Identification and Comparison of Components Influencing Rangeland Exploitation from Pastorals and Experts' Viewpoints Using SWOT and AHP
محورهای موضوعی : Relationship between Animal and RangelandAbolfazl Sharifiyan Bahraman 1 , Hossain Barani 2 , Ahmad Abedi Sarvestani 3 , Abolfazl Haji Mollahoseini 4
1 - M.Sc. Student, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
4 - M.Sc. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
کلید واژه: prioritization, Exploitations, Experts, Pastorals, SWOT,
چکیده مقاله :
Abstract. Over the past decades, range managers have devoted extensive efforts to conserve and restore rangelands and sustain their exploitation but these efforts are more focused on the classic sciences and the exploiters' knowledge and experience have been neglected in the process. Therefore, current study was done to deal with the prioritizing and comparing factors affecting rangeland exploitation based on four criteria involving the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to determine the degree of consistency and difference between the experts and pastorals' viewpoints. To assess the factors affecting rangeland exploitation, SWOT analysis was used. Factors identified using the questionnaire set based on Likert spectrum items and AHP analysis were prioritized and compared by the pastorals and experts. Results of comparing the factors' prioritization showed that three factors including the lack of coordination and trust between experts and pastorals, existence of feudalism in husbandry system, opportunities for revenue expansion from livestock production had the same prioritization from the experts and pastorals' viewpoints. Also, comparisons of weighted mean differences revealed that the factors' regional rangeland potential for forage species planting of strength criteria, salt affected and swampy rangelands with weakness criteria, greater use of the expertized capacity and specialized knowledge and opportunities for revenue expansion from livestock production in the opportunity criteria and dual ownership of the rangelands by pastorals and government in the threat criteria had the highest weighted mean differences. So, it can be inferred that there is a vast gap between pastorals and experts' viewpoints in prioritizing the factors affecting the rangeland exploitation. Results emphasized the importance of pastorals and local communities' knowledge and experience in the rangeland management and their exploitation improvement.
Anonymous, 2013. Department of Natural Resources, Golestan Province, Iran.
Ansari N., Seiyed Akhlaghi S. J., 2009. Comparison of the opinion of rangeland user and expert about factors influencing natural resources degradation in Iran. Rangeland, 3(3): 519-532. (In Persian).
Arayesh B., Hosseini F. A., Mirdamadi S. M., Malek mohammadi A., 2010. comparison between viewpoint of experts and utilizers pastorals of natural resources on people participation in the process of preservation, restoration, development and utilization of forests and rangelands- Ilam province. Iranian Jour. Range and Desert Reseach, 17(3): 377-392. (In Persian).
Azkia, M., 1996. Social aspects of management of rangeland in Iran (Case study: Fars and Kohkilouye and Boyer Ahmad Province). Social Science, 8: 1-23. (In Persian).
Barani, H., 2004. Reckoning an analyzing of custom orders in order to range management unites. The 3th National congress of range and range management, Tehran, Iran, pp 283-288. (In Persian).
Barstein, P., 1991. Policy domains: organization, culture and policy outcomes. Department of Sociology, university of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Bihamta, M. R. and Zare Chahuki, M. A., 2011. Principles of Statistics for the Natural Resources Science. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, Iran 300 pp. (In Persian).
Bonham-Carter, G., 1994, Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS, Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 398. UK.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Taghi Farvar, M., Nguinguiri, J. and Ndangang, V. A., 2000. Co management of natural resource. Deutsehe gesell schaft fur technische zusammenarbiet. Kasparek Verlag, Mönchhofstr. 16, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Press. 107 pp.
Chandler, D., 2000. Active citizens and the therapeutie state: the role of democratic participation in local government reform. Policy and Politics, The policy Press., 29(1): 3-14.
Cochran W. G., 1977. Sampling techniques. 3nd edition, Whley and Sons, USA, 428 pp.
Eskandari, N., Alizadeh, A. and Mahdavi. F., 2008. Policies of Range Management in Iran (Rangeland Technical Office), Pooneh Press. Tehran, Iran, 164p. (In Persian).
Expert Choice, 2001. Expert Choice. Expert Choice, Inc. (verified 13 October 2002). Available from http:// www.expertchoice.com/.
Gholipoor, R. A., Rasayi Fard, R., Dastan, B., 2008. Public participation in decision-making. Jour. Politics, 10(24): 179-200. (In Persian).
Hahn Alan, J., 1987. Policy making models and their role in policy education. Cornell university publication, Article provided by Farm Foundation in its journal Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies.
Hesse-Biber, S. N. and Levy, P., 2006. The practice of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Heydari, Q., 2010. Factors influencing the participation of pastoralists in implementation of range management projects (case study: in Baledeh summer rangeland, Mazandaran province), Ph. D. thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Gorgan, Iran. (In Persian).
Heydari, G., Barani, H., Khoshfar, G., Ghorbani, J., Aghili, M., Mahboobi, M., 2009. The role of social wealth on participation in performing pasteurizing projects based on the points of views of their applicants (case study: Balade pastures North of Iran). Jour. Rangeland, 3(1):121-137. (In Persian).
Hosseineynia, Gh. and Malekmohamadey, A., 2003. Explain the attitude of actors active in the field of rangeland management toward tenets of integrated management of sustainable development rangelands and analysis of factors affecting. Jour. Agricultural Sciences, pp: 143-169.
Janssen, M. A., Walker, B. H., Langridge, J., Abel, N., 2000. An adaptive agent model for analyzing co-evolution of management and policies in a complex rangeland system. Ecological Modeling, 131: 249–268.
Johnson, N. H. M., Ravnborg, O. and Westermann, K. P., 2001. User Participation in Watershed Management and Research System wide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights, International Food Policy Research Institute 2033 K Street, N. Washington, D. CU. S. A. 1-30Pp.
Kajanus, M., Kangas, J., Kurttila, M., 2004. The use of value focused thinking and the A’WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management, 25(4): 499-506.
OECD, public management brief, 2001. Engaging citizens in policy-making: information, consultation and public participatin. Puma policy brief, No10.
Papaioannou, T., 2007. Policy benchmarking: a tool of democracy or a tool of authoritarianism. Benchmarking: An International Jour., 14(4): 501-503.
Pour Jafar, M., Mahmoodi Nejad, H., Ilka, Sh. and Aghebat Bekheyr, H., 2012. Meta-analytic approach to evaluation of rural tourism development with emphasis on analysis of strategic factors (SWOT(. Jour. Environmental Science and Technology, 4(2): 61-79.
Rashtian, A. and Karimian, A. A., 2011. Assessment and comparison of experts and pastoralists opinion about grazing systems in range management plans in Semnan Province. Rangeland; Spring, 5(1): 109-118.
Razavi, S. M., 2005. Indigenous knowledge in agriculture and natural resources and matching with new knowledge. Jahad, 25(269):72-78.
Rubin, H. j. and Rubin, I. S., 2005. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Saaty, T. L., 1988. Decision Making for Leaders. The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decision a Complex Word, PSW Publications, pp. 78-79.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD), 2004. A Good Practice Guide. Montreal. Canada, 46 pp.
Shahraki M.R., Barani H., 2012. Examining factors on destruction of Golestan province rangelands. Jour. Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources, 1 (3): 59-78. (In Persian).
SWAC-OECD/ECOWAS, 2008. Livestock and regional market in the Sahel and West Africa. Sahel and West Africa Club/OECD, 170 p.
Taylor, B., 1998. An introductory guide to adaptive management, Ministry of forests, Canada, http://www.for.gov.bc. Canfo/amhome/ introyal/doc.htm.
Xingang, Z., Jiaoli, K. and Bei, L., 2013. Focus on the development of shale gasin China—Based on SWOT analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21:603-613.
Zhang, X. M., 2012. Research on the development strategies of rural tourism in Suzhou based on SWOT analysis. Energy Procedia, 16: 1295-1299.
