Factors Affecting Nonfarm Income Diversification among Rural Farm Households in Central Nepal
محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and managementRaju Ghimire 1 , Wen-Chi Huang 2 , Rudra Bahadur Shrestha 3
1 - Doctoral Student, Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of
Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Agribusiness Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology,
Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
3 - Doctoral Student, Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of
Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
کلید واژه: Food Security, Income Diversification, Rural Farm Household, Nepal,
چکیده مقاله :
Nonfarm activities play an important role in the determination of rural household income, consumption expenditure, and household food security. However, much less studies have been devoted to the factors that influence nonfarm income diversification by farm household in developing countries. Using cross-sectional data and a probit model, this study attempts to determine the factors influencing nonfarm income diversification decisions by farm households in Central Nepal. The result reveals that household characteristics such as age, gender and education of the household head, and family size play a significant role in nonfarm work decisions. The households with larger farm size are less likely to participate in nonfarm work than their counterpart. Additionally, for those remains in the rural households, distance to road and market hinders the opportunities for nonfarm work. Finally, regional differences also exist in participating nonfarm activities among farm households. This study suggests that government policy should pay more attention on education, gender and infrastructures such as road and markets, to reduce the entry barriers and facilitate easier access to nonfarm activities. Also, nonfarm activities need to be promoted and incorporated in governmental plans and policies for balanced development between hills and terai areas.
Nonfarm activities play an important role in the determination of rural household income, consumption expenditure, and household food security. However, much less studies have been devoted to the factors that influence nonfarm income diversification by farm household in developing countries. Using cross-sectional data and a probit model, this study attempts to determine the factors influencing nonfarm income diversification decisions by farm households in Central Nepal. The result reveals that household characteristics such as age, gender and education of the household head, and family size play a significant role in nonfarm work decisions. The households with larger farm size are less likely to participate in nonfarm work than their counterpart. Additionally, for those remains in the rural households, distance to road and market hinders the opportunities for nonfarm work. Finally, regional differences also exist in participating nonfarm activities among farm households. This study suggests that government policy should pay more attention on education, gender and infrastructures such as road and markets, to reduce the entry barriers and facilitate easier access to nonfarm activities. Also, nonfarm activities need to be promoted and incorporated in governmental plans and policies for balanced development between hills and terai areas.
| 1- Abdulai, A., & CroleRees, A. (2001). Determinantsof income diversification amongst rural householdsin Southern Mali. Food Policy, 26(4), 437-452. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 2- Abdulai, A., & Delgado, C. L. (1999). Determinantsof nonfarm earnings of farm-based husbandsand wives in Northern Ghana. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 81(1), 117-130. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 3- Ahearn, M. C., El-Osta, H., & Dewbre, J. (2006).The impact of coupled and decoupled governmentsubsidies on off-farm labor participation of US farmoperators. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,88(2), 393-408. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 4- Anderson, A. (2002). The effect of cash cropping,credit and household composition on household foodsecurity in southern Malawi. African Studies Quarterly,6(1-2), 175-202. | ||||
| 5- Andrew, D. F., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995).Learning by doing and learning from others: Humancapital and technical change in agriculture. Journalof Political Economy, 103(6),1176-1209. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 6- Asfaw, S., Shiferaw, B., Simtowe, F., & Lipper,L. (2012). Impact of modern agricultural technologieson smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzaniaand Ethiopia. Food Policy, 37(3), 283-295. [DOI via Crossref] [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 7- Babatunde, R. O., & Qaim, M. (2010). Impact ofoff-farm income on food security and nutrition inNigeria. Food Policy, 35(4), 303-311. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 8- Barrett, C.B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001).Nonfarm income diversification and householdlivelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics,and policy implications. Food Policy, 26(4),315-331. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 9- Beyene, A.D. (2008). Determinants of off-farmparticipation decision of farm households inEthiopia. Agrekon, 47(1), 140-161. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 10- CBS (Central Buresu of Statistics). (2011). NepalLiving Standard Survey. National Planning CommissionSecretariat, Government of Nepal. | ||||
| 11- Chang, H.-H., & Mishra, A. (2008). Impact ofoff-farm labor supply on food expenditures of thefarm household. Food Policy, 33(6), 657-664. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 12- Conley, T. G., & Udry, C. R. (2010). Learningabout a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. TheAmerican Economic Review, 100(1), 35-69. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 13- Doss, C.R., & Morris, M.L. (2000). How doesgender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations?Agricultural Economics, 25(1), 27-39. [DOI via Crossref] [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 14- El-Osta, H.S., Mishra, A.K., & Ahearn, M.C.(2004). Labor supply by farm operators under "decoupled"farm program payments. Review of Economicsof the Household, 2(4), 367-385. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 15- El-Osta, H. S., Mishra, A. K., & Morehart, M. J.(2008). Off-Farm labor participation decisions ofmarried farm couples and the role of governmentpayments. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(2),311-332. [DOI via Crossref] [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 16- Gould, B. W., & Saupe, W. E. (1989). Off-farmlabor market entry and exit. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics, 71(4), 960-969. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 17- Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis(7th ed.): New York University, Princeton Hall. | ||||
| 18- Huffman, W. E. (1980). Farm and off-farm workdecisions: the role of human capital. The Review ofEconomics and Statistics, 62(1), 14-23. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 19- Huffman, W. E., & Lange, M. D. (1989). Offfarmwork decisions of husbands and wives: jointdecision making. The Review of Economics and Statistics,70(3), 471-480. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 20- Karugia, J. T., Oluoch-Kosura, W., Nyikal, R.,Odumbe, M., & Marenya, P. P. (2006). Access toland, income diversification and poverty reductionin rural Kenya. Paper presented at International Associationof Agricultural Economists Conference,Gold Coast, Australia. | ||||
| 21- Lanjouw, J. O., & Lanjouw, P. (2001). The ruralnonâ€farm sector: issues and evidence from developingcountries. Agricultural Economics, 26(1), 1-23. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 22- Lass, D. A., & Gempesaw, C. M. (1992). Thesupply of off-farm labor: a random coefficients approach.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,74(2), 400-411. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 23- Mishra, A. K., & Goodwin, B. K. (1997). Farmincome variability and the supply of off-farm labor.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3),880-887. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 24- MOAD (Ministry of Agriculture Development).(2011). Statistical Information on Nepalese Aagriculture,Government of Nepal. | ||||
| 25- Olale, E., & Henson, S. (2012). Determinants ofincome diversification among fishing communitiesin Western Kenya. Fisheries Research, 125: 235-242. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 26- Polson, R. A., & Spencer, D. S. (1991). The technologyadoption process in subsistence agriculture:The case of cassava in Southwestern Nigeria. AgriculturalSystems, 36(1), 65-78. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 27- Reardon, T. (1997). Using evidence of householdincome diversification to inform study of therural nonfarm labor market in Africa. World Development,25(5), 735-747. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 28- Reardon, T., Delgado, C., & Matlon, P. (1992).Determinants and effects of income diversificationamongst farm households in Burkina Faso. The Journalof Development Studies, 28(2), 264-296. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 29- Uaiene, R. N., Arndt, C., & Masters, W. (2009).Determinants of agricultural technology adoption inMozambique. Discussion papers(67E). National Directorateof Studies and Policy Analysis, Ministry ofPlanning and Development, Republic of Mozambique. | ||||
| 30- Woldenhanna, T., & Oskam, A. (2001). Incomediversification and entry barriers: evidence from theTigray region of northern Ethiopia. Food Policy,26(4), 351-365. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 31- Wouterse, F., & Taylor, J. E. (2008). Migration andincome diversification. World Development, 36(4),625-640. [DOI via Crossref] worlddev. 2007. 03. 009 | ||||
