ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس ذهن‌آگاهی بین‌فردی
محورهای موضوعی : آزمون‌های روانیمحسن محمدپور 1 , سمیه پورشمس 2 , مرضیه کلیوند 3 , بهاره مرادحاصل 4 , سمیرا مرادی 5
1 - گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده علوم رفتاری و سلامت روان (انستیتو روانپزشکی تهران)، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران، تهران، ایران
2 - گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب
3 - گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران
4 - گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
5 - گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمانشاه، کرمانشاه، ایران
کلید واژه: مقیاس ذهن‌آگاهی بین‌فردی, تحلیل عاملی تاییدی, پایایی و روایی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس ذهن‌آگاهی بین‌فردی بود. روش پژوهش توصیفی- همبستگی و جامعه آماری شامل تمامی افراد شهر تهران مراجعه کننده به بیمارستان رسول اکرم (ص) در مهر و آبان سال 1401 بود. 321 نفر به روش نمونه‌برداری در دسترس انتخاب و به مقیاس‌های ذهن‌آگاهی بین‌فردی (پراتچر و دیگران، 2019) ، همدلی اساسی (فارینگتون، 2006) و پریشانی روان‌شناختی کسلر (کسلر و دیگران ،2002) پاسخ دادند. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روش همسانی درونی به شیوه آلفای کرونباخ و برای روایی سازه از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی نشان داد ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای نمره کل مقیاس 87/0 و برای زیرمولفه‌های حضور، آگاهی نسبت به خود و دیگری، پذیرش غیرقضاوتی و غیرواکنشی بودن به ترتیب 69/0، 83/0، 69/0 و 72/0 بود. مقیاس ذهن‌آگاهی بین فردی همبستگی مثبت معناداری را با مقیاس همدلی اساسی (0.429) و همبستگی منفی را با پریشانی روان شناختی (0.356-) نشان داد. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده ذهن‌آگاهی بین‌فردی می‌تواند پیامدهای رابطه‌ی مثبتی را در تعاملات بین‌فردی داشته باشد. به طور کلی نسخه ایرانی مقیاس ذهن‌آگاهی بین‌فردی ساختار 4 عاملی و پایایی و روایی مناسبی را نشان داد و در پژوهش‌های مختلف می‌توان از آن استفاده کرد
the present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale. The method of descriptive-correlation research. 321 people were investigated by the available sampling method. Participants completed the Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (Pratcher et al., 2019), Basic Empathy Scale (Farrington, 2006), and Kessler& Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler et al., 2002 to examine convergent and divergent validity. For data analysis, the internal consistency method was used using Cronbach's alpha method, and for construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis was used. The results of factor analysis showed that the Cronbach& alpha coefficient for the total score of the scale was 0.87 and for the sub-components of presence, awareness of self and others, non-judgmental acceptance and non-reactivity were 0.69, 0.83, 0.69 and 0.72, respectively. The interpersonal mindfulness scale showed a significant positive correlation with the basic empathy scale (0.429) and a negative correlation with psychological distress (-0.356). Based on the obtained results, interpersonal mindfulness can have positive relationship consequences in interpersonal interactions. In general, the Iranian version of the interpersonal mindfulness scale showed a 4-factor structure and good reliability and validity, and it can be used in various research.
Albiero, P. Matricardi, G. Speltri, D. Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contri- bution to the Italian validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 393-408.
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assess- ment, 13(1), 27–45.
Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W. K., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482-500.
Barani, H., & Fadzalepour, M)2021( ..The relationship between mindfulness and social security: the mediat- ing role of self-deception. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 17(68), 405-416. [In Persian].
Berry, D. R., Cairo, A. H., Goodman, R. J., Quaglia, J. T., Green, J. D., & Brown, K. W. (2018). Mindful- ness increases prosocial responses toward ostracized strangers through empathic concern. Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology, 147(1), 93110 -.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Ander- son, N. D., Carmody, J., & Devins, G. (2004). Mind- fulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology, Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), .237–211
Burgoon, J. K., Berger, C. R., & Waldron, V. R. (2000). Mindfulness and interpersonal communication. Jour- nal of Social Issues, 56(1), 105– 127.
Chalmers, R. A., Pratscher, S. D., Bettencourt, B. A., & Medvedev, O. N. (2021). Applying generalizability
3. autobiographical memory 4. evaluations of self-criticism
theory to diferentiate between trait and state in the Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale (IMS). Mindfulness, .622–613 ,)3(12
Cheung, R. Y., & Ng, M. C. (2019). Mindfulness and symptoms of depression and anxiety: The underlying roles of awareness, acceptance, impulse control, and emotion regulation. Mindfulness, 10(6), 1124-1135.
Cooper, D., Yap, K., & O’Brien, M. (2020). Mindful- ness and empathy among counseling and psycho- therapy professionals: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Mindfulness, 11(10), 2243-2257.
Dehkordian, P., Hamid, N., Beshlideh, K., & Meh- rabizade honarmand, M. (2017). The efectiveness of mindful parenting, social thinking and exercise on quality of life in ADHD children. International Jour- nal of Pediatrics, 5(2), 4295–4302. [In Persian].
Donald, J. N., Sahdra, B. K., Van Zanden, B., Du- ineveld, J. J., Atkins, P. W., Marshall, S. L., & Ciarro- chi, J. (2019). Does your mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the link be- tween mindfulness and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 101-125.
Duncan, L. G., Coatsworth, J. D., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). A model of mindful parenting: Implica- tions for parent–child relationships and prevention research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Re- view, 1(2)33-43.
Frank, J. L., Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2016). Validation of the Mindfulness in Teaching Scale. Mindfulness, 7(1), 155–163.
Fulton, C., & Cashwell, C. S. (2015). Mindfulness- based awareness and compassion: Predictors of counselor empathy and anxiety. Counselor Educa- tion and Supervision, 54(2), 122–133.
Furukawa, T. A., Kessler, R. C., Slade, T., & Andrews, G. (2003). The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian national survey of mental health and well- being. Psychological Medicine, 33(2), 357-362.
Gannon, M., Mackenzie, M., Kaltenbach, K., & Aba- temarco, D. (2017). Impact of mindfulness-based pa- renting on women in treatment for opioid use disor- der. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 11(5), 368–376.
Gjersing L ,Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. (2010). Crosscul-
tural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 1-10.
Hoopes, J. B. (2009). Acceptance and interpersonal functioning: Testing mindfulness models of empathy. The University of Texas at Austin.
Huston, D. C., Garland, E. L., & Farb, N. A. (2011). Mechanisms of mindfulness in communication train- ing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, .421–406 ,)4(39
Ivanovski, B & Malhi, G. S. (2007). The psychological and neurophysiological concomitants of mindfulness forms of meditation. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19(22), .76-91
Jafari, M. A., Nooroozi, Z., & Foolad Chang, M. (2017). The study of factor structure, reliability and validity of Basic Empathy Scale: Persian form. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 14(25), 23-38. [In Persian].
Jolliffe, D. & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589-611.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are. New York: Hyperion.
Karremans, J. C., Schellekens, M. P., & Kappen, G. (2017). Bridging the sciences of mindfulness and romantic relationships: A theoretical model and re- search agenda. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(1), 29–49.
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959-976.
Khoury, B., Knäuper, B., Pagnini, F., Trent, N., Chiesa, A., & Carrière, K. (2017). Embodied mindfulness. Mindfulness, 8(5), 1160–1171.
Khoury, B., Knäuper, B., Schlosser, M., Knäuper, B., Carrière, K., & Chiesa, A. (2017). Efectiveness of tra- ditional meditation retreats: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, .25–16 ,)10(92
Kimmes, J. G., Jaurequi, M. E., May, R. W., Srivastava, S., & Fincham, F. D. (2018). Mindfulness in the con-
text of romantic relationships: Initial development and validation of the Relationship Mindfulness Mea- sure. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(4), .589–575
Kok, B. E., & Singer, T. (2017). Effects of contempla- tive dyads on engagement and perceived social con- nectedness over 9 months omental training: A ran- domized clinical trial. American Medical Association Psychiatry, 74(2), 126–134.
Kuhn, R., Bradbury, T. N., Nussbeck, F. W., & Boden- mann, G. (2018). The power of listening: Lending an ear to the partner during dyadic coping conversations. Journal of Family Psychology 10(2), 334-345.
Lenger, K. A., Gordon, C. L., & Nguyen, S. P. (2017). Intra-individual and cross-partner associations be- tween the five facets of mindfulness and relationship satisfaction. Mindfulness, 8(1), 171–180.
Mayer, B., Polak, M. G., & Remmerswaal, D. (2019). Mindfulness, interpretation bias, and levels of anxi- ety and depression: Two mediation studies. Mindful- ness, 10(1), 55-65.
McCafrey, S., Reitman, D., & Black, R. (2017). Mind- fulness in Parenting Questionnaire (MIPQ): Devel- opment and validation of a measure of mindful par- enting. Mindfulness, 8(1), 232–246
Medvedev, O. N., Pratscher, S. D., & Bettencourt, A. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale using Rasch analysis. Mindful- ness, 11(8), 2007–2015.
Morton, M. L., Helminen, E. C., & Felver, J. C. (2020). A systematic review of mindfulness interventions on psychophysiological responses to acute stress. Mind- fulness, 11(9), 2039-2054.
Parker, S. C., Nelson, B. W., Epel, E. S., & Siegel, D. J. (2015). The science of presence: A central media- tor of the interpersonal benefits. New York: Guilford Press.
Potharst, E. S., Aktar, E., Rexwinkel, M., Rigterink, M., & Bögels, S. M. (2017). Mindful with your baby: Feasibility, acceptability, and efects of a mindful par- enting group training for mothers and their babies in a mental health context. Mindfulness, 8(5), 1236–1250.
Pratscher, S. D., Rose, A. J., Markovitz, L., & Betten- court, A. (2018). Interpersonal mindfulness: Investi- gating mindfulness in interpersonal interactions, co- rumination and friendship quality. Mindfulness, 9(4), .1215–1206
Pratscher, S. D., Wood, P. K., King, L. A., & Betten- court, B. A. (2019). Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale: Development and initial construct validation. Mind- fulness, 10(6), 1044–1061.
Reis, H. T., Lemay, E. P., & Finkenauer, C. (2017). To- ward understanding understanding: The importance of feeling understood in relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), 223-245.
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62 (3), 373-386.
Townshend, K., Jordan, Z., Stephenson, M., & Tsey, K. (2016). The efectiveness of mindful parenting pro- grams in promoting parents’ and children’s wellbe- ing: A systematic review. Database of Systematic Re- views and Implementation Reports, 14(3), 139–180.
Turpyn, C. C., & Chaplin, T. M. (2016). Mindful parent- ing and parents’ emotion expression: Effects on ado- lescent risk behaviors. Mindfulness, 7(1), 246–254.
Yaghubi, H. (2016). Psychometric properties of the 10 questions version of the Kessler Psychological Dis- tress Scale (K-10). Applied Psychological Research Quarterly, 6(4), 45-57. [In Persian].
Zarei, S, & Gravand, H. (2021). Mindfulness and sleep quality in adolescents: The mediating role of rumina- tion. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 18(70), 199-210. [In Persian].
