Applying CVM for Economic Valuation of Drinking Water in Iran
محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and management
Morteza Tahami Pour
1
(
Ph.D Student of Agriculture Economics, Department of Agriculture Economic, University of Tehran, Iran
)
Mohammad Kavoosi Kalashami
2
(
Ph.D Student of Agriculture Economics, Department of Agriculture Economic, University of Tehran, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Willingness to pay, Contingent valuation method, economic value of water, Municipal Water Consumption, Kohkiloye & Boyerahmad Province,
چکیده مقاله :
Economic valuation of water is useful in the administration and management of water. Population growth and urbanization caused municipal water demand increase in Iran. Limited water resource supply and urban water network capacity raised complexity in water resources management. Present condition suggests using economic value of water as a criterion for allocating policies and feasibility study of urban water supply projects. This study use contingent valuation method for determining economic value of drinking water in Kohkiloye & Boyerahmad province. Required data set were obtained from 177 questionnaires by applying stratified random sampling in 2011 year. From 136 investigated urban households 111 ones are willing to pay more for qualified drinking water. Also, from 41 investigated rural households only 3 ones are willing to pay more for qualified drinking water. Results indicated that economic value of drinking water is 6877 Rial per cubic meter.
Economic valuation of water is useful in the administration and management of water. Population growth and urbanization caused municipal water demand increase in Iran. Limited water resource supply and urban water network capacity raised complexity in water resources management. Present condition suggests using economic value of water as a criterion for allocating policies and feasibility study of urban water supply projects. This study use contingent valuation method for determining economic value of drinking water in Kohkiloye & Boyerahmad province. Required data set were obtained from 177 questionnaires by applying stratified random sampling in 2011 year. From 136 investigated urban households 111 ones are willing to pay more for qualified drinking water. Also, from 41 investigated rural households only 3 ones are willing to pay more for qualified drinking water. Results indicated that economic value of drinking water is 6877 Rial per cubic meter.
| 1- Assadollahi, S.A. (2009). Groundwater ResourcesManagement in Iran. Secretary General, IRNCIDand Deputy of Protection and Exploitation of IranWater Resources Management Company. | ||||
| 2- Chakravorty, V. and J. Roumasset. (1991). EfficientSpatial Allocation Irrigation Water. American journalof Agricultural Economics. 73: 165-173. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 3- Farlofi, S., Mabugu, R., & Ntshingila, S. (2007).Domestic Water Use and Aalues in Swaziland:Contingent Valuation Analysis, Agrekon Magazine.(Abstract) | ||||
| 4- Gnedenk, E., Gorbunova, Z., & Safonov, G.(1999). Contingent Valuation of Drinking WaterQuality in Samara City, Moscow State University,zone "I", room 75, Moscow, 117234, VorobievyGory. | ||||
| 5- Gnedenko E.D., & Gorbunova, Z.V. (1998). AContingent Valuation Study of Projects ImprovingDrinking Water Quality", Modern ToxicologicalProblems. (Abstract). [Pubmed] | ||||
| 6- Guha, S. (2007). Valuation of Clean Water Supplyby Willingness to Pay Method in Developing Nation,a Case Study in Calculate, India. Jabalpur University. | ||||
| 7- Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the Environmentthrough Contingent Valuation. Journal of EconomicPerspectives. 8(4): 19-43. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 8- Hanemann, W. M., Loonis, J., & Kanninen, B.(1991). Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded DichotomousChoice Contingent Valuation. AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4): 1255-1263. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 9- He, L., & Tyner, W. (2004). Improving IrrigationWater Allocation Efficiency Using Alternative Policyoption in Egypt, http://econpapers.hhs.se | ||||
| 10- Hussain, R.Z., & Young, R.A. (1985). Estimatesof the Economic Value Productivity of IrrigationWater in Pakistan from Farm Surveys, Water ResourcesBulletin. 26(6): 1021-1027. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 11- Lee, C. (1997). Valuation of Nature-based TourismResources Using Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuationmethod, Tourism Management. 18(8): 587-591. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 12- Lehtonen, E., Kuluvainen, J., Pouta, E., Rekola,M., & Li, C. (2003). Non-market Benefits of ForestConservation in Southern Finland. EnvironmentalScience and Policy. 6: 195-204. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 13- Maddala, G.S. 1991. Introduction of Econometrics.2nd Edition, Macmillan, New York. | ||||
| 14- Thompson, C.D. (1988). Choice of FlexibleFunctional Forms: Review and Appraisal, WesternJournal of Agricultural Economics. 13: 169-183. | ||||
| 15- Turner, J.C., Douglas, C.L., Hallum, C.R., Krausman,P.R., & Ramey, R.R. (2004). Determination ofCritical Habitat for the Endangered Nelson's bighornsheep in southern California. Wildlife SocietyBulletin, 32: 427-448. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 16- Young, R.A. (2005). Determining the EconomicValue of Water. Concepts and Methods. Washington,DC: Resources for the Future. | ||||
