بررسی پهنه های مناسب توسعه میان افزا در شهر ایلام
محورهای موضوعی : مطالعات برنامه ریزی شهری و منطقه ایپاکزاد آزادخانی 1 , جعفر حسین زاده 2 , زهره حیدری 3
1 - استادیار گروه معماری و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه باختر ایلام، ایلام، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه علوم جنگل، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایران
3 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشگاه باختر ایلام، ایلام، ایران
کلید واژه: زمین شهری, شهر ایلام, کاربری شهری, توسعه میان‌افزا,
چکیده مقاله :
امروزه با توجه به اهمیت حفظ منابع طبیعی و کاهش آثار زیست‌محیطی توسعه بی‌رویه شهرها، توسعه میان‌افزا به عنوان یکی از رویکردهای شهرسازی مطرح شده است. در نتیجه به جای گسترش افقی شهرها، رشد آنها در محدوده موجود و با حداکثر استفاده از امکانات اراضی توسعه یافته واقع در محدوده شهر اولویت دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی پهنه‌های مناسب رشد توسعه میان‌افزا در شهر ایلام به شیوه توصیفی –تحلیلی با تکیه بر اطلاعات کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی صورت گرفته است است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را متخصصین مدیریت شهری تشکیل می‌دهد که تعداد 20 نفر از آنها به صورت در دسترس انتخاب شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نقشه‌های GIS مرتبط با شاخص‌های موردنظر و روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (AHP) برای رتبه‌بندی و اولویت‌بندی پهنه-ها، انجام شده است. نتایج بررسی‌ها نشان داد که معیار کالبدی-فضایی با وزن نهایی 408/0 مهمترین عامل تعیین پهنه‌های میان‌افزا می‌باشد و پس از آن عامل کارکردی-مدیریتی با 311/0 و در نهایت معیار اقتصادی- اجتماعی با 281/0 در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار دارند. از دیگر نتایج این پژوهش شناسایی پهنه‌های مناسب توسعه میان‌افزا در شهر ایلام بود. چنانچه نتایج نشان داد از میان 162 هکتار اراضی فاقد کاربری، فرسوده و مخروبه موجود در سطح شهر ایلام تنها 13 هکتار دارای قابلیت بسیار مناسب و 38 هکتار دارای قابلیت مناسب جهت توسعه میان افزار هستند و ما بقی آن فاقد قابلیت لازم به منظور این مهم می باشند
.Nowadays, owing to the importance of natural resources maintenance and reducing the environmental influences of irregular urban developments, the infill development has been introduced as one of the urban planning approaches. Therefore, urban developments in existing areas and maximum using of developed lands facilities located in the cities are the first priorities rather than horizontal developments of the cities. The aim of this paper is to investigate proper arenas for the infill developments in Ilam City. It’s an analytical-descriptive research using field study and data from the libraries. The population includes urban management experts that 20 of them were chosen as the sample by Convenience Sampling Method. To analyze the data, GIS maps related to intended indexes were used and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for ranking and prioritizing the arenas was done. The findings reveal that the spatial-body criterion with the total weight of .408 is the most important factor in determining the infill arenas. The functional-managerial factor with the total weight of .311 and social-economic criterion with the total weight of .281 respectively are the next important factors. Determining proper arenas for the infill developments in Ilam City was another objective of this study. According to the results, among 162 hectares of land pieces in Ilam City which are poor, ruined and without any uses, just 13 hectares were highly suitable and 38 hectares were suitable for infill developments and the rest lack the criteria for the mentioned purpose.
Abedin Darkoosh, S. (1985). An Introduction to Urban Economy, (1st ed). Tehran: The Press of University Press Center. (In Persian)
Adili, E. (2008). Group Place Decision Making in Evaluating the Appropriateness of Urban Fields Using GIS. The Thesis of M.A, The Faculty of Topography Engineering, Khajeh Nassiroddin Toosi University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Aeeni, M. (2007). Economic, Financial, and Managerial Issues of Regeneration in The Urban Distressed Areas. Tehran: Building & Housing Research Center. (In Persian)
Bani Hashemi, Om H., Sarvar, R., & Ziari, Y.A. (2014), Infill Developments in Old Urban Tissue, the Case Study Is Khaniabad Neighborhood in Tehran. The Geographical Quarterly of the Land, 10 (40), 41-54. (In Persian)
Consulting Engineers of Boadtechnique. (2012). The Comprehensive Plan of Ilam City. Ilam: The Department of Urban Development. (In Persian)
Dadashpoor, H., & Mohsenzadeh, S. S. (2012). The Feasibility Study for Using the Pattern of Development Rights Transfer for Conserving the Agricultural Fields in Babolsar City. Applied Studies of Geographical Sciences, 12 (25). 7-29. (In Persian)
Design Center for American Urban Landscape Design Pointer. (2003). Design Principle Mixed Land Use, University of Minnesota, Number 3, December. www.healthyplaces.org.au.
El Araby, M. M., (2003). The role of the state in managing urban land supply and prices in Egypt. Habitat International, 43 (3), 245-299.
EPA (Enviroment Protecting Agency). (1999). Parking Alternative Making Way for Urban Infill and Brownfield Redevelopment. Washington DC: Urban and Economic development division.
Falconer, F. (1990). Sufficiency of Infrastructure Capacity for Infill Development. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 116 (3), 48-137.
Greensboro Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. (2008). Infill Development for Greensboro NC, (A White Paper 2000). Retrieved from: Http:// www .brgov .org/dept/ planning, 2008.
Habitat. (2003). United Nations Human Selletment Program (UNHS). Disaster Management Program of UNHABIIAT, http://Unhabitat.org.
Hajikhani, Gh. (1993). The Criteria of Urbanization for the Idea of a Healthy City. The Thesis of M.A in Urbanization, The Faculty of Beautiful Arts, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Herington, J. (1984). The outer city. London: Harper and Row publishers.
Ilam Governor. (2016). Ilam divisions and Ilam province position on the map. (In Persian)
Javad Shahidi, K. (1998). An Introduction to the Concepts of New Cities from the Beginning up to Now. (1st ed). Tehran: Pazhoohandeh Press. (In Persian)
Kälberer, A. (2005). The Future lies on Brownfields. Federal Environmental Agency, Dessau.
McAuslan, P. (1985). Urban Land and Shelter for the Poor. Washington D.C: Earthscan.
Mc Connell, Sh. (1981). Theories for Planning. First Published, London: Heinemann.
Mirkatooli, J., & Hosseini, S. M. H. (2012). Evaluating the Appropriateness of Interstitial Fields in Gorgan City for the Infill developments Using the Combination of GIS and AHP. Urban Studies, 3 (9), 69-80. (In Persian)
Municipal Research & Services Center of Washington. (1997). Infill Development –Strategies for Shaping Livable Neighborhoods.
Ilam Municipality. (2016). A detailed plan map of the city of Ilam. (In Persian)
Ghodsi, N. (2012). Identifying the Potental Arenas for the Infill developments in Inefficient Areas of City Centers, the Case Study is District 1 in Isfahan City. The Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 6 (20), 51-68. (In Persian)
Poormoosa, S. M., Nasser Mostafavi, A., & Saleh Bidhendi, M. (2014). Identifying the Executive Principles and Strategies of Infill Developments in Tehran City as One of the Aspects of Urban Sustainable Development. The Journal of Social Development in Iran, 6 (4), 37-58. (In Persian)
RERC (Real Estate Research Corporation). (1982). Infill Development Strategies, USA, America. Published Jointly by ULI-Urban Land Institute and American Planning Association.
Rivkin, M.B. (1983). Intervention through direct participation, In: Dunkerley, H.B. (Ed.), Urban Land Policy. Issues and Opportunities, New York: World Bank Publications.
Stallworthy, M. (2002). Sustaiability, land use and environment. Norwich Law School University of East Anglia, England.
Statistics Center Iran. (2016). Statistical Yearbook of Ilam Province. (In Persian)
William, S. (2003). smart infill: Creating More Livable Communities the Bay Area; A Guide for Bay Area Leader. San Francisco: Greenbelt Alliance.
Williams, C ., Breton E., & Jenkins M. (2004). Achieving Urban Sustainability. Translated by Araz Moradi Masihi, Vo. 1, Tehran: The Firm of Processing and urban planning Associated to Tehran Municipality. (In Persian)
_||_
