Shear Bond Strength and Bond Failure Characteristics of Glass Ionomer Flooring Materials on Dental Dentin: Implications for Dental Restorations and Therapeutic Sealing
Shadi Hosseinzadeh Zari Baf
1
(
Graduate of Dental School, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Mehrdad Kazemian
2
(
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Shear bond strength, Bond failure, Resin-modified glass ionomer cements, Dentin Universal testing, Dental materials,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength and bond failure characteristics of three distinct glass ionomer flooring materials applied to dental dentin. Extracted molars were prepared and divided into three groups, each receiving specific resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Shear bond strength was assessed using a universal testing machine, and bond failure types were examined with a digital microscope. The hypothesis posited that the chemical ionomer glass liner would exhibit higher shear bond strength to tooth dentin than the other two types. Findings demonstrated variations in shear bond strength among the groups, accompanied by different bond failure types. These results suggest that the shear bond strength and bond failure characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on dentin are dependent on the specific cement employed. The study also explores the concept of therapeutic sealing and evaluates the challenges associated with using glass ionomer cements in dental restorations. Furthermore, the preservation of sound tooth structure is emphasized as a critical factor to be taken into consideration. These results have implications for the development and enhancement of dental materials and techniques. Understanding these variations and characteristics is crucial for selecting appropriate materials and optimizing dental treatments, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction.
چکیده انگلیسی :
This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength and bond failure characteristics of three distinct glass ionomer flooring materials applied to dental dentin. Extracted molars were prepared and divided into three groups, each receiving specific resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Shear bond strength was assessed using a universal testing machine, and bond failure types were examined with a digital microscope. The hypothesis posited that the chemical ionomer glass liner would exhibit higher shear bond strength to tooth dentin than the other two types. Findings demonstrated variations in shear bond strength among the groups, accompanied by different bond failure types. These results suggest that the shear bond strength and bond failure characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on dentin are dependent on the specific cement employed. The study also explores the concept of therapeutic sealing and evaluates the challenges associated with using glass ionomer cements in dental restorations. Furthermore, the preservation of sound tooth structure is emphasized as a critical factor to be taken into consideration. These results have implications for the development and enhancement of dental materials and techniques. Understanding these variations and characteristics is crucial for selecting appropriate materials and optimizing dental treatments, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction.
1. Turkün L.S.E., Türkün M., Ertug˘ Rul F., Ates M., Brugger S., 2008. Long‐term antibacterial effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine‐containing glass ionomer cement. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 20(1), 29-44.
2. Featherstone J.D., 1999. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 27(1), 31-40.
3. Hook E.R., Owen O.J., Bellis C.A., Holder J.A., O’Sullivan D.J., Barbour M.E., 2014. Development of a novel antimicrobial-releasing glass ionomer cement functionalized with chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate nanoparticles. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 12, 1-9.
4. Walls A.W., Murray J.J., McCabe J.F., 1988. The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the deciduous dentition. British Dental Journal. 165(1), 13-17.
5. Swift E.J., Sturdevant C.M., Roberson T.M., Heymann H., 2006. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. Elsevier Health Sciences.
6. Welbury R.R., Walls A.W., Murray J.J., McCabe J.F., 1991. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. British Dental Journal. 170(5), 177-181.
7. El-Kalla I.H., García Godoy F., 1998. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of compomers in primary and permanent teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 8(2), 103-114.
8. Ngoc VTN., Ha P.T., Hung D.T., Anh N.V., 2023. Management of clear aligner-related severe enamel demineralization with a modified resin infiltration technique: a case report. Dental Hypotheses. 14(2), 66-68.
9. Wilson A.D., Kent B.E., 1972. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. British Dental Journal. 132(4), 133-135.
10. Hammadi F.R., Abdul-Ameer Z.M., 2023. Evaluation of the push-out bond strength of the bio-c repair and compare it with the mineral trioxide aggregate and amalgam when used as root-end filling material: an in vitro study. Dental Hypotheses. 14(2), 62-65.
11. Khandan A., Karamian E., Bonakdarchian M., 2014. Mechanochemical synthesis evaluation of nanocrystalline bone-derived bioceramic powder using for bone tissue engineering. Dental Hypotheses. 5(4), 155-161.
12. Martinez-Mondragon M., Urriolagoitia-Sosa G., Romero-Ángeles B., Pérez-Partida J.C., Cruz-Olivares I.M., Urriolagoitia-Calderón G., 2023. Bilinear numerical analysis of the structural behavior of a dental implant applied as a biomaterial carbon fiber reinforced polyether-ether-ketone (CFR-PEEK): a finite element analysis. Dental Hypotheses. 14(2), 45-48.
13. Coutinho E., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Fukuda R., Snauwaert J., Nakayama Y., De Munck J., Lambrechts P., Suzuki K., Van Meerbeek B., 2007. Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. Journal of Dental Research. 86(7), 656-661.
14. Kadhim B.H., Mahmood W.S., 2023. Effect of gaseous ozone on transverse and impact strengths of heat cure acrylic resin: an in vitro study. Dental Hypotheses. 14(1), 13-15.
15. Turki O.H., Jafar Z.J., 2023. Antibacterial activity of juglans regia L. dry husk extract against streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus: an in vitro study. Dental Hypotheses. 14(1), 29-31.
16. Croll T.P., Berg J.H., 2010. Glass ionomer cement systems. Inside Dent. 6(8), 82-84.
17. Uno S., Finger W.J., Fritz U., 1996. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dental Materials. 12(1), 64-69.
18. Dilian N.S., Kadhim A.J., 2022. Comparative evaluation of marginal microleakage between bulk-fill, preheated Bulk-Fill, and Bulk-Fill flowable composite resins above and below cemento-enamel junction using micro-computed tomography: an in vitro study. Dental Hypotheses. 13(4), 128-131.
19. Narayanan S., Hegde M.N., Thirunarayanan S., Dsouza T.S., 2022. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with newer methacrylate-based dental composite materials: An in vitro study. Dental Hypotheses. 13(4), 149-153.
20. Malekipoor M., Shirani F., Mousavinasab S.M., Jafari N., Sharifinejad N., 2022. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the color change of artificial white spot lesions treated with three different commercially available remineralizing agents: an in vitro study. Dental Hypotheses. 13(3), 90-93.
21. Iranmanesh P., Tabatabaei S.A., Saatchi M., Tahani B., Binandeh E.S., Khademi A., 2021. Evaluation of the perceived confidence of undergraduate dental students in performing endodontic treatment. Dental Hypotheses. 12(3), 144-148.
22.Khandan A., Nassireslami E., Saber-Samandari S., Arabi N., 2020. Fabrication and characterization of porous bioceramic-magnetite biocomposite for maxillofacial fractures application. Dental Hypotheses. 11(3), 74-85.
23. Moretti J.C.C., Junior R.C., Palmieri Jr.C.F., Luz J.G.C., 2022. Does the position of the third molar have an influence on the location of mandibular fractures?. Dental Hypotheses. 13(3), 86-89.
24. Beauchamp J., Caufield PW., Crall J.J., Donly K., Feigal R., Gooch B., Ismail A., Kohn W., Siegal M., Simonsen R., 2008. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the american dental association council on scientific affairs. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 139(3), 257-268.
25. Rajaei A., Kazemian M., Khandan A., 2022. Investigation of mechanical stability of lithium disilicate ceramic reinforced with titanium nanoparticles. Nanomedicine Research Journal. 7(4), 350-359.
26. Brackett W.W., Gunnin T.D. Gilpatrick R.O., Browning W.D., 1998. Microleakage of class V compomer and light-cured glass ionomer restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 79(3), 261-263.
27. Breschi L., Ferracane J.L., Cadenaro M., Mazzoni A., Hilton T., 2013. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. in: fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. In Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, Fourth Edition. Quintessence Publishing. 207-248.
28. Gateau P., Sabek M., Dailey B., 1999. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 82(3), 341-347.
29. Chung C.H., Cuozzo P.T., Mante F.K., 1999. Shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 115(1), 52-54.
30. Holmgren C.J., Roux D., Doméjean S., 2013. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 5. atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)–a minimum intervention and minimally invasive approach for the management of dental caries. British Dental Journal. 214(1), 11-18.
31. Fusayama T., Okuse K., Hosoda H., 1966. Relationship between hardness, discoloration, and microbial invasion in carious dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 45(4), 1033-1046.
32. Craig R.G., Curro F.A., Green W.S., Ship J.A., 2008. Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 139(6), 705-712.
33. Alves L.S., Fontanella V., Damo A.C., de Oliveira E.F., Maltz M., 2010. Qualitative and quantitative radiographic assessment of sealed carious dentin: a 10-year prospective study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 109(1), 135-141.
34. Gruythuysen R., van Strijp G., Wu M.K., 2010. Long-term survival of indirect pulp treatment performed in primary and permanent teeth with clinically diagnosed deep carious lesions. Journal of Endodontics. 36(9), 1490-1493.
35. de Castilho A.R., Duque C., Negrini T.D., Sacono N.T., de Paula A.B., Sacramento P.A., de Souza Costa C.A., Spolidorio D.M., Puppin-Rontani R.M., 2012. Mechanical and biological characterization of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing doxycycline hyclate. Archives of Oral Biology. 57(2), 131-138.
36. Prabhakar A.R., Agarwal S., Basappa N., 2014. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial effect and physical properties of conventional glass-ionomer cement containing 1% chlorhexidine and 1% xylitol. International Journal of Oral Health Sciences. 4(2), 63-69.
37. Sadeghian Marnani N., Kazemian M., 2024. Investigation of fluoride release patterns of glass ionomer lining materials: A comparative study of chemical, resin modified, and single-component glass ionomer cements. Nanochemistry Research. 9(1), 55-67.
38. Sakaguchi R.L., Powers J.M., 2012. Restorative materials—composites and polymers. Restorative Dental Materials. 13thed. Philadelphia. 161-90.
39. Sudsangiam S., Van Noort R., 1999. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 1(1), 57-67.
40. Somani R., Jaidka S., Singh D.J., Sibal G. K., 2016. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various glass ionomer cements to dentin of primary teeth: an in vitro study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 9(3), 192.
41. Murthy S.S., Murthy G.S., 2015. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three commercially available glass ionomer cements in primary teeth. Journal of International Oral Health. 7(8), 103.
42. Poggio C., Beltrami R., Scribante A., Colombo M., Lombardini M., 2014. Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. Annali Di Stomatologia. 5(1), 15.
43. Navimipour E.J., Oskoee S.S., Oskoee P.A., Bahari M., Rikhtegaran S., Ghojazadeh M., 2012. Effect of acid and laser etching on shear bond strength of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements to composite resin. Lasers in Medical Science. 27, 305-311.
44. Sa F.C., Pascotto R.C., Pieroli D.A., Navarro M.F.D.L., 1997. Shear bond strength of three glass ionomer cements to enamel and dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 76, 314.
45. El-Askary, F.S., Nassif, M.S., 2011. The effect of the pre-conditioning step on the shear bond strength of nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer to dentin. European Journal of Dentistry. 5(02), 150-156.
46. Tabari Shahandasht N., Bolandi M., Rahmati M., Jafarisani M., 2023. A review of non-pharmacological oral supplements containing nutrients and micronutrients in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 13(3), 401-409.
47. Sedighi M., Namdari M., Mahmoudi P., 2023. An overview of angiogenesis and chemical and physiological angiogenic factors: short review. Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 13(3), 411-422
48. Udodi P.S., Anonye T.C., Ezejindu D.N., Abugu J.I., Omile C.I., Obiesie I.J., Ogwo R.N., Abattam C.I., Akukwu D.C., Uloneme G.C., Oyinbo C., 2023. Exposure to insecticide mixture of cypermethrin and dichlorvos induced neurodegeneration by reducing antioxidant capacity in striatum. Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 13(3), 423-439.
49. Ramachandran S., Krishnan N.L., Ponmudi P., 2023. Effect of tannery effluents on the antioxidant enzymes of a fresh water fish channa striatus. Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 13(3), 441-447.
