تأثیرات ارتباطات کامپیوتری بر روابط میان‌فردی
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه فرهنگ ارتباطات(علمی و ترویجی )سید وحید عقیلی 1 , حسین امامی رودسری 2
1 -
2 -
کلید واژه: اینترنت, ارتباطات کامپیوتری, روابط میان‌فردی,
چکیده مقاله :
ارتباطات کامپیوتری، شیوه ای از تعامل و برقراری ارتباطات انسانی در محیط آنلاین یا همان فضای مجازی اینترنت است که موجب شده تا صورت بندی جدیدی از ارتباطات میان فردی پدید آید. کیفیت و کمیت این نوع از ارتباطات موجب شده تاثیراتی را بر ارتباطات آفلاین و یا چهره به چهره در زندگی روزمره پدید آورد که این موضوع همواره مدنظر اندیشمندان در عرصه های مختلف جامعه شناسی، ارتباطات اجتماعی و روان شناسی بوده است. از آنجایی که اساس برقراری ارتباطات کامپیوتری از طریق پیام متنی است و کاربران قادر به مشاهده عکس العمل ها و اقدامات یکدیگر نیستند این مقاله به تأثیرات روانشناختی برقراری ارتباطات در فضای مجازی و تفاوت های آن با ارتباطات چهره به چهره می پردازد
Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71-80.
Baker, A. (2002). What makes an online relationship successful? Clues from couples who met in cyberspace. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 363-375.
Barnes, S. (2003). Computer-mediated communication: Human-to-human communication across the Internet. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
December, J. (1996). What is Computer-mediated Communication? Retrieved December, 16, 2011 from http://www.december.com/john/study/cmc/what.html
Facebook.com (2006). Retrieved January, 23, 2012 from http://www.facebook.com/
Green, M.C., Hilken, J. Friedman, H., Grossman, K., Gasiewski, J., Adler, R. et al. (2005). Communication via instant messenger: Short- and long-term effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 445-462.
Gross, E.F, Junoven, J., & Gable, S.L.(2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75-91.
Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28, 325-347.
Hardmeier, S. (2005). Technology and the internet. Retrieved January, 23, 2012 fromhttp://www.microsoft.com/windows/IE/community/columns/technology internet.mspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-mediated_communication. Retrieved December, 12, 2011
Koch, W.H. & Pratarelli, M.E. (2004). Effects of intro/extraversion and sex on social
internet use. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 371-382.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisted. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
Kubey, R.W., Lavin, M.J., & Barrows, J.R. (2001). Internet use and collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 51, 366-382.
Joinson, A. N. (2001a). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
Joinson, A. N. (2001b). Knowing me, knowing you: Reciprocal self-disclosure in internet-based surveys. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 587-591.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hiltin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved January 2, 2012 from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports.
McCown, J.A., Fischer, D., Page, R., & Homant, M. (2001). Internet relationships: People who meet people. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4, 593-596.
McKenna, Y.A., Green, A.S., & Gleason, M.E. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
McQuail, Denis. (2005). Mcquail's Mass Communication Theory. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Markey, P.M. & Wells, S.M. (2002). Interpersonal perception in internet chat rooms. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 134-146.
Metz, J. M. (1992). Computer mediated communication: Perceptions of a new context. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
Myspace.com: A place for friends. (2006). Retrieved January, 23, 2012 fromhttp://www.myspace.com/
Parks, R. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). ‘Making MOOsic’: The development of personalrelationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517-537.
Peris, R., Gimeno, M.A., Pinazo, D., Ortet, G., Carerro, V., Sanchez, M., et al. (2002). Online chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented
people. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 43-51.
Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 581-598.
Riva, G., & Galmiberti, C. (1998). Computer-mediated communication: Identity and social interaction in an electronic environment. Genetic, Social, & General
Psychology Monographs, 124, 434-463.
Romiszowski, Alexander & Mason, Robin.(2004). Computer-Mediated Communication, Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, ed. David H. Jonassen. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.
Walther, J. B., & D’addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer
Review, 19, 323-345.
Wilson, E. V., & Zigurs, I. (2001). Interpersonal influence goals and computer-mediatedcommunication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11, 59-76.
Wright, K. B. (2004). On-line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively Internet-based and primarily Internet-based relationships. Communication Studies, 55, 239-253.
