Factors Affecting on Research Practices Development regarding Entrepreneurship in Agricultural Higher Education: A Two-Step Approach to Structural Equation Modeling
محورهای موضوعی : Decision-making
1 - استادیار دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شوشتر
کلید واژه: factor analysis, Islamic Azad University, entrepreneurship, Higher Education, Research Practices Development,
چکیده مقاله :
The purpose of this research was to identify the factors affecting research practices development (RPD) regarding entrepreneurship in agricultural higher education, case study Islamic Azad University, Khouzestan Province, Iran. Faculty members in Islamic Azad University, Khouzestan Province were considered as statistical population. The sample size based on Cochran formula was determined (n=210). Stratified random sampling was used to select faculty members. A researcher-made questionnaire was employed for data collection. Its validity was confirmed by content validity and its total reliability was estimated by Cronbach's alpha as to be 0.81. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to describe RPD performance regarding entrepreneurship in agricultural higher education and inferential statistics to analyzing factors affecting on RDP. The results of the factor analysis showed that four factors such as encouraging researchers to research in entrepreneurship (MF1), institutionalization of entrepreneurship in academic research (MF2), establishing proper communication between the university and industry (SF) and creating the necessary rules and infrastructure for the commercialization of knowledge regarding entrepreneurship (LF) were identified as factors affecting the research practices development (RPD) regarding entrepreneurship in agricultural higher education which explained 62.55% of the total variance altogether. The result of the structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that, it can be seen that the predictive positive effect of MF1 to RDP is supported (β=0.38, t-value=4.86, p<0.001). In addition, MF2 has a positive effect on RDP (β=0.39, t-value=5.08, p<0.001). Also the LF has a positive effect on RDP (β=0.31, t-value=4.05, p<0.001). MF2, SF and LF also have a significant impact on MF1. The findings showed that R2 for RDP was 0.53. So that, these four construct (MF1, MF2, SF and LF) determinants accounts for 62% of the variance in the RDP.
هدف از این تحقیق شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در توسعه فعالیتهای تحقیق (RPD) در خصوص کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی کشاورزی، مطالعه موردی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان خوزستان، ایران است. اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی استان خوزستان به عنوان جامعه آماری در نظر گرفته شدند. حجم نمونه بر اساس فرمول کوکران (210 نفر) تعیین شد. نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه بندی شده برای انتخاب اعضای هیئت علمی استفاده شد. برای جمع آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته استفاده شده است. روایی آن با اعتبار محتوا تأیید شد و پایایی آن توسط آلفای کرونباخ 81/0 محاسبه شد. داده ها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی برای توصیف عملکرد RPD در مورد کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی کشاورزی و آمار استنباطی به تجزیه و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر RDP پرداخته شد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی نشان داد که چهار عامل از جمله تشویق محققان به پژوهش در کارآفرینی (MF1)، نهادینه کردن کارآفرینی در تحقیقات دانشگاهی (MF2)، برقراری ارتباط مناسب بین دانشگاه و صنعت (SF) و ایجاد قوانین و زیرساخت های لازم برای تجاری‌سازی دانش در مورد کارآفرینی (LF) به عنوان عوامل مؤثر در توسعه فعالیتهای تحقیقاتی (RPD) درخصوص کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی کشاورزی شناخته شد که 62.55٪ از کل واریانس را در کل توضیح داد. نتیجه مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) نشان داد که ، می‌توان تأثیر مثبت پیش‌بینی کننده MF1 به RDP را پشتیبانی کرد (β = 0.38 ، t-value = 4.86 ، p <0.001). علاوه بر این ، MF2 بر RDP اثر مثبت دارد (β = 0.39 ، t-value = 5.08 ، p <0.001). همچنین LF تاثیر مثبتی بر RDP دارد (β = 0.31 ، t-value = 4.05 ، p <0.001). MF2 ، SF و LF همچنین تأثیر قابل توجهی در MF1 دارند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که R2 برای RDP برابر با 0.53 است. به این ترتیب، چهار عامل MF1 ، MF2 ، SF و LF 62 درصد از واریانس RDP را تشکیل می‌دهند.
Ashcroft, K., & Rayner, P. (2011). Higher education in development. Lessons from Sub-Saharan Africa. Charlotte, Information Age Publishing, USA.
Carr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as inter-generational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A Theory of Planned Behavior approach. Journal of Business Research, 60 (1), 1090-1098.
Clark, B.R. (1998). The entrepreneurship university demand and response: Theory and practice. Tertiary Education Management, 4(1), 5-16.
Cortese, A.D. (2003). The critical role of higher education on creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15-22.
Darmadji, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship as new approach to support national agriculture development program to go self sufficient food. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 9, 72-82.
Deuren, R. (2013). Capacity development in higher education institutions in developing countries. Academic Coordinator MBM Programs, Maastricht School of Management, the Netherlands.
Eshiwani, G. (1999). Higher Education in Africa: Challenges and Strategies 31 for the 21st Century. In Higher Education in the 21 st Century: Global Challenge and National Response (Edited by Philip G. Altbach and Patti McGill Peterson) Institute of International Education and Boston College Center for International Higher Education.
Fayolle,A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmers: A new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701-720.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Goke, M. (2005). How institutions of higher education function as business enterprises in the global market of the USA. With special reference to a private college - A case study about Benedictine College, Atchison (KS), unpublished thesis, University of Lincoln, USA.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R.E.,Tatham, R.L.,& Black. W.C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc
Johnston, A. (2007). Higher education for sustainable development. Final Report of International Action Research Project to the OECD from Forum for the Future, in October 2006 – March 2007.
Khoshmaram, M., Zarafshani, K., Alibaygi, A., & Mirakzadeh, A. (2017). Exploring the role of social capital in agricultural entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: Application of Smart PLS. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 7(4), 395-406.
Masoomi, E., Zamani, N., Bazrafkan, K., & Akbari, M. (2016). An investigation of the factors influencing entrepreneurial intention of senior agricultural students at Shiraz University. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 6(4), 431-437.
Mitchell, R. K., Smith, J. B., Morse, E. A., Seawright, K. W., Peredo, A. M., & McKenzie, B. (2002). Are entrepreneurial cognitions universal? Assessing entrepreneurial cognitions across cultures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 9-29.
Nadirkhanlou, S., Pourezzat, A., Gholipour, A., & Zehtabi, M. (2012). Requirements of knowledge commercialization in universities and academic entrepreneurship. Innovation through Knowledge Transfer, 18, 179-194.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Onstenk, J. (2003). Entrepreneurship and vocational education. European Educational Research Journal, 2, 74- 89.
Ommani, A. (2016). Institutionalizing entrepreneurship in side industries of agriculture in Khouzestan Province, Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 6(4), 449-457.
Pertuzé, J. A., Calder, E.S., Greitzer, E. M., & Lucas, W. A. (2010). Best practices for industry-university collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51 (4), 82-91.
Reyes, C. N. (2017). Frames in the institutionalization of the entrepreneurial university model the case of national university of Singapore. Tampere University Press.
Roach, M. (2017). Encouraging entrepreneurship in university labs: Research activities, research outputs, and early doctorate careers. PLoS One. 12(2): e0170444. doi: [10.1371/journal.pone.0170444].
Sadeghi, M., & Malekinia, A. (2011). Students’ evaluation of entrepreneurial environments and investigating its relationship with entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Research and Planning in Education, 59, 68-89.
Sanyal, B. C., & Varghese, N. V. (2006). Research capacity in higher education sector in developing countries. UNESCO: Paris.
Talebi, K., & Zare yekta, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship education academic and its role in creation and development firms small and medium basis knowledge. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 1, 111-131.
UNESCO (2004). Higher education for sustainable development, Education for Sustainable Development Information Brief. UNESCO, Paris.
Wood, M., Welter, C., Artz, K., & Bradley, S. W. (2014). Discerning opportunity types: implications for entrepreneurial action and entrepreneurship education. In Innovative Pathways for University Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century (pp. 119-144). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.World Bank (2000). Higher education in developing countries. Peril and promise. Washington DC, World Bank.
World Bank (2012). Putting higher education to work. Skills for research and growth in East-Asia. Washington DC, World Bank.
Yaghoubi, J. (2010). Study barriers to entrepreneurship promotion in agriculture higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1901-1905.
