Comparison and application of multi-criteria decision making methods in the selection of construction projects (Study of Gostar Mehr Atlas project)
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه بینالمللی هوش تصمیم
1 - کارشناس ارشد مدیریت صنعتی، ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ايران
کلید واژه: multi-criteria decision making, TOPSIS, Kaplan,
چکیده مقاله :
The main goal of this study was to spread more multi-criteria decision making techniques Also, the second goal of this research was to determine the best location to implement the construction project of Atlas Gostar Mehr Method: In this article, multi-criteria decision-making methods were used to select the best location, in such decisions, several indicators that are sometimes contradictory are considered. Findings: Eight indicators of the number of personnel, equipment, company location, experience, proposed cost, quality of materials, delivery time and interaction with local people were extracted and refined by Delphi method, and five indicators of experience, proposed cost, quality of materials, delivery time and interaction It remained that the expert method was used to determine the weight of the indicators, and the most importance was assigned to the index of the proposed cost and the quality of the materials, and the least weight was assigned to the index of interaction. Conclusion: The findings of the research showed different priorities, therefore the Kaplan and Breda method was used to summarize and make the final decision. According to the available indicators and the Breda and Kaplan method, the Sepenta camp was chosen as the best camp for the implementation of the project.
The main goal of this study was to spread more multi-criteria decision making techniques Also, the second goal of this research was to determine the best location to implement the construction project of Atlas Gostar Mehr Method: In this article, multi-criteria decision-making methods were used to select the best location, in such decisions, several indicators that are sometimes contradictory are considered. Findings: Eight indicators of the number of personnel, equipment, company location, experience, proposed cost, quality of materials, delivery time and interaction with local people were extracted and refined by Delphi method, and five indicators of experience, proposed cost, quality of materials, delivery time and interaction It remained that the expert method was used to determine the weight of the indicators, and the most importance was assigned to the index of the proposed cost and the quality of the materials, and the least weight was assigned to the index of interaction. Conclusion: The findings of the research showed different priorities, therefore the Kaplan and Breda method was used to summarize and make the final decision. According to the available indicators and the Breda and Kaplan method, the Sepenta camp was chosen as the best camp for the implementation of the project.
1. Tasa, Omid, Gulabchi, Mahmoud, Ravanshadnia, Mehdi, 2023, Risk response assessment in complex construction projects using fuzzy TOPSIS method, Tehran University Industrial Management Journal, Volume 15, Number 2, 335-364
2. Modares, Azam, Motahari, Nasser, Bafendangan Mozrozi, Vahidah, 2022, development of the newspaper seller model according to the relative competence of suppliers based on possible group decision-making, Scientific Research Journal of Industrial Management of Tehran University, Volume 14, Number 1, 115-142
3. Ebrahimi Tederar, Ali, 2021, presentation of fuzzy possibility-flexibility hybrid model with fuzzy TOPSIS for mathematical planning problems of financial investment, Tehran University Industrial Management Scientific Research Journal, Volume 13, Number 2, 352-369
4. Khajawi, Shokrallah, Fatahi Navji, Hassan, 2014, comparative study of efficient hybrid algorithms to evaluate financial performance using fuzzy approach (case study: Tehran Stock Exchange companies), University of Tehran Industrial Management Scientific Research Journal, Volume 7, No. 2, 285-304
5. Mohammadi Mutlaq, Hasan Ali, Mohammadi Mutlaq, Alireza, 2014, Designing an expert system for supplier evaluation and selection, Scientific Research Journal of Industrial Management of Tehran University, Volume 7, Number 2, 385-403
6. Zarei Mahmoodabadi, Mohammad, Tahari Mehrjardi, Mohammad Hossein, Mahdovian, Alireza, 2013, evaluation of research and development activities in Iran: data coverage analysis approach, volume 6, number 1, 55-74
7. Molavi, Behnam, Esmailian, Majid, Ansari Reza, 2013, presenting a method for prioritizing organizational agility strategies using TOPSIS technique and fuzzy inference system, University of Tehran Industrial Management Scientific Research Journal, Volume 5, Number 1, 123-138
8. Mohammad Moradi, Asghar, Akhtar Kavan, Mehdi, (2008), Methodology of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Models, Arman Shahr, No. 2
9. Ahmadvand, Mohsen; Khorasan Chi, Fatemeh and Ahmadvand, Ansieh. (2012) Ranking of requirements for the realization of green supply chain management in Iran police by Fuzzy TOPSIS method, Applied Research Center of Amad Deputy and Naja Support. . 59-79.
10. Azar, Adel; Mahmoudian, Omid; and Hashemi, Mehdi; (2016), presenting a method to evaluate the green supply chain performance of Assalouye Petrochemicals using the combination of fuzzy method and nonlinear modeling, Energy Economy Studies, 12(48): 173-194.
11. Gol, Hossein, Hosseinzadeh, Majid, (2019), Introduction of multi-criteria decision-making methods for wastewater treatment, 11th International Conference on Sustainable Development and Urban Development
12. Hajizadgan, Saida. 2014. "Comparison and application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in selecting the optimal process for wastewater treatment". Imran's master's thesis, Birjand University.
13. Qudsipour, Sidhsan. 2015. "Multi-objective programming of ten-dimensional weighting methods after solving". Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology Publications.
14. Qudsipour, Sidhsan. (2008) "Debates in multi-criteria decision making: Hierarchy analysis process", Amir Kabir Industrial University Publications
15. Mirabi, Mehrdad, Mian Abadihojat, Sharifi, Mohammad Baqer. 2013 "The application of multi-criteria decision making in choosing the appropriate option for the collection of sewage in the city of Niasser." Semnan, Sixth National Congress of Civil Engineering.
16. Amir Salami, Sara, Alaei, Saeed, (1402), Fuzzy DENAP-Fuzzy TOPSIS-Dual Objective Mathematical Model approach for the problem of green supplier selection and order allocation and its solution with Harmony Search Algorithm, Tehran University Industrial Management Journal
17. Filizadeh, Mohammadreza, Sadeghi, Hassan, 2015, Project management based on multi-criteria decision-making process, Master of Management Thesis, Birjand University
18. Rafezi, Zohra, Hadi Nejaad, Farhad, Kazem, Saeed, Mirzazadeh, Fereshte, Valipour, Habib, 2013, the second social psychology congress of Iran
19. Asgharpour, Mohammad Javad, 2003, Group decision-making and game theory with an operations research approach, first chapter, Tehran, Tehran University Publications.
20. Hatem, Nahid, Torani, Sogand, 2014, Application of multi-criteria decision making model in measuring hospital efficiency, scientific journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
21. Safari, Mehdi, Islamzadeh, Omid, 2015, selection and test of bankruptcy model with multi-criteria decision criteria, the second international conference of new ideas in management, economics and accounting, Singapore
• Colson G, Bruyn CD ( 1989) "Models and methods in multiple objectives decision making" Math. Comput.Modelling 1989;12: PP.1201–11.
• Drew D, Skitmore M, Po Lo H (2001) "the Effect of Client and Type and Size of Construction Work on a Contractor’s Bidding Strategy" Building and Environment 2001;36(3):393–406
• Guitoun A, Martel JM (1998) "Tentative Guidelines to Help Choosing an Appropriate MCDA Method" European Journal of Operational Research 1998; 109: PP.501–21
