Effect of a Multispecies Probiotics on Productive and Reproductive Performance of Holstein Cows
محورهای موضوعی : Camel
1 - Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran|Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 - Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
کلید واژه: pregnancy, cattle, probiotics, Lactation,
چکیده مقاله :
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplemental multispecies probiotics on milk production and reproductive performance of postpartum lactating Holstein cows. Ninety-six cows were assigned to one of two dietary treatments from day 1 to 85 postpartum. Treatments were including 1) control, a standard diet, (n=48) and 2) probiotic, same as control plus 3 g/cow/day of the probiotics supplement (Hypro-cow®) (n=48). In a subset of eight animals per group, dry matter intake (DMI), body condition score (BCS), rectal temperature (RT), respiration rate (RR), and heart rate (HR) were assessed, and blood samples and milk yield recorded. Milk samples were analyzed every 2 wk. for fat, protein and somatic cell. Blood samples were collected on day 0, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70 and 85 post-partum for determining plasma total protein, albumin, creatinine, urea, glucose and triglyceride concentrations and activity of transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase). In all animals, occurrence of health disorders (i.e. metritis, endometritis, laminitis and mastitis), calving to first estrus interval, days open (DO), conception rate to first insemination and pregnancy up to 85 and 120 DIM were evaluated. Probiotic supplementation increased DMI (17.43±0.11 vs. 14.12±0.17) and BCS (3.36±0.16 vs. 3.14±0.23) (P<0.05). Mean daily milk yield (36.34±0.32 vs. 34.36±0.38) (P=0.05), and all milk components increased (P<0.05) by probiotic supplementation. Plasma concentrations of urea (10.28±0.63 vs. 11.08±0.47) and creatinine (1.00±S0.25 vs. 1.23±0.63) was lower (P<0.05) in supplemented group compared to control group. The incidence of laminitis (20.5±0.61 vs. 27±0.31) and metritis (32±0.03 vs. 40±0.81) were reduced (P<0.05) in supplemented cows compared to control cows. Interval from calving to first estrus and days open (DO) was reduced by 4 and 26 days, respectively (P<0.05) in treated cows. The conception rate was greater in probiotic group (22.5%) than control group (12.5%). In conclusion, supplemental multi-species probiotics during postpartum has a beneficial effect on productive and reproductive performance of dairy cows.
Abdel-Khalek A.E. (2003). Productive and reproductive performance of primiparous and multiparous Friesian cows fed rations supplemented with yeast culture (Yea-Sacc1026). Egyptian J. Nutr. Feeds. 6, 1095-1105.
Aikman P.C., Henning P.H., Humphries D.J. and Horn C.H. (2011). Rumen pH and fermentation characteristics in dairy cows supplemented with megasphaera elsdenii NCIMB 41125 in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 2840-2849.
Alayande K.A., Aiyegoro O.A. and Collins NjieAteba C.N. (2020). Probiotics in animal husbandry: Applicability and associated risk factors. Sustainability. 12(3), 1087-1095.
Ametaj B.N., Iqbal S., Selami F., Odhiambo J.F., Wang Y., Ganzle M.G., Dunn S.M. and Zebeli Q. (2014). Intravaginal administration of lactic acid bacteria modulated the incidence of purulent vaginal discharges, plasma haptoglobin concentrations, and milk production in dairy cows. Res. Vet. Sci. 78, 158- 166.
Ayad M.A., Benallou B., Saim M.S., Smadi M.A. and Meziane T. (2013). Impact of feeding yeast culture on milk yield, milk components, and blood components in Algerian dairy herds. J. Vet. Technol. Sci. 4, 2-8.
Beauchemin K.A., Yang W.Z., Morgavi D.P., Ghorbani G.R and Kautz W. (2003). Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 81, 1628-1640.
Biricik H. and Yavuz M. (2001). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast culture on milk production, milk composition and some rumen and blood parameters of dairy cows. J. Vet. 20, 9-12.
Bryszak M., Szumacher-Strabel M., El-Sherbiny M., Stochmal A., Oleszek W. and Roj E. (2019). Effects of berry seed residues on ruminal fermentation, methane concentration, milk produc-tion, and fatty acid proportions in the rumen and milk of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 102, 1257-1273.
Butler W.R. and Smith R.D. (1989). Interrelationship between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 72, 767-783.
Calsamiglia S., Castillejos M. And Busquet M. (2006). Alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters in cattle. Rec. Adv. Anim. Nutr. 19, 129-167.
Campanile K.A., Zicarelli F. and Vecchio D. (2008). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vivo organic matter digestibility and milk yield in buffalo cows. Livest. Sci. 114, 358-361.
Cutting S.M. (2011). Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol. 28, 214-220.
Dann H.M., Drackley J.K., McCoy G.C., Hutjens M.F. and Garrett J.E. (2000). Effects of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on prepartum intake and postpartum intake and milk production of Jersey cows. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 123-127.
Dehghan M., Banadaky H., Rajaei Sharifabadi M. and Vazirigohar M. (2020). A meta analysis of the effect of probiotics administration on growth performance of Suckling calves in Iran. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 10, 213-219.
Deng Q., John F., Farooq U., Lam T., Suzanna M. and Burim N. (2015). Intravaginal lactic acid bacteria modulated local and systemic immune responses and lowered the incidence of uterine infections in periparturient dairy cows. PLoS ONE. 10(4), e0124167.
Dutta T.K., Kundu S.S. and Kumar M. (2009). Potential of direct-fed-microbials on lactation performance in ruminants. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 21, 160-166.
Giorgio G., Nina C. and Yantyati W. (2010). Importance of Lactobacilli in food and feed biotechnology. Res Microbiol. 61, 480-487.
Gujjar S.R., Ahmad M. and Javid R.S. (2006). Effect of biovet and probiotic (bm-technology) on milk production in lactating buffaloes. Pakistan Vet. J. 26, 201-203.
Iwanska S., Strusinska D., Zalewski W. and Opalka A. (1999). The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1026 used alone or with vitamin-mineral premix on milk yield and milk composition in dairy cows. Acta Vet. Hung. 47, 41-52.
Komari R.K., Reddy Y.K.L., Suresh J. and Raj D.N. (1999). Effect of feeding yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and Lactobacillus acidophilus on production performance of crossbred dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 128-139.
Laborde J.M. (2008). Effects of probiotics and yeast culture on rumen development and growth of dairy calves. MS Thesis. Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Lesmeister K.E., Heinrichs A.J. and Gabler M.T. (2004). Effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on rumen development, growth characteristics, and blood parameters in neonatal dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 87, 1832-1839.
Lucy M.C. (2001). Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end? J. Dairy Sci. 84, 1277-1293.
Maragkoudakis P.A., Mountzouris K.C., Rosu C., Zoumpopoulou G., Papadimitriou K., Dalaka E., Hadjipetrou A., Theofanous G., Strozzi G.P. and Carlini N. (2010). Feed supplementation of Lactobacillus plantarum PCA 236 modulates gut microbiota and milk fatty acid composition in dairy goats—A preliminary study. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 141, 109-116.
McArt J.A.A., Nydam D.V. and Oetzel G.R. (2012). Epidemiology of subclinical ketosis in early lactation dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 5056-5066.
Moallem U., Lehrer H., Livshitz L., Zachut M. and Yakoby S. (2009). The effects of live yeast supplementation to dairy cows during the hot season on production, feed efficiency, and digestibility. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 343-351.
Mostafa T.H., Elsayed F.A., Ahmed M.A. and Elkholany M.A. (2014). Effect of using some feed additive (two- probiotics) in dairy cow rations on production and reproductive performance. Egyptian J. Anim. Prod. 51, 1-11.
Nasiri A.H., Towhidi A., Shakeri M., Zhandi M., Dehghan-Banadaky M. and Colazo M.G. (2018). Effects of live yeast dietary supplementation on hormonal profile, ovarian follicular dynamics, and reproductive performance in dairy cows exposed to high ambient temperature. Theriogenology. 122, 41-46.
Nasiri A.H., Towhidi A., Shakeri M., Zhandi M., Dehghan-Banadaky M., Pooyan H.R., Sehati F., Rostami F., Karamzadeh A., Khani M. and Ahmadi F. (2019). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on milk production, insulin sensitivity and immune response in transition dairy cows during hot season. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 251, 112-123.
Newbold C.J., Mcintosh F.M. and Wallace R.J. (1998). Changes in the microbial population of a rumen-simulating fermenter in response to yeast culture. Canadian J. Anim. Sci. 78, 241-244.
Nocek J.E., Kautz P.W., Leedle J.A.Z. and Block E. (2003). Direct-Fed microbial supplementation on the performance of dairy cattle during the transition period. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 331-339.
NRC. (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA.
Ospina P.A., Nydam D.V., Stokol T. and Overton T.R. (2010). Associations of elevated nonesterified fatty acids and beta-hydroxybutyrate concentrations with early lactation reproductive performance and milk production in transition dairy cattle in the northeastern United States. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 1596-1603.
Otero M.C., Morelli L. and Nader-Macias M.E. (2006). Probiotic properties of vaginal lactic acid bacteria to prevent metritis in cattle. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43, 91-97.
Rathwell A. (2000). Lameness in a dairy herd. J. Dairy Sci. 66, 694-710.
Reid G., Andrew W., Bruce M., Fraser N., Heinemann C.H., Owen J. and Henning B. (2001). Oral probiotics can resolve urogenital infections. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 30, 49-52.
Reid G. and Bruce A.W. (2003). Urogenital infections in women: Can probiotics help? Postgrad. Med. J. 79, 428-432.
Samal L. (2013). Heat stress in dairy cows - reproductive problems and control measures. Int. J. Livest. Res. 3, 1994-2004.
Sejian V., Naqvi S.M.K., Ezeji T., Lakritz J. and Lal R. (2012). Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production. Springer, Germany.
Sharma N., Singh N.K. and Bhadwal M.S. (2011). Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: An overview. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 24, 429-438.
Sheldon I.M., Lewis G.S., Le Blanc S. and Gilbert R.O. (2006). Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology. 65, 1516-1530.
Srikandakumar A., Johnson A.E. and Mahgoub O. (2003). Effect of heat stress on respiratory rate, rectal temperature and blood chemistry in omani and Australian merino sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 49, 193-198.
Souza V.L., Lopes N.M., Zacaroni O.F., Silveira V.A., Pereira R.A.N., Freitas J.A., Almeida R., Salvati G.G.S. and Pereira M.N. (2017). Lactation performance and diet digestibility of dairy cows in response to the supplementation of Bacillus subtilis spores. Livest. Sci. 40, 91-97.
Tesfaye A. Hailu Y. (2019). The effects of probiotics supplementation on milk yield and composition of lactating dairy cows. J. Phytopharmacol. 8, 12-17.
Thrune M., Bach M., Ruiz-Moreno M.D., Stern D. and Linn J.G. (2009). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal pH and microbial fermentation in dairy cows: Yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation. Livest. Sci. 124, 261-265.
West W. (2003). Effect of heat stress on production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 2131-2144.
Wohlt J.E., Corcione T.T. and Zajac P.K. (1998). Effects of yeast on feed intake and performance of cows fed diets based on corn silage during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 1345-1352.
Yousef M.K. (1985). Stress Physiology in Livestock. Volume I. Basic Principles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
