Related to Agricultural Research, Distribution of Income and Agricultural Value Added

محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and management

Zeinab Moinoddini ¹

1 - 1. Invited Lecturer Payame Noor University of Kerman, Iran. 2. PhD Student of Agricultural Economics Zabol University of Iran.

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/05/14 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/05/14 تاریخ انتشار : 1394/03/11

کلید واژه: Agricultural Research, Agricultural value added, Per Capita Income, 3SLS,

چکیده مقاله :

Agricultural Research is one of the most important factors in agricultural development, thus, the role and importance of research is increasing. Within the past years, all developed and consequently developing countries have engaged their most attention to promote their researches indexes. This study is investigating the effect of agricultural research on the distribution of income and agricultural value added in Iran, during the period of 1976 - 2012. Three SLS methods were used to determine the income distribution functions, value added and per capita income. The results showed that agricultural researches were effective on improvement of agricultural value added. The results also express that continuance in agricultural researches can increase per capita income and less inequality of income distribution. Effect of agricultural value added on inequality of income distribution was low but though increase in agricultural value added and decrease it.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Agricultural Research is one of the most important factors in agricultural development, thus, the role and importance of research is increasing. Within the past years, all developed and consequently developing countries have engaged their most attention to promote their researches indexes. This study is investigating the effect of agricultural research on the distribution of income and agricultural value added in Iran, during the period of 1976 - 2012. Three SLS methods were used to determine the income distribution functions, value added and per capita income. The results showed that agricultural researches were effective on improvement of agricultural value added. The results also express that continuance in agricultural researches can increase per capita income and less inequality of income distribution. Effect of agricultural value added on inequality of income distribution was low but though increase in agricultural value added and decrease it.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Alene, A. D., & Coulibaly. O. (2009). The Impact of Agricultural Research on Productivity and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy. 34 (2): 198-209. [DOI via Crossref]

2. Ali, S., & Ahmad, N. (2014). Livestock Development and Poverty in Pakistan: Evidence from the Punjab Province. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4(6), 269-276.

3. Ali, S., Mustafa, MQ. & Shahbazi, IA. (2013). Agriculture value added and income inequality in Pakistan: a time series analysis. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 8(2), 25-33.

4. Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., & Pardey, P.G. (1995). Science under scarcity: principles and Practice for agricultural evaluation and priority setting. Cornell University Press, New York.

5. Bourguignon, F., & Morrison, C. (1998). Inequality and development: the role of dualism. Journal of Development Economics. 57: 233-257. [DOI via Crossref]

6. Bruno, M., Ravallion, M., & Squire, L. (1996). Equity and Growth in Developing Countries: Old and New Perspectives on the Policy Issues. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

7. Coelli, T.J., & Rao, D.S.P. (2005). Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: A Malmquis index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000. Agricultural Economics. 32(1), 115-134. [DOI via Crossref]

8. Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1996). How important to IndiaÂ’s poor is the sectoral composition of economic growth? The World Bank Economic Review, 10(1), 1-25. [DOI via Crossref]

9. Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1998). Farm Productivity and rural poverty in India. Journal of Development Studies, 34(4), 62-85 [DOI via Crossref]

10. DeJanvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2002). World poverty and the role of agricultural technology: direct and indirect effects. Development Studies. 38 (4), 1-26. [DOI via Crossref]

11. Fulginiti, L.E., Perrin, R.K., & Yu, B. (2004). Institution sand agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural Economics. 31, 169-180. [DOI via Crossref]

12. Gallup, J., Radelet, S., & Warner, A. (1997) “Economic Growth and the Income of the Poor”. Harvard Institute for International Development CAER II Discussion Paper, 36, 30-61.

13. Khaksar Astane, H., & Karbasi, A.R. (2007). Calculate the marginal rate of return on investment of Agricultural Research. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 50, 35-46.

14. Marashi, N., & Sheykhan, N. (2004). Agricultural Research Program in Iran, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development. 37, 279-301.

15. Mehrgan, N., & Nassabian, Sh. (2010). Agriculture Growth and Income Inequality in Iran. America Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 7(6), 637-643.

16. Ravallion, M. (1995). Growth and poverty: Evidence for developing countries in the 1980s. Economics letters. 48: 411-417. [DOI via Crossref]

17. Ravallion, M., & Datt, G. (1999). When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from the diverse experience of IndiaÂ’s states. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 2263.

18. Thirtle, C., Lin, L., & Piesse, J. (2003). The impact of research-led agricultural value added growth on inequality in income distribution reduction in Africa. Asia and Latin American World Development. 1959-1976. [DOI via Crossref]

19. Timmer, C. (1997). How well do the poor connect to the growth process? Harvard Institute for International Development, CAER II Discussion Paper. 17, 335-350.

20. Haggblade, S., Hazell, P., & Reardon, T. (2002). Strategies for Stimulating Poverty-Alleviating Growth in the Rural Non-Farm Economy in Developing Countries. Environment and Production Technology Paper. 92, 127-141.