نقش قابلیتهای پرسنل در چابکی زنجیره تأمین (مطالعه موردی: کارکنان شرکت دخانیات استان آذربایجان غربی)
محورهای موضوعی :
دو فصلنامه مدیریت زنجیره ارزش
رستم امینی
1
(
استادیار گروه مدیریت، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران.
)
رضا رستم زاده
2
(
استادیار گروه مدیریت، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران.
)
تاریخ دریافت : 1395/04/30
تاریخ پذیرش : 1395/08/08
تاریخ انتشار : 1395/09/01
کلید واژه:
توانمندسازی,
قابلیتهای پرسنل,
چابکی زنجیره تأمین,
مهارت کارکنان,
مهارت های چندگانه,
چکیده مقاله :
در یک محیط رقابتی جهانی همواره در حال تغییر، چابکی زنجیره تأمین یک سازمان به‌طور مستقیم بر توانایی آن در تولید و ارائه محصولات نوآورانه به مشتریان خود و به‌موقع و مقرون‌به‌صرفه بودن تأثیر دارد. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی نقش قابلیتهای پرسنل در چابکی زنجیره تأمین می‌باشد. نمونه هدف از این مطالعه کارکنان شرکت دخانیات استان آذربایجان غربی است.آلفای کرونباخوپایاییترکیبیبرایپژوهشبالاتراز8/0به دستآمد وهمچنینرواییهمگرابرایهمهمتغیرهابالاتراز5/0کهباتوجهبهمعیارهایارائه‌شده پایاییورواییپژوهشدرسطحاستانداردوقابل قبولیمی‌باشد. یافته‌هایحاصلازمطالعهبرازشمدل پیشنهادیبرایارزیابیتأثیر قابلیتهای پرسنل بر چابکی زنجیره تأمین را تائید می‌کند. علاوه براین،نتایج نشان می‌دهد که شش متغیرمهارت کارکنان،هوشمندی و آگاهی، مجموعه شایستگی، مدیریت دانش، مهارت‌های چندگانه وفرهنگ توانمندسازی به‌طورقابل توجهی چابکی سازمان راتحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهند.
چکیده انگلیسی:
In a constantly changing global competitive environment, an organization's supply chain agility directly impacts on its ability to produce, and deliver innovative products to their customers in a timely and cost effective manner. The purpose of this thesis is to study the impact of personnel capabilities on supply chain agility. The target samples of this study were employees of the Tobacco Manufacturing Company of West Azarbaijan. The Cronbach’s coefficient and the composite reliability of each variable is greater than 0.8 which is acceptable. Also, average variance extracted (AVE) values were calculated which were greater than 0.5. Findings from the study confirmed the validity of the proposed model. In addition, the results showed that the six variables including skill staff, aware and intelligent, qualifications set, knowledge management, culture empowerment and multiple skills significantly influenced supply chain agility.
منابع و مأخذ:
زاهدی، ش. ا.، خسروی، ا.، ذهی، م. ح. ی. ا.، احمدی، ر. (1392). بررسی ابعاد و شاخصهای قابلیتهای چابکی نیروی انسانی. فصلنامهی مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، ص 24-21.
آذر، ع.، تیزرو، ع.، عرض، ع. م. ب.، رستمی، ع. ا. ا. (1387). طراحی مدل چابکی زنجیره تامین، رویکرد مدلسازی تفسیری-ساختاری. پژوهشهای مدیریت در ایران(4).
کزازی، ا.، سهرابی، ر. ا. (1389). ارائه مولفهها و شاخصهای ارزیابی چابکی زنجیره تامین شرکت ملی نفت ایران (مورد مطالعه: شرکت مناطق نفت خیز جنوب). پژوهشنامه مدیریت تحول(4).
· Abbasi, M., Hosnavi, R., & Babazadeh, R. (2014). Agile and flexible supply chain network design under uncertainty. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21(4), 190-208.
· Adachi, M., Dominguez, G. A., Sasaki, T., Tsumura, R., Koshi, T., & Mori, K. (2015). Novel Social Innovation Concept Based on the Viewpoint of the Infrastructure User. Paper presented at the Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS), 2015 IEEE Twelfth International Symposium on.
· Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial marketing management, 36(4), 443-457.
· Baker, P. (2006). Designing distribution centres for agile supply chains. International Journal of Logistics, 9(3), 207-221.
· Bargshady, G., Zahraee, S. M., Ahmadi, M., & Parto, A. (2016). The effect of information technology on the agility of the supply chain in the Iranian power plant industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(3), 427-442.
· Braunscheidel, M. J. (2005). Antecedents of supply chain agility: an empirical investigation.
· Campbell, A. J., & Wilson, D. T. (1996). Managed networks: creating strategic advantage. Networks in marketing, 125-143.
· Chaabane, A., & Geramianfar, R. (2015). Sustainable supply chain planning and optimization trade-offs between cost, GHG emissions and service level. Paper presented at the Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), 2015 4th International Conference on.
· Cheng, H.-H., & Yang, H.-L. (2014). The antecedents of collective creative efficacy for information system development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 1-17.
· Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
· Christopher, M. (1999). Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service Financial Times: Pitman Publishing. London, 1998 ISBN 0 273 63049 0 (hardback) 294+ 1× pp.
· Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
· D'Annunzio-Green, N., & Macandrew, J. (1999). Re-empowering the empowered-the ultimate challenge? Personnel Review, 28(3), 258-278.
· Dalmolen, S., Moonen, H., van Hillegersberg, J., Stoter, A., & Cornelisse, E. (2015). Supply chain orchestration and choreography: Programmable logistics using semantics. Paper presented at the Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), 2015 4th International Conference on.
· Deng, X., & Wang, T. (2014). Presentation 11. Promoting IT service employees' customer-oriented behaviors: An empirical study of an ERP support center in a healthcare enterprise. Paper presented at the IT Professional Conference (IT Pro), 2014.
· Dotoli, M., Fanti, M. P., Meloni, C., & Zhou, M. (2006). Design and optimization of integrated e-supply chain for agile and environmentally conscious manufacturing. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on, 36(1), 62-75.
· Fasanghari, M. (2008). Assessing the impact of information technology on supply chain management. Paper presented at the Electronic Commerce and Security, 2008 International Symposium on.
· Fayezi, S., & Zomorrodi, M. (2015). The role of relationship integration in supply chain agility and flexibility development: An Australian perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(8), 1126-1157.
· Ferguson, D. F., & Hadar, E. (2011). Optimizing the IT business supply chain utilizing cloud computing. Paper presented at the Emerging Technologies for a Smarter World (CEWIT), 2011 8th International Conference & Expo on.
· Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
· Garland, P. (1993). Competence based qualifications for FE lecturers. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 17(2), 86-89.
· Goldman, S. L. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
· Gunasekaran, A. (1998). Agile manufacturing: enablers and an implementation framework. International journal of production research, 36(5), 1223-1247.
· Hasani, A., Zegordi, S. H., & Nikbakhsh, E. (2012). Robust closed-loop supply chain network design for perishable goods in agile manufacturing under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4649-4669.
· Honold, L. (1997). A review of the literature on employee empowerment. Empowerment in organizations, 5(4), 202-212.
· Khalili-Damghani, K., Taghavifard, M., Olfat, L., & Feizi, K. (2011). A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEA and simulation to measure the efficiency of agility in supply chain: real case of dairy industry. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 6(3), 163-172.
· Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Molina-Castillo, F. J. (2008). Customer Knowledge Management and E-commerce: The role of customer perceived risk. International Journal of Information Management, 28(2), 102-113.
· M. Gligor, D. (2014). The role of demand management in achieving supply chain agility. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 577-591.
· Moyaux, T., Chaib-Draa, B., & D'Amours, S. (2004). Multi-agent simulation of collaborative strategies in a supply chain. Paper presented at the Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004. Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on.
· Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods: New York: McGraw-Hill.
· Plomin, R., & Deary, I. J. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular psychiatry, 20(1), 98-108.
· Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20.
· Rollins, M., & Halinen, A. (2005). Customer knowledge management competence: Towards a theoretical framework. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
· Shao, X.-F., & Dong, M. (2012). Supply disruption and reactive strategies in an assemble-to-order supply chain with time-sensitive demand. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 59(2), 201-212.
· Sharp, J., Irani, Z., & Desai, S. (1999). Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 155-169.
· Soltani, Z., & Navimipour, N. J. (2016). Customer relationship management mechanisms: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 667-688.
· Spekman, R. E., Spear, J., & Kamauff, J. (2002). Supply chain competency: learning as a key component. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 41-55.
· Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 177-195.
· Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2011). A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(4), 256-274.
· Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31-55.
_||_
