Examining the Impact of Lead Farmer Approach on Follower Farmers’ Knowledge and Practice of Conservation Agriculture: A Case Study in Kalira Extension Planning Area, Ntchisi District, Malawi
محورهای موضوعی : Agricultural Extension
Daniel Devoted Matemba
1
,
Dalo Njera
2
1 - Department of Agri-Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Mzuzu University, Private Bag 201, Luwinga, Mzuzu, Malawi.
2 - Department of Forestry and Environmental Management, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Mzuzu University, Private Bag 201, Luwinga, Mzuzu, Malawi.
کلید واژه: Conservation agriculture, Lead Farmer, Follower Farmer, Malawi,
چکیده مقاله :
The Lead Farmer Approach (LFA) has emerged as a vital strategy for agricultural extension services in developing nations like Malawi, aiming to disseminate new technologies and practices among smallholder farmers. This study investigates the impact of LFA on follower farmers' (FFs) knowledge and practice of Conservation Agriculture (CA) in Malawi. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study conducted household surveys and focus group discussions in the Kalira Environmental Protection Area, Ntchisi district. Results indicate a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in FFs' knowledge of CA post-LFA, with notable advancements in crop rotation and minimum soil disturbance understanding. The LFA also positively influenced FFs' CA practices, particularly in minimum soil disturbances, permanent ground cover, and integration of agroforestry trees. While intercropping and crop rotation showed no significant change, the overall impact underscores the effectiveness of LFA in enhancing FFs' understanding and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. The findings contribute valuable insights for governments, development agencies, and researchers working toward promoting CA and sustainable agriculture through the LFA approach, emphasizing its potential scalability and long-term sustainability
The Lead Farmer Approach (LFA) has emerged as a vital strategy for agricultural extension services in developing nations like Malawi, aiming to disseminate new technologies and practices among smallholder farmers. This study investigates the impact of LFA on follower farmers' (FFs) knowledge and practice of Conservation Agriculture (CA) in Malawi. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study conducted household surveys and focus group discussions in the Kalira Environmental Protection Area, Ntchisi district. Results indicate a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in FFs' knowledge of CA post-LFA, with notable advancements in crop rotation and minimum soil disturbance understanding. The LFA also positively influenced FFs' CA practices, particularly in minimum soil disturbances, permanent ground cover, and integration of agroforestry trees. While intercropping and crop rotation showed no significant change, the overall impact underscores the effectiveness of LFA in enhancing FFs' understanding and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. The findings contribute valuable insights for governments, development agencies, and researchers working toward promoting CA and sustainable agriculture through the LFA approach, emphasizing its potential scalability and long-term sustainability
1. Bhatti, M. A., Godfrey, S. S., Ip, R. H. L., Kachiwala, C., Hovdhaugen, H., Banda, L. J., Limuwa, M., Wynn, P. C., Ådnøy, T., & Eik, L. O. (2021). Diversity of Sources of Income for Smallholder Farming Communities in Malawi: Importance for Improved Livelihood. Sustainability, 13(17), 9599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179599
2. Cerf, M., Guillot, M., and Olry, P. (2012) Acting as a Change Agent in Supporting Sustainable Agriculture: How to Cope with New Professional Situations? Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(1), 7–19.
3. Chabata, I. and de Wolf, J. (2012) 'The Lead Farmer Approach: An effective way of agricultural technology dissemination?', International Centre Tropical Agriculture. Available at: https://www.cgiar.ciat.org
4. Chinseu, E. L., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2022). Strengthening Conservation Agriculture innovation systems in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons from a stakeholder analysis. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1911511
5. Chirwa, E. W., Kumwenda, I., Jumbe C., Chilonda, P., & Minde I. (2008). Agricultural growth and poverty reduction in Malawi: past performance and recent trends. Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System. (ReSAKSS) Working Paper No. 8. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), 41. Available at: http://www.sa.resakss.org
6. Finca, A., Linnane, S., Slinger, J., Getty, D., & IgshaanSamuels, M. (2023). Implications of the breakdown in the indigenous knowledge system for rangeland management and policy: a case study from the Eastern Cape in South Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 40(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2138973
7. Fisher, M., Holden, S. T., Thierfelder, C., & Katengeza, S. P. (2018). Awareness and adoption of conservation agriculture in Malawi: what difference can farmer-to-farmer extension make? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(3), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1472411
8. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2019). Conservation Agriculture Training guide for extension agents and farmers in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Rome, Italy: FAO.
9. Franzel, S., Sinja, J., & Simpson, B. (2014). Farmer-to-farmer extension in Kenya: The perspectives of organizations using the approach. Nairobi. World Agroforestry Centre. https://doi.org/10.5716/WP14380.PDF
10. Gadzirayi, C. T., Mafuse, N., & Munyati, V. (2014). Enhancing Farmer Productive Capacity: Case of Action Research Based Conservation Agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 4(2), 93-97.
11. Hermans, T. D. G., Whitfield, S., Dougill, A. J., & Thierfelder, C. (2021). Why we should rethink ‘adoption’ in agricultural innovation: Empirical insights from Malawi. Land Degradation & Development, 32(4), 1809-1820. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3833
12. Jewa, E. K. K., Whitfield, S., Dougill, A. J., Mkwambisi, D. D., & Steward, P. (2020). Farming systems and Conservation Agriculture: Technology, structures and agency in Malawi. Land Use Policy, 95, 104612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104612
13. Kahsay, G. A., Bulte, E., Alpizar, F., Hansen, L. G., & Medhin, H. (2023). Leadership accountability in community-based forest management: experimental evidence in support of governmental oversight. Ecology and Society, 28(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14469-280420
14. Karuhanga, M., Kiptot, E., & Franzel, S. (2012) ‘The effectiveness of the farmer trainers’ approach in technology dissemination in the East African dairy development project in Uganda: A study of volunteer farmer trainers. Uganda: University of Uganda.
15. Khaila, S., Tchuwa, F., Franzel, S., & Simpson, S. (2015). The Farmer-to-Farmer Extension Approach in Malawi: A Survey of Lead Farmers. Nairobi. World Agroforestry Centre, 1–17.
16. Nakano, Y., Tsusaka, T. W., Aida, T., & Pede, V. O. (2018). Is farmer-to-farmer extension effective? The impact of training on technology adoption and rice farming productivity in Tanzania. World Development, 105, 23–37.
17. Nakano, Y., Tsusaka, T.W., Aida, T., & Pede, V.O. (2018) Is farmer-to-farmer extension effective? The impact of training on technology adoption and rice farming productivity in Tanzania. World Development, 105, 23–37.
18. Nyathi, P., Moyo, T., Posthumus, H., & Stevens, J. (2020) ‘Impact of Social and Institutional Factors on the Uptake of Conservation Agriculture: A Case of Zambia and Zimbabwe’, Sustainable Agriculture Research, 9, 67. doi:10.5539/sar.v9n1p67.
19. Obazi, S. A., Dimelu, M. U., & Chukwueze, M. (2022). Access and Usefulness of Agricultural Information among Poultry Farmers. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems (IJASRT in EESs), 12(2), 65-74. Retrieved from http://ijasrt.iau-shoushtar.ac.ir
20. Okori, P., Munthali, W., Msere, H., et al. (2022). Improving efficiency of knowledge and technology diffusion using community seed banks and farmer-to-farmer extension: experiences from Malawi. Agriculture & Food Security, 11(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00375-4
21. Osumba, J. J. L., Recha, J. W., & Oroma, G. W. (2021). Transforming Agricultural Extension Service Delivery through Innovative Bottom–Up Climate-Resilient Agribusiness Farmer Field Schools. Sustainability, 13(7), 3938. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073938
22. Oyelami, B., Akinwale, J., & Ladele, A. (2018). Lead farmer extension approach and sustainable extension service delivery in Oyo State, Nigeria. Contemporary Agriculture, 233. https://doi.org/10.1515/contagri-2018-0034
23. Ragasa, C. (2020). Effectiveness of the lead farmer approach in agricultural extension service provision: Nationally representative panel data analysis in Malawi. Land Use Policy, 99, 104966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104966
24. Taylor, M., and Bhasme, S. (2018) Model farmers extension networks and the politics of agricultural knowledge transfer. Elsevier Ltd, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.015. [Accessed on 30/12/2021].
25. Thobejane, M. K. (2022). The Impact of Empowering Women Farmers Towards Sustainable Agriculture in the Gauteng Province of South Africa (Doctoral dissertation). University of Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. Department of Sustainable Food System and Development, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences.
26. Ward, P. S., Bell, A. R., Droppelmann, K., & Benton, T. G. (2018). Early adoption of conservation agriculture practices: understanding partial compliance in programs with multiple adoption decisions. Land Use Policy, 70, 27–37.
