Development of Entrepreneurship in Complementary and Processing Industries in Khouzestan Province, Iran
محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and management
1 - Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University,
Shoushtar, Iran
کلید واژه: entrepreneurship, Complementary and Processing Industries, Citrus Products,
چکیده مقاله :
The main purpose of this study was to identify and analyze factors affecting development of entrepreneurship in complementary and processing industries of citrus products at Khouzestan province, Iran. The Statistical population of this study consisted of all managers in processing and complementary industries of citrus products in Khouzestan province (N=89). By census method all managers were selected for participation in the study. Return rate was 84% (N=75). The main instrument in this study was questionnaire which its validity was confirmed by a panel of experts and its reliability was established by calculating Cronbach Alpha Coefficient (a=0.87). Findings reveal that there were positive and significant relationship between willingness to creativity, risk oriented, responsibility, competitiveness, participation on education programs, attitude to entrepreneurship, income level, educational level and level of entrepreneurship. According to factor analysis, factors affecting development of entrepreneurship in complementary and processing industries were categorized into four groups consisting: development of cognitive and psychomotor domains, development of infrastructure equipments, improving economic policies and development of psychological characteristics that those factors explained 68.82% of the total variance of the research variables.
The main purpose of this study was to identify and analyze factors affecting development of entrepreneurship in complementary and processing industries of citrus products at Khouzestan province, Iran. The Statistical population of this study consisted of all managers in processing and complementary industries of citrus products in Khouzestan province (N=89). By census method all managers were selected for participation in the study. Return rate was 84% (N=75). The main instrument in this study was questionnaire which its validity was confirmed by a panel of experts and its reliability was established by calculating Cronbach Alpha Coefficient (a=0.87). Findings reveal that there were positive and significant relationship between willingness to creativity, risk oriented, responsibility, competitiveness, participation on education programs, attitude to entrepreneurship, income level, educational level and level of entrepreneurship. According to factor analysis, factors affecting development of entrepreneurship in complementary and processing industries were categorized into four groups consisting: development of cognitive and psychomotor domains, development of infrastructure equipments, improving economic policies and development of psychological characteristics that those factors explained 68.82% of the total variance of the research variables.
| 1- Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social entrepreneurship:definition and boundaries. Technology InnovationManagement Review, (February 2012: TechnologyEntrepreneurship). | ||||
| 2- Burdus, E. (2010). Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship.Review of International Comparative Management,11(1), 33-42. | ||||
| 3- Dodd, S.D., & Gotsis, G. (2007). The InterrelationshipBetween Entrepreneurship And Religion,Entrepreneurship AndInnovation, 8(2), 93-104. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 4- Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship,UK, Elsevier Linacre House, 2006 | ||||
| 5- Hekmat, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship approachesin agricultural cooperatives. International Journal ofAgricultural Science, Research and Technology,2011; 1(1), 39-45. | ||||
| 6- Kuratko, D. F., & Hodgetts, R. M. (2004). Entrepreneurship:Theory, Process, Practice (Mason, OH;South-Western Publishers). | ||||
| 7- Mccline, Richard L. (2004). Opportunity recognition:An exploratory investigation of a componentof the entrepreneurial process in the context of thehealth care industry: Theory and Practice. TertiaryEducationManagement, 25(2), 81-94. | ||||
| 8- Mohapatra, S., Rozelle, S., & Goodhue, R.(2007). The rise of self-employment in rural China:development or distress?. World Development,35(1), 163-181. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
| 9- Pages, E.R., & Markley, D. M. (2004). Understandingthe environment for rural North Carolina.Center for Rural Entrepreneurship. http:\www.ruraleship.org | ||||
| 10- Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2000). Psychologicalapproaches to entrepreneurial success. A generalmodel and an overview of findings. In C.L. Cooper& I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrialand Organizational Psychology (pp. 101-142). Chichester: Wiley. | ||||
| 11- Schumpeter, J. A. (2012). Capitalism, Socialismand Democracy. Routledge. ISBN 0415107628. | ||||
| 12- Solomon, G.T., Duffy, S., & Tarabishy, A.(2002). The State of Entrepreneurship Education inthe United States: A Nationwide Survey and Analysis.International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education,1(1), 65-86. | ||||
| 13- Volery, T., & Muller, S. (2006). Conceptualframework for testing the effectiveness of entrepreneurshipeducation programs towards entrepreneurialintention. Available on the http://www1.kmu.unisg.ch/rencontres/RENC2006/Topics06/A/Rencontres_2006_Volery-MuellerS. pd | ||||
