الگوی بومی پیشگیری از فساد اداری منابع انسانی در بخش عمومی ایران (رویکرد ایرانی- اسلامی)
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت دولتی
فاطمه علیزاده
1
(دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اردبیل، اردبیل، ایران.)
محمد فیضی
2
(استادیار گروه مدیریت دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران، ایران.)
محمد حسن زاده
3
(استاد گروه مدیرت و اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.)
مجید احمدلو
4
(استادیار گروه مدیریت داشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه آزاد واحد اردبیل، اردبیل، ایران.)
کلید واژه: فساد, پیشگیری از فساد, منابع انسانی, الگوی بومی, رویکرد ایرانی- اسلامی.,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش، ارائه الگوی بومی پیشگیری از فساد اداری منابع انسانی در بخش عمومی ایران می‌باشد. پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی-توسعه‌ای و به روش کیفی از نوع اکتشافی انجام شده است. روش گردآوری داده‌ها، میدانی و ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه‌های ساختار نیافته بود که به‌صورت هدفمند و تا اشباع نظری صورت گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 16 نفر از خبرگان صاحب نظر بود و تحلیل داده‌ها از طریق سه روش کدگذاری باز، کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری انتخابی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار MAXQDA2020 انجام شد. نتیجه مصاحبه‌ها شامل 85 کد باز، 11 کد محوری و 5 کد انتخابی می‌باشد. سپس برای تعیین روایی و پایایی مقوله‌ها و مؤلفه‌های مدل از CVR و CVI و پایایی بازآزمون استفاده گردید. با توجه به نتایج یافته‌ها عوامل لایه کنترل سازمانی شامل 2 مقوله (بعد اخلاقی-تربیتی، بعد فرهنگی- حمایتی)، لایه خود‌کنترلی شامل 2مقوله (درونی‌سازی هنجارهای اجتماعی و ارزشی، درونی‌سازی فرهنگ جامعه)، لایه مکانیزم‌های کنترلی و نظارتی شامل 3 مقوله (مکانیزم عمومی، مکانیزم قانونی، مکانیزم اداری)، لایه اقدامات عملی شامل 2 مقوله (بعد سازمانی، بعد قانونی) و لایه اصلاحات شامل 2مقوله (مهندسی سازمانی، مهندسی آموزشی) شناسایی شدند. طبق یافته‌ها می‌توان گفت که مدل بومی پیشنهادی حاضر می‌تواند در پیشگیری از فساد در بخش عمومی ایران حائز اهمیت باشد، زیرا متناسب با ساختار و فرهنگ کشور به دست آمده‌اند.
The purpose of this research is to provide a local model for preventing human resource corruption in the public sector of Iran. The research was carried out in terms of practical-developmental purpose and with a qualitative method of exploratory type. The data collection method was field and the data collection tool was unstructured interviews, which were conducted purposefully and until theoretical saturation. The statistical population of the research included 16 experts and data analysis was done through three methods open coding, axial coding, and selective coding using MAXQDA2020 software. The results of the interviews include 85 open codes, 11 central codes, and 5 selective codes. Then, CVR, CVI, and retest reliability were used to determine the validity and reliability of the model's categories and components. According to the results of the findings, the factors of the organizational control layer include 2 categories (ethical-educational dimension, cultural-supportive dimension), the self-control layer includes 2 categories (internalization of social and value norms, internalization of society culture), the layer of control and monitoring mechanisms includes 3 categories (mechanism general, legal mechanism, administrative mechanism), the layer of practical measures including 2 categories (organizational dimension, legal dimension) and the layer of reforms including 2 categories (organizational engineering, educational engineering) were identified. According to the findings, it can be said that the current proposed local model can be important in preventing corruption in the public sector of Iran because they have been obtained according to the structure and culture of the country.
Adebimpe, O. M., & Oluwatamilore Akin, O. (2022). Effect of Corruption on Economic Growth in Nigeria. African Journal of Management and Business Research, 3(5), 115-132.
Afzali, A. R. (2011). Administrative corruption and its impact on development: causes, consequences and solutions. International Legal Journal - International Presidential Affairs Center, 27(4), 235- 264. [In Persian]
AliAkbari, R., Ahmadi, S., Morovati, I., & Karimi, B. (2023). Criticism and Evaluation of preventive policy Against Administrative Corruption in Iran’s Criminal System. Legal Civilization Magazine, 14(14), 221-244. [In Persian]
Alvani, S. M. (2018). Public Management. Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2022). Public Administration Digitalization and Corruption in the EU Member States: A Comparative and Correlative Research Analysis. Transylvanian review of administrative sciences, 65(2), 5-22.
Belohlavek, P. (2017). Social Corruption and Corruption Inhibitors as a Complex Adaptive System. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066116
Bounar, A., & Oudda, Y. (2021). Financial & Economic Crimes: The impact of main and corollary offenses on public policies in morocco "case of corruption and money laundering”. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 21(2), 289- 302.
Browen, C. (2022). Strengthening Jamaica's Anticorruption Policy. Journal of Management History, 22(4), 1-24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359469292
Dler, M. A., & Star, S. S. (2022). Impact of Integration Between the Commission of Integrity And Judicial Audit to Reduce Financial and Administrative Corruption in Iraq. journal of scientific periodical peer-reviewed published by the Lebanese French University, 7(1), 515- 537.
Fallahian, N. (2019). Mechanisms to prevent administrative corruption in the light of good governance in Iran's legal system. Research Journal of Comparative Law, 1(2), 21-57. [In Persian]
Firuzjaiyan, A., & Mahmodiyan, M. (2021). A systematic review of studies conducted in the field of administrative corruption in Iran. Biannual journal of social issues of Iran, 12(2), 201- 220. [In Persian]
Hakakei, M. R., & Salemei, M. R. (2021). The effect decisions of the Court Administrative Justice in preventing administrative corruption. Journal of Law Studies, 21(55), 236-258. [In Persian]
Hasani, A., & Shams, A. (2012). Strategies to combat administrative corruption based on Islamic values. Islam and management researches, 2(1), 81-104. [In Persian]
Hazaei, S. A., Tabash, M. I., Zhu, J., Khatib, S. F. A., & Betami, H. A. (2022). Corruption and supreme audit institutions in the Yemeni public sector: An empirical investigation. Public Administration Issues, 5(2), 87–109.
Heryana, Y., & Sukarya, E. M. (2022). The influence of Islamic Law on corruption perceptions and its impact on public trust in the City of Bandung, Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 11(1), 372-378.
Huntington, S. (2013). Political system in societies undergoing transformation (M. Salesi, Trans.). Tehran: Science Publications.
KhalajMasoumi, A. H., Kheyri, E., & Dourodiyan, M. (2023). Prevention of Corruption its Impact on Administrative Health in Iran. Rahyaft Scientific Quarterly, 17(63), 47-66. [In Persian]
Khan, M., & Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2017). Corruption’ in Governance and the Law (World Development Report, Issue. World Bank Policy Research.
Malagas, N., Kontos, G., Yilmaz, A., & Nikitakos, N. (2022). Organizational Culture: Types and Critical Success Factors for Organizational Excellence. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. https://novapublishers.com/product-category/series/advances-in-sociologyresearch/
Manteghei, M. (2018). Prevention of administrative corruption by emphasizing in-service training of employees. Naja Scientific Quarterly of Supervision and Inspection, 13(48), 139-174. [In Persian]
Mirkamali, S. A., & KhaliliPachei, A. (2015). The role of public participation in the field of corruption prevention. Detective Magazine, 35(9), 108-122. [In Persian]
Mironga, A. (2022). Corruption and its negative governance output in Africa: An analysis of the drivers of corruption. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 27(5), 12-21.
Mohamadi, M., Mohseni Tabrizi, A., & Mottaghi, A. (2023). Investigating Factors affecting Administrative Corruption with an Attitude to bureaucratic Health in Government Organizations. National security magazine, 13(48), 113-136. [In Persian]
Mosavidost, S. M. (2019). Causes and consequences of administrative corruption. Quarterly Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 3(25), 34-43. [In Persian]
OECD. (2019). Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement.
Omar, H., Mansoor, M., Ramli, L., & Salleh, H. F. M. (2020). Corruption and Accountability of Public Officials: Comparative analysis from Malaysia and Indonesia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(15), 269–274.
Peters, A. (2018). Corruption as a Violation of International Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 29(4), 1251–1287. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy070
Previtali, P., & Cerchiello, P. (2018). The Prevention of Corruption as an Unavoidable Way to Ensure Healthcare System Sustainability. Sustainability, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093071
Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niffiyev, I. (2022). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037
Salomovich, T. A. (2022). Some Issues of Improving Anti-Corruption Legislation in the Republic of Uzbekistan. European Multidiscplinary Journal of Modern Science, 4(1), 829-833.
Sandor, S. D. (2018). Measuring Public Sector Innovation. Transylvanian review of administrative sciences, 54(4), 125-137.
Soltani, H., Amini Sabegh, M., Zeynalabedin, A., & Majidi, M. (2022). Prioritizing effective factors on fighting corruption in Iran’s government organizations with a policy-making approach. Political sociology of Iran, 27(27), 6744-6753. [In Persian]
Taslimi, A. H., Ashrafi, M., & Malmir, M. (2023). Social Prevention of Administrative Corruption. Comparative Penal Jurisprudence Quarterly, 3(3), 1-11. [In Persian]
Zaraei, B. (2014). public sector accounting standards; Ambiguity in the definition of the public sector. Auditing Monthly, 77(1), 64-67. [In Persian]
Zarandi, S., & Madani, J. (2014). Designing a local model to fight against administrative corruption in Iran. Evaluation Knowledge Quarterly, 7(25), 5-24. [In Persian]
