Investigation of Fe-Cu-Sr/ γ-Al2O3 catalyst performance in Fisher- Tropsch synthesis: Pressure effect
محورهای موضوعی : شیمی کاربردی
Marziyeh Rahimi Mashkaleh
1
,
Yahya Zamani
2
,
sahar baniyaghoob
3
,
Ensiyeh Ganji Babakhani
4
1 - Department of Chemistry, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Gas research division Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of chemistry, Science and research branch, Isalamic azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Gas Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry
کلید واژه: CO Hydrogenation, Nano iron based catalyst, Reaction Condition, product selectivity.,
چکیده مقاله :
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is conducted on the catalysts such as Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and ZrO2 supported with metals like Co, Fe or Ru. While hydrogen to CO ratio is low, the Iron supported catalysts are more useful to produce alkenes, branched hydrocarbons and oxygenates due to Iron's water-gas-shift (WGS) activity. The aim of this article is to produce C5+ hydrocarbon product from synthetic gas using Fe-Cu-Sr/ γ-Al2O3 nano-sized catalyst. The nano iron-based catalyst was synthesized by wet impregnation method. The synthesized catalyst (18Fe/4Cu/2Sr/ γ-Al2O3) was characterized by XRD, BET, ICP, SEM and H2-TPR techniques. Effect of reaction pressure on the product selectivity and catalyst activity was investigated in CO hydrogenation reaction. The nano catalyst was loaded in a fixed-bed reactor and tested in pressure of 16 and 20 atm, at temperature of 290 oC, with H2/CO ratio of 1 and GHSV of 2 l.h-1.g cat-1. The results demonstrated that with increasing reaction pressure, the CO conversion and C5+ selectivity increased from 63.8% and 44.03% to 78.3% and 46.2%, respectively.
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is conducted on the catalysts such as Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 and ZrO2 supported with metals like Co, Fe or Ru. While hydrogen to CO ratio is low, the Iron supported catalysts are more useful to produce alkenes, branched hydrocarbons and oxygenates due to Iron's water-gas-shift (WGS) activity. The aim of this article is to produce C5+ hydrocarbon product from synthetic gas using Fe-Cu-Sr/ γ-Al2O3 nano-sized catalyst. The nano iron-based catalyst was synthesized by wet impregnation method. The synthesized catalyst (18Fe/4Cu/2Sr/ γ-Al2O3) was characterized by XRD, BET, ICP, SEM and H2-TPR techniques. Effect of reaction pressure on the product selectivity and catalyst activity was investigated in CO hydrogenation reaction. The nano catalyst was loaded in a fixed-bed reactor and tested in pressure of 16 and 20 atm, at temperature of 290 oC, with H2/CO ratio of 1 and GHSV of 2 l.h-1.g cat-1. The results demonstrated that with increasing reaction pressure, the CO conversion and C5+ selectivity increased from 63.8% and 44.03% to 78.3% and 46.2%, respectively.
Pour AN, Shahri SMK, Zamani Y, Zamanian A. Promoter effect on the CO2-H2O formation during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on iron-based catalysts. Journal of natural gas chemistry. 2010;19(2):193-7.
2. Mandić M, Todić B, Živanić L, Nikačević N, Bukur DB. Effects of catalyst activity, particle size and shape, and process conditions on catalyst effectiveness and methane selectivity for Fischer–Tropsch reaction: a modeling study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(10):2733-45.
3. Xie J, Yang J, Dugulan AI, Holmen A, Chen D, de Jong KP, et al. Size and promoter effects in supported iron Fischer–Tropsch catalysts: Insights from experiment and theory. ACS Catalysis. 2016;6(5):3147-57.
4. Hadnađev-Kostić MS, Vulić TJ, Marinković-Nedučin RP, Nikolić AD, Jović B. Mg-Fe-mixed oxides derived from layered double hydroxides: a study of the surface properties. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2011;76(12):1661-71.
5. Kaneko T, Derbyshire F, Makino E, Gray D, Tamura M, Li K. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Coal Liquefaction. 2012;10(14356007):a07_197.
6. Stamenić M, Dikić V, Mandić M, Todić B, Bukur DB, Nikačević NM. Multiscale and Multiphase Model of Fixed-Bed Reactors for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Optimization Study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2018;57(9):3149-62.
7. Vosloo AC. Fischer–Tropsch: a futuristic view. Fuel processing technology. 2001;71(1-3):149-55.
8. Almalki FA. Selective Deposition of Platinum by Strong Electrostatic Adsorption onto Cobalt-and Iron-based Catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis. 2018 ; Ph.D thesis, College of Engineering and Computing, South Carolina.
9. Chum HL, Overend RP. Biomass and renewable fuels. Fuel processing technology. 2001;71(1-3):187-95.
10. Sharma B, Ingalls RG, Jones CL, Khanchi A. Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;24:608-27.
11. Stamenić M, Dikić V, Mandić M, Todić B, Bukur DB, Nikačević NM. Multiscale and multiphase model of fixed bed reactors for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: intensification possibilities study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(36):9964-79.
12. Li X, Liu X, Liu Z-W, Asami K, Fujimoto K. Supercritical phase process for direct synthesis of middle iso-paraffins from modified Fischer–Tropsch reaction. Catalysis Today. 2005;106(1-4):154-60.
13. Zhang Y, Koike M, Yang R, Hinchiranan S, Vitidsant T, Tsubaki N. Multi-functional alumina–silica bimodal pore catalyst and its application for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2005;292:252-8.
14. Geng S, Jiang F, Xu Y, Liu X. iron‐based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis for the efficient conversion of carbon dioxide into Isoparaffins. ChemCatChem. 2016;8(7):1303-7.
15. Wei Y, Luo D, Zhang C, Liu J, He Y, Wen X, et al. Precursor controlled synthesis of graphene oxide supported iron catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2018;8(11):2883-93.
16. Zhang X, Lin Q, Liu B, Zheng J, Jiang F, Xu Y, et al. Unravelling the structure-performance relationship over iron-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis by depositing the iron carbonyl in syngas on SiO2 in a fixed-bed reactor. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2019;572:197-209.
17. CHEN Y-l, SUN J-q, ZHANG Y-f, ZHENG S-k, WANG B-h, Zheng C, et al. CoFe2O4 nanoarray catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology. 2017;45(9):1082-7.
18. Kuila D, Nagineni V, Zhao S, Indukuri H, Liang Y, Potluri A, et al. Characterization of alumina and silica sol-gel encapsulated Fe/Co/Ru nanocatalysts in microchannel reactors for FT synthesis of higher alkanes. MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive. 2004;820.
19. Abrokwah RY, Rahman MM, Deshmane VG, Kuila D. Effect of titania support on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis using cobalt, iron, and ruthenium catalysts in silicon-microchannel microreactor. Molecular Catalysis. 2019;478:110566.
20. Ma X, Sun Q, Ying W, Fang D. Effects of promoters on catalytic performance of Fe-Co/SiO2 catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Journal of natural gas chemistry. 2009;18(3):354-8.
21. Yang S, Lee S, Kang SC, Han SJ, Jun K-W, Lee K-Y, et al. Linear α-olefin production with Na-promoted Fe–Zn catalysts via Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. RSC advances. 2019;9(25):14176-87.
22. Jothimurugesan K, Goodwin Jr JG, Gangwal SK, Spivey JJ. Development of Fe Fischer–Tropsch catalysts for slurry bubble column reactors. Catalysis Today. 2000;58(4):335-44.
23. Pour AN, Zamani Y, Tavasoli A, Shahri SMK, Taheri SA. Study on products distribution of iron and iron–zeolite catalysts in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Fuel. 2008;87(10-11):2004-12.
24. Li S, Li A, Krishnamoorthy S, Iglesia E. Effects of Zn, Cu, and K promoters on the structure and on the reduction, carburization, and catalytic behavior of iron-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Catalysis Letters. 2001;77(4):197-205.
25. Duvenhage D, Coville N. Effect of K, Mn and Cr on the Fischer–Tropsch activity of Fe: Co/TiO 2 catalysts. Catalysis letters. 2005;104(3):129-33.
26. Zamani Y, Zamaniyan A, Bahadoran F, Shojaei M. Effect of calcium promoter on nano structure iron catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology. 2015;5(1):21-7.
27. de Smit E, Weckhuysen BM. The renaissance of iron-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: on the multifaceted catalyst deactivation behaviour. Chemical Society Reviews. 2008;37(12):2758-81.
28. Zhao X, Lv S, Wang L, Li L, Wang G, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of preparation methods of iron-based catalysts for enhancing Fischer-Tropsch synthesis performance. Molecular Catalysis. 2018;449:99-105.
29. Chou W, Wu P, Luo M, Li W, Li S. Effects of Al, Si, Ti, Zr Promoters on Catalytic Performance of Iron-Based Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis Catalysts. Catalysis Letters. 2020;150(7):1993-2002.
30. Chou W, Wu P, Luo M, Li W, Li S. Effects of Al, Si, Ti, Zr promoters on catalytic performance of iron-based Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Catalysis Letters. 2020;150:1993-2002.
31. Jongsomjit B, Panpranot J, Goodwin Jr JG. Co-support compound formation in alumina-supported cobalt catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 2001;204(1):98-109.
32. Pour AN, Shahri SMK, Bozorgzadeh HR, Zamani Y, Tavasoli A, Marvast MA. Effect of Mg, La and Ca promoters on the structure and catalytic behavior of iron-based catalysts in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2008;348(2):201-8.
33. Pengnarapat S, Ai P, Reubroycharoen P, Vitidsant T, Yoneyama Y, Tsubaki N. Active Fischer-Tropsch synthesis Fe-Cu-K/SiO2 catalysts prepared by autocombustion method without a reduction step. Journal of energy chemistry. 2018;27(2):432-8.
34. Sudsakorn K, Goodwin JG, Jothimurugesan K, Adeyiga AA. Preparation of attrition-resistant spray-dried Fe Fischer− Tropsch catalysts using precipitated SiO2. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2001;40(22):4778-84.
35. Yaghoobpour E, Zamani Y, Zarrinpashne S, Zamaniyan A. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: effect of silica on hydrocarbon production over cobalt-based catalysts. Chemical Papers. 2019;73:205-14.
36. Jabalameli M, Zamani Y, Baniyaghoob S, Shirazi L. Investigation of Mn and Ca promoter effects in iron-based catalysts: CO hydrogenation reaction. New Journal of Chemistry. 2023;47(20):9923-32.
37. Wan H, Wu B, Zhang C, Xiang H, Li Y. Promotional effects of Cu and K on precipitated iron-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2008;283(1-2):33-42.
38. Zhang H, Ma H, Zhang H, Ying W, Fang D. Effects of Zr and K promoters on precipitated iron-based catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Catalysis letters. 2012;142(1):131-7.
39. Aluha J, Braidy N, Dalai A, Abatzoglou N. Low‐temperature Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis using plasma‐synthesized nanometric Co/C and Fe/C catalysts. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2016;94(8):1504-15.
40. Zamani Y, Bakavoli M, Rahimizadeh M, Mohajeri A, Seyedi SM. Synergetic effect of La and Ba promoters on nanostructured iron catalyst in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2012;33(7-8):1119-24.
41. Aldossary MAM. Structure and reactivity of iron-based catalysis for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. 2015.
42. Zamani Y, Mohajeri A, Bakavoli M, Rahimizadeh M, SEYEDI SM. The Effect of Temperature on Product Distribution over Fe-Cu-K Catalyst in Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis. 2016; 6(1), 46-52
43. Qian W, Zhang H, Sun Q, Liu Y, Ying W, Fang D. Effects of Zr and Ni promoters on the activation and deactivation of a precipitated iron-based catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis. 2014;111(1):293-304.
44. Pour AN, Zare M, Shahri SMK, Zamani Y, Alaei MR. Catalytic behaviors of bifunctional Fe-HZSM-5 catalyst in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2009;1(6):183-9.
45. Niu C, Xia M, Chen C, Ma Z, Jia L, Hou B, et al. Effect of process conditions on the product distribution of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over an industrial cobalt-based catalyst using a fixed-bed reactor. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2020;601:117630.
