Investigating on surface roughness of nanohybrid and micro-hybrid composite resins following the use of a simplified polishing system
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه شبیه سازی و تحلیل تکنولوژی های نوین در مهندسی مکانیکSeyedeh Parvin Hosseini Fadabobeh 1 , Mehrdad Kazemian 2 , M. R Malekipour Esfahani 3
1 - Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Surface Roughness, Nanohybrid, Dental Polishing, Composite Resins, Microhybrid,
چکیده مقاله :
This in vitro experimental study compared the average surface roughness (Ra value) of Z250 microhybrid and Z350 nanohybrid composite resins following polishing with the EVE simplified polishing system versus the multi-step Sof-Lex discs. Ninety-six composite discs (8 x 2 mm) were randomly divided into four subgroups: control (surface under the Mylar strip, no finishing/polishing), polishing with Sof-Lex discs, polishing with EVE discs, and polishing with EVE discs + EVE polishing paste. Prior to polishing, the specimens were ground with 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper. The average surface roughness of each specimen was measured before (baseline) and after polishing using a profilometer. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests. The control subgroups showed the smoothest surfaces. A significant difference in surface roughness was found in the Z350 subgroups, with the Sof-Lex system yielding the roughest surface (P<0.05). The EVE discs + EVE paste system yielded the smoothest surface after the control subgroup. The difference in surface roughness was also significant among the Z250 subgroups, with the Sof-Lex system creating significantly rougher surfaces than the EVE discs + paste system. A significant difference in surface roughness was observed in all eight subgroups, with Z350 specimens polished with Sof-Lex discs and Z350 control specimens showing the maximum and minimum roughness, respectively. The study concludes that the two-step EVE polishing system may be preferred over the multi-step Sof-Lex discs for polishing Z250 and Z350 composites, as it provided significantly smoother surfaces.
This in vitro experimental study compared the average surface roughness (Ra value) of Z250 microhybrid and Z350 nanohybrid composite resins following polishing with the EVE simplified polishing system versus the multi-step Sof-Lex discs. Ninety-six composite discs (8 x 2 mm) were randomly divided into four subgroups: control (surface under the Mylar strip, no finishing/polishing), polishing with Sof-Lex discs, polishing with EVE discs, and polishing with EVE discs + EVE polishing paste. Prior to polishing, the specimens were ground with 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper. The average surface roughness of each specimen was measured before (baseline) and after polishing using a profilometer. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests. The control subgroups showed the smoothest surfaces. A significant difference in surface roughness was found in the Z350 subgroups, with the Sof-Lex system yielding the roughest surface (P<0.05). The EVE discs + EVE paste system yielded the smoothest surface after the control subgroup. The difference in surface roughness was also significant among the Z250 subgroups, with the Sof-Lex system creating significantly rougher surfaces than the EVE discs + paste system. A significant difference in surface roughness was observed in all eight subgroups, with Z350 specimens polished with Sof-Lex discs and Z350 control specimens showing the maximum and minimum roughness, respectively. The study concludes that the two-step EVE polishing system may be preferred over the multi-step Sof-Lex discs for polishing Z250 and Z350 composites, as it provided significantly smoother surfaces.
[1] Dogan Buzoglu, H., Calt, S., & Gümüsderelioglu, M. (2007). Evaluation of the surface free energy on root canal dentine walls treated with chelating agents and NaOCl. International Endodontic Journal, 40(1), 18-24.
[2] Barekatain M, Mirzakocheki BP, Aref D, Mirzakhani M, Jahangirmoghadam M. (2017). Assessing the effect of different polishing methods of three common composite resins on the contact angle of distilled water. Journal of Isfahan Dental School. 13(3), 219-226.
[3] Attar, N. (2007). The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 8(1), 27-35.
[4] Heymann, H. O., Swift, E. J., Ritter, A. V. (2012). Sturdevant's Art & Science of Operative Dentistry-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
[5] Jones, C. S., Billington, R. W., & Pearson, G. J. (2004). The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. British dental journal, 196(1), 42-45.
[6] Turssi, C. P., Ferracane, J. L., & Serra, M. C. (2005). Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing
and polishing procedures. Dental Materials, 21(7), 641-648.
[7] Fruits, T. J., Miranda, F. J., & Coury, T. L. (1996). Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials. Quintessence International, 27(4).
[8] Yap, A. U. J., Lye, K. W., & Sau, C. W. (1997). Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Operative Dentistry, 22, 260-265.
[9] Turkun, L. S., & Turkun, M. (2004). The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Operative Dentistry-University of Washington, 29(2), 203-211.
[10] Powers J.M.., Sakaguchi R.L., (2012). Craig RG. Craig's restorative dental materials, 13th edition, Elsevier/Mosby.
[11] Yap, A. U., Sau, C. W., & Lye, K. W. (1998). Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 25(6), 456-461.
[12] Rajaei, A., Kazemian, M., & Khandan, A. (2022). Investigation of mechanical stability of lithium disilicate ceramic reinforced with titanium nanoparticles. Nanomedicine Research Journal, 7(4), 350-359.
[13] Kemaloglu, H., Karacolak, G., & Turkun, L. S. (2017). Can reduced‐step polishers be as effective as multiple‐step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness?. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 29(1), 31-40.
[14] Patel, B., Chhabra, N., & Jain, D. (2016). Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD, 19(1), 37.
[15] Erdemir, U., Sancakli, H. S., & Yildiz, E. (2012). The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. European journal of dentistry, 6(02), 198-205.
[16] Korkmaz, Y., Ozel, E., Attar, N., & Aksoy, G. (2008). The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Operative dentistry, 33(1), 44-50.
[17] MirzaKoucheki Boroujeni, P., Daneshpour, N., & Zare Jahromi, M. (2013). The Effect of Different Polishing Methods and Composite Resin Thickness on Temperature Rise of Composite Restorative Materials. Journal of Iranian Dental Association, 25(1), 28-34.
[18] Schieker, M., Seitz, H., Drosse, I., Seitz, S., & Mutschler, W. (2006). Biomaterials as scaffold for bone tissue engineering. European journal of trauma, 32, 114-124.
[19] Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Khan, R. H., & Suman, R. (2020). 3D printing applications in bone tissue engineering. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 11, S118-S124.
[20] Soundarya, S. P., Menon, A. H., Chandran, S. V., & Selvamurugan, N. (2018). Bone tissue engineering: Scaffold preparation using chitosan and other biomaterials with different design and fabrication techniques. International journal of biological macromolecules, 119, 1228-1239.
[21] Maia, F. R., Bastos, A. R., Oliveira, J. M., Correlo, V. M., & Reis, R. L. (2022). Recent approaches towards bone tissue engineering. Bone, 154, 116256.
[22] Moarrefzadeh, A., Morovvati, M. R., Angili, S. N., Smaisim, G. F., Khandan, A., & Toghraie, D. (2022). Fabrication and finite element simulation of 3D printed poly L-lactic acid scaffolds coated with alginate/carbon nanotubes for bone engineering applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 224, 1496-1508.
[23] Haddadzadeh, M., Razfar, M. R., & Mamaghani, M. R. M. (2009). Novel approach to initial blank design in deep drawing using artificial neural network. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223(10), 1323-1330.
[24] Asadian-Ardakani, M. H., Morovvati, M. R., Mirnia, M. J., & Dariani, B. M. (2017). Theoretical and experimental investigation of deep drawing of tailor-welded IF steel blanks with non-uniform blank holder forces. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 231(2), 286-300.
[25] Mahale, R. S., Vasanth, S., Krishna, H., Shashanka, R., Sharath, P. C., & Sreekanth, N. V. (2022). Electrochemical sensor applications of nanoparticle modified carbon paste electrodes to detect various neurotransmitters: A review. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 908, 69-88.
[26] Patil, A., Banapurmath, N., Hunashyal, A. M., Meti, V., & Mahale, R. (2022). Development and Performance analysis of Novel Cast AA7076-Graphene Amine-Carbon Fiber Hybrid Nanocomposites for Structural Applications. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry, 12(2), 1480-1489.
[27] Wu, J., Ling, C., Ge, A., Jiang, W., Baghaei, S., & Kolooshani, A. (2022). Investigating the performance of tricalcium phosphate bioceramic reinforced with titanium nanoparticles in friction stir welding for coating of orthopedic prostheses application. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20, 1685-1698.
[28] Chen, X., Kolooshani, A., Heidarshenas, B., Mortezagholi, B., Yuan, Y., & Semiruomi, D. T. (2023). Effects of tricalcium phosphate-titanium nanoparticles on mechanical performance after friction stir processing on titanium alloys for dental applications. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 293, 116492.
[29] Khandan, A., Ozada, N., & Karamian, E. (2015). Novel microstructure mechanical activated nano composites for tissue engineering applications. J Bioeng Biomed Sci, 5(1), 1.
[30] Zadeh Dadashi, M., Kazemian, M., & Malekipour Esfahani, M. (2023). Color Match of Porcelain Veneer Light-Cure Resin Cements with Their Respective Try-in Pastes: Chemical Stability. Nanochemistry Research, 8(3), 205-214.
[31] Safaei, M., Abedinzadeh, R., Khandan, A., Barbaz-Isfahani, R., & Toghraie, D. (2023). Synergistic effect of graphene nanosheets and copper oxide nanoparticles on mechanical and thermal properties of composites: Experimental and simulation investigations. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 289, 116248.
[32] Hendrikson, W., van Blitterswijk, C., Rouwkema, J., & Moroni, L. (2017). The use of finite element analyses to design and fabricate three-dimensional scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 5, 30.
[33] Yarahmadi, A., Hashemian, M., Toghraie, D., Abedinzadeh, R., & Eftekhari, S. A. (2022). Investigation of mechanical properties of epoxy-containing Detda and Degba and graphene oxide nanosheet using molecular dynamics simulation. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 347, 118392.
[34] Abdellahi, M., Karamian, E., Najafinezhad, A., Ranjabar, F., Chami, A., & Khandan, A. (2018). Diopside-magnetite; A novel nanocomposite for hyperthermia applications. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 77, 534-538.
[35] Ozada, N., Ghafoorpoor Yazdi, S., Khandan, A., & Karimzadeh, M. (2018). A brief review of reverse shoulder prosthesis: arthroplasty, complications, revisions, and development. Trauma Monthly, 23(3), e58163-e58163.
[36] Iranmanesh, P., Ehsani, A., Khademi, A., Asefnejad, A., Shahriari, S., Soleimani, M. & Khandan, A. (2022). Application of 3D bioprinters for dental pulp regeneration and tissue engineering (porous architecture). Transport in Porous Media, 142(1-2), 265-293.
[37] Mirmohammadi, H., Kolahi, J., Khandan, A., Al-Musawi, M. A., & Ali, O. H. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Dental Preprints which Published in 2022. Dental Hypotheses, 14(1), 1-2.
[38] Khoroushi, M., Ghasemi, M., Abedinzadeh, R., & Samimi, P. (2016). Comparison of immediate and delayed light-curing on nano-indentation creep and contraction stress of dual-cured resin cements. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 64, 272-280.
[39] Samimi, P., Kazemian, M., Shirban, F., Alaei, S., & Khoroushi, M. (2018). Bond strength of composite resin to white mineral trioxide aggregate: Effect of different surface treatments. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD, 21(4), 350.
[40] Raji, Z., Hosseini, M., & Kazemian, M. (2022). Micro-shear bond strength of composite to deep dentin by using mild and ultra-mild universal adhesives. Dental Research Journal, 19.
[41] Hosseini, M., Raji, Z., & Kazemian, M. (2023). Microshear Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial Dentin by Use of Universal Adhesives with Different pH Values in Self-Etch and Etch & Rinse Modes. Dental Research Journal, 20(1), 5.
[42] Babaei, S., Kazemian, M., Aghaee, F., & Ghodousi, A. (2022). Evaluation of the Harmony of Smile Appearance with Personality Traits in Patients Applying for Smile Makeover, Journal of Isfahan Dental School, 18(4), 356-64.
[43] Kazemian, M. (2017). An In-Vitro Study of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Cavity Liners Against Streptococcus Mutans and Lactobacillus Casei. Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, 2(2), 23-28.
