Examining the Ergonomic Aspects of Sports Equipment Located in Open Spaces and Urban Parks with a Risk Management Approach
محورهای موضوعی : Geography and tourism planning, geography and urban planning, urban planning, architecture, geography and rural planning, political geographyMaryam Safdari 1 , Bagher Morsal 2 , Seyed Mostafa Tayebisani 3 , Sosan Sahami 4
1 - Department of physical education, Shahrood branch, Isalmic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
2 - Department of physical education, Shahrood branch, Isalmic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
3 - Department of physical education, Shahrood branch, Isalmic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
4 - Department of sociology, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht,Iran.
کلید واژه: ergonomic evaluation, sports users, risk level, sports equipment, urban park,
چکیده مقاله :
The purpose of research is to evaluate the ergonomics of sports equipment located in parks and public spaces in Tehran. For this purpose, 4 areas of Tehran municipality were selected as study sites and 2 parks and 2 recreation areas were selected from each. Three devices were evaluated. REBA technique was used for posture assessment and William Fine method was used for risk assessment.Three devices were evaluated. The REBA technique was used to assess posture and the William fine method was used to assess risk. The PMBOK, 2000 model was also used to provide risk reduction solutions. The results of the posture evaluation show that working with the Rotary ship rudder has a very high risk (the risk number is higher than 13). After that, the device "leg and underarm Press" has a high risk level (risk number 9). Finally, the "elliptical" device has an average risk level (risk number 6). rank and risk level of the sports equipment studied were evaluated based on 2 separate methods. results indicate that in both evaluation methods, the lowest level of risk assessed belonged to the elliptical device. But the results of the methods used differ between the highest risk levels assessed for the sports devices studied. So in the posture assessment method (REBA),ship's Rudder had the highest degree of risk, while according to the William fine assessment method, the leg and underarm Press showed the highest level of risk. General solutions for risk management include: aggressive, defensive, conservative and combined solutions.
The purpose of research is to evaluate the ergonomics of sports equipment located in parks and public spaces in Tehran. For this purpose, 4 areas of Tehran municipality were selected as study sites and 2 parks and 2 recreation areas were selected from each. Three devices were evaluated. REBA technique was used for posture assessment and William Fine method was used for risk assessment.Three devices were evaluated. The REBA technique was used to assess posture and the William fine method was used to assess risk. The PMBOK, 2000 model was also used to provide risk reduction solutions. The results of the posture evaluation show that working with the Rotary ship rudder has a very high risk (the risk number is higher than 13). After that, the device "leg and underarm Press" has a high risk level (risk number 9). Finally, the "elliptical" device has an average risk level (risk number 6). rank and risk level of the sports equipment studied were evaluated based on 2 separate methods. results indicate that in both evaluation methods, the lowest level of risk assessed belonged to the elliptical device. But the results of the methods used differ between the highest risk levels assessed for the sports devices studied. So in the posture assessment method (REBA),ship's Rudder had the highest degree of risk, while according to the William fine assessment method, the leg and underarm Press showed the highest level of risk. General solutions for risk management include: aggressive, defensive, conservative and combined solutions.
Daneshyar, H., Mirdamadi, S. M., Niknami, M., & Lashgarara, F. (2023). Structural analysis modeling of participatory stakeholder management for green space improvement: evidence from Tehran Metropolis. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 83, e277847. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.277847 .
Daneshyar, hadis, Mirdamadi, Seyed Mehdi, Niknami, Mehrdad, & Lashgarara, Farhad. (2022). Identifying Obstacles to Implementing a Participatory Green Space Management System: A Qualitative Study Using the Delphi Method. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 24(4 (119) ), 121-135. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1064019/en.
Daneshyar, H., Niknami, M., & Lashgarara, F. (2021). Designing a participatory green space management process model: The necessity of education stakeholder. Agricultural Education Administration Research, 13(57), 170-186. doi: 10.22092/jaear.2022.356943.1868 .
Ilbigi. Said, Ibrahim Sadr. Mohsen, Afzalpur. Muhammad Ismail, Muzani. Conductor. (1400). Does the ergonomic characteristics of the underarm and aviation Park sports equipment fit the anthropometric characteristics of male users? Eronomics, 9 (2), 17-29.
Josie. Ali, (1388). Risk assessment and Management, published by the Islamic Free University, Tehran, 344 P.
Hussainpur. Alexander, the cow. The power of God, the power of God. Abraham, the Emir. Majid, the glorious Farahani. Majid. (1398). Presentation of a safety deployment model in sports environments (using the foundation data theory). Research in educational sports, 7(16), 107-128.
Sadiki Naini. Hasan, Masjid. Siddhashim, jafarnad Shahri. Range. (1400). Principles of Ergonomics in sports and sports equipment design, healthy family publications, first edition, 142 P.
Theoretically. Angel, sincere. Haider, the oppressed. Fair. (1393). Comparison of Ergonomic characteristics of the step-by-step bodybuilding machine with anthropometric characteristics of female student users. Strategic Studies of sports and youth, 13 (24).
AlMadani, Dima, and Awwad, Dababneh. 2016. "Rapid entire body assessment: A literature review." American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 9.1 (2016): 107-118.
Andersen JH, Harhoff M, Grimstrup S, Vilstrup I, Lassen CF, Brandt LPA, Kryger AI, Overgaard E, Hansen KD, Mikkelsen S. 2007. Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder. Occup Environ Med. 2008, 65: 126-131. 10.1136/oem.2007.033506.
Choobineh, A.R., Lahmi, M.A., Shahnavaz, H., Khani Jazani, R. and Hosseini, M. (2004). Musculoskeletal symptoms as related to ergonomic factors in Iranian hand-woven carpet industry and general guidelines for workstation design. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, vol. 10, No. 2, 157-168
David G. 2005. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occupational medicine. 2005; 55(3):190-9.
Eduard, N. Y., & Nikolay, V. (2016). Risk assessment in concessions: A case study of municipal sports facilities. Paper presented at The 21st International Economic Conference, Sibiu, Romania.
Gosheger, Georg. 2003. "Injuries and overuse syndromes in golf." The American journal of sports medicine 31.3 (2003): 438-443.
Helander, M.G. (1995). A guide to the ergonomics of manufacturing. London: Taylor & Francis.
Kashef, M., Hossinnpour, E. (2012). Management of safety and hygiene in sport places and fields. Tehran: Hatmei Press. (Persian)
Kee, D. 2020. "An empirical comparison of OWAS, RULA and REBA based on self-reported discomfort." International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics 26.2 (2020): 285-295.
Kong, K., Yong, N. 2018. "Comparisons of ergonomic evaluation tools (ALLA, RULA, REBA and OWAS) for farm work." International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics 24.2 (2018): 218-223.
Lee, M., Sesso, H. D., & Paffenbarger, R. S. (2016). Physical activity and coronary heart disease risk in men: Does the duration of exercise episodes predict risk? Circulation, 102(9), 981-986.
Takano, T. (2017). Health and environment in the context of urbanization. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 12(2), 51.
Veitch, J., Bagley, S., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. (2016). Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents' perceptions of influences on children’s active free –play. Health and Place, 12, 383-393.