Rangelands Goods and Services Local People Views and Priorities (Case Study: Hezarjarib Rangelands, Mazandaran Province, Iran)
محورهای موضوعی : Relationship between Animal and Rangeland
Mohammad Reza Shahraki
1
(Researcher and Lecturer, Saee Institute of Higher Education, Gorgan)
Naghmeh Gholami Baghi
2
(Rangeland Sciences)
Mohsen Sharafatmandrad
3
(Natural Resources Department, University of Jiroft, Jiroft)
Bahareh Behmanesh
4
(Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gonbad Kavous
University)
کلید واژه: Rangeland ecosystems, Local people, Exploiters, Rangelands goods and services, Hezarjarib,
چکیده مقاله :
Rangelands are the main sources of forage for livestock feeding by localpeople. Beside forage production, rangeland ecosystems provide many other goods andservices such as medicinal plants, recreation, soil and water conservation, wildlife habitat,fishing, hunting, hiking, etc. Nevertheless, there are no much information about the waythat local communities think about the rangelands goods and services. Therefore, a studywas conducted to examine how local people think about rangelands goods and services andwhat their priorities are. The statistical populations were farmers, pastoralists andbeekeepers of Hezarjarib, Mazandaran Province, Iran and 100 people of them wererandomly selected as a sample. First, 17 indices of rangeland importance (goods andservices) were identified through questionnaires and oral interviews. Each indicator wasquestioned using a 5-point Likert-type scale. Validity was established using a panel ofexperts and Cronbach's alpha was used for reliability of questionnaire. Data were analyzedand then, interpreted using coefficients of variance. Medicinal plants, beekeeping, foodproduction for human and grazing lands for livestock were the first four prioritiesrespectively considered as the most important indices by local people. Aquaculture andfishing and soil conservation with the highest CVs were considered as the less importantindices in local people views. The results showed that the extent of range exploitation hadsignificant relationships with the education of exploiters, number of livestock, income andfarmland area. It was concluded that rangelands goods and services should be defined andevaluated based on local people views to be considered as a source of alternative income ornew enterprises for local people.
Literature Cited
Campbell, B. M., Luckert, M. and Scoones, I., 1997. Local-level valuation of savanna resources: a case study from Zimbabwe. Economic Botany, 51(1): 59–77.
Dale, V. H., Brown, S., Haeuber, R. A., Hobbs, N.T., Huntly, N., Naiman, R. J., Riebsame, W.E., Turner, M. G. and Valone, T.J., 2000. Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications, 10: 639–670.
Eskandari, N., Alizade, A. and Mahdavi, F., 2008. Policy of range management in Iran. Organization of Forest, rangelands and watershed of Iran. Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., Helkowski, J. H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. A., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, D., Patz, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N. and Snyder, P. K., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309: 570- 574.
Havstad, K. M., Petersa, P. C., Skaggsb, R., Brownc, J., Bestelmeyera, B., Fredricksona, E., Herricka, J. and Wrightd, J., 2007. Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecological Economics, 64: 261-268.
Khosroshahi, M. and Ghavami, Sh., 2005. Warning: natural resources are life bed, strive to maintain them. Organization of Forest, rangelands and watershed of Iran. Tehran, Forth edition. (In Persian).
MacLeod, N. D. and Brown, J. R., 2014. Valuing and Rewarding Ecosystem Services from Rangelands. Rangelands. 36: 12–19.
Maczko, K., Tanaka, J. A., Breckenridge, R., Hidinger, L., Heintz, H. T., Fox, W. E., Kreuter, U. P., Duke, C. S., Mitchell, J. E. and McCollum, D. W., 2011. Rangeland ecosystem goods and services: values and evaluation of opportunities for ranchers and land managers, Rangelands, 33: 30-36.
Mesdaghi, M., 2003. Rangeland management in Iran. Astan Ghods Razavi Press. Mashhad. (In Persian).
Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Perkins, J. S., Atlhopheng, J. R., Mulale, K. and Favretto, N., 2015. Reorienting land degradation towards sustainable land management: Linking sustainable livelihoods with ecosystem services in rangeland systems. Jour. Environmental Management, 151: 472-485.
Reed, M. S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141: 2417–2431.
Shokri, M., Bahmanyar, M. A. and Tatian, M. R., 2003. An ecological investigation of vegetation cover in Estival rangelands of Hezarjarib (Behshahr). Iranian Jour. Natural Resources, 56(1): 131-141.
Squires, V. R. and Sidahmed, A., 1997. Livestock management in dry land pastoral systems: prospects and problems. Annals of Arid Zone. 36(2): 79–96.
Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A. and Martinuzzi, A., 2005. Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations. Jour. Business Ethics, 61: 263–281.
Torell, L., Torell, G. L. and Skaggs, R. K., 2014. Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Economic Assessments of Restoration Projects. Rangelands, 36(2): 45-51.
