تحلیل ساختاری-کارکردی توسعه حمل و نقل محور در محدوده طرح ترافیک کلانشهر تهران

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

محسن کلانتری ¹ (دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.)
محسن احدنژاد روشتی ² (دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.)
ابوالفضل مشکینی ³ (دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.)
محمد جواد نوروزی ⁴ (دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/11/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/07/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/05/01

کلید واژه: حمل و نقل شهری, توسعه کالبدی-فضایی, حمل و نقل محور, کلان شهر تهران,

چکیده مقاله :

       امروزه با رشد فیزیگی شهرهای بزرگ و افزایش سفرهای درون شهری، مسئله حمل و نقل و دستیابی به یک الگوی مطلوب توسعه فضایی مبتنی بر حمل و نقل عمومی محور، اهمیت بسزایی دارد. در این راستا شناخت محدودیت های ساختاری-کارکردی شهرها در زمینه توزیع فضایی کاربری ها، خدمات و جمعیت، نحوه ایجاد تعادل بین ظرفیت های اقتصادی، اجتماعی و کالبدی شهر با پتانسیل های حمل و نقل، می تواند به راهبردهای توسعه فضایی مطلوب رهنمون سازد. لذا این مقاله با روش تحلیلی-اکتشافی به بررسی و تبیین ساختاری-کارکردی توسعه کالبدی شهری مبتنی بر سیستم حمل و نقل همگانی محور (TOD) در محدوده طرح ترافیک شهر تهران می پردازد. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از مطالعات کتابخانه ای و میدانی استفاده شده است. برای تحلیل داده ها از روش های سیستم اطلاعات مکانی از قبیل ضریب شاخص دسترسی بهینه، درون یابی براساس فاصله معکوس (IDW) و تحلیل شبکه براساس همپوشانی وزنی لایه ها با کمک نرم افزار ARC GIS 10.3 استفاده شده است. شاخص های پژوهش نیز شامل تراکم جمعیت، کاربری اراضی، تنوع کاربری، کاربری مراکز فعالیت و ظرفیت حمل و نقل است. یافته های تحقیق نشان داد که با وجود ظرفیت های بالای سیستم حمل و نقل شهر تهران اعم از 17 کیلومتر خط اتوبوس تندرو (BRT) و 41 ایستگاه؛ 38 کیلومتر خط مترو و 40 ایستگاه؛ و 107 کیلومتر خط اتوبوص با 317 ایستگاه ؛ توزیع کاربری ها نامناسب است. از طرفی 63 درصد از فضای محدوده در زمینه شاخص تحرک در پهنه «زیاد» قرار گرفته است. در نتیجه، به علت توزیع نامناسب کاربریها، مردم، روزانه سفرهای درون شهری متعددی برای دریافت خدمات از نقاط گوناگون انجام می دهند. در نتیجه، به علت بالا بودن شاخص تحرک فضایی و عدم تناسب بین تنوع کاربری و ظرفیت جمعیت پذیری و حجم مراجعات؛ نقاط داغ ترافیکی شهر منطبق بر محورهای حمل و نقل خطوط BRT و مترو است. لذا، محدود کردن استفاده از خودروهای شخصی، خروج کاربری های نامناسب و ناسازگار، تشویق مردم به پیاده روی و دوچرخه سواری، و حفظ جمعیت محدوده و جلوگیری از تغییر کاربری مسکونی به فعالیتی، ضروری است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Today, with the physical growth of large cities and increasing intra-urban travel, the issue of transportation and the achievement of an optimal spatial development pattern based on public transport are of great importance. In this regard, recognizing the structural and functional constraints of cities in the spatial distribution of utilities, services and population, how to balance the economic, social and physical capacities of the city with transport potential, can lead to favorable spatial development strategies. So, this paper, by analytical-exploratory method, explores and explains the structural-functional urban development based on the TOD system in the traffic area of Tehran. Library and field studies have been used to collect information. For data analysis, spatial information system methods such as optimal access index, inverted interpolation (IDW) and network analysis based on the weight overlay of layers have been used with ARC GIS 10.3 software. Research indicators also include population density, land use, user diversity, and use of activity centers and network capacity of the road.
The research findings showed that despite the high capacity of Tehran's transportation system, it has 17 km of radial bus lines (BRT) and 41 stations; 38 km of subway lines and 40 stations; and 107 km of bus lines with 317 stations; Inappropriate. On the other hand, 63% of the scope of the Mobility Index is located in the "high" area. As a result, due to the distribution of inappropriate applications, people daily diverge intra-city trips to receive services from a variety of locations. As a result, it seems to be necessary to restrict the use of private cars, the withdrawal of inappropriate and incompatible uses, encouraging people to walk and bike, and to keep the population in range and prevent the change of residential usage.
Extended Abstract
Introduction: One of the most important forms of transportation planning and urban development is the emphasis on expanding the public transport system and guiding daily trips to utilize its capacity. This spatial development planning approach creates tight-knit, pedestrian-driven communities around high-quality freight stations, allowing for an increased quality of life without vehicle dependency. With the growing physicality of major cities and increasing urban travel, the issue of transportation and the achievement of a favorable spatial development model based on public transport is of great importance. Therefore, understanding the structural-functional constraints of cities in the spatial distribution of land uses, services, and populations, how to balance the economic, social, and physical capacities of cities with transportation potentials is desirable for designing spatial development strategies.
Methodology: This paper, by analytical-exploratory method, explores and explains the structural-functional urban development based on the TOD system in the traffic area of Tehran. Library and field studies have been used to collect information. For data analysis, spatial information system methods such as optimal access index, inverted interpolation (IDW) and network analysis based on the weight overlay of layers have been used with ARC GIS 10.3 software. In this study, variables related to urban transport and factors affecting exacerbation of physical problems have been formulated. Research indicators also include population density, land use, user diversity, and use of activity centers and network capacity of the road. Initially, using population density indexes, institutions and economic centers, employment, land use, traffic volume and vehicle traffic at time and place; the traffic status and spatial flows of traffic in Tehran were studied using GIS techniques. Secondly, the BRT metro stations and accessibility index were calculated based on the standard access radius for each user, the distance between service centers and their access to the metro and BRT lines, and the mobility and range dynamics. And finally, using the layers produced in the previous steps and their evaluation and standardization, by examining and comparing public transport system patterns and spatial analysis, the extent of conformity of the range transport capacities with the TOD criteria of the study was.
Results and discussion: Surveys show that Tehran has a population of about 8 million with a fixed population of about 4 million, with over 5 million cars and 15 million daily commute, with traffic and transportation problems particularly in the central city. Faces the limit of traffic plan. In this regard, the experiences of successful cities in applying the TOD-based transport system show that in Japan the emphasis is on cycling, public buses and city trains and in Brazil on the use of BRT express buses in the city center. Also, in downtown Amsterdam, the Netherlands, there is no bus or subway station, and cycling and special taxis are limited. On the other hand, according to the different models of transportation-centered design systems, it seems that Tehran's situation with TOD Corridor model is based on several types of transport lines (such as public bus, subway, BRT tram, etc.). And several distribution cores are more consistent. In this regard, the examination of the conditions of the transport system of the successful countries, especially the city of Amsterdam, showed that, in order to create a city with a transport-oriented and traffic-control system, the transport system with the main terminals, and the secondary and intermediate terminals with Design hierarchical relationships around the central part. And central control in the form of pedestrian and bicycle design and special and limited taxis. In this regard, in order to explain the conditions of the city of Tehran within the scope of the traffic plan and its compliance with the models and experiences of the successful cities, the existing situation and the transportation capacities were investigated. The results of the study showed that the transport capacity of the traffic plan area consisted of 35 kilometers of lanes with a width of more than 25 meters; 17 kilometers of BRT and 41 stations and 95 buses; more than 38 kilometers of subway and 40 stations. And 23 metro stations; and more than 107 kilometers of bus lines with 317 bus stops and 293 buses. However, this area is one of the busiest areas in the city and the traffic hotspots are in line with the metro route and BRT lines. According to the surveys, 63 percent of the space in the area of ​​mobility index is in the "high" zone. This shows that many residents in the area are also unable to access their needs from a convenient access distance. And to get multiple services, they need to travel long distances.
Conclusion: Therefore, it can be said that many of the traffic and transportation problems in Tehran, especially in the area of ​​traffic planning, depend on the spatial distribution of land use and the proportionality between population and activity and service use. Also, the analysis of conformity of transportation capacities and land use pattern with TOD principles showed that Tehran city was not successful in terms of pedestrian, accessibility, cycling and spatial distribution of land use proportional to population capacity. For this purpose, according to the theoretical and analytical findings, the following requirements are necessary to achieve the criteria of the axle transport system:

Restrict the use of private cars in the city's central loop and design of pedestrian / bicycle-based networks
Spatial Distribution of Service and Business Users Based on Population Capacity and Transport
Exit incompatible land uses and move them to areas beyond the city center or second layer landfills

Protecting the population of the area and preventing

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Abdi, Mohammad Hamad & Alizadeh, Hooshmand (2013). Public Transport Corridor-Based Pattern in Pasdaran Boulevard, Sanandaj, Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development, No. 13.


2. Arrington, GB. Faulkener, T. (2002). “State Wide TOD Study Factors for Success in Ca lifornia”, Technical Appendix, California DT, pp. 12-19.


3. Behzadfar, Mostafa and Zabihi, Maryam (2011), Urban Area Planning Guide in Public Transport-Based Development Framework, Bagh Nazar Journal, Volume 8, Number 18Belzer, D., & Autler,

G. (2012). Transit Oriented Development: Moving from Rhetoric to Reality: The Brookings

Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy and the Great American Station Foundation.

1. Boarnet, Marlon (2011). "A Broader Context for Land Use and Travel Behavior, and a Research Agenda". Journal of the American Planning Association. 77 (3): 197–213.


2. Calthorpe, Peter (2013). The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press


3. Cervero, R. (2016). The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry, USA: Island Press.


4. Dittmar, H., Ohland, G. (2014). The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-oriented Development, Island Press.


5. Duncan, Michael (2017) Would the replacement of park-and-ride facilities with transit-oriented development reduce vehicle kilometers traveled in an auto-oriented US region,? Transport Policy,


6. Etminani, Roya and Sultan, Ali. (2013). Impact of distributed urban development on the pattern of daily trips of urban residents (Case study: Shiraz One-Metropolitan Area). Journal of Regional Planning, 3 (No. 10), 61-70


7. Falah menshadi, Elham and Rohi, Amir and Falah menshadi, Afrooz. (2015). Analysis and review of  Measures needed to implement integrated urban transport in metropolises; Case study: Tehran. Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 6 (20), 83-98.


8. Guerra, Erick and Cervero, Robert (2015). "Is a Half-Mile Circle the Right Standard for TODs?” ACCESS, University of California, Berkeley


9. Hardy, D. (2018) Sustainability 101: A primer for ITE members. ITE Journal, 28-34.


10. Hazel, G. a. (2007): Megacities challenges. Munich: Siemens AG


11. Litman, Todd, (2016) Land Use Impacts on Transport, How Land Use Factors Affect Travel Behavior, Victoria Transport Policy Institute with Rowan Steele


12. Manaugh, Kevin & Kreider, Tyler (2017). What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix, The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol6, No.1pp:63-72.


13. Martinez, Matt (2010). "Washington, D.C., launches the nation's largest bike share program". Grist


14. Mohammadpour, Saber and Sarafi, Mozaffar and Tavakkolia, Jamila. (2016). An Analysis of Travel Demand Management for Sustainable Urban Transport (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis). Journal of Regional Planning, 6 (21), 103-116


15. Moore, Adrian.T. & Staley, Samuel.R. & Poole, Robert.W. (2010). "The role of VMT reduction in meeting climate change policy goals". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 44 (8): 565–574


16. Niles.j and Nelson. D. (2011). “Measuring the Success of TOD”, Prepared for the American planning Association, National Planning Conference, Scattle Un, Washington, pp. 75-89.


17. Pour Ahmad, Ahmad, Imranzadeh, Behzad.(2012). Evaluation and Presentation of BRT Transport System Development Solutions in Tehran Metropolis Using SWOT Model. Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 3 (11), 17-36.


18. Reconnecting America’s Center for Transit-Oriented Development. (2017) Station Area Planning: How To Make Great Transit-Oriented Places", Technical Report (TOD 202), USA: Federal Transit Administration


19. Rezaei, Mohammad Reza and Karimi, Barbaz (2016). The Role of CDS Urban Development Strategies in Organizing Informal Settlements by Combining ANP and SWOT Models (Case Study: Shiraz Spring Township). Journal of Regional Planning, 6 (22), 109-120.


20. Soltani, Ali. (2014). An Analysis of the Status of Sustainable Transport in Municipal Development Plans; A Case Study of Shiraz Municipality. Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 5 (16), 1-18.


21. Smas, Lukas & Schmitt, Peter & Perjo, Liisa & Tunström, Moa (2016) Transit-oriented development and sustainable urban planning, Austrian Institute for Spatial Planning , Färgfabriken
    
    
    1. Singh, Yamini Jain(2015) Measuring transit - oriented development (TOD) at regional and local scales : a planning support tool, PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation
    
    


22. Spears, Steven   & Marlon G. Boarnet & Handy, Susan (2018). Impacts of Land-Use Mix on Passenger Vehicle Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.California Environmental Protection Agency.


23. Tehran Center for Studies and Planning (2012). Investigation and Presentation of Policies for Sustainable Transport in Tehran, Daneshgah No 128, Summer 2012


24. Tehran Comprehensive Transport and Traffic Studies Company (2011). Tehran Comprehensive Transport and Traffic, Deputy of Transport and Traffic of Tehran Municipality, Tehran.


25. White, S. M., & Mcdaniel, J. B. (2009) TCRP Legal Research Digest 12: The Zoning and Real Estate Implications of Transit-Oriented Development, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 1 -50