طراحی چارچوب مسئلهشناسی تولید در شرکت ملی نفت ایران به روش تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهشنامه اقتصاد و کسب و کارمحمد آرمانفر 1 , فواد مکوندی 2 , سیروس کرراهی مقدم 3 , محمد همتی 4
1 - گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران
2 - گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران
3 - گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد شوشتر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شوشتر، ایران
4 - گروه مدیریت ، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران
کلید واژه: چارچوب مسئلهشناسی, سیاستگذاری تولید شرکت ملی نفت ایران, مولفه های مسئله شناسی,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش به صورت اکتشافی، مولفههای شناخت مسائل سیاستی را تحلیل و چارچوب مسئلهشناسی تولید در شرکت ملی نفت ایران را طراحی نموده است. در فرایند این پژوهش مولفههای احصاء شده در پژوهشهای پیشین شامل ۳۲۴۳ مفهوم، ۲۶۴ مولفه فرعی و ۱۶ مولفه اصلی بر اساس نظرسنجی از کارشناسان و مدیران صنعت نفت و خبرگان حوزه مدیریت انرژی و سیاستگذاری عمومی در قالب عوامل مدیریتی، عوامل اجرایی، عوامل پیرامونی، عوامل ماهیتی و دستاوردهای شناخت مسائل سیاستی در سیاستگذاری تولید در شرکت ملی نفت ایران صحت سنجی و اولویت بندی گردیدند. نتایج نشان میدهد که بیشترین توافق از منظر مشارکتکنندگان در پژوهش بر شناخت کارائی و اثربخشی مسائل سیاستی در شرکت ملی نفت ایران و کمترین توافق بر شناخت موضوعی مسائل حاصل شده است. چارچوببندی فرایند شناخت مسائل مرتبط با موضوع این پژوهش نشان دهنده نقش شناخت نهادی و درک جامعیت مسائل در چارچوب عوامل مدیریتی، نقش گونه شناسی و شناخت موضوعی، محتوایی و شکلی مسائل در چارچوب عوامل مربوط به ماهیت مسئله، نقش شناخت و نگاشت ذینفعان و عوامل زمینهای و محیطی مرتبط با مسائل در چارچوب عوامل پیرامونی مسئله، شناخت فناوریهای مرتبط با تولید و ساختار مسئله در چارچوب عوامل اجرایی و شناخت رویکرد، شفافیت، کارایی و اثربخشی و مشروعیت مسائل به عنوان دستاوردهای فرایند شناخت میباشد.
In an exploratory way, this research has analyzed the components of understanding political issues and designed the framework of production problems in the National Iranian Oil Company. In the process of this research, the components counted in previous researches include 3243 concepts 264 sub components and 16 main components based on a survey of experts and managers of the oil industry and experts in the field of energy management and public policy in the form of managerial factors, factors implementation, peripheral factors, intrinsic factors and the achievements of understanding policy issues in production policy making in the National Iranian Oil Company were verified and prioritized. The results show that the highest agreement from the perspective of the participants in the research was on the recognition of the efficiency and effectiveness of policy issues in the National Iranian Oil Company, and the lowest agreement was reached on the thematic recognition of the issues. Framing the process of recognizing issues related to the subject of this research shows the role of institutional recognition and understanding the comprehensiveness of issues in the framework of management factors, the role of typology and thematic, content and formal recognition of issues in the framework of factors related to the nature of the issue, the role of recognizing and mapping stakeholders and Contextual and environmental factors related to issues in the framework of peripheral factors of the issue, recognition of technologies related to production and structure of the issue in the framework of executive factors and recognition of the approach, transparency, efficiency and effectiveness and legitimacy of issues as the achievements of the recognition process.
آرمان¬فر محمد، مکوندی فؤاد، کراهی مقدم سیروس، همتی محمد. (1402). مؤلفه‌های مسئلهشناسی تولید در شرکت ملی نفت ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش های سیاست گذاری وبرنامه ریزی انرژی. ۱۴۰۲; ۹ (۴) :۱۲۷-۱۴۷.
اصلی¬پور و خان¬محمدی. (1400). تحلیل بر عوامل موثر بر خط مشی پژوهی مبتنی بر رویکرد مدل سازی ساختاری تفسیر. مدیریت سازمان¬های دولتی. 2(34). صص 72-61.
بنی هاشمی, میر قاسم. (1401). فراترکیب تحلیل ساختاری نظام مسائل استان های ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی, 25(3), 85-124. پورکیانی و همکاران. (1393). تبیین موانع اجرای خط مشی با استفاده از بحث متمرکز گروهی (مورد مطالعه: قانون مدیریت خدمات کشوری). مدیریت سازمان های دولتی. 9 (7-24).
تمسکی، احسان، محمدی کنگرانی، حانیه، اشتریان، کیومرث، حلی ساز، ارشک، و نادری، فرشید. (1400). مسئله شناسی سیاستگذاری محیط زیست در ایران. سیاستگذاری عمومی، 7(2 )، 109-125.
خواستار، حمزه. (۱۳۸۷). بررسي عوامل مؤثر بر خودكارآمدي در زمينة علم و فن‌آوري براي تحقق اهداف چشم انداز، پايان نامة كارشناسي ارشد، دانشكدة مديريت دانشگاه تهران.
روزبهانی، قلی¬پور و سید جوادین. (1401). بهینه سازی الگوی شایستگی مدیران دانشگاهی با تکینک دلفی-فازی و رویکرد مفهوم سازی داده بنیاد. تحقیق در عملیات در کاربردهای آن. ۱۹(۱)، ۵۷-۸۰
ساعی، احمد، و پاشنگ، مریم. (1396). موانع توسعه صنعت نفت در آینده با بررسی عوامل رکود صنعت ایران در دوره زمانی (1393-1383). راهبرد، 26(84 )، 59-75.
مبینی دهکردی، علی. حوری جعفری، حامد. (1396). بررسی تحلیلی سیاست ها و برنامه های اصلاح الگوی مصرف و تاثیر اجرای آنها بر شدت انرژی در ایران. فصلنامه سیاست نامه علم و فناوری. 7(3).
مرکز پژوهش¬های مجلس شورای اسلامی. (1395). ارزیابی علل ناکامی های مربوط به تدوین سیاست های جامع انرژی در کشور. کد گزارش: ۱۰۰۹۱۷۵.
Aligica, P.D. (2006). Institutional and Stakeholder Mapping: Frameworks for Policy Analysis and Institutional Change. Public Organiz Rev. 679–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-006-6833-
Aligica, P.D. (2006). Institutional and Stakeholder Mapping: Frameworks for Policy Analysis and Institutional Change. Public Organiz Rev 6, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-006-6833-
Arnopoulos, P. (1995). Prolegomena to Problemology: A Definition of Social Problems. Concordia University. Montreal.
Bache, I. (2020). Evidence in the Policy Stream: The Multiple Streams Approach. 10.1007/978-3-030-21376-3_5. Balane, M.A. Palafox, B. Palileo-Villanueva, L.M. McKee, M. Balabanova, D. (2020). Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures. BMJ Glob Health.5(11).
Barkauskas, V. Barkauskienė, K. Jasinskas E. (2015). Analysis of Macro Environmental Factors Influencing the Development of Rural Tourism: Lithuanian Case, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 213, P. 167-172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.421.
Barkauskas, V. Barkauskienė, K. Jasinskas E. (2015). Analysis of Macro Environmental Factors Influencing the Development of Rural Tourism: Lithuanian Case, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 213, P. 167-172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.421.
Beattie, G. (2020). Advertising and media capture: The case of climate change. Journal of Public Economics. Vol.188.
Beyer, D. et al. (2022). Punctuated Equilibrium and the Comparative Study of Policy Agendas. Polit Vierteljahresschr 63, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00400-y
Blum, S. Kuhlmann, J. (2019). Stories of how to give or take – towards a typology of social policy reform narratives, Policy and Society. 38 (3): 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1657607
Bodnieks, V. (2020). The New Institutionalism: A tool for analysing defence and security institutions. Security and Defence Quarterly, 32(5), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/130903
Bond, G. R. (2018). Evidence-based policy strategies: A typology. Wiley: Online Library, Volume25, Issue4. Browne, J. Coffey, B. Cook, K. Meiklejohn, S., Palermo, C. (2019). A guide to policy analysis as a research method. Health Promot Int. 1;34(5):1032-1044. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day052.
Browne, J. Coffey, B. Cook, K. Meiklejohn, S., Palermo, C. (2019). A guide to policy analysis as a research method. Health Promot Int. 1;34(5):1032-1044. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day052
Buchanan, D.R., Miller, F.G., & Wallerstein, N. (2007). Ethical Issues in Community-Based Participatory Research: Balancing Rigorous Research with Community Participation in Community Intervention Studies. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 1(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2007.0006.
Bulmer, M., Coates, E., & Dominian, L. (2007). “Five: Evidence-based policy making”. In Making policy in theory and practice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Bulmer, S. George, S. Parker, O. Bache, I. (2015). Politics in the European Union. The new European Union series. Oxford University Press.
Clarence, E. (2002). Technocracy Reinvented: The New Evidence Based Policy Movement. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 1-11.
Douglas, Adam. Et al. (2022). Advocacy Coalition Framework. 10.4324/9781003269083-5.
ELO. S, & Kyngas. H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Wiley Online Library. V.62, P. 107-115
Faris, C. W., Robinson, P. J., Wind, Y. (1967). Industrial Buying and Creative Marketing. Allyn & Bacon.
Faris, C. W., Robinson, P. J., Wind, Y. (1967). Industrial Buying and Creative Marketing. Allyn & Bacon.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston. Giacchino, S., & Kakabadse, A. (2003). Successful Policy Implementation: The Route to Building Self-Confident Government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., & Scott, T. ua (1994): The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
Gray, Earle. (2008). Ontario’s Petroleum Legacy: The Birth, Evolution and Challenges of a Global Industry Edmonton. Heritage Community Foundation.
Gregory, A. J. Atkins, J. P. Midgley, G. Hodgson, A. M. (2020). Stakeholder identification and engagement in
problem structuring interventions, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 283, Issue 1. Hallsworth, M. Parker, S. Rutter, J. (2011). Policy Making in The Real World (Evidence and Analysis). Instute for Government. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/policy
Hardy, R.J. E. Rollason, L.J. Bracken, A.R.G. Large. (2018). Evaluating the success of public participation in integrated catchment management. Journal of Environmental Management. 228 (267-278)
Hester, P. H. (2015). Analyzing Stakeholders Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping, Procedia Computer Science, Volume 61.
Hoefer R. (2022). The Multiple Streams Framework: Understanding and Applying the Problems, Policies, and Politics Approach. J of Pol Practice & Research.;3(1):1–5.
Hoefer, R. (2022). Institutionalism as a Theory for Understanding Policy Creation: an Underused Resource. J of Pol Practice & Research.;3(2):71–6. doi: 10.1007/s42972-022-00059-0.
Hoornbeek, J. A. Peters, B. G. (2017) Understanding policy problems: a refinement of past work, Policy and Society, 36:3, 365-384, DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2017.1361631
Hoornbeek, J. A. Peters, B. G. (2017) Understanding policy problems: a refinement of past work, Policy and Society, 36:3, 365-384, DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2017.1361631
Hudson, B. Hunter, D. & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice. 2(1),1-14.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. et al. (2018). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program. Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN: 9780429494284
JEWELL, C.J., & BERO, L.A. (2008), “Developing Good Taste in Evidence”: Facilitators of and Hindrances to Evidence-Informed Health Policymaking in State Government. The Milbank Quarterly, 86: 177-208.
Johann Höchtl, Peter Parycek & Ralph Schöllhammer (2016) Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26:1-2, 147-169, DOI: 10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187
Johannesson, L. Qvist, M. (2020). Navigating the policy stream: Contested solutions and organizational strategies of policy entrepreneurship. International Review of Public Policy. 2:1. 5-23.
Katarzyna, S. Bogacz, P. (2022). A Method for Stakeholder Mapping in Connection with the Implementation of a Development Project. Energies 15, no. 4: 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041592
Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2007). Consensus and Conflict in Policy Networks: Too Much or Too Little? In: Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (eds) Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625006_8
Laboutková1, Š., Vymětal, P. (2017). Transparency in economic and political decision-making: the identification of sunshine rules for transparent lobbying, DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 8(3), 157–171, DOI: 10.1515/danb-2017-0011
Landro, M. et al. (2020). Avalanche decision-making frameworks: Classification and description of underlying factors, Cold Regions Science and Technology, Volume 169.
Lauth, H. J. (2016). The internal relationships of the dimensions of democracy: The relevance of trade-offs for measuring the quality of democracy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 606–617.
Lauth, H. J. (2016). The internal relationships of the dimensions of democracy: The relevance of trade-offs for measuring the quality of democracy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 606–617.
Lenkova, O.V. (2017). Risk management of oil and gas company in terms of strategic transformations. Revistaespacios. Vol. 18, P. 30.
Longo, J. McNutt, K. (2018). "Eighteen: From policy analysis to policy analytics". In Policy Analysis in Canada.
Bristol, UK: Policy Press. Retrieved Mar 27, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447334927.ch018 M. C. Willemsen, (2018). Tobacco Control Policy in the Netherlands, Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72368-6_10
Makarychev, A. Diez, T. (2023). Introduction: Political Logics and Academic Rationalities of Securitisation and International Crises. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies. 17(2). 4-20.
Markard, J. Suter, M. Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change–Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. (18) 215-237.
Massey, A., Wallace, W. (1996). Understanding and facilitating group problem structuring and formulation: mental representations, interaction, and representation aids.
Matti, S., Sandström, A. (2011). The Rationale Determining Advocacy Coalitions: Examining Coordination Networks and Corresponding Beliefs. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com. 39(3). 385-410
McFadden, L. and Priest, S. (2011) Guidance for identifying the Policy Issue, Spicosa Project Report, London, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.
McFadden, L. Priest, S. J. Green, C. (2011). Introducing Institutional Mapping: A Guide for SPICOSA Scientists. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5146886
McFadden, L. Priest, S. J. Green, C. (2011). Introducing Institutional Mapping: A Guide for SPICOSA Scientists. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5146886
Metz, F. Lieberherr, E. Schmucki, A. Huber, R. (2021). Policy Change Through Negotiated Agreements: The Case of Greening Swiss Agricultural Policy. Wiley: Online Library. 49(3), 731-756
Michaud G. (2019). Punctuating the equilibrium: A lens to understand energy and environmental policy changes. Int J Energy Res. 43: 3053–3057. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4464
Milovanovitch, Mihaylo. (2018). Guide to Policy Analysis. ETF expert. © European Training Foundation. doi:10.2816/60610
Mukherjee, I., Coban, M.K. & Bali, A.S. (2021). Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review. Policy Sci 54, 243–268 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09420-8
Mulyaningrum. Kartodihardjo. H. Suratijaya, I. Nugroho, B. (2013). Stakeholders Analysis of Policy-Making Process: The Case of Timber Legality Policy on Private Forest. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management).
Nohrstedt, D. Heinmiller, T. (2024). Advocacy coalitions as political organizations. Policy and Society. 10.1093/polsoc/puae005.
Ohno, T. (2022). Advocacy Coalition Framework in Environmental Governance Studies: Explaining Major Policy Change for A Large Dam Removal in Japan. International Review of Public Policy [Online]. 4:1. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/irpp/2362
Parsons, W. (1995). Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/public-policy-9781852785543.html
Peters, B. G., & Hoornbeek, J. A. (2005). The problem of policy problems. McGill-Queens University Press. Rasmussen, A. Reher, S. (2023). Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making. British Journal of Political Science. 53(1): 45-64. doi: 10.1017/ S0007123422000242
Rochefort, D. A. (2016). Chapter 3: Agenda setting, problem definition, and their contributions to a political policy analysis. Social and Political Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715922.00010
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1). P12
Scott, J. (1991) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Contemporary Sociology, 22, 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075047
Selman, P. (2000). Environmental Planning, Second Edition, London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd., doi:10.1017/S0376892901210406
Smith, V. (2023). Applying the Multiple Streams Framework in Westminster systems: A comparative case study of pay-for-performance policymaking in primary health care in England and New Zealand. International Review of Public Policy, 5:1 | 2023, 44-63
Sterck, M. & Scheers, B. & Bouckaert, G. (2006). "Lessons from Australian and British Reforms in Results oriented Financial Management," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(2), 133-162.
Sterck, M. Scheers, B. Bouckaert, G. (2006). "Lessons from Australian and British Reforms in Results oriented Financial Management," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(2), 133-162.
Steuer, Fabian. (2018). Machine learning for public policy making: how to use data-driven predictive modeling for the social good. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/43488
Timothy, T. Gregory, P. (2007). 2.2.2 Using Stakeholder Analysis to Define the Problem in Systems Engineering. INCOSE International Symposium. 17. 296-309. 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2007. tb02876. x.
Toynbee and G. R. Urban: Toynbee, Arnold J., and G. R. Urban: New York: Oxford University Press, 113 pp., Publication Date: February 21, 1974. History: Reviews of New Books, 2(8), 206.
van den Berg, C. (2017). Dynamics in the Dutch policy advisory system: externalization, politicization and the legacy of pillarization. Policy Sci 50, 63–84 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9257-x
Verweij, P. et Al. (2016). QUICKScan as a quick and participatory methodology for problem identification and scoping in policy processes. Environmental Science & Policy. (66)47-61.
Verweij, P. et Al. (2016). QUICKScan as a quick and participatory methodology for problem identification and scoping in policy processes. Environmental Science & Policy. (66)47-61.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Webber, M. (1973). Planning in an Environment of Change. J.B. Culling Worth Ed, London. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
Wenzelburger, G. Hartmann, K. (2021). Policy formation, termination and the multiple streams framework: the case of introducing and abolishing automated university admission in France. Policy Studies. 43. 1-21. 10.1080/01442872.2021.1922661.
Zahidie, A. et al. (2023). Building on the Health Policy Analysis Triangle: Elucidation of the Elements. Pak J Med Sci. 39(6):1865-1868. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.7056
