بررسی شفافیت و اعتماد در بلاکچین به عنوان ابزاری برای مدیریت نوین
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت دولتی
پیام نوری دوآبی
1
,
فریدون رهنمای رودپشتی
2
,
حمید رضا کردلویی
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری، گروه حسابداری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران
2 - استاد، گروه مالی و حسابداری، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران
3 - استاد یار و عضوهیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامشهر
کلید واژه: شفافیت, خودشفافیت, بلاکچین, اعتماد, اطمینان,
چکیده مقاله :
شفافیت و اعتماد به عنوان دو مفهوم مرتبط اساسی و اسطوره‌های قابل ستایش برآمده از خواست و ضرورت جوامع هستند که از دیرباز کانون مطالبات و مناقشات فراوانی بوده‌اند. در این راستا، فناوری بلاکچین نوع جدیدی از تکنولوژی مبتکرانه است که با بستری از توانمندی و پایگاه اطلاعاتی اجتماعی بی‌واسطه و تضمین شده، درک ما از واقعیت‌های اجتماعی و ساختارهای روایتی که از حوزه کنش انتزاع می‌شوند را مستندسازی و پیکربندی می‌کند. دیدگاه پدیدارشناختی سازگار بر ماهیت، روح و معماری حاکم بر بلاکچین یک اکوسیستم شفاف و قابل اعتماد تحول‌آفرین را نشان داده و بینش‌های جدیدی را در مقایسه با آنچه ما به‌عنوان واقعیت می‌شناسیم ارائه می‌دهد. بر این اساس، این پژوهش در پاسخ به وجود شفافیت و اعتماد در فناوری بلاکچین و با هدف دانش‌افزایی، پرکردن خلاء دانشی، به دنبال کشف و تبیین اسطورهای معنایی برآمده از خواست‌های اخلاقی و اجتماعی نهان در فناوری بلاکچین می‌باشد. بدین منظور، با روش تحلیل محتوا و تعمیم نظری، تجربیات و مطالعات جهانی برآمده از روش اسنادی و کتابخانه‌ای را با استفاده از نرم افزار Atlas.ti مورد پایش و کدگذاری قرار داده و در نهایت به تبیین، ترسیم و ساختاربندی رویکرد مفهومی و الگوی همگرای آن پرداخته است. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که بلاکچین به واسطه‌ی ماهیت، ظرفیت و قابلیت‌هایش، شفافیت کامل و اعتمادی مطلوب را ایجاد می‌کند؛ فلذا شفافیت و اعتماد، دو اسطوره بالقوه در بلاکچین هستند که می‌تواند بالفعل شوند.
Transparency and trust are two related and fundamental concepts and praiseworthy myths that arose from the will and necessity of societies. They have been the center of many demands and disputes in the past. In this regard, blockchain technology is a new type of innovative technology that provides a platform of empowerment and social databases without intermediaries and guarantees. Blockchain documents and configures our understanding of social realities and narrative structures that emerge from the field of abstract action. A consistent phenomenological perspective on the nature and architecture of blockchain makes it possible to demonstrate a transparent and reliable transformative ecosystem. And it provides new insights compared to what we know as reality. Based on this, this research has been done in response to the existence of transparency and trust in blockchain technology. The aim of this research is to increase knowledge and fill the knowledge gap, and it seeks to discover and explain the semantic myths arising from the ethical and social demands hidden in blockchain technology. For this purpose, with the method of content analysis and theoretical generalization, he has monitored and coded global experiences and studies resulting from documentary and library methods using Atlas.ti software. Finally, it has explained, drawn, and structured the conceptual approach and its model. The results of this research show that blockchain creates complete transparency and trust due to its nature, capacity, and capabilities. Therefore, transparency and trust are two potential myths in blockchain that can become actual.
1- بولو، قاسم؛ اسماعیل‌زاده مقری، علی. (1383). نقش پاسخگویی، شفافیت و درستکاری در مبارزه با فساد، نشریه حسابدار، سال هیجدهم، شماره 159.
2- رهنما رودپشتی، فریدون؛ کردلویی، حمیدرضا؛ نوری دوآبی، پیام. (1403). توپولوژی بلاکچین، انتشارات ترمه، تهران.
3- صراف، فاطمه؛ پسندیده پارسا، بهرام؛ حاجی رضا، محمدرضا؛ غریب، مهدی. (1400). فرصت‌ها و چالش‌های پیش‌رو در چشم انداز آتی حسابداری با ظهور بلاکچین در راستای شفافیت در گزارشگری و ارائه خدمات مالی، نشریه حسابدار، شماره 338.
4- مرتب، یحیی؛ یاوری، وحید. (1400). شناسایی معیارهای ارزیابی شفافیت در مجلس شورای اسلامی، مطالعات مدیریت دولتی ایران، سال چهارم، شماره 1، صص 35-62.
5- مکرمی، یدالله. (1394). شفافیت مالی، فصلنامه حسابرس، شماره 77.
6- نوری دوآبی، پیام. (1401). شفافیت محصول بلاکچین، اولین همایش ملی ارتقای شفافیت و نقش آن در سلامت اداری و مبارزه با فساد، سازمان بارزسی کل کشور، تهران.
7- نوری دوآبی، پیام؛ طالب‌نیا، قدرت‌اله. (1402). تأثیرات فناوری بلاکچین بر حرفه حسابداری و حسابرسی، فصلنامه رشد فناوری، سال نوزدهم، شماره ویژه.
8- ACCA. (2020). Blockchain: is it still the great accountancy disruptor. Retrieved from https://www.accaglobal.com /pk/en/student/sa/features/blockchain.html
9- Alina Olaru, Elena. (2021). the Impact of Blockchain on the Accounting Profession, ceccar business review, No 4.
10- ALSaqa, Zeyad Hashim; Hussein, Ali Ibrahim; and Mahmood, Saddam Mohammed. (2019). the Impact of Blockchain on Accounting Information Systems, Journal of Information Technology Management, Vol. 11, No. 3.
11- Atzori, M. (2015). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary? Available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2709713.
12- Akram, A., Bross, P. (2018). Trust, Privacy and Transparency with Blockchain Technology in Logistics. Proceedings of the Twelfth Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems
13- Balatska, V., Opirskyy, I., and Slobodian, N. (2024). Blockchain for enhancing transparency and trust in government registries, Information Technology and Nanotechnology 3826(1613-0073):50-59
14- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business research methods. Oxford university press.
15- Berg, C., Davidson, S. & Potts, J. (2018). Ledgers. Available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3157421.
16- Budish, Eric B. (2022). The Economic Limits of Bitcoin and Anonymous, Decentralized Trust on the Blockchain. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4148014.
17- Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of accounting research, 42(2), 207-252.
18- Crichton, Danny. (2018). Liquid democracy uses blockchain to fix politics, and now you can vote for It.” https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/24/liquid -democracy-uses-blockchain.
19- De Filippi, Primavera; Mannan, Morshed; and Reijers, Wessel. (2020). Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance, Technology in Society, Volume 62, 101284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284.
20- Doorey, D. J. (2011). The Transparent Supply Chain: from Resistance to Implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 587-603. Doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0882-1.
21- Drescher, Daniel. (2017). Blockchain Basics: A Non-Technical Introduction in 25 Steps, Apress, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-2604-9_10.
22- Evans, David. (2014). Economic Aspects of Bitcoin and Other Decentralized Public-Ledger Currency Platforms. Coase-Sandor Institute for Law &
Economics Research Paper No. 685 (April 15, 2104). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2424516 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2424516.
23- Fischer, Dov. (2018). Ethical and Professional Implications of Blockchain Accounting Ledgers. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3331009
24- Ghodoosi, F. (2021). Contracting in the age of smart contracts. Washington Law Review, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449674.
25- Haryanto, Sendy Dwi, Sudaryati, Erina. (2020). The Ethical Perspective of Millennial Accountants in Responding to Opportunities and Challenges of Blockchain 4.0, Journal of Accounting and Investment, Vol. 21, No. 3, 452-470.
26- Hütten, M. (2019). The soft spot of hard code: blockchain technology, network governance and pitfalls of technological utopianism, Global Networks, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 329-348, available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12217
27- Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118–127.
28- ICAEW. (2017). Blockchain and the future of accountancy. https://www.icaew.com/technical/ technology /blockchain/blockchainarticles/blockchain-and-the-accounting-perspective.
29- Jeppsson, André; Olsson, Oskar. (2017). Blockchains as a solution for traceability and transparency, Master Thesis Department of Design Sciences, Faculty of Engineering LTH, Lund University.
30- João, Gonçalves. (2021). Blockchain technology as a mechanism for transparency and accountability, 14th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business, pp 331-349
31- Kaufmann, D. (2002). Public and private mis governance in finance: perverse links, capture, and their empirics. Financial sector governance: the roles of the public and private sectors, 81-118.
32- Kırbaş, İ. (2018). Blokzinciri Teknolojisi ve Yakın Gelecekteki Uygulama Alanları. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 9 (1), 75-82. DOI: 10.29048/makufebed.365066
33- Laponite, Cara; Fishbane, Lara. (2022). the blockchain ethical design framework, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization (2019) 12 (3-4): 50–71.
34- Lee, Y.K. & Park, J.W. (2016). Impact of a sustainable brand on improving business performance of airport enterprises: The case of Incheon
International Airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 53, 46-53.
35- Lemieux, V. L. (2016). Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal, 26(2), 110-139. doi:10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042
36- Lewis, P. A. (2000). Realism, causality and the problem of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30 (3), 249-268.
37- Mancini, D., Lamboglia, R., Castellano, N. G., & Corsi, K. (2017). Trends of Digital Innovation Applied to Accounting Information and Management Control Systems, in Corsi, K., Castellano, N. G., Lamboglia, R., Mancini, D. (Eds.), Reshaping Accounting and Management Control Systems – New
Opportunities from Business Information Systems, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 1-19.
38- Mason, R.O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5-12.
39- Miller, K.W. (2010). Ethical analysis in the cloud, IT Professional, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 7-9.
40- Mol, A. P. J. (2015). Transparency and value chain sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 154-161. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.012
41- Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting
research. The British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100833. Doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2019.04.002.
42- Moor, J.H. (2006). The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 18-21.
43- Natarajan, H., Krause, S., & Gradstein, H. (2017). Distributed ledger technology and blockchain. World Bank.
44- Noori Doabi, Payam. (2021). Blockchain- The Transformation of Accounting, International Journal of Financial Technology (IJFT), Vol. 1, No. 3.
45- Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J. and Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 355-364.
46- Omoalu Simon, Suleman. (2019). Effect of digitalization of accounting information on business orginisation of some selected compamies in edo state, nigeria, depatment of business administrator faculty of management sciences, auchi polytechnic auchi.
47- Palamara, Pietro. (2018). Tracing and Tracking with the Blockchain, Master of Science Degree in Management Engineering, Politecnico di Milano.
48- Potekhina, A., & Riumkin, I. (2017). Blockchain – A new accounting paradigm: Implications for credit risk management. Master degree thesis, Umeå School of Business and Economics.
49- Reijers, W., O’Brolcháin, F. and Haynes, P. (2016). Governance in blockchain technologies & social contract theories, Ledger, Vol. 1 pp. 134-151, available at: https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger. 2016.62.
50- Rousseau, J.-J. (1920). the Social Contract and Discourses, J.M. Dent and Sons, London and Toronto.
51- Seebacher, S. and Schüritz, R. (2017). Blockchain technology as an enabler of service systems: A structured literature review. In: International Conference on Exploring Services Science. Springer.
52- Sharif, Monica M & Ghodoosi, Farshad. (2020). The Ethics of Blockchain in Organizations, Journal of Business Ethics, 178, pages1009–1025
53- Steiner, Jutta. (2015). Blockchain Can Bring Transparency to Supply Chains. The Business of Fashion. Published June 19, 2015. http://www.businessoffashion.com/ articles/opinion/op-ed-blockchain-can-bring-transparency-to-supply-chains.
54- Swan, M. (2016). Blockchain Temporality: Smart Contract Time Specifiability with Blocktime. Rule Technologies: Research, Tools, and Applications, Cham.
55- Swan, M. and de Filippi, P. (2017). Toward a philosophy of blockchain: a symposium: introduction, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 603-619.
56- Tang, Yong eat al. (2018). Ethics of Blockchain: A Framework of Technology, Applications, Impacts and Research Directions, Information Technology & People and available at https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2018-0491.
57- Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2017). How blockchain will change organizations. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2), 10.
58- Vishwanath, T., & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Toward transparency: New approaches and their application to financial markets. The World Bank Research Observer, 16(1), 41-57.
59- Werbach, K. (2018). The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. MIT.
60- WFP (2017). Blockchain against hunger: harnessing technology in support of Syrian refugees, available at: www.wfp.org/news/blockchain-against-hunger-harnessing-technology-support-syrian-refugees
61- Wong, J.I., Kar, I. (2016). Everything you need to know about the Ethereum hard fork. https://qz.com/730004/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-ethereum hard-fork/Accessed 26 Jul 2019.
62- Yli-Huumo, J., KO, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?-A Systematic Review. Plos One, 11(10), 27. Doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0163477.
