Performance Characteristics, and Behavior Indices of Broiler Chickens in Response to Color and Form of the Feed
محورهای موضوعی : Camel
M.A. Mesmarian
1
(Department of Animal Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
M. Toghyani
2
(Department of Animal Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
کلید واژه: behavior, broiler chickens, feed color, feed form, growth performance,
چکیده مقاله :
Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of feed color or feed form on feed preference, growth performance, and behavior indices of broilers. In experiment 1, 60 one-day-old broilers were dis-tributed in 3 vast floor pens whereby broilers of each pen were offered a non-colored feed as well as green, blue, and red colored diets. Broilers preferred to consume higher amounts of green or non-colored feed than those offered with blue and red diets (P<0.05) across the entire rearing period. In experiment 2, 240 one-day-old broilers were assigned to one of 4 treatments, comprising five replicates per treatment in a com-pletely randomized design. Dietary treatments included a control (non-colored diet) and diets with blue, green, or red colors. The most significant duration of tonic immobility was observed in broilers fed red feed, while the lowest duration was observed in birds fed blue diet (P<0.05). Feeding, preening, and aggres-sive behavior were higher in birds fed on green feed than those received a control diet (P<0.05). In experi-ment 3, 360 one- day-old chicks were allotted to 6 experimental treatments of a non-colored mash diet; non-colored pelleted feed; non-colored mash + non-colored pelleted diet; non-colored mash + blue color pel-leted feed; non-colored mash + green color pelleted feed; and non-colored mash + red color pelleted feed. Broilers fed non-colored pelleted feed had the lowest feed conversion ratio (FCR) during the starter, grow-ing, and entire rearing periods (P<0.05). Overall, broilers preferred to consume a colored diet. Feeding pel-leted feed improved the growth performance of broilers regardless of feed color.
Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of feed color or feed form on feed preference, growth performance, and behavior indices of broilers. In experiment 1, 60 one-day-old broilers were dis-tributed in 3 vast floor pens whereby broilers of each pen were offered a non-colored feed as well as green, blue, and red colored diets. Broilers preferred to consume higher amounts of green or non-colored feed than those offered with blue and red diets (P<0.05) across the entire rearing period. In experiment 2, 240 one-day-old broilers were assigned to one of 4 treatments, comprising five replicates per treatment in a com-pletely randomized design. Dietary treatments included a control (non-colored diet) and diets with blue, green, or red colors. The most significant duration of tonic immobility was observed in broilers fed red feed, while the lowest duration was observed in birds fed blue diet (P<0.05). Feeding, preening, and aggres-sive behavior were higher in birds fed on green feed than those received a control diet (P<0.05). In experi-ment 3, 360 one- day-old chicks were allotted to 6 experimental treatments of a non-colored mash diet; non-colored pelleted feed; non-colored mash + non-colored pelleted diet; non-colored mash + blue color pel-leted feed; non-colored mash + green color pelleted feed; and non-colored mash + red color pelleted feed. Broilers fed non-colored pelleted feed had the lowest feed conversion ratio (FCR) during the starter, grow-ing, and entire rearing periods (P<0.05). Overall, broilers preferred to consume a colored diet. Feeding pel-leted feed improved the growth performance of broilers regardless of feed color.
Abdelfattah M. and Farghly M. (2016). Effect of feed color on growth performance of broilers. Pp. 10-13 in Proc. 17th Conf. Egyptian Soc. Anim. Prod. Sustain. Livest. Dev. Chall. Opport., Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt.
Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V. and Svihus B. (2013). Influence of grain type and feed form on performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal digestibility of nitrogen, starch, fat, calcium and phosphorus in broiler starters. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 186, 193-203.
Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V. and Svihus B. (2014). Influence of feed form on growth performance, ileal nutrient digestibility, and energy utilisation in broiler starters fed a sorghum-based diet. Livest. Sci. 165, 80-86.
Ale Saheb Fosoul S.S., Toghyani M., Gheisari A., Tabeidiyan S.A., Mohammadrezaei M. and Azarfar A. (2016). Performance, immunity, and physiological responses of broilers to dietary energy and protein sequential variations. Poult. Sci. 95, 2068-2080.
Amerah A.M., Ravindran V., Lentle R.G. and Thomas D.G. (2008). Influence of feed particle size on the performance, energy utilization, digestive tract development, and digesta parameters of broiler starters fed wheat- and corn-based diets. Poult. Sci. 87, 2320-2328.
Aviagen. (2014). Ross 308: Broiler Nutrition Specifications. Huntsville, Alabama, USA.
Bell D.J. and Freeman B.M. (1971). Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
Bowlby G.M.S. (1957). Some preliminary investigations into the effects of light on broilers. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 13, 214-216.
Bryan Jones R. and Faure J.M. (1981). Tonic immobility (righting time) in laying hens housed in cages and pens. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 7, 369-372.
Campo J.L. and Redondo A. (1996). Tonic immobility reaction and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio in hens from three Spanish breeds laying pink eggshells. Poult. Sci. 75, 155-159.
Cooper J.B. (1971). Colored feed for Turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 50, 1892-1893.
Cornsweet T.N. (1970). Visual Perception. Academic Press, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Delhey K., Hall M., Kingma S.A. and Peters A. (2013). Increased conspicuousness can explain the match between visual sensi-tivities and blue plumage colours in fairy-wrens. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 1750-1758.
Egbuniwe I. and Ayo J. (2016). Physiological roles of avian eyes in light perception and their responses to photoperiodicity. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 72, 605-614.
Engberg R.M., Hedemann M.S. and Jensen B.B. (2002). The influence of grinding and pelleting of feed on the microbial composition and activity in the digestive tract of broiler chickens. British Poult. Sci. 43, 569-579.
Farghly M. and Abdelfattah M.G. (2017). Growth performance and carcass characteristics of broilers as affected by feed color. Egyptian J. Anim. Prod. 54, 143-148.
Farghly M. and Abou-Kassem D. (2014). Impacts of feed color and form on growth performance of local turkey. Egyptian J. Nutr. Feeds. 17, 537-547.
Farghly M.F. and Mahrose K.M. (2018). The response of growing native turkeys to different feed colours and forms. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 102, 69-76.
Goldsmith T.H. (2006). What birds see. Sci. Am. 295, 68-75.
Gulizia J.P. and Downs K.M. (2021).The effects of feed color on broiler performance between day 1 and 21. Animals. 11(6), 1511-1517.
Ham A.D. and Osorio D. (2007). Colour preferences and colour vision in poultry chicks. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 274, 1941-1948.
Hurnik J.F., Jerome F.N., Reinhart B.S. and Summers J.D. (1971). Color as a stimulus for feed consumption. Poult. Sci. 50, 944-949.
Jahan M., Asaduzzaman M. and Sarkar A. (2006). Performance of broiler fed on mash, pellet and crumble. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5, 265-270.
Jensen L. (2000). Influence of pelleting on the nutritional needs of poultry. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 13, 35-46.
Khosravinia H. (2007). Preference of broiler chicks for color of lighting and feed. J. Poult. Sci. 44, 213-219.
Kim N., Lee S.R. and Lee S.J. (2014). Effects of light color on energy expenditure and behavior in broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 27, 1044-1049.
Latshaw J.D. and Moritz J.S. (2009). The partitioning of metabolizable energy by broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 88, 98-105.
Leslie A., Hurnik J. and Summers J. (1973). Effects of color on consumption of broiler diets containing rapeseed meal and rapeseed. Canadian J. Anim. Sci. 53, 365-369.
Mobarkey N., Avital N., Heiblum R. and Rozenbiom I. (2009). The role of retinal and extra-retinal photostimulation in reproductive activity in broiler breeder hens. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 38, 235-243.
McKinney L.J. and Teeter R.G. (2004). Predicting effective caloric value of nonnutritive factors: I. pellet quality and II. prediction of consequential formulation dead zones. Poult. Sci. 83, 1165-1174.
Nir I., Twina Y., Grossman E. and Nitsan Z. (1994). Quantitative effects of pelleting on performance, gastrointestinal tract and behaviour of meat type chickens. British Poult. Sci. 35, 589-602.
Prayitno D.S., Phillips C.J. and Stokes D.K. (1997). The effects of color and intensity of light on behavior and leg disorders in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 76, 1674-1681.
Preston C.M., McCracken K.J. and McAllister A. (2000). Effect of diet form and enzyme supplementation on growth, efficiency and energy utilisation of wheat-based diets for broilers. British Poult. Sci. 41, 324-331.
Retnani Y., Suprapti E., Firmansyah I., Herawati L. and Mutia R. (2009). Effect of coloring agent addition in the broiler chicken rations on performance, percentage of bursa of fabricius, carcass and viscera. J. Indonesian Trop. Anim. Agric. 34, 115-121.
SAS Institute. (2003). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Scanes C.G. and Dridi S. (2021). Sturkie's Avian Physiology. Academic Press, Elsevier Science, San Diego.
Serrano M.P., Valencia D.G., Méndez J. and Mateos G.G. (2012). Influence of feed form and source of soybean meal of the diet on growth performance of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. 1. Floor pen study. Poult. Sci. 91, 2838-2844.
Taylor A., Sluckin W. and Hewitt R. (1969). Changing colour preferences of chicks. Anim. Behav. 17, 3-8.
Ueda H., Suehiro K., Kainou S. and Bungo T. (2005). Feeder color and feeder position act as a cue to discriminate between two diets in choice feeding of chicks. J. Poult. Sci. 42, 321-328.
Xu Y., Stark C.R., Ferket P.R., Williams C.M. and Brake J. (2015). Effects of feed form and dietary coarse ground corn on broiler live performance, body weight uniformity, relative giz-zard weight, excreta nitrogen, and particle size preference be-haviors. Poult. Sci. 94, 1549-1556.
