سنجش و ارزیابی پایداری شهری با استفاده از تکنیک های ANP, Topsis, Saw (مطالعه موردی: شهر کرمان)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

علی اصغر عبدالهی ¹

1 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1395/03/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1396/08/28 تاریخ انتشار : 1396/10/01

کلید واژه: TOPSIS, شاخص های پایداری شهری, توسعه پایدار شهری, شهر پایدار, ANP, Saw , کرمان,

چکیده مقاله :

با بروز ضایعات زیست محیطی و کاهش سطح عمومی زندگی مردم به ویژه در جوامع شهری طی یکی دو دهه گذشته، رهیافت پایداری شهری به عنوان موضوع روز دهه آخر قرن 20 از سوی سازمان ملل مطرح شد و به عنوان دستور کار قرن 21 در سطوح بین­المللی، منطقه­ای و محلی تعیین گردید. هدف کلی تحقیق حاضر؛ ارزیابی شاخص­های پایداری شهری در شهر کرمان  با استفاده از تکنیک­های تصمیم­گیری چند شاخصه می­باشد. روش شناسی تحقیق توصیفی – تحلیلی با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی GIS  و تکنیک­های تصمیم­گیری چند شاخصه (ANP,Topsis,Saw) می­باشد. براساس یافته­های به دست آمده از تکنیک ANP، معیارهای اقتصادی با 254/0، زیربنایی با 251/0، اجتماعی با 162/0، زیستی با 125/0 و معیار کالبدی با 35/0 به ترتیب بالاترین مقادیر را از نظر سطوح پایداری به خود اختصاص داده­اند. بر همین اساس منطقه 2 با 491/0، منطقه 1 با 302/0، منطقه 4 با 213/0 و در نهایت منطقه 3 با 211/0 اولویت­های اول تا چهارم را به خود اختصاص داده­اند. نتایج به دست آمده از تکنین SAW نیز بیانگر این مهم می­باشدکه از بین معیارهای مؤثر در سطوح پایداری شهر کرمان، معیار زیستی با 26/0 ، اجتماعی و کالبدی با 23/0، اقتصادی با 18/0 و زیربنایی با 07/0 به ترتیب بیشترین وزن را به خود اختصاص داده­اند و منطقه 2 با 73/0، منطقه 1 با 63/0، منطقه 3 با 55/0 و منطقه 4 با 53/0 به ترتیب اولویت های اول تا چهارم را به خود اختصاص داده­اند. در ادامه یافته های تحقیق، نتایج به دست آمده از تکنیک Topsis نشان می­دهد که منطقه 1 با 783/0، منطقه 4 با 743/0، منطقه 2 با 591/0 و منطقه 3 با 170/0 به ترتیب اولویت­های اول تا چهارم را به خود اختصاص داده­اند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

With the emergence of environmental waste and reduce the general level of people's lives, especially in urban communities during the past two decades, Approach to urban sustainability theme of the day as the last decade of the 20th century came from the United Nations and as a 21st century approach at international, regional and local levels were determined. The Aim of this study is to evaluate the sustainability indices in Kerman city using multi-criteria decision-making techniques are. Research methodology - descriptive analysis using Geographic Information System Gis and techniques Multiple Attribute Decision Making (ANP, Topsis, Saw) is. The results show that ANP techniques, economic and social criteria in terms of enhancing the stability of the highest, respectively. The final results also show the superiority of options 1 and 2 in the Kerman region in order of priority in terms of sustainability indicators have been established in the city of Kerman. According to the results of the techniques Saw, in the four regions of Kerman on urban sustainability, Zones 2 and 1 in the first and second zones 3 and 4 In third and fourth place in terms of urban sustainability have been effective and prioritize areas of Kerman based techniques shows Topsis 1 and 4 positions of the first and second regions and zones 2 and 3 are the third and fourth positions.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Alpopi, C, Manole, C, Colesca.2011. Assement of the Sustainable Urban      Development Level through the use of Indivators of Suutainability, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Volume 6 Issue 2.


2. Azani M., Mokhtari Malekabadi, R., and Molaei Birgani. 2014. The Study of Indices of Sustainable Development in the District of Isfahan, 13th District. Journal of Spatial Planning, Volume 3 (2): 119-142. [ in Persian]


3. Azad Armeki, Gh, Eftekhari, A, 2001, Sustainable Development Economics. Volume (1). Publications from the Institute of Business Studies and Research. [ in Persian]


4. Baro, S, 1997. Sustainable Development, Concept, Method and Practice. Translation by Seyyed Ali Badri. Quarterly journal of geographic research. [ in Persian]


5. Campbell, S, 1996.Green cities growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contadiction of sustainable development, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol,62(3):296-312.


6. Connelly, S,.2007. Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment, 12(3): 259–278.


7. De Chazel,.2010. A Systems Approach to Livability and Sustainability. Definning Terms and Mapping Relationships to Link Desires with Ecological Opportunities and Constraints, Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res. Vol (27):585 – 597.


8. Drakakis Smith, D, 1996.Sustainability. urbanization and developments. Thrid World Planing Review.18(4:111-V.


9. Farhoudi, R. Rahnamaei, m, Timury A, 2011, The Sustainable Development Dimensions of Urban Neighborhoods Using Fuzzy Logic and Geographic Information System, Case Study: Tehran 17th District. Human Geography Research. [ in Persian]


10. Flood, j, 1997.Urban and housing indicators, Urban Studies,34(10):1635-1665.


11. Gilbert, A. Galger, J., 1997. Cities, Poverty and Development, Urbanization in the Third World. Translation by Parviz Karimi Naseri. Tehran. General Directorate of Public Relations and International Affairs of Tehran Municipality. [ in Persian]


12. GoldMary, V,.1999. Sustainable agriculture. Definition and terms, special reference.BriefSeriesNo.SRB99-2,http://www.nalusda.gov/afsic/AFSICpubs/ srb9901.htm.


13. Hancock, T,.1993. Health human development and the communirt ecosystem. three ecological


14. Hosseinzadeh Delir, K. Victim Ghorbani, R, Firooz Jah, p, 2009, Quality analysis and assessment of urban sustainability measures in Tabriz city. Urban and Regional Studies. The first year. [ in Persian]


15. http://www.nssd.net/Reference/Reid/ch03.htm,.2001. The Contribution of Strategiesto Sustainable Development.


16. Ikerd, JE,.1996. Sustaining the profitability of agriculture, The Economist’s Role in the Agricultural Sustainability Paradigm, Extension Pre-conference, SanAntonio.TX,July27,http://www.ssu.missouri.edu/faculty/Jikerd/papers/AAESASA.


17. Joza, A., Brown, D,.2005. Neighborhood Sustainability Indicators Report on a Best Practice Workshop. School of Urban Planning, McGill University and the Urban Ecology Center/SodecM, Montreal, June 10–11.


18. Khalilian, s, 1999. Sustainable Development and Optimal Welfare of Generations. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. [ in Persian]


19. Kiani, M., 2003. Sustainable Development and Reconstruction of Bam, Quarterly Abadi. Center for Urban and Architecture Studies. 14 years. [ in Persian]


20. Kojkoub, M., 2011. The mediatak center in Qazvin city with an approach to achieving social sustainability in the city and public spaces. Master's Thesis. Islamic Azad University of Qazvin. [ in Persian]


21. Krause, M,.1996. Nachhaltigeit Dimension Eines Begriffs und Seine Bedeutung fur die Raumliche planung, Freie Universitat Berlin. Fachbereich Geowissenschaften.Berlin. Institut fur Geographische wissenschaft.


22. Landry, C., 2004.Urban Vitality. A New source of Urban Competitiveness.prince claus fund journal, ARCHIS issue Urban Vitality / Urban Heroes.


23. Maclaren, V,.1996. Urban sustinability reporting, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol,62(2):183-184.


24. Mahshwari Sh, .1998. Sustainable Development and Governmental Management in India. Development Management. The 9th Collection of Public Administration Training Center. [ in Persian]


25. Majid Zadeh, Y. 1990. The Beginning of Urbanization in Iran. First Edition. Tehran University Publication Center. [ in Persian]


26. Maleki, S., 2010. Income on Sustainable Urban Development, Shahid Chamran University Press, Ahwaz. First Edition. [ in Persian]


27. Meadows, D. Meadows,.1992. Beyond the LimitsToronto. Mc Cleland & Stewart. mdels. Health promotion international. 8 (1): 41- 47.


28. Mostaghim, M, Kermi Pour, A. 2014, Conflict resolution in Sustainable Development and Sustainable Communities. International Conference on Energy, Management and Environment (Dec. 11-12). [ in Persian]


29. Mukomo, s, 1996.Onsustainable urban development in sub-saharan Africa Cities, 13 (40):265-271.


30. Nasiri, H., 1997. Sustainable development of the third world perspective. Culture Andishe Publishing. [ in Persian]


31. National Economic and Social Council,.2002. Nationalprogress indicators for sustainable.


32. Oliver, P, A.


33. Ottawa county planning commission, 2004.Ottawa county urban smart growth. planning and grants department.


34. Piran, P., 2008. Urban and Rural Management Encyclopedia, Municipalities Organization's Publishing. Tehran.


35. Pour Jafari, M. Mahmoudinejad, eh 2009 Urban Design and Social Capital in Urban Spaces. Tehran. Hale Publishing. [ in Persian]


36. Resoland, M, 1997.Dimension of the eco – city, Cities,.14(4):197-202.


37. Sarrafi, M., 2000. Sustainable Development of Tehran Metropolis. Conference on the Development and Anti-Social Development of Tehran City. [ in Persian]


38. Shiea, E., 2008. Urban and Rural Management Encyclopedia, Municipalities Organization’s. [ in Persian]


39. Smith, Jeffrey, 2000.Evaluating Active Labor Market Policies. Lessons from North America. in MittAB-Schwerpunktheft. Evaluation.


40. Shoki, H., .1990. New perspectives on urban geography. 1: Tehran. Publication samt. [ in Persian]


41. Taravati, H, Eiafat, s,1998, Agenda 21, UNDP's Environmental Protection Agency publication. [ in Persian]


42. The World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987.Our Future Common. OFxford: Oxford University Press.


43. Turner, T., 1997. The city, like the landscape, is an outlook beyond urbanism to urban design and planning. Translation by Farshad Nourian, Tehran. Urban Processing and Planning Co. [ in Persian]


44. UNDP, Human development report,.1994, New York: Oxford Univercity Press.


45. Varol, C., Ercoskun, O, Gurer, Y, 2010.Local participatory mechanisms and collective actions for sustainable urban development in Turkey.Habitat International. Article in Press.


46. Yang, T., Berton, M, .1997, Translation by Mohsin Tashakori. Agricultural sustainability with its definition and implications in agricultural and commercial policy. Ministry of Agriculture Planning and Economics Research. [ in Persian]


47. Zahedi Mazandaran, M., 1997. Development and social inequality. Doctorate dissertation on sociology from the Department of Social Sciences, University of Tehran. [ in Persian]