Comparative Cost Structure and Yield Performance Anzlysis of Upland and Mangrove Fish Farms in Southwest, Nigeria

محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and management

Mafimisebi Taiwo Ejiola ¹ ( Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, The Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria )
Okunmadewa Foluso Yinka ² ( World Bank Country office, Asokoro, Abuja, Nigeria )

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/06/07 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/06/07 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/06/11

کلید واژه: Nigeria, Fish Farming, Cost Structure, Gross Revenue, Investment Yield, Upland and Mangrove Areas,

چکیده مقاله :

The bias against mangrove areas in siting fish farms prompted a comparison of the cost structure and yield performance in upland and mangrove locations. Tools utilized included descriptive statistics, budgetary and cash flow analyses and profitability ratios. Empirical results revealed that substantial revenue could be realized from both farms. While the upland farms yielded average gross revenue per hectare per year of $9, 183.53, the mangrove farms made $8, 135.93 revealing a slight difference. Results of combined cash flow and sensitivity analysis buttressed that of budgetary analysis. NPVs were $10, 888.11 and $10, 375.84, B/Cs was 1.28 and 1.29 and IRR were 48.55% and 48.51% for the upland and mangrove farms, respectively. Profitability ratios were also comparable but slightly higher in the upland farms. The conclusion is that there was little or no difference in yield performance. However, the high risk of investment loss in years of excessive flood should prompt investors in mangrove farms to compulsorily insure their farms.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The bias against mangrove areas in siting fish farms prompted a comparison of the cost structure and yield performance in upland and mangrove locations. Tools utilized included descriptive statistics, budgetary and cash flow analyses and profitability ratios. Empirical results revealed that substantial revenue could be realized from both farms. While the upland farms yielded average gross revenue per hectare per year of $9, 183.53, the mangrove farms made $8, 135.93 revealing a slight difference. Results of combined cash flow and sensitivity analysis buttressed that of budgetary analysis. NPVs were $10, 888.11 and $10, 375.84, B/Cs was 1.28 and 1.29 and IRR were 48.55% and 48.51% for the upland and mangrove farms, respectively. Profitability ratios were also comparable but slightly higher in the upland farms. The conclusion is that there was little or no difference in yield performance. However, the high risk of investment loss in years of excessive flood should prompt investors in mangrove farms to compulsorily insure their farms.

منابع و مأخذ:

1- Adegeye, A.J. & Dittoh, J.S. (1985). Essentialsof Agricultural Economics. Impact Publishers Nig.Ltd., Ibadan. p 251.

2- Adesimi, A.A. (1985). Farm Management Analysis.Tintner Publishing Company, pp 105-206.

3- Ajayi, T.O. & Talabi, S.O. (1984). The Potentialsand Strategies for Optimum Utilization of theFisheries Resources of Nigeria. NIOMR TechnicalPaper, No. 18, P 24.

4- Dada, B.F. (1976). Present Status and Prospectsfor Aquaculture in Nigeria. NIOMR Technical Paper52: 5-12.

5- Delgado, C.L., Wada, N., Rosegrant, M.W.,Meijer, S. and M. Ahmed. (2003). Fish to 2020:Supply and Demand in Changing Global Markets.International Food Policy Research Institute, WashingtonD.C, World Fish Center, Penang, Malaysia P223.

6- Fagbenro, O.A. (1987). A Review of the Biologicaland Economic Principles Underlying CommercialFish Culture. Journal of West African Fisheries,11(2): 171-177.

7- Falusi, O.A. (2003). Poverty Analysis of FishFarmers in Abeokuta Metropolis. An UnpublishedProject Report, Department of Agricultural Economicsand Farm Management, University of Agriculture,Abeokuta, Nigeria. p 57.

8- FAO (1995). The State of World Fisheries andAquaculture, Rome.

9- FAO (1998). The State of World Fisheries andAquaculture, Rome.

10- FAO (2005). The State of World Fisheries andAquaculture, Rome.

11- Federal Department of Fisheries (1979). FisheriesStatistics of Nigeria. pp 1-32.

12- FOS (2000) Projected Fish Demand and Supplyin Nigeria (1999-2010). Federal Office of Statistics,Abuja, Nigeria.

13- Inoni, O.E.,(1992). Financial Analysis of FishFarming in Delta State, Nigeria. Unpublished M.ScDissertation, University of Ibadan. p 88.

14- Mafimisebi, T.E. (1995). Profitability and YieldPerformance of Selected Fish Ponds in Ilaje Ese-Odo Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria.Unpublished M.Sc Dissertation, University of Ibadan.p. 83.

15- Mafimisebi, T.E. (2003). Yield Performance ofCommercialized Upland Fish Farms in Ondo Statof Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production.30 (2): 217-228. [DOI via Crossref]

16- Naylor, R.L., Goldburg, R.J., Primavera, J.H.,Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M.C.M., Clay, J., Folke,C., Lubchenco, Mooney J. H., & Troell, M. (2000).Effects of Aquaculture on World Fish Supplies.Nature 405: 1017-1024. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]

17- Ondo State Agricultural Development Project(1996). Aquaculture Potentials of Ondo State ofNigeria. pp 1-10.

18- Tobor, J.G.(1990). The Fishing Industry inNigeria: Status and Potentials for Self-Sufficiencyin Fish Production. NIOMR Technical Report. No.54: 1-23.

19- Touminen, T.R., & Esmark, M. (2003). Foodfor Thought: The Use of Marine Resources in FishFeeds. WWF Report 02/03. Norway: World WildlifeFund.

20- Williams, M.J. (1996). Transition in the Contributionof Living Aquatic Resources to SustainableFood Security". In Perspectives in Asian Fisheriesed Sena S. De Silva. Makati City, The Philippines:Asian Fisheries Society.

21- Zadek, S.,(1984) Development de l'Aquaculturein Egypte. Reference a la Farme de Reswa (PortSaid et Froposition d'une Politique National Equacole.Ph.D Thesis, Toulouse Institut National Polytechniquede Toulouse P. 151.