تاثیر کاربرد متانول و عنصر روی بر رشد و عملکرد بادام زمینی (Arachis hypogaea L.)

محورهای موضوعی : یافته های نوین کشاورزی

رضا پیله وری خمامی ¹ ( کارشناس ارشد زراعت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان، اراک، ایران )
محمدنقی صفرزاده ویشکایی ² ( استادیار گروه زراعت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت )

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/08/17 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/08/17 تاریخ انتشار : 1392/12/01

کلید واژه: عملکرد, روی, رشد, متانول, بادام زمینی,

چکیده مقاله :

به منظور بررسی اثر متانول و روی بر شاخص های رشد و عملکرد بادام زمینی رقم NC2از آزمایش فاکتوریل با طرح پایه بلوک های کامل تصادفی در 3 تکرار در سال زراعی 90-89 در شهرستان بندر کیاشهر واقع در استان گیلان استفاده گردید. مقادیر مختلف مصرف متانول (صفر، 10، 20، 30 درصد حجمی) و کلات روی (صفر، 5/0، 1، 5/1 گرم در لیتر)، تیمارهای مورد بررسی را تشکیل دادند. نتایج حاصل نشان داد مقدار مصرف متانول و روی بر شاخص سطح برگ، وزن خشک غلاف، سرعت رشد گیاه، سرعت رشد غلاف، عملکرد غلاف، عملکرد دانه، بادام زمینی تاثیر معنی دار داشت و بیشترین مقدار آنها مربوط به تیمارهای 20 و 30 % حجمی متانول و 5/1 در هزار روی بود. اما مقدار روغن دانه ها بین شاهد و بوته های تیمار شده با متانول تفاوت معنی داری نداشت. همچنین اثر متقابل محلول پاشی متانول و روی در صفات اندازه گیری شده به جز مقدار روغن دانه معنی دار بود. حداکثر عملکرد غلاف و عملکرد دانه (6809 و 5181 کیلوگرم در هکتار) با مصرف 30% حجمی متانول به همراه 5/1 در هزار روی به دست آمد. بالاترین شاخص سطح برگ، سرعت رشد گیاه و سرعت رشد غلاف به ترتیب در 90 و 105 روز پس از کاشت با همان مقدار مصرف متانول و روی نیز به دست آمد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

     NC2 variety of a Factorial experiment with randomized complete block design in 3 replication during 2010-2011 done in Bandar Kiashahr county located in Guilan province is used to survey effect of methanol and zinc on peanut growth index and yield. Various methanol application (0, 10, 20, 30 v/v) and zinc chelate (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5) in 1000 cc formed surveying treatments. The result showed that methanol application had significant impact on leaf area index, pod dry weight, crop growth rate, pod growth rate, pod yield, grain yield, and maximum belonged to 20 % and 30 % v/v of methanol and 1.5/1000 cc zinc application treatments. But amount of seed`s oil had no significant difference between witness and plants treated with methanol. Also interaction effect of methanol and zinc was significant in all parameters except oil content. Maximum seed and pod yield (6809 and 5181 kg/h) were gained by 30 % v/v of methanol and 1.5/1000 cc zinc application. The highest leaf area index, growth rate of plant and pod growth rate were gained respectively in 90 and 105 days after planting with same methanol and zinc application mentioned above.

منابع و مأخذ:

1- Pilehvari khomami, R., Safarzadeh Vishkaei, M, N., Sajedi, N. and Moradi, M. 2009. Effect of methanol and zinc application on peanut qualities and quantities characteristics in Guilan region. Journal of Agricultural Arak Yaftehaye Novin. 4:339-351.

2- Hosseinzadeh Gashti, A. 2006. Effects of gypsum and superphosphate on growth, yield and yield components of peanuts. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan. Pp: 124.

3- Safarzadeh Vishkaei, M. N. 1998. Peanut. Islamic Azad University of Rasht publications. Pp: 46.

4- Safarzadeh Vishkaei, M. N. 1998. Effect of sulfur on growth and yield of peanut. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Isfahan Technology. Pp: 105.

5- Safarzadeh Vishkaei, M, N., NourMohammadi, GH. and Hosseinzadeh Gashti, A. 2009. Methanol synthesis and metabolism in plants and its role in increasing crop yield. The first National Conference on New Technologies in Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University, Rasht. Iran.

6- Bell, M. J., R. C. Muchow and G. L. Wilson. 1987. The effect of plant population on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) in a monsoonal tropical environmental. Field Crop Res., 17: 91-107.

7- Chuni, L. and Singh, A. L. 2007. Screening for High Zinc Density Groundnut Genotypes in India. 24-26 May. Istanbul. Turkey.

8- Downie, A., S. Miyazaki, H. Bohnert, P. John, J. Coleman, M. Parry and Haslam. R. 2004. Expression profiling of the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to methanol stimulation. Phytochem. 65:2305-2316.

9- Duncan, W. G., D. E. McCloud, R. L. McGraw and Boote, K. J. 1978. Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Science. 18: 1015-1021.

10- Fageria, N. K. 2009. The use of nutrients in crop plants. CRC Press. pp: 448.

11- Fall, R. and A.A. Benson. 1996. Leaf methanol-the simplest natural product from Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1(9):296-301.

12- Gardner, F. P. and E. O. Auma. 1988. Canopy structure, light interception, yield and market quality of peanut genotypes as influenced by planting pattern and planting date. Field Crop Res., 20: 13-29.

13- Halepyati, A. S. 1998. Effect of moisture regimes and zinc levels on growth and yield of summer groundnut. University of Agriculture Sciences. India.

14- Hemming, D. J. B., Criddle, R. C. and Hansen, L.D. 1995. Effects of methanol on plant respiration. J. Plant Physiol. 146:193-198.

15- Ivanova, F. G., Doronina, N. V. and Trotsenko, Y. A. 2001. Aerobic methylobacteria are capable of synthesizing auxins. Microbiol. 70:392-397.

16- Kotzabasis, K., A. Hatziathanasiou, M.V. Begoa-Ruigomes, M. Kentouri and Divanach, P. 1999. Methanol as alternative carbon source for quicker efficient production of the microalgae Chlorella minutissima: role of the concentration and frequence of administration. J. Biotechnol. 70:357-362.

17- Li, Y., Gupta, G., Joshi, J. M. and Siyumbano, A. K. 1995. Effect of methanol on soybean photosynthesis and chlorophyll. J. Plant Nutr. 18:1875-1880.

18- Madhaiyan, T., S. Poonguzhali, S.P. Sundaram and T. Sa. 2006. A new insight into foliar applied methanol influencing phylloplane ethylotrophic dynamics and growth promotion of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Env. Exp. Bot. 57:168-176.

19- Makhdum, M. I., Malik, N. A., Udin, S., Ahmad, F. and Chaudhry, F. I. 2002. Physiological response of cotton to methanol foliar application J. Res. Sci. 13(1):37-43.

20- Marschner. H., Oberle, H., Cakmak, L. and Romheld, V. 1990. Growth enhancement by silicon in cucumber (cucumis sativus) plants depends on imbalance in phosphorus and zinc supply. Plant and Soil. 124:211-219.

21- Marwaha, B. C. Study of the Significance of Zinc Nutrition on Crop Productivity and Quality of Produce at Farmers’ Fields in India. 24-26 May 2007. Istanbul. Turkey.

22- Meena, S., Malarkodi, M. and Senthilvalavan, P. 2007. Secondary and micronutrients for groundnut. Indian Journals of Agronomy.

23- Murugesan, K. 1995. Influence of zinc the growth and yield of groundnut and its effect on microbial population. Journal Ecotoxicoligy & Environmental Monitoring. 5:15-18.

24- Nonomura, A. M. and Benson, A. A. 1992. The path of carbon in photosynthesis: Improved crop yield with methanol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89:9794-9798.

25- Omer, Z. S., Tombolini, R., Broberg, A. and Gerhardson, B. 2004. Indole-3- acetic acid production by pink-pigmented acultative methylotrophic bacteria. Plant Growth Regul. 43:93-96.

26- Ramberg, H. A., Bradley, J. S. C.,  Olson, J. S. C., Nishio, J. N., Markwell, J.and Osterman, J. C. 2002. The role of methanol in promoting plant growth: An Update. Rev. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 1:113-126.

27- Ramirez, I, Dorta, F., Espinosa, V., Mercado, A. and Pena-cortes, H. 2006. Effect of foliar and root application of Methanol on the growth of Arabidopsis, Tobacco, and Tomato plants. J. Plant Growth Regulation. 56:165-174.

28- Singh, A. L. 2007. Prevention and Correction of Zinc Deficiency of Groundnut in India. Zinc Crop conference 24-26 May. Istanbul. Turkey.

29- Singh, Y. P. S. 2007. Mannj. Interaction effect of sulphur and zinc in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and their availability in tonk district of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agronomy.

30- Singh, F. and Oswalt, D. L. 1995. Groundnut production practices. ICRISAT. Pp: 39.

31- Sukhija, P.S., Randhawa, V., Dhillon, K. S. and Munshi, S. K .1987. The influence of Zinc and Sulphur deficiency on Oil-Filling in peanut kernels. J. Plant and soil. 103:261-267.

32- Theodoridou, A., Dornemann, D. and Kotzabasis, K. 2002. Light-dependent induction of strongly increased microalgal growth by methanol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1573:189-198.

33- Zbiec, I., Karczmarczyk, S. and Podsiadlo, C. 2003. Response of some cultivated plants to methanol as compared to supplemental irrigation. Elec. J. Polish Agri. Univer. Agronomy. 6(1):1-7.