Effectiveness of Technology Dissemination and Adoption among Farmers in Cross-River State, Nigeria

محورهای موضوعی : Agricultural Extension

Agbarevo, M.N. Benjamin ¹ ( Department of Rural Sociology and Extension Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Umuahia )
Nwachukwu Ephraim. O ² ( Department of Agricultural Education, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education Owerri, Imo State )

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/10/03 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/10/03 تاریخ انتشار : 1392/09/10

کلید واژه: effectiveness, Technology, adoption, Dissemination, Cross-River State,

چکیده مقاله :

This study compared farmers’ rating of extension effectiveness in technology dissemination to the level of adoption. In conducting the study, 180 farmers participating in extension programme in Cross-River State were randomly selected through multi-stage random sampling technique. The data collected through a structured questionnaire were analyzed using the t-test of significance of difference between means to find out if farmers’ mean rating of extension effectiveness differed significantly from the mean adoption score. The study found no significant difference between farmers’ mean rating of extension effectiveness and the level of farmers’ adoption of introduced technologies at 95% confidence level. Hence, the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the farmers’ mean rating of extension effectiveness and their mean adoption score was accepted, while the alternative hypothesis was rejected.

منابع و مأخذ:

1) Agbarevo, M. N. (2005). Sustainable agriculture in Nigeria: Issues and the way forward. Journal of Research in Agriculture. 2(2): 1-6.

2) Agbarevo, M. N. B and Obinne, C. P. O. (2010). Elements of Rural Sociology and Agricultural Extension. Enugu: Teo Publishers.

3) Agbarevo, M. N. B. (2013). Farmers’ Perception of Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension Delivery in Cross-River State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) 2(6): 1-7.

4) Ajayi, A. R. (2005). Programme, planning, monitoring and evaluation in agricultural extension. In S. F. Adedoyin, (ed.), Agricultural Extension in Nigeria. Ilorin: Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria.

5) Amalu, U. C. ( 1998). Agricultural Research and Extension Delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa. Calabar, University of Calabar Press.

6) Guatam, M. (2009). Improving the relevance of agricultural extension with respect to farm size. The case of Uganda. Accessed from www.ageconearch.umn.edu/bitsream.

7) Igbokwe E. A and Enwere, N. J ( 2001). Participator y Rural Appraisal in Developmental Research. Enugu: New Generation Books.

8) Imoh, A. N and Essien, M. U. ( 2005). Adoption of improved cassava varieties among small scale farmers in Ikot-Ekpene Zone of Akwa Ibom State in Nigeria, in M.A. orheruata, S.O. Nwokoro, M.T. Ajayi, A.T. Adekunle and G.N. Asumugha (eds), Agricultural Rebirth for Improved Production in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Society of Nigeria held at the University of Benin, Benin-City, Edo State, Nigeria, October 9-13, 2005, pp.8-10.

9) Lebo, A. E. A. (1986). Management and coordination of technical services in Cross River Agricultural Development Programme, Monograph series.

10) Swanson, B. E (1997). Strengthening research extension farmer linkages, in B.E. Swanson, R.P. Bentz, A. J. Sofranko (eds.), Improving Agricultural Extension. A Reference Manual(2nd ed.), pp.89-107.

11) Zeitlyn, J (1992). Appropriate Media for Training and Development. Bangladesh: UPL and Tool Publications.