Farmers Perception about gains from Integrated Pest Management Farmer Field School

محورهای موضوعی : Agricultural Extension

Pawan Singh Bhandari ¹

1 - Agri-Economist, Monitoring and Evaluation Section, Department of Agriculture (MoAD), Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur, Nepal

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/10/04 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/10/04 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/06/11

کلید واژه: Integrated pest management, empowerment, Chemical pesticides, Farmer Field School, Farmer Group,

چکیده مقاله :

The study was conducted among the two farmer groups in Bhaktapur and Kavre districts of Nepal. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the differences in belief, attitude and practices felt by the farmers after participation in the IPM FFS. The study has been based on data collected through personal interview with the farmers, focus group discussion, personal observation in the farmers field, discussions with the leader farmers, agro-vet owners, farmer facilitators of the FFS and also on secondary data collected from related publications of various organizations. The study has revealed that FFS is being an effective tool in increasing IPM knowledge and techniques of ecological pest management among the farmers. Integrated Pest Management through Farmer Field approach has not only been a means to sustainable management of pests thereby ensuring sustainable yield of crops but also the IPM based crop management has positive effect on household food security, income and empowerment of farmers. This justifies the potential of IPM FFS as an effective mechanism for increasing the knowledge and techniques of sustainable pest management vis-à-vis being a driving force for socio-economic changes in the lives and livelihoods of the smallholder farming communities. [Pawan Singh Bhandari. Farmers Perception about gains from Integrated Pest Management Farmer Field School. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology, 2012; 2(3):137-142].

منابع و مأخذ:

1. ABPSD. (2006). Statistical information in Nepal Agriculture. Agri-Business Promotion and Statistical Division, MoAD, GoN.

2. Esser, K.B., Saethre. M., Pradhananga, N and Ojha, H. (2012). Midterm review of the National Integrated Pest Management Programme in Nepal, phase II, Noragric Report No. 67, Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB), Norway, p.6.

3. FAO. (2004). Capacity building for participatory local planning and empowerment of rural women and rural poor through decentralization in Nepal. In: Country experiences in decentralization in South Asia, Report of the Sub-regional Workshop, Kathmandu, Nepal, p.29.

4. FAO. (2011). Integrated pest management. In: Nepal and FAO Achievements and success stories, FAO Representation in Nepal, UN House, Pulchowk, Kathmandu, Nepal, p.2.

5. IPM. (2012). Introduction. In: National IPM Program in Nepal, Consolidation, Up-scaling and Institutionalization Phase II, Plant Protection Directorate, Department of Agriculture, Lalitpur, Nepal.

6. Jha, R.K., Regmi, A. (2007). Integrated Pest Management and Reduction in Pesticide Use: An Evidence from Vegetable Production Area of Nepal. Agricultural Development Journal, Vol. 4, No. 4, Directorate of Agricultural Training, Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur, p.128.

7. K.C., G. K., G. C. Y. (2010). Proceedings of IPM Regional Review Workshops Eastern and Central Development Regions, Plant Protection Directorate, Hariharbhawan, Lalitpur, p.8.

8. Pontius, J., Dilts, R and Bartlett, A. (2002a,b). A critical theoretical framework and the FFS approach. In: From farmer field school to community IPM Ten years of integrated pest Management Training in Asia, FAO Community IPM Programme, p.1, 59.

9. Rajbhandari, B. P. (2002). The Concept and Approach. In: Integrated animation and Bio-Intensive farming System, WOREC, Kathmandu, Nepal, p.44.

10. Upadhaya, B. P. (2003). Prospect of Integrated Pest Management in Sustainable Agricultural Development in Nepal, Himalayan Resources Institute, New Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal, pp. 205.