, P, (2003), Population geography: does geography matter in fertility research? Progress in Human Geography, 27(5), 615-626. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph452pr


12. Burillo, P., Salvati, L., Matthews, S. A., & Benassi, F, (2020), Local-Scale Fertility Variations in a Low-Fertility Country: Evidence from Spain (2002–2017). Canadian Studies in Population, 47(4), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42650-020-00036-6


13. Carioli, A., Devolder, D., & Valverde, J. R, (2014), A spatial analysis of recent fertility patterns in Spain. In Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America (PAA), Boston, 1-3.


14. Cramb, S., Duncan, E., White, N., Baade, P., & Mengersen, K, (2016), Spatial Modelling Methods. Brisbane: Cancer Council Queensland and Queensland University of Technology


15. Cressie, N, (1992), Smoothing regional maps using empirical Bayes predictors. Geographical Analysis, 24(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00253.x


16. Dadzie, D., Kenu, E., Peprah, N. Y., Ajumobi, O. O., Masiira, B., Bandoh, D. A., ... & Afari, E, (2018), Spatio-temporal distribution of under-five malaria morbidity and mortality hotspots in Ghana, 2012–2017: a case for evidence-based targeting of malaria interventions. Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.37432/JIEPH.2018.1.1.4


17. Entwisle, B. (2007). Putting people into place. Demography, 44(4), 687-703. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2007.0045


18. Erdogan, S., Yalçin, M., & Dereli, M. A, (2013), Exploratory spatial analysis of crimes against property in Turkey. Crime, law and social change, 59(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9398-6


19. Faulkner, D. R, (2005), The spatial dynamics of fertility in South Australia 1976 to 1996. Ph.D Thesis. The University of Adelaide.


20. Gemperli, A., Vounatsou, P., Kleinschmidt, I., Bagayoko, M., Lengeler, C., & Smith, T, (2004), Spatial patterns of infant mortality in Mali: the effect of malaria endemicity. American journal of epidemiology, 159(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh001


21. Goovaerts, P, (2005), Geostatistical analysis of disease data: estimation of cancer mortality risk from empirical frequencies using Poisson kriging. International Journal of Health Geographics, 4(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-4-31


22. Hank, K, (2001), Regional fertility differences in Western Germany: an overview of the literature and recent descriptive findings. International journal of population geography, 7(4), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.228


23. Hansen, Katherine M. (1991), “Head-Banging: Robust Smoothing in the Plane.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 29 (3): 369–78. DOI: 10.1109/36.79427


24. Heidarzadeh, E., & Behzadfar, M. (2019). The Impact of Population Density on Urban Quality


25. Hosseini, H. (1999), Ethnicity and Fertility: Explaining the Fertility Behaviors of Kurdish and Turkish Women in Urmia. PhD Thesis, Social Science Department, University of Theran. [In Persian].


26. Hosseini, H., & Haghshenas, N. M. (2009), Dynamics of development and fertility convergence in Muslim countries. In th IUSSP International population conference.


27. https://www.amar.org.ir


28. Law, J., Quick, M., & Chan, P, (2014), Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling for analysing local patterns of crime over time at the small-area level. Journal of quantitative criminology, 30(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-013-9194-1


29. León-Gómez, B. B., Gotsens, M., Marí-Dell’Olmo, M., Domínguez-Berjón, M. F., Luque-Fernandez, M. Á., Martin, U., ... & Pérez, G, (2019), Bayesian smoothed small-areas analysis of urban inequalities in fertility across 1999–2013. Fertility research and practice, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-019-0066-8


30. Logan, JR., Zhang, W., & Xu H., (2010), Applying spatial thinking in social science research. GeoJournal. Jan 1; 75(10):15-27. doi: 10.1007/s10708-010-9343-0


31. Matthews, S. A., Stiberman, L., Raymer, J., Yang, T. C., Gayawan, E., Saita, S., ... & Wong, D. W, (2021), Looking Back, Looking Forward: Progress and Prospect for Spatial Demography. Spatial Demography, 9(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-021-00084-9


32. Mojica, V. J., Choi, A., & Co, F, (2019), Spatial analysis of violent crimes in Metro Manila, Philippines. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 43(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2017.1398669


33. Mungiole, M, Linda W. Pickle, & Katherine Hansen S, (1999), Application of a Weighted Head‐banging Algorithm to Mortality Data Maps. Statistics in Medicine 18 (23): 3201–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991215)18:23<3201::AID-SIM310>3.0.CO;2-U


34. Pfeiffer, Dirk, Tim Robinson, Mark Stevenson, Kim Stevens, David Rogers, and Archie Clements, (2008), Spatial Analysis in Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


35. Raymer, J., Willekens, F., & Rogers, A, (2019), Spatial demography: A unifying core and agenda for further research. Population, Space and Place, 25(4), e2179. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2179


36. Razeghi-Nasrabad, H. B., Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., & Moeinifar, M, (2020), Are We Facing a Dramatic Increase in Voluntary and Involuntary Childlessness in Iran That Leads to Lower Fertility? Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences, 7(2).


37. Rezaee, M., Faraji Sabokbar, H., & Tahmasbi, S, (2022), Spatial Smoothing of Fertility Rate in Rural Areas of Iran (2011-2016), Journal of Rural Research, 12(4), Pages 734-749.doi: 10.22059/jrur.2022.325115.1641[In Persian].


38. Ruckthongsook, W, (2017), The Influence of Disease Mapping Methods on Spatial Patterns and Neighborhood Characteristics for Health Risk. (Thesis). University of North Texas.


39. Salvati, L., Benassi, F., Miccoli, S., Rabiei-Dastjerdi, H., & Matthews, S. A, (2020), Spatial variability of total fertility rate and crude birth rate in a low-fertility country: patterns and trends in regional and local scale heterogeneity across Italy, 2002–2018. Applied Geography, 124, 102321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102321


40. Schmertmann, C. P., Cavenaghi, S. M., & Potter, J. E, (2013), Bayes plus Brass: estimating total fertility for many small areas from sparse census data. Population studies, 67(3), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2013.795602


41. Shayani, S. (2004). Investigating the economic, social and demographic factors affecting the fertility of women (15-49) years old in Noorabad Mamsani city. Master's thesis, Social Science Department, University of Theran. [In Persian].


42. Talbot, T. O., Kulldorff, M., Forand, S. P., & Haley, V. B, (2000), Evaluation of spatial filters to create smoothed maps of health data. Statistics in medicine, 19(17‐18), 2399-2408. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000915/30)19:17/18<2399: aid-sim577>3.0.co;2-r


43. Türkan, A. H., Erdugan, F., & Aldemir, S, (2020), Spatial Patterns of Infant Mortality in Turkey between 2011 and 2016. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.8.4_1


44. Vitali, A., & Billari, F. C, (2017), Changing determinants of low fertility and diffusion: A spatial analysis for Italy. Population, Space and Place, 23(2), e1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1998


45. Voss PR (2007a), Demography as a spatial social science. Population Research and Policy Review 26(5–6): 457–476. doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9047-4.


46. Waller, Lance A, and Carol A Gotway. 2004. Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2005.s15.


47. Wang, Y., & Gao, W, (2020), The application of spatial empirical Bayesian smoothing method in spatial analysis of bacillary dysentery: A case study in Yudu County, Jiangxi Province. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 568, No. 1, p. 012009). IOP Publishing. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/568/1/012009


48. Zambon, I., Rontos, & Salvati, L, (2020), Toward an unwanted dividend? Fertility decline and the North–South divide in Italy, 1952–2018. Quality & Quantity, 54(1), 169-187. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00950-1


49. Zewdie, S. A, (2014), Spatial analysis of child mortality in South Africa in relation to poverty and inequality: evidences from the 2011 census (Master's thesis, University of Cape Town).


50. Zhang, J., Yin, F., Zhang, T., Yang, C., Zhang, X., Feng, Z., & Li, X, (2014), Spatial analysis on human brucellosis incidence in mainland China: 2004–2010. BMJ open, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004470


51. Zhang, Z., Bhattacharjee, A., Maiti, T., Marques, J. L., Martins, J. M., & Castro, E. A, (2013), Spatial small area estimation of regional fertility rates: A Bayesian approach applied to Portuguese NUTS III regions.