چکیده مقاله :
The purpose of research was identifying the relationship between social capital and performance of agricultural extension experts, Khouzestan province, Iran. The method of research was a descriptive-correlative. The sample size was agricultural extension experts (n=98). A five-point Likert-type scale was used as instrument to gather data in order to measure the social capital. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS19). Questionnaire reliability was estimated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and it was appropriate for this study (Cranach's alpha 0.93). Te result of research revealed that the correlation between organizational performance with social participation, social status and social trust was significant. Liner regression was used to predict changes in performance by different variables. Based on the results social participation, social status and social trust, educational level and job satisfaction may well explain for 48.9% changes (R2 = 0.489) in organizational performance of extension experts.
منابع و مأخذ:
1) Adler, P and Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1) 17–40.
2) Cheung, F. Y and Wu, W. P. (2011). Participatory management and employee work outcomes: The moderating role of supervisor-subordinate guanxi. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 29, Issue, 3, pp. 344-364.
3) Coffe, H and Geys, B. (2005). Institutional Performance and Social Capital: An Application tothe Local Government Level , Journal Of Urban Affairs, Volume 27, Number 5, pages 485–501.
4) Coffe, H and Geys, B. (2006). Towards an Empirical Characterization of Bridging and Bonding Social Capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 36 (1), 121-139.
5) Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement): S95-S120.
6) Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. NY: Free press.
7) Knack, S and Keefer, Ph. (1995) "Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures" Economics and Politics 7(3): 207-227.
8) La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A and Vishny, R. W. (1997). Trust in Large Organizations. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 87(2): 333-338.
9) Laar, C. V and Sidanius, J. (2001). Social Status and the Academic Achievement Gap: A Social Dominance Perspective. Social Psychology of Education, Volume 4, Issue 3-4, pp 235-258.
10)Leana, C and Buren, H. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 538-556.
11)Leana, C. R and Barry, B. (2000). Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organization life. Acad. Management Rev. 25 :753–759.
12)Nahapiet, J and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242-267.
13)Nahapiet, J and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23: 242–266.
14)Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
