Does Feeder Type Influence the Performance of Stable and Mixed Bucks in Stall Fed System?

محورهای موضوعی : Camel

G. Kaur ¹ (Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India)
S. Kaswan ² (Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India|Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, College of Veterinary Science, Rampura Phul, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India)
C. Singh ³ (Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India)
M. Singla ⁴ (Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India)
A. Sharma ⁵ (Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India)
S.K. Dash ⁶ (Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India)
J.S. Lamba ⁷ (Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/08/23 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/12/06 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/06/10

کلید واژه: welfare, Wastage, Mixing, beetal, feeder,

چکیده مقاله :

Present investigation was conducted to assess the effect of two feeder types (hexagonal vs. linear) on performance of stable (before mixing) and mixed Beetal bucks. In first trial, stable bucks were studied for 4-week period at hexagonal (BH) vs. linear (BL) feeder (n=6 each). In second trial, after rearing 4 weeks on two feeder types, half (3) of the bucks {1 high, 1 intermediate and 1 low ranked in social hierarchy} from both the groups were interchanged to form two mixed groups (hexagonal and linear mixed bucks i.e. BHM and BLM), which were observed for 2 weeks period. Bucks were observed for weight gain, body condition score (BCS), daily feed intake, feed wastage, injuries and blood biochemical parameters. Blood samples were collected at weekly interval before regrouping period and at day 1 (regrouping), 3, 7 and 14 after regrouping. Body weight (BW) and dimensions of adult bucks had no influence of feeder type during premixing as well as post-mixing. Feed intake as well as wastage (green fodder) too did not differ statistically though overall feed wastage was numerically higher at hexagonal feeder. Injuries and lameness incidences were relatively more at hexagonal feeder (BH : BL :: 1 : 0 and BHM : BLM :: 3 : 1). Blood biochemical indicators of stress did not differ between the groups. Stable and regrouped Beetal bucks had similar performance indicators at both types of feeders with minor welfare advantages at linear feeder.

منابع و مأخذ:

Andersen I.L., Roussel S., Ropstad E., Braastad B.O., Steinheim G., Janczak A.M., Jørgensen G.M. and Bøe K.E. (2008). Social instability increases aggression in groups of dairy goats, but with minor consequences for the goats’ growth, kid production and development. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114, 132-148.

Ángel-García O., Meza-Herrera C.A., Guillen-Muñoz J.M., Carrillo-Castellanos E., Luna-Orozco J.R., Mellado M. and Véliz-Deras F.G. (2015). Seminal characteristics, libido and serum testosterone concentrations in mixed-breed goat bucks receiving testosterone during the non-breeding period. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 43, 457-461.

ARC. (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Agricultural Research Council, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureax, Slough, United Kingdom.

Aschwanden J., Gygax L., Wechsler B. and Keil N.M. (2008). Social distances of goats at the feeding rack: Influence of the quality of social bonds, rank differences, grouping age and presence of horns. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114, 116-131.

BAHFS. (2019). Basic Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, India.

Barnett J.L., Hemsworth P.H., Cronin G.M., Newman E.A., McCallum T.H. and Chilton D. (1992). Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioural and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 34, 207-220.

Campbell J.R. and Marshall R.T. (2016). Dairy production and processing: The science of milk and milk products. Waveland Press, Hancock, USA.

Ďuračková Z. (2007). The Activity of Natural Compounds in Diseases Prevention and Therapy. SAP Slovakia Ltd., Slovakia.

Fritz W.F. (2017). Self-enurination in the domesticated male goat (Capra hircus). Ph D. Thesis. Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, Canada.

Goetsch A.L. (2019). Recent research of feeding practices and the nutrition of lactating dairy goats. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 47, 103-114.

Hasegawa N., Nisshiwaki A., Sugawara K. and Ito I. (1997). The effects of social exchange between two groups of lactating primiparous heifers on milk production, dominance order, behavior and adrenocortical response. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 51, 15-27.

Hyun Y., Ellis M., Riskowski G. and Johnson R.W. (1998). Growth performance of pigs subjected to multiple concurrent environmental stressors. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 721-727.

Ison S.H., Donald R.D., Jarvis S., Robson S.K., Lawrence A.B. and Rutherford K.M.D. (2014). Behavioral and physiological responses of primiparous sows to mixing with older, unfamiliar sows. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 1647-1655.

Katz L.S. (1987). Endocrine systems and behavior. The veterinary clinics of North America. Food Anim. Pract. 3, 393-404. 

Kaur G., Kaswan S., Singla M., Sharma A. and Lamba J.S. (2021). Behaviour of Beetal does and bucks at linear vs. hexagonal feeder with special reference to homologous regrouping. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 234, 1-11.

Keil N.M., Pommereau M., Patt A., Wechsler B. and Gygax L. (2017). Determining suitable dimensions for dairy goat feeding places by evaluating body posture and feeding reach. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 1353-1362.

Kenney P.A. and Black J.L. (1984). Factors affecting diet selection by sheep. I. Potential intake rate and acceptability of feed. Australian J. Agric. Res. 35, 551-563.

Kielland C., Boe K.E., Zanella A.J. and Osteras O. (2010). Risk factors for skin lesions on the necks of Norwegian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 3979-3989.

Kumari A. and Patel B.H.M. (2015). Wastage of green fodder under different feeding systems in rohilkhandi kids. Livest. Res. Int. 3, 74-76.

Li Y.Z., Wang L.H. and Johnston L.J. (2012). Sorting by parity to reduce aggression toward first-parity sows in group-gestation housing systems. J. Anim. Sci. 90, 4514-4522.

Marrocco I., Altieri F. and Peluso I. (2017). Measurement and clinical significance of biomarkers of oxidative stress in humans. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 1-32.

Millman S.T. and Duncan I.J.H. (2001). Social cognition of farm animals. Pp. 35-72 in Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. L. Keeling and H. Gonyou, Eds., CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, United Kingdom.

Miranda-de La Lama G.C. and Mattiello S. (2010). The importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small Rumin. Res. 90, 1-10.

Miranda-de la Lama G.C., Sepúlveda W.S., Montaldo H.H., María G.A. and Galindo F. (2011). Social strategies associated with identity profiles in dairy goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 134, 48-55.

Morgan K.N. and Tromborg C.T. (2007). Sources of stress in captivity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 102, 262-302.

Neave H.W., von Keyserlingk M.A., Weary D.M. and Zobel G. (2018). Feed intake and behavior of dairy goats when offered an elevated feed bunk. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 3303-3310.

Noack E. and Hauser R. (2004). Der ziegengerechte Fressplatz im Laufstall. FAT-Berichte Nr. 622/2004, Agroscope FAT Tänikon, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Agrar- und Landtechnik, CH-8356 Ettenhausen.

Nordmann E., Barth K., Futschik A., Palme R. and Waiblinger S. (2015). Head partitions at the feed barrier affect behaviour of goats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 167, 9-19.

O’Connell N.E., Beattie V.E. and Moss B.W. (2003). Influence of social status on the welfare of sows in static and dynamic groups. Anim. Welfare. 12, 239-249.

O'Driscoll K., Von Keyserlingk M.A.G. and Weary D.M. (2006). Effects of mixing on drinking and competitive behavior of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 229-233.

Omokanye A.T., Balogun R.O., Onifade O.S., Afolayan R.A. and Olayemi M.E. (2001). Assessment of preference and intake of browse species by Yankasa sheep at Shika Niger. Small Rumin. Res. 42, 201-208.

Pakhretia S. and Pirta R.S. (2010). A behavioural study of the sheep and goats of the transhumant gaddis. J. Hum. Ecol. 29, 93-100.

Phillips C.J.C. and Rind M.I. (2001). The effects on production and behavior of mixing uniparous and multiparous cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 2424-2429.

Rahal A., Kumar A., Singh V., Yadav B., Tiwari R., Chakraborty S. and Dhama K. (2014). Oxidative stress, prooxidants, and antioxidants: the interplay. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 1-19.

Sharma A., Kaswan S., Kumar S.S. and Lamba J.S. (2018). Feeding dynamics and performance of Beetal does in relation to body condition score at the time of mating. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 42, 649-657.

Silva N.C.D., Puchala R., Gipson T.A., Sahlu T. and Goetsch A.L. (2018). Effects of restricted periods of feed access on feed intake, digestion, behavior, heat energy, and performance of Alpine goats. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 46, 994-1003.

Slavnitsch K. (2008). Einflusseiner umgruppierung auf das sozialverhalten von milchziegen. MS Thesis. University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Soede N.M., Van Sleuwen M.J.W., Molenaar R., Rietveld F.W., Schouten W.P.G., Hazeleger W. and Kemp B. (2006). Influence of repeated regrouping on reproduction in gilts. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 96, 133-145.

Szabo S. (2011). Social stress in large groups of dairy goats-Influence of presence of horns and introduction management of young goats. Ph D. Thesis. University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

Szabò S., Barth K., Graml C., Futschik A., Palme R. and Waiblinger S. (2013). Introducing young dairy goats into the adult herd after parturition reduces social stress. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 5644-5655.

Tanaka M., Kamiya Y., Suzuki T., Kamiya M. and Nakai Y. (2008). Relationship between milk production and plasma concentrations of oxidative stress markers during hot season in primiparous cows. Anim. Sci. J. 79, 481-486.

Tuncer S.S., Şireli H.D. and Tatar A.M. (2016). Behavioral patterns of goats. Pp. 2369-2374 in Proc. 7 VII Int. Sci. Agric. Symp., Jahorina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Upreti C.R., Kuwar B.S. and Panday S.B. (2005). Development and evaluation of improved feeders for goats suitable to stall-fed management system. Nepal Agric. Res. J. 6, 78-83.

Von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Olenick D. and Weary D.M. (2008). Acute behavioral effects of regrouping dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 1011-1016.

Waiblinger S., Schmied-Wagner C., Nordmann E., Mersmann D., Szabo S., Graml C., Von Hof J., Maschat K., Grubmuller T. and Winckler C. (2010). Haltung von behornten und unbehornten Milchziegen in Großgruppen. Endberichtzum Forschungsprojekt 10019, Eigenverlag, Vienna, Austria.