بنیان‌های ژئوپلیتیکی سیاست خارجی جمهوریاسلامیایران با ترکیه از دیدگاه سازه‌انگاری
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ایآرش سلطانی 1 , افشین متقی دستنایی 2 , رضا سیمبر 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
3 - استاد گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین المل دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.
کلید واژه: "بنیان‌های ژئوپلیتیکی", "سیاست خارجی", "جمهوری‌اسلامی ایران", "ترکیه",
چکیده مقاله :
از مهمترین مسئولیت‌های هر کشوری تنظیم روابط خارجی خود با دیگر کشورها از طریق سیاست خارجی است و در این بین از مهمترین متغیرهای مؤثر در شکل‌گیری خط‌مشی سیاست خارجی کشورها، بنیان‌های ژئوپلیتیک میباشد. جمهوریاسلامیایران نیز بواسطۀ همجواری با مناطق ژئوپلیتیکی و ژئواستراتژیکی متعدد می‌بایست از این بنیانها برای دستیابی به اهداف و منافع ملی حداکثری در سیاست خارجی خود استفاده کند. در بهرهبرداری از این بنیانها، بناچار در بعضی از مناطق با دیگر کشورها بویژه با کشورهای همسایه، تناقضات و تضادهایی در برخی موارد پیش میآید. در این میان یکی از کشورهایی که اقدامات و سیاستهای آن برای جمهوریاسلامیایران همواره مهم و تأثیرگذار بوده است، ترکیه میباشد. این کشور به عنوان یکی از مهمترین بازیگران و همسایگان ایران در منطقه جنوب‌غرب‌آسیا، برای دستیابی به اهداف و منافع‌ملی در سیاست خارجی خود همواره با جمهوریاسلامیایران در رقابت بوده و دستیابی به منافع ملی در منطقه این دو کشور را مجبور به برقراری ارتباط (تعامل– تقابل) در زمینه‌های مختلف کردهاست و این مسئله لزوم بررسی روابط دو کشور را دوچندان می‌کند. پژوهش حاضر از نظر روششناسی توصیفی ـ تحلیلی بوده و از نظر نوع تحقیق، کاربردی محسوب میگردد. مهمترین بنیان‌های ژئوپلیتیکی مؤثر بر سیاست خارجی جمهوریاسلامیایران در ارتباط با ترکیه عبارتند از: نحوۀ ارتباط دو کشور با آمریکا و اسرائیل، رقابت در آسیای مرکزی و قفقاز، مسئلۀ کُردها، ژئوپلیتیک شیعه و نحوۀ واکنش به تحولات منطقه از جمله عراق و سوریه است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد متناسب با سیاستهای اتخاذی هر دو کشور در منطقه، جمهوریاسلامیایران برای دستیابی به منافع ملی حداکثری، روابطی از طیف تعاملی تا رقابتی را نسبت به ترکیه انتخاب کرده است.
One of the most important responsibilities of any country is to regulate its foreign relations with other countries through foreign policy, and in the meantime, one of the most important variables influencing the formation of foreign policy is the geopolitical foundations. The Islamic Republic of Iran, due to its proximity to various geopolitical and geostrategic regions, must use these foundations to achieve maximum national goals and interests in its foreign policy. In exploiting these foundations, in some areas with other countries, especially with neighboring countries, contradictions and contrast occur in some cases. Meanwhile, one of the countries whose actions and policies have always been important and effective for the Islamic Republic of Iran is Turkey. As one of the most important players and neighbors of Iran in the region of Southwest Asia, this country has always been in competition with the Islamic Republic of Iran to achieve national goals and interests in its foreign policy and has to establish national interests in the region of these two countries And Communication (interaction-confrontation) has taken place in various fields, and this issue doubles the need to study the relations between the two countries. The present research is descriptive-analytical in terms of methodology and is applied in terms of the type of research. The geopolitical foundations influencing the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in relation to Turkey are: how the two countries relate to the United States and Israel, competition in Central Asia and the Caucasus, the Kurdish issue, Shiite geopolitics and how to respond to regional developments including Iraq and Syria. Findings show that in accordance with the policies adopted by both countries in the region, the Islamic Republic of Iran has chosen relations from the interactive to competitive spectrum to Turkey in order to achieve maximum national interests.
Extended Abstract
Introduction:
One of the most important responsibilities of any country is to regulate its foreign relations with other countries through foreign policy, and among these, geopolitical foundations are one of the most important variables in shaping the foreign policy of countries. How the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is influenced by the geopolitical foundations and how to use these components for greater dynamism and efficiency in relation to Turkey is the main issue of the present study. The Islamic Republic of Iran needs to establish relations with other countries, especially neighboring countries, in order to influence regional developments and secure national interests and increase security in the national and global dimensions. Meanwhile, Turkey, as one of the most important players in the region of Southwest Asia, seeks to increase its geopolitical sphere of influence in the region to achieve its national goals and interests. Therefore, the present study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the geopolitical relations between the two countries and to extract the geopolitical components affecting the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in relation to Turkey.
Methodology:
The present research is considered descriptive-analytical methodology and applied in terms of research type. The method of collecting data and information of this research is documentary-library and by studying the available books, articles and dissertations as well as internet resources. After collecting and classifying information, their analysis has been done through descriptive and based on thinking, logic and reasoning.
Results and discussion:
Central Asia and the Caucasus
The limited possibilities and new opportunities created by the developments in Central Asia have caused the relations between Iran and Turkey in the region to tend towards a kind of confrontation and competition from the beginning of the emergence of new states in this region, so that the elements and dimensions This competition prevents the formation of a central nucleus consisting of two regional powers, namely Iran and Turkey, in the Central Asian region and the Caucasus. In this regard, the obstacles to convergence between Iran and Turkey in this region are mostly around the three main aspects, namely ideological, geopolitical (confrontation of regional maps) and finally economic competition, crystallized and concentrated.
United States of America One of the factors that has seriously influenced the construction of the geopolitical structure governing Turkish-Iranian relations is the changing subject of the United States and the type of relationship and Ankara's view of Tehran based on Washington's considerations that have led to the formation of perceptions and actions in the minds. Iranian officials. In recent years, despite numerous disagreements with Washington, Ankara has maintained a special position for the United States in its foreign policy and has tried not to confront the country directly. However, the Islamic Republic of Iran has a strategic difference with the United States based on the norms and identities derived from the Islamic Revolution, and this has a significant impact on the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in relation to countries such as Turkey, which is a strategic ally of the United States.
Israel
After the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, despite the stability of some influential factors in foreign policy, the foreign policy of this country towards Israel underwent a fundamental change. Among Iran's neighbors, Turkey has established extensive political, scientific, military, intelligence, and trade relations with Israel over the past decades. Meanwhile, one of the most important concerns of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Middle East is how Turkey relations with Israel. Turkish-Israeli cooperation in the region is very crucial for Iran. It can be said that if Turkey and Israel converge in the region, we will see tension in Iran-Turkey relations and also the beginning of insecurity in the region. Conversely, if the two countries diverge, the positions of Iran and Turkey will become closer and will also see a reduction in conflicts between countries in the region.
Iraq The Islamic Republic of Iran, as one of Iraq's most important and influential neighbors, has more opportunities than its other regional rivals. Another influential country in the developments in Iraq is Turkey, which has a more security approach to Iraq. The process of forming a government in Iraq after the US occupation turned into a rivalry between Ankara and Tehran. Both countries competed to secure their friendship with the central government in Baghdad and other influential actors in Iraqi politics. However, the old security concerns of Turkey and Iran, which stemmed from the potential independence of a Kurdish country, led them to put aside their differences and rivalry and participate in joint efforts to contain the common threat.
Syria
Due to its special geopolitical position, Syria has always been considered by the centers of power in the international system. With the onset of the Arab Spring in the region, Iran and Turkey apparently had similar views. Over time, their strategic and ideological differences led to competition between the two countries. The prolongation of the crisis and, as a result, the complication of its dimensions, have led to an increasing conflict of interests among the actors involved in the crisis. Each of these actors pursues different policies and actions depending on their identity and interests.
Conclusion:
Geopolitics has played a vital role in Turkish-Iranian relations throughout history; In this regard, it can be said that components such as relations with the United States and Israel, NATO, the Central Asian region and the Caucasus, the Alawite debate in Turkey, Shiite geopolitics and the issue of Pan-Turkism have led to the divergence of their relations; And in issues such as the Kurdish issue, Iran's nuclear program and security developments in the region, especially developments in neighboring countries, relations between the two countries have been convergent and interactive. In periods when Turkey's relations with the above-mentioned countries were friendly and warm, such as Turkey's membership in NATO and the establishment of political and economic relations with them, and due to their hostile relations with Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran's foreign policy towards Turkey became competitive and divergent. This is in complete contradiction with the geopolitical codes of both countries (foreign policy and national interests). Islamic Iran had a friendly and convergent relationship. Therefore, it can be said that as long as economic, geopolitical, political and ideological motives are evident in the relations between the two countries, competition will play an important principle in the behavior pattern of the two countries.
Abdalla Moh’d Dyab Al-Nouimat et al.( 2019). Geopolitical interest of Iran in Central Asia. International Relations and International Law Journal, [S.l.], v. 87, n. 3, p. 40-46, oct.
- Abolghasemi, Mohammad Javad and Hossein Ardoush (1378), Turkey at a Glance, Tehran: Al-Huda Publishing[in persian].
-Ahmadi, Qasem, (1395). Military Investment and Economic Growth in Saudi Arabia and Turkey from 2000 to 2015, Supervisor: Zahedi, Nessa, M.Sc. Thesis, Mofid University[in persian].
- Aghaei, Seyed Davood, Rasouli, Elham. (1388). Constructivism and foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran towards Israel. Quarterly Journal of Politics, 1, (39)[in persian].
-Avci, Erkan. (2014), ABD'NİN IRAK'I İŞGALİ SONRASI TÜRKİYE'NİN IRAK POLİTİKASI VE PKK SORUNU (2003-2013), USBED.
-Aydin Aydin),2017(.Turkey-Iran Relations in the Light of Nuclear Power Debates and Arab Spring, Turkey’s Role and The Future of Relations. International Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business, Vol:7, No:2 s. 123-130.
-Bayram Sinkaya, (2018). The Kurdish question in Iran and its effects on Iran-Turkey relations, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 45:5, 840-859.
-Bayram Sinkaya,)2019(.Turkey-Iran Relations after the Islamic Revolution of 1979 In: Turkey-Iran Relations after the JDP. Istanbul: Institut français d’études anatoliennes.
-Ebrahimi, Amir, Akhavan, Saeed (1389), Proceedings of the Second Iran-Central Asia Review Conference, November 2010[in persian].
-Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza (1381), Political Geography of Iran, Tehran: Samat [in persian].
-Hosseinpour Pouyan, Reza. Explain the geographical and geopolitical components of relations in geopolitical areas. Journal of Geopolitics, (1392), Ninth Year, No. 2, pp. 230-161[in persian].
-Imani, Hemmat, (1393). Relations between Turkey and Israel during the Justice and Development Party, Tehran, Entekhab Publishing[in persian].
-De Neve, J., & Lesage, D. (2018). Continuïteit en fluctuatie in de Turks-Iraanse relatie 2002-2018: rivaliserende vrienden of bevriende rivalen? Masterproef voorgelegd voor het behalen van de graad master in de richting EU-studies.
-Ergin Güneş,Power Struggle Between Turkey and Iran in Shia Geopolitics, Ankara Üniversitesi
SBF Dergisi, Cilt 74, No. 1, 2019, s. 57 – 88.
-Gol Karami, Abed, (1396). Explaining the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran from a Geopolitical Perspective and Presenting an Optimal Regional Model, Supervisor: Yadaleh Karimipour, PhD Thesis in Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran.
-Khorami, Mohammad Ali, The Iran-Iraq War in UN Documents, Tehran: Sacred Documentation and Defense Center, 2008, Vol. 1, p. 56[in persian].
-Kerim Yildiz, The Kurds in Turkey: EU Accession and Human Rights (London: Pluto Press, 2015).Iran: Freedom of Expression and Association in the Kurdish Regions’, Human Rights Watch.
-Lupovici, A. (2019). Constructivism methods: a plea and manifesto, London: British International Studies Association.
-Mohammadi, Manouchehr. "Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Principles and Issues", Tehran, Justice Publishing,1997[in persian].
-Mojtahedzadeh, Pirooz, (1391). Geopolitical philosophy and function, concepts and theories in the age of cyberspace; Samat Publications, Tehran[in persian].
-Mostafavi, Gholam Ali, (1396). Analysis of Geopolitical Relations between Iran and Turkey (2003-2016), Supervisor: Yashar Zaki, M.Sc. Thesis in Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran[in persian].
-Mottaqi, Afshin, (1390). Explaining the Geopolitics of Islamism in Turkish Foreign Policy with a Structuralist Approach (1995 to 2011), Supervisor: Rasoul Afzali, Thesis for a PhD in Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran.[in persian].
- Mottaghi, Afshin (2015), Analysis of the grounds of incompatibility in Iran-Saudi Arabia relations based on structural theory, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Policy Research, Volume 12, Number 13.[in persian].
- Mahmoudi Kia, Mohammad, Farhadi, Abbas. (1398). A Comparative Study of the Foreign Policy Action of Iran and Turkey in Relation to the Syrian Crisis Based on Constructivist Theory. International Relations Studies. 12 (47), 178-151. [in persian].
-Niakoui, Seyed Amir and Bahmanesh, Hossein, (1391), Actors Opposed to the Syrian Crisis: GoalsAnd Approaches, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Volume 4, Number 4[in persian].
-Ozkan, Gökhan. (2010). Türkiye'nin Orta Asya ve Kalkasya'daki Bölgesel Politikasında Enerji Güvenliği, Akademik Bakış, Cilt 4 Sayı7, ss18-19.
-Özcan, N. A., & Özdamar, Ö. (2010). Uneasy Neighbors: Turkish-Iranian Relations Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Middle East Policy 17(3), 101-117.
-Philpott, D. )2019). Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-Rafi, Hussein, Mazloumi, Ismail, (1391). Barriers to the convergence of Iran and Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Central Eurasian Studies, 5 (No. 10 (Spring and Summer 2012) [in persian].
-Sajjadpour, Kazem. Geopolitics and Iran's Foreign Policy: Continuity and Change. Proceedings of the First Scientific Congress of the Geopolitical Association of Iran, (1383), pp. 240-224[in persian].
-ŞAFAK BAŞ , “PRAGMATISM AND RIVALRY: THE NATURE OF TURKEY-IRAN RELATIONS ” Journal of Third World Studies, Vol.12, No.3 (2013), p. 3-4.
-Vosoughi, Saeed, Rezaei, Massoud. (1394). Turkish-American considerations in relations with Iran. Journal of Defense Policy, 24 (93)[in persian].
-Zehfuss, M. (2020). Constructivism and Identity, a Dangerous Liaison, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 7. No.3, pp. 315-328.
_||_