The Effect of Growth Bed Containing Organic Substrates and Irrigation Period on the Growth of Araucaria excelsa L.
محورهای موضوعی : مجله گیاهان زینتیAli MohammadiTorkashvand 1 , Mehdi Misaghi 2 , Fatemeh Ramezanzadeh Bisheh Gahi 3
1 - Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2 - Former M.Sc.Student, Department of Horticulture, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3 - Young Researchers and Elite Club, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.
کلید واژه: vermicompost, Perlite, Municipal waste compost, Cocopeat,
چکیده مقاله :
Araucaria excelsa L. of Araucariaceae family is a beautiful conifer which has a high economic importance in the flower industry. A factorial experiment based on randomized completely block design with two factors: 1. Irrigation intervals in 2, 4 and 6 days (I1, I2 and I3) and 2. The growth bed in pots 3 L included M1 (100 % v/v cocopeat), M2 (100% municipal waste compost), M3 (100 % vermicompost), M4 (25 % cocopeat + 25 % perlite + 25 % soil + 25 % municipal waste compost), M5 (25 % cocopeat + 25 % vermicompost + 25 % soil + 25 % perlite) and M6 (25 % vermicompost +25 % municipal waste compost + 25 % perlite + 25 % soil) was conducted with 18 treatments in three replications. Traits that were measured in this experiment included height of the crown, number of lateral shoot, branches distance, number of branches, length of lateral shoot, fresh weight of root and shoot, total fresh weight, dry weight of root and shoot, total dry weight. The results showed that the growth indices increased in 100 % vermicompost. The treatment I1M3 was the best treatment in the growth of plant. The 100 % vermicompost bed had a better response to 6 days irrigation than in the other beds, but it was observed a considerable difference in the growth indices between 6 days and 2 days periods of irrigation.
آروکاریای زینتی L. Araucaria excelsa از خانواده Araucariaceae از جمله سوزنی‌برگان زیبا است که دارای اهمیت اقتصادی بالایی در صنعت گلکاری می‌باشد. یک آزمایش فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با دو فاکتور: رژیم آبیاری شامل I1 (آبیاری دو روزه )، I2 (آبیاری چهار روزه)، I3(آبیاری شش روزه) و بستر‌کشت شاملM1 (کوکوپیت 100%)، M2 (کمپوست زباله شهری 100%)، M3(ورمی‌کمپوست 100%)، M4 ( 25% کوکوپیت + 25% پرلیت+ 25% خاک سبک+ 25% کمپوست زباله شهری)، M5 (25% کوکوپیت+ 25% ورمی کمپوست+ 25% خاک سبک+ 25% پرلیت )، M6 (25% ورمی کمپوست + 25% کمپوست زباله شهری + 25% خاک سبک + 25% پرلیت )، با 18 تیمار در سه تکرار طراحی و اجرا شد. صفات اندازه‌گیری شده در این آزمایش شامل ارتفاع بوته از طوقه، تعداد شاخه‌های جانبی، اندازه فاصله طبقات، تعداد طبقات، طول شاخه‌های جانبی، وزن تر ریشه، وزن تر ساقه، وزن تر کل، وزن خشک ریشه، وزن خشک ساقه و وزن خشک کل بود. نتایج نشان داد شاخصهای رشد در بستر 100% ورمی‌کمپوست افزایش یافت. این تیمار به همراه آبیاری دو روز بهترین تیمار در رشد گیاه محسوب شد. بستر کشت مذکور در مقایسه با بسترهای دیگر پاسخ بهتری به آبیاری شش روزه داشت، اما تفاوت قابل ملاحظهای در رشد گیاه بین آبیاری دو و شش روز وجود داشت
Almasiyan, F., Astayi, A. and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 2006. Effect of municipal leachate and compost on yield and yield component of wheat. Journal of Biyaban, 11:89-97 (In Persian).
Avang, Y., Sharom, A.S., Mohammad, R.B. and Selamat, A. 2009. Chemical and physical characteristics of cocopeat-based media mixtures and their effects on growth and development of Celosia cristata. American Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 4:63-71.
Avang, Y., Sharom, A.S., Mohammad, R.B. and Selamat, A. 2010. Growth dynamics of Celosia cristata grown in cocopeat, burnt rice hull and knaf core fiber mixture. American Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 5(1):70-76.
Bachman, G.R. and Metzger, J.D. 2007. Physical and chemical characteristics of a commercial potting substrate amended with vermicompost produced from two different manure sources. Horticulture Technology, 17: 336-340.
Basantia, D., Singh, L.B. and Sirvastava, R.C. 2011. Effect of vermicompost on the round year flower production of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Sevaeola, in Andaman Island. International Conference on Tropical Island Ecosystem Andaman and Nicobar Island, India.
Cala, V., Cases, M.A. and Walter, I. 2005. Biomass production and heavy metal content of Rosmarinus officinalis grown on organic wastes-amended soil. Journal of Arid Environment, 62:401-412.
Chanda, G.K., Bhunia, G. and Chakraborty, S.K. 2011. The effect of vermicompost and other fertilizers on cultivation of tomato plants. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 3(2):42-45.
Chizari, A.,Usefi. A. and Mousavi, S.H. 2006. Evaluation of target markets for export of Iranian ornamental plant. Agricultural Economic and Development. Fourteenth Years. Number 55.
Davidson, H., Mecklenburg, R. and Peterson, C. 1998. Nursery management: administration and culture. Second ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, 173 p.
Edwards, C.A. and Burrows, I. 1988. The potential of earthworm composts as plant & growth media. pp. 21-32. In: C. A. Edwards, and E. Neuhauser, (Eds), Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic Press. The Hague, the Netherlands.
Edwards, C.A., Dominguez, J. and Arancon, N.Q. 2004. The influence of vermicompost on plant growth and pest incidence. Pp. 369-419. In: Shakir, S.H. and Mikhail W.Z.A. (Eds), soil zoology for sustainable development in the 21st century, Cairo.
Eghball, B., Ginting, D. and Gilley, J. E. 2004. Residual effects of manure and compost application on maize production and soil properties. Agronomy Journal, 96.442-447.
Ehyaee, M. and Behbahani, A. 1993. Description methods of chemical analysis of soil. Soil & Water Research Institute, Technical Publication, Number 93(In Persian).
Emami, A. 1995. Study and comparison of methods measuring total phosphorus. Soil & Water Research Institute. Technical Publication. Number 939(In Persian).
Esmaeilpour, B. and Chamani, E. 2009. Vermicompost effects on growth and yield of cucumber. International Organic Agriculture Symposium. 19-21 August, Bangakaka, Thailand.
Fascella, G. and Zizzo, G.V. 2005. Effect of growing media on yield and quality of soilless cultivated roses. Acta Horticulturae, 697:133-138.
Garcya-Gil, J.C., Plaza, C., Solar-Rovira, P. and Polo, A. 2000. Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biologyand Biochemistry, 1907-1913.
Hall, A.D. 2009. Role of perlite in hydroponic culture and (Hall. I. C., Is your plant reaching its full potential. California State Science Fair. Project summary.
Hidlago, P.R., Matta, F.B. and Harkess, R.L. 2006. Physical and chemical properties of substrates containing earthworm casting and effects on marigold growth. Horticulture Science, 41:1474-1476.
Khalighi, A. and PadashtDahkaei, M.N. 2000. Effect of media produced by tree bark, tea wastes, rice hull on flowering of marigold (Tagetes patella Golden Boy). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 31: 557-565(in Persian).
Khomami, A.M. 2010. Effect of sawdust vermicompost in pot media on nutrition and growth of dieffenbachia (Dieffenbachia amonea). Seed and Plant Production Journal. 2-26(4):444-435(In Persian).
Lizarraga, A., Boesveld, H., Huibers, F. and Robles, C. 2003. Evaluating irrigation scheduling of hydroponics tomato in Navarra, Spain. Irrigation and Drainage, 52:177-188.
Malopa, E.A., Abouhadid, M., Prasad, N. and Kavafakis, C. 2001. Response of cucumber and tomato plants to different substrates mixtures of pumices in substrate culture. Acta Horticulturae, 550:593-599.
Manteghi, N. 1986. Described methods and laboratory studies on water and soil sample. Soil & Water Research Institute, Technical Publication,Number 168.
Marcote, I., Hernandes, T., Garcia, C. and Polo, A. 2001. Influence one or two successive annual application of organic fertilizers on the enzyme activity of a soil under barely cultivation. Bioresource Technology, 79: 147-154.
Martinez, P.F. and Abad, M. 1992. Soilless culture of tomato in different mineral substrates. ActaHorticulturae, 323: 251-259.
Mbarki, S., Labidi, N., Mahmoudi, H., Jdidi, N. and Abdelly, C. 2008. Contrasting effects of municipal compost on alfalfa growth in clay and in sandy soils: N, P, K, content and heavy metal toxicity. Bioresource Technology,99(15): 6745-50.
Mitchell, J.P., Shennan, S.R. and May, D.M. 1991. Tomato fruit yields and quality under water deficit and salinity. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 116: 215-221.
Noguera, P., Abad, M.,Noguera, V.,Puchades, R. and Maquieira, E. 2000. Coconut coir waste, a new and ecologically-friendly peat substitute. Acta Horticulturae, 517: 279-286.
Ostos, J.C., Lopes-Garrido, R., Murillo, J.M. and Lopes, R. 2008. Substitution of peat for municipal solid waste and sewage sludge-based composts in nursery growing media: Effects on growth and nutrition o f the native shrub Pistacia lentiscus L. Bioresource Technology, 99:1793-1800.
Padasht Dahkaei, M.N. 2004. Effect of tea wastes on composting of shredded and unshredded tree bark and effect of mixes on growth of french marigold (Tagetes patulla 'Golden Boy'). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 31:553-565 (In Persian).
Padasht Dahkaei, M.N. and Gholami, M. 2009. Effect of different media on growth of pot plants Dracaena marginata Ait. and Beaucarnea recurvata Lem. Seed and Plant Production Journal. 25(1):63-77(In Persian).
Padasht Dahkaei, M.N., Khalighi, A., Naderi, R. and Mousavi, A. 2006. Effects of temperature, propagation media and scale position on bublet regeneration of chelcheragh lily (Lilium ledebouri Boiss.) by scaling method. Seed and PlantProduction Journal, 22: 382-394 (In Persian).
Peet, M.M. and Willits, D.H. 1995. Role of excess water in tomato fruit cracking. Horticulture Science, 30:65-68.
Samiei, L.,Khalighi, A., Kafi, M.,Samavat, S. and Arghavani, M. 2005. Investigation the possibility of using cellulosic waste as an alternative peat mass leaf ornamental plant. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 36(2): 503-510(In Persian).
Savithri, P. and Khan, H.H. 1993. Characteristics of coconut coir peat and its utilization in agriculture. Journal of Plant Crop, 22:1-18.
Sezen, M.S., Gulendam, C., Yazar, A.,Tekin, S. and Kapur, B. 2010. Effect of irrigation management on yield and quality of tomato grown in different soilless media in a glasshouse. S. R. E. A. J. 5(1): 041-048. Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE
Shahbazi, M.,Chamani, E., Shahbazi, M.,Mostafavi, M., Pourbeirami, Y. and Ehir, A. 2012. Investigation of media (vermicompost, peat and cocopeat) on growth and flowering of carnation flower. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science, 22(3).
Shinohara, Y., Hata, T., Maruo, T.,Hohjo, M. and Ito, T. 1999. Chemical and physical properties of the coconut-fiber substrate and the growht and productivity of tomato plants. Acta Horticulturae, 481:145-149.
Somare, M., Tack, F.M.G. and Verloo, M.G. 2003. Effects of a municipal solid waste compost and mineral fertilization on plant growth in two tropical agricultural soils of Mali. Bioresource Technology, 86: 15-20.
Suhane, R.K., Sinha, R.K. and Singh, P.K. 2008. Vermicompost, cattle- dung compost and chemical fertilizer: impacts on yield of wheat crops. Communication of Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusa, Bihar, India.
Topcuoglo, B. 2005. The usage of MSW compost a partial substitutes for peat on the growth of poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima). Proceeding of the Interactional Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, pp: 921-926.
Traka-Mavrona, E., Gerasopoulos, D.,Pritsa, T. and Maloupa, E. 2001. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato in relation to substrate and nutrition source in a soilless culture system. ActaHorticulturae, 548:173-179.
Verdonck, O., Boodt, M.D., Sradict, P. and Pennik, R. 1995. The use of tree bark and tobacco waste in agriculture and horticulture. Composting of Agriculture and Other Wastes, 203-215.
Wilson, S.B., Staffella, P.J. and Graetz, D.A. 2002. Development of compost- based media for containerized perennials. Horticulture Science, 93: 311-320.
Zare, H. 2001. Non-native species conifer Iran. Institute of Forest and Range Research. Paper 493.
